Wow! Is that even a sentence? / The Mentalist 

Aigerim Khussainova lmaoo

Aigerim Khussainova

@Just Another Guy It explains that in the episode, they looked into him for a reason.

He didn't break in. The door was unlocked...He simply walked in...

@@MasterChief-sl9ro That still makes it trespassing.

Well if you're a millionaire who doesn't care about money then it's easy to have a bit of fun with it

By the end of this episode, Jane had to pay 16,000 fines. Does not seem to bother him either.

rini1010 well he could easily earn that by 10 folds with poker anytime he wants 😂😂

@@rini1010 yeah but I highly doubt he will pay the fines ... in his logic, the reason to do that is to solve the case and after watching entire series we both know nobody can force him to do anything if he don't want

Or that it’s a TV show.

Sometimes, Jane, your love of tea should be put on hold.

Sometimes, Jane, your love of tea should be put on hold.

Sometimes, Jane, your love of tea should be put on hold.

Sometimes, Jane, your love of tea should be put on hold.

Sometimes , Jane, your love of tea should be put on hold.

Good stuff

That would never happen in real life. Kind of cool, though.

@@AbrahamSalazar210 u never know what can happen in real life. Life isn't a movie, it is much more virtuous.

@Bon Jovi really?

He also has a heart made of stone. He watched the murder video ... though, you don't see the suspect in the video. I still don't see how it could have otherwise been found and then planted on him unless it was an elaborate conspiracy. In a way, this is a good judge, because he upholds the rights of citizens, but in another way, it's tragic on a human level when evidence gets thrown out in real life over things like this.

Good stuff

@Ophelia I love Lisbon's remark to the judge: "Sir, if you let me down, I can handle him."

@@dawazobrist5867 I love Lisbon's remark to the judge: "Sir, if you let me down, I can handle him."

I remark Lisbon's judge to the love: "Down, if you let me handle, i can sir him."

@@THEMRfatefighter wat

@@WhenAllTheWarmthLeavesUs is it just me or have you guys lost it

Give it a shot it's the best !!

It is the best show ever in my opinion. It’s all on Amazon Prime too!

Someone probably had Lupus

It's never lupus

@@docst5481 its always Lupus

It is basically a cop version of house lmao

it's cushings

+SAW Table Actually it wasn't stupid, it was planned by him to look like it was his big mistake.

Lisbon caught in the middle of Janes stupid things is literally the entire show.

Jane things were ANYTHING but stupid! All his mind games and mind traps yielded a result he needed. Well, most of the time.

It wasn’t stupid, it’s just unorthodox.

do it. And don't forget the recent reservation for the episode that Lisbon and Jane get together

Remember when he won a shit load at the casino, thats probably where he gets the money

He gave it all away. First 250g to charity and the next 300g to the Vietnamese girl who needed a liver for her grandma.

He's rich as hell.

yeah and he was a very successful con man in the past, he is loaded

Richard Stamos woah?

Yup yup

It sounds like this is not the trial, but rather a hearing on a motion to dismiss. I could be wrong, though, Hollywood is always a littel fuzzy on courtroom scenes :)

yes this was a violation of dis-closer does not matter if its a hearing or a trial

Defence doesn't have disclosure obligations in criminal proceedings!

Isn't that how Penny & Leonard treat Sheldon, as a child who wants to eat all the candy he can when going to an amusement park?

Oh, the weakness of a tea junkie.

Oh, the junkie of a tea weakness.

I’m gonna punch you in the fuck

Oh, the tea of a weak junkie

Weak, the teaness of an Oh Junkie.

What about Lucifer?

Dexter bring the chat))

Petitte Shaman Ozark easy

@@Sonia-oj6im Lucifer aint shit compared to the mentalist; and I watch & love both

@@dianas6866 yeah i agree😂

"Tiresome woman" owned.

Tiresome man. Hmm, doesn't quite work does it? There are a lot of adages like that.

hooligan bubsy unfortunately if the evidence is not collected properly it can be argued the evidence was planted, forged or otherwise tampered with. That is why all evidence has to have a clear chain of custody. Any person who has any contact with the evidence must be documented and vetted. If a murder weapon is collected by officer A, brought to officer B , checked out by lawyer A, and brought back to officer B, then your golden. But if somewhere in there officer B let his cousin, a 18 year old who was visiting him, play with the gun... well who is to say he did not switch the gun or something. So the evidence is now invalid.

hooligan bubsy it does more good than bad. Remember this is just a tv show that’s supposed to make you feel certain things and does not reflect reality

why the fuck are there so many unnecessary quotation marks in your comment???

When there in enough evidence to convict the criminals always weasel their way out, when there is little to no evidence innocent people get arrested and thrown in jail ranging from a few days to a few months (false claims, or claims that lack evidence)... What a world we live in.

It stops the police, both local and federal, from exercising too much power. Sure, it's not perfect but consider the alternative. What you're asking for is totalitarianism. The Chinese police don't need warrants are you saying that's a better system? My dad is a lawyer and he always told me that the American judicial system was,"the worst in the world, except for every other one." It's corrupt, full of bureaucratic flaws, thousands of meaningless, tedious laws written by politicians who are almost universally lawyers, and inefficient. But it's about the closest thing to a good system that has yet been found.

He goes with the flow. He obviously made a mistake here (the "uh oh" means he didn't plan this).

Oh yeah, they're in a town and go to an art studio. Something about the artist making a forgery.

Which has absolutely nothing to do with this video.

OBJECTION!! Oh, wait...

Tell us more

We need court sins

@@pablocau3792 Overruled!!

You clearly haven't seen Sanders Sides

,😂 same here

Blood Money (Season 2 Episode 19)

Watch the show again, perfect reason when you've forgotten.

Good script as well. The dialogue in The Mentalist is top notch. Bruno Heller (the showrunner) has been praised for his pacing, and rightfully so if you ask me.

@@TunezCottage Yes, it had good pacing. Everything seemed to work well. Good people do good work. Every job is important.

Finally found someone who knows both dexter and patrick 😂

Breath, High Ground.

haha ez :)

You shouldn't have drunk so much.

Tbf, Jane should have faced criminal charges for breaking and entering

Jet MaX No, he was being fined to be in contempt. By asking for 2000, he was telling the judge to fine him $2000 with the aim to speed things along

Gizmo 73 Aren’t you describing what bribery is...

No he didnt....the money goes to the court not to the judges pocket.....n its a fine that increased from $1000 to $2000 ....not bribery

Handsome Man what’s wrong with your fundamental logic? A fine is a reluctant payment made for a bad behaviour. If you are however willing to pay for it, what does that make it? A bribe. 🙄

except that the person who you might say was being bribed (the judge) would never see a penny of that fine, so there is no incentive which is actually what a bribe is for. If i pay john smith $10 then ask you for something, that is not a bribe because the two have no monetary or other connection

Same here, I think he did screw up here

True. But he's the reason they had the evidence at all.

Did you even watch the whole Episode?

@@czevofficial5933 This was the way he solved the case LOL

John Chooran what episode?

🙋‍♀️

He also takes Lisbon’s money and steals her sandwiches 😂😂😂

Theoneandonlykeder wtf

I agree. If someone is guilty and there is evidence, punish them, but we can't have police deliberately obtaining evidence illegally because it would create an Orwellian society, so if they obtain it illegally, a punishment for them, as well.

Yikes. I'm glad it is a thing in the States. Things like this (this fictional example is highly hyperbolic, btw) are unfair-and it's up to good lawyers and law enforcement officers to work within people's rights to execute justice-but the federal government has no business inside my house on a hunch.

@@sevensailsinsymphony , the truth much more important than perfect technicality in german courts. There is a reason it is called an inquisitorial process. At the same time, please note, judges here are not very fond of police officers just breaking into people’s houses. We had a case where the police “sneaked” into a house and the judge ruled self-defense when one of the officers was shot and killed. (He was actually quite angry at the police for not using normal procedure) It is not an automatic process over here. Most important distinction: In Germany, judges are not just arbiter in a dispute but do their own questioning (at least in criminal law cases, it is more nuanced in civil law), and come to their own conclusion. Also, emotional arguments are much more difficult here, as there is no jury you can sway. We have lay judges but those function very differently (out of scope for this discussion).

@@BlackandGold83 I really appreciate your thoughtful response. I think there's a general problem with politics and law in the States in regard to emotional manipulation. The difference between the US and other countries is the foundation of our government and the principles behind it. Americans like distribution of power. Having a jury is a purposeful check for corruption in positions of power; government by the people makes it harder for those who have influence to take advantage. It's also harder to bribe a jury, and more likely a jury will be measured and fair because it's made up of people like your neighbor, your mailman, and your kid's kindergarten teacher-not career politicians who potentially owe favors. The US is shaky right now because The People are uninformed, passive, and apathetic. Our system of government only works to govern an educated, involved, enthusiastic people.

@@sevensailsinsymphony, and we go a different way to rid ourselves of corruption: Legal system and Executive System is very clearly separated. Even to get rid of an unwanted judge, a politician would have to fight a very hard fight. Forget it if you don’t have clout on at least a state level. And over here, judges (and DAs) see themselves more of servants of the law and it is very seldom that they lay the foundation of a political career. It probably has to do with that they are “Beamte”, they are not elected but sworn-in officers of the state. Also, germans don’t think of the state as something different from the society, we also don’t have such a clear distinction between communities. For example, most germans don’t really get why a sheriff in american TV caters so much to the needs of his community, as most police officers over a certain pay grade are expected to change postings quite often in their career. That is also the reason we often find it quite funny that people have problems with the FBI. The german pendant to the FBI looks exactly the same as local law enforcement. So the idea that only locals can judge over someone is seen as alien over here. I understand the roots of the american law system. It gives different answers to the same humane problems every society has: How to live in a peaceful and just society? For me it is sometimes very alien in the particulars but I won’t say it is a “wrong” system. Ok, I personally really like our system but it probably has flaws too. 😅

@@BlackandGold83 As an American, I just always find it funny when Europeans compare their countries to ours one-to-one. I don't think a lot of Europeans have an idea of the sheer geographic size, population, and radical cultural diversity of the United States. Germany's national government is more comparable to our local, state government. Of course our local officials need to cater to their specific communities. Changing a post from California to Georgia, within our national borders, would be somewhat like moving from Sweden to Greece, or from Germany to Kazakstan. The cultural difference is not minor. Imagine that Europe (excluding Russia for its size and the sake of argument) were united under a higher level of government. That would be comparable to our federal government (and our FBI)-it's understandable why individual states balk at it. Imagine that every citizen in every European country had a vote to elect a president who would make unilateral decisions for the whole of Europe. From an American perspective, it's funny when European people-whose cultures are neatly divided into countries and kept separate under different governments tailored to them-look down on the US for our political disagreements. They generally have no idea how well unified we actually are, in spite of all our cultural and racial differences. I'm certainly not saying that's what you're doing! This is just a soapbox of mine. I like our structure of government and want to keep it; what works for European countries wouldn't work here.

MegaWinner16 indeed

And, that's actually illegal.

As stated by another commenter, the defense presented the mug. The prosecutor should have objected to the line of questioning to Lisbon, cannot answer for another person or something like that.

Overruled! The defense has no such requirement. Only the prosecution does.

Its on amazon prime

not correct . you don't have to be under orders from a superior to break the law . you can break it yourself . jane was not acting as a private citizen , he was acting as a consultant on a specific case he learned of from police .

HazimusLegendN57 who's piney?

Lol i realizef in the first 2 seconds of seeing him. Such an iconic character.

Chris Fuentes Sons of anarchy

Only the tank of oxygen is missing