X-T5 vs X-H2s vs GFX 100s 

it will be better if you stay in the loaded 100% zoom view for a few more seconds, and not scroll around the image so often so fast. As the GFX100s weight is not much more than the XH2S, will you tent to just bring the gfx for much better image quality? Being a 100S owner I really wish it can mount adapted mirrorless lenses (FF or APS-C) so I can reduce weight can share lens. Too bad only SLR lenses are adaptable, which are either too heavy or less than stellar image quality.

Great comparison! GFX100s' shots at 10,000 ISO is surprising!

10,000 ISO test is interesting - GFX is clearly just on another level very impressive. I found it interesting that the XT5 looked a little worse in the first example, and a little better in the second in terms of hanging onto detail vs. the 2S. Can't help but wonder if the difference was more focus-related than ISO related. That is to say, the image quality was nearly equal between them. I enjoy the peeping videos as it has clarified that the new 40mp sensor performs on par with the older sensors but can offer stronger resolution/dynamic range if you have the light. But I wish you could slow down a bit - often you move on to the next photo before I've really taken it all in. Thanks!

hi, I own GFX100S and I love its deep image quality but unfortunately, I cannot take it everywhere because of its heavy weight. Based on your experiments, 40mp on XH2 with red batch lenses is giving me crispy sharpness and dynamic range for image quality like 102mp on GFX100s? Do you think it's a good decision to sell my GFX100s and lenses and invest in XH2 with red batch lenses?