X-Plane 12 | MAXED Graphics Settings | A330, RV-10, Storms, Trees More... 

He Bro , some website that is promoting a cracked version of this game is using Your Video and RU-vid as reference , or are you behind that?

@@sranang-kino No, I like to pay for my products and encourage everyone else to do so as well. Unfortunately, I have no control over how other people choose to embed the video link. The only time I can do something is if someone reuploaded my content.

what a brilliant comment

It’s a pretty obvious fact but OK 😁

Well said 👍👍🙌

If it wasn't frowned upon would you really only go out with one girlfriend

@@Keitan97 Indeed, but I just felt like it needed to be shouted out with all the tribalism that tends to go on in the hobby. 😁😁

Yep where is that runway?

@@redundantlyuseful3366 I'm actually not sure. But if I had to guess it would probably somewhere in Alaska or BC Canada

It’s in a better state than FS2020 has been over the past two years. The only thing FS2020 has that’s better, in my opinion, is the ground scenery. The rest X-Plane has always done better

@@Michael-ig8ne far better graphics and world than X plane tho

@@squadric7722 my current xp11 looks alot better than default 12 the aliasing is somehow worse in 12,Only thing xp does better than msfs is fluidity of the flight model,everything else its not even close.I was expecting better than what 12 currently is.

@@William_99640 doubt

Yall truly are comparing an early access beta to a game that's been out for a little over two years now, damn. Of course the aliasing will be bad and things buggy, don't expect too much from an unfinished product

Same here. I have tried it a few times in the past but gravitated back to Microsoft as it was back then (no P3D). But I have not tried it for at least 6 years so I am going to see what version 12 is like. P3D did not really evolve as well as I would have liked in terms of pristine visuals and although I am happy to give it a concession because it is more for training than sight seeing, I still think they could easily have done a lot better. And a poor internet connection means MSFS is out - I consider myself lucky if a 10 GB download is done within 24 hours with several interrupts along the way. I'd have to run the X-Plane 12 DVD version if it were X-Plane assuming the DVd is available to users outside of the US. The only other realistic alternative for me now is P3D, but version 6 requires a permanent internet connection which isn't the case for me (and at this stage I am not enthusiastic enough to pay $500 AUD for the P3D version 6 professional licence!). I tried version 4 P3D and the aliasing on the runways is horrible. They resolved that with version 5 but in version 5 the aliasing of the taxiway signs at night make night approaches unbelievably distracting - like flying into a sparkler show.

The atc was definitely a vatsim audio recording dubbed over the takeoff..

The water spraying of the wheels looks cool, but wouldn't the engines on TOGA create a massive spray behind it as well? Or is that still WIP?

@@sushiat probably WIP, they had experimental particle effects in XP11 I wouldn’t be surprised if they rework it for 12.

Imagine in 10 to 20 years time especially when VR gets really good

definately a lot easier to spot FSX dead straight dead flat runways...ILS on X-plane a must!

Yes and the biggest feckup that I have seen so far is a Boeing FMC in the Airbus 330....OPPS!! Wonder why they chose to go with this and not put In The AB MCDU? Lazy last minute coding........ just pop in the 737 FMC, no one will notice, honest boss!!

@@richardswede a long time ago Laminar already announced a mcdu is work in progress, but will not be included in the beta, because it will not be completed at that time.

@@caspersolleveld9611 that maybe, but to see a Boeing computer in my beloved AB, means this is a miss for me

@@richardswede yes, *Boeing FMC is a "PLACEHOLDER" until Laminar finishes custom FMGS for A330*

@@richardswede Isn't sherry picking in an early access, beta, pre version a bit ridiculous, or is it just stupidity?

Yep it feel better then mfs because it good flight model and instant Werther update

Agreed. The props & sprites make a massive difference to VFR and is something really lacking in MSFS2020, despite it being the preferred choice for VFR flying.

Not a bad assessment… it’s not nearly as bad as the comments allude it to be.

HUGE isn't the world. Maybe marginal. Just shinier runways and fake volumetric clouds.

That's because the water is on the inside 🤣

FSX could do this

It's called early access.

@@AlexFHDVideos2 The Zibo wipes rain. It's not an XP issue it's a developer issue. FSX never had rain effects. P3D got rain effect about 6 years into its life by a third party developer called TFDI. At first it only worked on the 717 and today only works on a small amount of planes and it most cases also does not wipe.

Well, I was reading where a glider club was using msfs to help its new students one of the reasons where they found it helpful was the scenery was so close to the real one that everyone found their way to base. XP 11 they could not find it since the auto gen made it look different. Msfs is getting better. I do both VFR and IFR cat 3 all the time on Msfs I have both sims

FS2020 has realism settings. I think u didn't notice. U can turn all assists off and the airframe / flight model is much superior to XP11.

@@radialb1894 of course I tried to disable all the assists and the cell and in any case the flight model was much worse. The reason is that in FS2020 the flight model is written by a programmer for each individual airplane, while on the x-plane it is calculated automatically by an algorithm based on the dynamics of the fluids on every single surface of each plane. This is the reason why self-built prototypes can reasonably be tested on x-plane and not on FS2020. in summary FS2020 is a magnificent game but it is not (nor did Microsoft ever want it to be) a simulator suitable for training real pilots.

Its got a few bugs so far but its insane im loving it.

MSFS has the same problem non-effective wipers.

@@thegreathadoken6808 No

I got anxiety from those wiper blades not working lol

One of these XP fanboys will tell you it's because it's early access😏.

@@benos4x4adventures49 Laminar isn’t broke. I couldn’t buy X-Plane 12 because the server was overloaded. Maybe everyone is buying X-Plane 12?

@@caspersolleveld9611 I am sure the servers were hammered. It happens all the time when something gets released. Doesn't change the fact it doesn't match MSFS yet. I am sure XP will improve though..

@@geekyfreq How doesn't it match it? Granted, the scenery is great in MSFS but the aircraft themselves and flight characteristics are much better and more realistic in XP. I'm here to fly .. not look at the scenery so much!!

@@davidhuett3579 lol

@@davidhuett3579 That is totally fine, but let's not forget that there is a thing called "VFR" that totally belongs on watching scenery ;))

I didn’t check but what kind of access do they give you on the demo? Is it a certain area again?

Same

@@TheFlightSimDeck Yeah, same deal as the 11 demo. All the planes but only one area and 15 minutes of flight time.

@@TheFlightSimDeck They only give you KPDX (Portland). And the time limit as well. Word of warning to the demo users: the sim let's you try and load other ICAOs, but once you do you have no way to go back to the defaults without a reinstall unless you know the airport. So if you want to fly the default airport in the demo, use ICAO: KPDX

I noticed that too. Amazing attention to detial.

Same in helicopters. R22 shakes it compass.

its another version of xplane 9 and 11 put together lol 😁😁

I totally agree

Yes man! I opened the cockpit door (VR) took a seat in the back and looked out the window and played with the engine sound, really! I think I try XP12 a little more...

Correct, that’s a free strip you can download. Already takes advantage of the new trees because it’s mostly auto gen.

The A330 systems are like all their other default planes.

I heard the xplane forum is attempting to zibofying the a330 lmao

that's gotta be a hand made area though

Yeah for sure! Those logs, underbrush and detailed strip do look pretty precise.

I think it's going to happen for sure. Good starting point for a small team.

The A330 has a Boeing fms 😂

No, if the raindrops move (see at the take off) then the wiper also does nothing!

Humm, I haven't used multiplayer in years, what's wrong with it? Me and some buddies were doing multiplayer just fine ~20 years ago in the v6.x days......

That airstrip is a free one you can download. I wanted to try it because now all the trees have been replaced automatically. But not every strip looks this nice unless you edit it.

They work until a certain speed 1:22

been a couple years now. MSFS still has a long way to go on both systems and flight model...

@@BonanzaPilot 100% agree. I only just switched to MSFS from XP11 after the 2 years you mentioned. It’s in a place where I’m happy to use it. It can only improve.

Thanks Geoff. I love using this method because it really looks like a camera is being used. I use software called FaceTrackNoIR. It lets you use a web cam to follow you head movements. You can also use your cell phones camera.

@@TheFlightSimDeck thanks for this. I did track this down only to find out it is only for use of pc. I know Bob (sticks and rudders) had down something similar but not with the flexibility you mention. Now if only, if only ....

You can't compare the two. They use different systems, to achieve similar goals. MS , uses ON the FlY streaming data, WHICH REQUIRES A fast internet connection, to achieve their PHOTO REAL. scenery . And , the system requirements are obnoxious. AND, the system is typical Microsoft tiered. IF you want the real the "STUFF," the eye candy, YOU pay for it. Bronze, Silver and basically GOLD. And, is basically a stripped down SIM, unless you level up. MS is more realistic, but , the cost of the SIM ,and painful, hardware requirements, makes it impractical for the general user. XP Plane 12, comes with a lot more features, and is still only 60.00. I'll go with that all day.

How are you running msfs with a 670. You must be stuck at 10 fps with major airports.

@@FPSOlaf Simply dont go to major airports lmao, i feel his pain

@@ziepex7009 me too and I play on a 2070 😂

@@FPSOlaf not rlly tbh, I get 30fps in Gatwick with scenery and other airports, it stutters but runs smoother than xplane 11 for some reason lol, I'm going for a Rx 580 8gb,

@@ziepex7009 yeah I avoid some big airports lol

It's called early access.

Maybe a screen resolution conflict? I’ve been running it windowed.

@@TheFlightSimDeck Could be. Everything else seems fine though. I’ll give it a try

@@TheFlightSimDeck That worked! Though as soon as I go full screen but still in the windowed mode it goes all weird again. Probably a bug? Should I reportit

@@hamish3607 Yeah probably, it seems like a lot of people are having this bug so it's probably already been reported but still, just in case it's not report the bug

It’s free strip you can download. Naturally looks better because the new trees drop in around it now.

That is Machmell Fishery, near Washington.

@@TheFlightSimDeck Thank you

1:22 you can see it better, but it dissipates with speed.

Yes that’s the only one. The trees are still there without, but it’s a free strip called Machmell Fishery.

imo that is not true, some addon planes in fs2020 are really good... but due to its popularity there is a lot of poor quality products being sold by greedy devs.

,?

Dude a330 has a 737 fmc in 2022..

@@berkorhan3399 Dude custom mcdu for a330 is work in progress according to Laminar a few months ago. Have some patience!

Because troll trash have nothing better to do with their lives.

the plural of aircraft is aircraft, not aircrafts

I like to use something to transition the topic change or when time has advanced, and straight cut within the topic. But I will consider this when editing.

@@TheFlightSimDeck It's nice to look for examples in movies. Crossfade, fade block in between or Star Wars styled wipe transition might work better for these cases.

I would personally prefer just straight cut, L-cut or J-cut but it's obviously your content so do whatever you like. For examples of different cuts, see ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Wv3Hmf2Dxlo.html