"You Have No Moral Right To Run This" - Famous Journalist To Alex O'Connor 

Big fan, but I have to say, I was extremely disappointed in you for not challenging Destiny when he said there's no evidence that our phones are spying on us.

.... Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell Come to Jesus Christ today Jesus Christ is only way to heaven Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today Holy Spirit Can give you peace guidance and purpose and the Lord will John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. Mark 1.15 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. 2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Hebrews 11:6 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Jesus

You can disagree with him. Just not ask him why 350 times in a row. He answered the question and then repeatedly was asked the same question again. It wasn't an interview, it was an interrogation.

I think Alex did labour the point a little bit. There were other topics Hitchens wanted to discuss and he is bored of the drugs issue now. He knows he has lost the war to the progressive society so he accepts his defeat.

@@davidgraham8058yet not a single time was the phrase “next topic” uttered in any form or essence…

How dare his brainwashing not work?

he was banging on about drugs to the point I went onto something else. Anyone with that kind of constant bore of drugs topic would have walked out in my view

@@SM-mz2hz Agree mate, exactly

That's Peter Hitchens in a nutshell.

Hitchens asked this guy not to air the interview but he did so anyway even though he had no moral right to do so.

​@@goldenboy06 he might have not had a moral right to run it before Peter started bitching about it on twitter first (and even then it's debatable). At that point Peter did that Alex not only had the moral right, but the moral responsibility to run it and let people decide for themselves.

@@TheNheg66 The problem with "letting people decide for themselves" though is that of course everyone of HIS FANS on HIS CHANNEL are going to agree with him regardless, which Alex obviously knew. Regardless of who was right, it's these underhanded pretences of Alex that is wrong.

Peter Hitchens doesn’t even have half the neurons that would be required to do that, along with Jordan Peterson, the guy’s pretty much the perfect example of a pseudo-intellectual.

It was a hour of subject that he didn't care about. And the speaker was clueless about. To try paint it any other way is dumb.

...... Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell Come to Jesus Christ today Jesus Christ is only way to heaven Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today Holy Spirit Can give you peace guidance and purpose and the Lord will John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. Mark 1.15 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. 2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Hebrews 11:6 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Jesus

​@@arthurfleck629 Nah Hitchens is a very clever man

​​@@JamieZero7it was exactly 40 minutes, on a subject he's written a book about, had previously agreed to discuss and clearly cares about. I think Alex is partially at fault, but what you said is factually incorrect.

You are correct.

This reminds me of Ben Shapiro walking out of the interview with Andrew Neil. Shapiro is smart enough to rebut but wasn’t aware in the moment that that was an option. Rough…

​@@patrinohe was trying to get answers, period. Peter refused to give them. Going around in circles was on Peter, not Alex. If Peter expected no pushback then that's his failure...

@@TheNheg66 To be fair, Alex was trying to catch Peter out the whole time with the same questions because he's clearly biased towards the pro-drug front. I think Peter just sensed that.

oh no, better storm out!@@patrino

From my memory smoking fell out of popularity quite a while before vapes become a big thing but maybe it depends where you are.

Kids stopped smoking when cigarettes became priced like luxury items. $16 a pack (New York) is quite prohibitive for a middle school kid

That's the point Hitchens made, actually.

@@ravecrab Exactly & Alex tried pretending he didn't get a rebuttal in this video. I was kinda on the fence about who was wrong in the interview, but considering Alex is still being disingenuous long after the interview has finished kinda makes me side with Hitchens which I don't usually do lol.

​@@fiddlecastro1453I just watched the interview and Hitchens was right that they spent 42mins of going round in circles of Alex not listening to the points Hitchens was making! 4 or 5 mins into it was clear he was getting frustrated with the discussion and that should have been picked up on and the topic changed. If he considered an hour long interview, of what became 2 topics, with an extra half hour if the conversation was flowing, which it definitely was not, then why at the end did Alex say "the plan was to spend an hour on drugs". My gf agreed it was a terrible interview and despite Hitchens not handling it well, he was right to be frustrated by it.

I concur.

that is how christies argue.

@@susanwjoh0re735 By 'christies' can I assume you mean 'Christians'? If so that's quite a generalised comment.

He's always been rude and arrogant, he's also no where near as smart as people think he is.

You forgot that he had his trousers half way to his armpits, strapped in place by a belt and braces. And hus nurse was on hand with a bedpan if needed.

​@@StillAliveAndKicking_true, but then he was dealing with someone who doesn't look like they've finished going through puberty. So maybe it's a matter of perspective.😂

@@SM-mz2hz Fair enough, I think of the DM and MoS as the same genre i.e. populist right wing. Yes he expects adoration or at least agreement, and when someone argues he feigns exasperation and boredom, claiming that he’s explained it all before, and suggesting others should read his book(s) to gain enlightenment. I do think he’s a bully, even though you don’t, going by the panel discussions he has been on which I have witnessed. Look at the way he behaved when he flounced out of the interview in question. I wouldn’t call it stormed out, it was a hissy fit.

@@SM-mz2hz The young man got stuck on repeat and Peter got exasperated. Alex wasn't processing the answer, which suggests he wasn't really listening. It doesn't help that Alex is also wrong, but hopefully years from now and with added life experience he'll realize that.

@@juzi68 After about the 15 minute mark, Alex would start a question and Hitchens immediately would pounce, shut him down, talk over him, and not actually hear the question at hand. If anything, Hitchens wasn't listening to Alex's questions. I've seen plenty of interviews where there really was false pretenses, and droning topics, and the only appropriate response is to CLEARLY state that you are tired of the topic, or that you don't expect to be talking about the topic, and ask to move on. You can even do so grumpily. And if the interviewer doesn't want to move on, you give one last warning before walking out. You can sit there and send signals all day and night but people aren't mind readers. They can't be expected to separate a clear public persona of a boisterous, angry old man from genuine frustration. He's an adult, he can speak clearly instead of just angrily. Also, if you're going to walk out of an interview, then walk out. Don't dance around for over 15 minutes hurling insults and acting like some kind of authority parent figure over your interviewer, complaining that your time has been wasted (while continuing to waste time).

Classic so-called crybully

@@juzi68 You're sounding as inflexible and as certain of your opinions as facts as Hitchens. I watched a markedly different interview, where the interviewee constantly interrupted the interviewer's attempts to frame and reframe questions, leading to a frustrating experience all round. Hitchens' habit of overtalking and ignoring any challenge to his views was in full effect.

Christopher, please. Only because that is his name lol

"Chris" 😂 Imagine thinking you're chummy with someone who never knew that you existed

lol imagine being pathetic enough to get upset over someone else's name

I mean, Christopher Hitchens ROUTINELY corrected people as he did not like to be referred to as Chris, he never used that nickname @@oatdilemma6395

.... Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell Come to Jesus Christ today Jesus Christ is only way to heaven Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today Romans 6.23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. Mark 1.15 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. 2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Hebrews 11:6 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Jesus

Or just refrain from making silly points attempting to undermine his position.

It's the interviewer's job to direct the flow of the conversation.

Well said@@ragnardanneskjold7259 too many sycophants here.

@@philip851 Without a doubt Hitchens made a bit of a tit of himself but the line of questioning was repetitive and I was getting frsutrated watching it so I can just imagine a cantankerous fella like Hitchens would have been stewing. No excuse for his behaviour though.

That's a reasonable take on it. @@thelastemperor3704

so many people use it already all around the world, i kinda feel like it wouldnt change shit if we legalized it

Sales of Pringles went up.

@@AM_o2000🤣🤣🤣 Mmm, Pringles are unhealthy …

You have Communist and thugs running your government.

Justin Trudope

Haha He's not passive aggressive. He's active aggressive.

It's better because it shows commitment.

Peters comment as quoted was childish , extreme and bemusingly antagonistic .

Is your pfp kyle rittenhouse?

@@abcdefzhij Yes. Crying in court at his trial. Bwahahahah

That was another impression of mine too. That was too much for PH to handle and resulted in that very bad ending of that whole recorded interview.

@@jenniferjoyner112 True, but PH is a horrible person in any interview with anyone. Take a look at recent Piers Morgan interview of him. PH just as obnoxious and argumentative. He’s a bitter old man and very much like his deceased brother was, Christopher Hitchens.

@@jenniferjoyner112 Yes. PH was a miserable bitter old man. But, he’s like that with every interviewer. Just watch him on a recent Piers Morgan clip. He’s just as rude and obnoxious to Piers Morgan as he was to Alex. But, the difference is, Piers Morgan stood up to him and didn’t let him get away with it. PH was just as nasty and mean a person as was his deceased brother, Christopher Hitchens.

He always says that at the beginning of interviews, it's not that deep.

@@gillespaling7039 Maybe so, but just watch a recent Piers Morgan of his. Piers doesn’t put up with his bitterness and nonsense. I think PH even reminds Piers „I don’t have to be here you know“, to which Piers replies „Of course not, but it’s my program and I get to ask the questions.“ PH just has some major problems with everyone.

yes indeed, someone being dull and stiff doesn't render you any right to be pompous and self-righteous. So not sure what's your point for mentioning it in the first place.

I interpreted that as Alex being a bit thrown off by the initial hostility of Hitchens.

Exactly! I don't think for one second Peter would have went back and asked himself "maybe I had something to do with how poorly the interview went"

He said it on multiple occasions during the interview...of course, you may have wanted the C-A-T for cat, but intelligent people tend not to communicate via tins of alphabet spaghetti.

Ah yes, far too intelligent to say the words he wanted to communicate. So deep!@@philip851

@@philip851You mean when he went on for 15 minutes saying "you have no moral right to publish the interview. Go ahead, publish it. You came in with false pretenses, and it doesn't matter what I say. Don't publish the interview. I can't stop you. Do it. But don't do it. But do it." All while immediately yelling the moment Alex opened his mouth to defend himself from these genuinely hurtful accusations. Or are you referring to when Alex offered to cut the entire interview, and do a completely different interview with a different topic, before having insults hurled at him? Yeah, I guess Alex should have just let him rant on X for 3+ days without ever defending himself or showing people what really happened.

Exactly. And I have a godbrother who has more emotional intelligence than Peter Hitchens. And my godbrother is 7

@@malgrosskreuz01 How would a person with an IQ at room temperature be able to judge another persons immaturity?

Arguing with a woman in a nutshell lol. "You don't understand me!" "No, I understand you, I just think you're wrong."

​@frankbrennan1619 Honestly, pretty sobering.

Why does Hitchens have to be nice? In particular, why does he have to be nice to the latest funded snark puppet?

@@shortscenes9338 This is not about being 'nice,' this is about the utter downfall of a man's optimism and his overall well being. Hitchens has fallen victim to two deadly sins: the first being his complete and utter hopelessness that borders on giving up. The second being that he is so narcissistic and conceited that he is no longer even patient with people for daring to suggest there is hope, and he is rude to people when they even ask him his views. I hope he will be alright, truly, because I think he is a decent man, he's just fallen victim to the madness of the times. But there is always hope, which of course Hitchens would disagree with.

@@sweetie4915 You're actively answering a question I did not actively ask.

@@shortscenes9338 No, I understand why you might think that is what I was doing, but I was just describing the way I see Hitchens in his present state of mind.

Yes. In the "Pinned Comment" at the top, that you had to scroll past to comment!

@@bc9485 thank you

He’s always been a prick. If he has I’m sorry for him, I wouldn’t wish that on anyone but it doesn’t change the fact that he’s always been pompous and hostile to anyone who doesn’t agree with his life view.

Within Reason Podcast

His channel on YT is Alex O'Connor

Hitchens isn't going to sleep with you dude

Yes.

Whether that is true or not (I think not) is not the core issue. You don't behave like Peter did, full stop. If he thought Alex should move on or whatever, he could've simply asked politely. Instead he behaved like an evil crybaby.

​@@EricusXIVnot just a cry baby. But an evil one 👀

Who are you people? A 40-minute discussion and dozens of you are pulling your hair out in boredom? Is this a crackhead convention? Sounds like a made-up opinion that post-hoc validates a psycho meltdown from a guest.

@EricusXIV lets slip in the word Evil, because Hitchens disliked his shitty interview. Evil because he wrote a book to educate people on drugs and getting dissed, by people who never read his book?

"You actively dislike what Christopher Hitchens stands for ..." Pardon? Did you actually pay attention to this video or the interview? Or are you just trolling.

Agreed.

He spent 17 minutes staying and being rude and pompous, after he said he was gonna leave. Talk about time spending.

The reason Hitchens got frustrated is because he know he's argument are flawed and inconsistent. They are not based in rationality but in emotions. Hitchens argument is: "cannabis is bad for your health and especially when childrend get a hold of them" (paraphrasing). Alex points out in that case, for Hitchens to be logical consistent. He SHOULD be against alcohol and tobacco too. But for some ode reason the same argument about the negative health risk and the risk of children geting there hands on alcohol and tobacco does not apply?! Why is that? Why can't Hitchens just explain why there is different standards for cannabis then tobacco. Or give another argument why he is against Cannabis. If he does not have one. Maybe he should reevaluate he's position on it or just admit he is arguing form feelings and not reason.

@@TheRobinL Nope. The existence of a poison doesn't make another poison safe. If Tobacco was illegal today literally no one would be advocating making it legal. Obviously Alex and his fanboys don't like their pro-drug nut agenda being challenged but that's really a 'them' problem. Which is ultimately why he couldn't think of an argument other than ''whatabout''... once it was pointed out to him that ''whatabout'' doesn't make cannabis safe, he then had a bit of a mare and just repeated himself endlessly because he realised the inconsistency and sheer ignorance of his position, rather than acknowledge this he decided to make the argument circular. Not the brightest.

Although it is well used, I don’t think the “what about alcohol?” response is fallacious or uninteresting. At its core, cannabis being legalised is a question of human liberty and mental capacity. It’s about adult humans making choices for themselves that may or may not hurt them or help them. And the same applies for alcohol, which is almost universally accepted and engrained in cultures across the planet.

@@brianmeen2158 agreed but it’s the automatic dismissal of a view because of age that I have a problem with. Hear them out. Listen to understand not just the react. Help them don’t shut them down. Entitlement in some of the younger generation is a thing though, so tread carefully. But I was the same. We forget that sometimes as we get older.

​@@brianmeen2158 Some 35 year olds may have learnt very little and experienced very little. Some 20 year olds may have experienced a lot and learnt a lot.

@@brianmeen2158you are unironically doing exactly what the original comment advised against immediately. Genuinely can’t make this shit up

It is true. He ought to have changed the subject before the 30 minute mark when it was clear it was going nowhere.

You need to reassess your comment; it may have been dramatic, but it was awful and belabored a boring point. ;)

100% Peter was just fine here. Alex seems hopelessly stubborn, he is protecting the validity of his previous points to his viewers. It feels like Alex is underachieving the entire interview, and the implication might be that he is defending his own drug use which is just intolerable. Alex was very smug, and even gave Peter a "mmmyees" at one point in order to make fun of Peter's logic for a topic Alex knew about. You just don't do that in debate if you want to be taken seriously and the logic followed was not difficult to inquire about. The behaviour is actually propaganda, it tells the unknowing "oh this old fuddy >would< say such a thing." It's a display of popularism, it's entrepenurial, and because it plays with the very spirit of man and their ability to live, I think it is also a bit evil.

​@@chyerchr1850 I admire the passion of your commitment here, but also, all you are saying is: I don't like Alex. Hitchens is long manifestly more guilty of the crimes you impute.

@@talastra at this point your comment is so baseless I think this is a russian psyop to destroy western society.

On his channel.

@@RandomAussieGuy87 Would have been nice to have it linked in the description, instead of a bunch of unrelated links to supplements and whatnot, that way people didn't have to waste their time having to find it.

Finding the video would take you less than five seconds if you typed ''alex peter hitchens'' or any variety of them words, plus any other related words. Do you understand how easy it is to find specific content on here? Genuinely it is so easy @@literalghost929

Except instead of asking to move on politely he decided to storm out like a fussed child

@@Olster-xy5ol he repeatedly asked him to move on . I am not excusing Hitchens’s temper but it was not all his fault.

Hitchens also threw a 20 minute tantrum after so I don’t think his time was overly valuable tbh

Peter is way beyond Christopher.

If one dismisses Alex's views due to his age, it reflects ageism. Hitchens' conduct in the interview seemed objectionable, marked by arrogance, dishonesty, and rudeness. Notably, he struggled to substantiate his own thesis, suggesting a misplaced sense of intellectual superiority on his part. He seemed to get frustrated that Alex kept asking questions that he couldn't answer. Pathetic behaviour.

No, @@EricusXIV it is simply a matter of knowing what your talking about and having a little life experience. Alex believes cannabis should be legal and employs whataboutery, which is ignorant on the many issues Hitchens made him aware of. Take the point on testing...how naive and utterly stupid is Alex's position here "We'll have to do random testing" when it's bloody obvious you'll have to test everyone doing important jobs before they're allowed to do them. And isn't it interesting that you are as guilty as that young man of not listening to what Hitchens was saying! Hitchens doesn't have to substantiate his 'thesis'...he isn't offering a solution to a problem. If you want to smoke cannabis and wreck your brain, do it. He's just telling you that it wrecks your brain.

@@philip851 He is not just saying that, he wants it to be a severe criminal offence. I thought you at least knew something about his work? But since you don't know what a thesis is, maybe I shouldn't be so surprised... I can't be bothered explaining this to you. Read a book or ask a grownup (you seem to put a lot of weight on age) and they'll explain it for you. Lesson one: don't have strong opinions on stuff you know next to nothing about.

No@@EricusXIV it is already an offence. He believes the law should be upheld, don't you? Your attempt to belittle my input says a lot about you ...and tbh you should really heed your own advice here. It did make me chuckle though. If I were to say to you that smoking cannabis in your teen years it increases the risk of psychosis and that there is a bunch of literature available proving this happens and we you should be dissuaded by being punished. That is my line of argument, my thesis...to think a good counter (or that there should be a counter at all) is saying "but what about alcohol ( repeatedly) that is dangerous too but it's perfectly legal?" ...is puerile!. He hasn't a clue what he's talking about and that was obvious when asked what managing that would look like."Well we'll randomly test people" He believes that a credible solution but doesn't even begin to address the problems that arise from legalizing cannabis.Clearly, he hasn't thought about it. If you invite Mr Hitchens on a podcast to have a conversation. You may disagree with him, he doesn't really care...but if all you have is naive BS and you use that to debate his pov...obviously, you've wasted his time.

@@philip851 I am not belittling you, it's simply a matter of knowing what you're talking about and having a little life experience.

Yep!!

Utterly moronic seems a little harsh. I'm sure Alex is smart enough to know that most of his fans would take his side, but there are other places he'd look for feedback like X where there are a lot of Hitchens fans. You just have to analyse the reasons that people give for Alex or Peter being in the right, and it's up to each person to decide which argument is more compelling, which I'm sure is what Alex did.

But that's the thing, I think Alex had his own answers and was waiting for Peter to challenge them.

The man was well in over his head. HE invited Hitchens. HE was the interviewer. Everything that went wrong was O'Connor's responsibility. The interviewer is meant to DIRECT the conversation and CONDUCT the conversation, and O'Connor was incapable as an interviewer. He just got bulldozed. He has a very overinflated sense of self-worth, and it became obvious in that particular interview, which is why he is now seeking validation from a 'friend'.

​@@bodhisattva99 And what were your idol Hitchens "POINT" about why alex had run it poorly? Hitchens was saying "Drugs" topic is Boring even tho they agreed upon it for a 1 hour Drug discussion and 1 Hour God discussion. Like he's calling the subject boring when he's written a book about it and what kind of a stuck up old man basically says "Read my book about it i don't have to answer you" 😂.Hitchens also called him a propagandist, because he didn't agree with Hitchens? Hitchens isn't even capable of being a public interviewee if he's going to make it personal. He proved the biggest cry baby in the whole interview for 20 mins ranting about how alex is a terrible person. So adult of him and definitely not childish eh?

Perhaps a bad strategy for entertainment value from Alex, but he asked the same question several times because Hitchens *never answered it* and he wasn't letting him off the hook. I'll take that level of scrutiny from an interviewer and have a boring podcast over placating terrible arguments any day. Best example of what I'm talking about is Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson. That podcast was mind numbing, but I understand so much more about those two people for having listened to it.

@@Rave.- it's not true that Hitchens didn't answer. He even repeated the same answers twice. We might not be satisfied with those answers but that's not his fault

​@@adampezzuolo5618 First words of the interview from Hitchens "So far. So good'. He couldn't wait to make it known he didn't like this. And then kept giving off weird vibes. Interrupting. Every. Word. To. Stop. You. From. Speaking. He is clearly way too emotional and not in control of himself to be able to debate his points clearly. He made a fool of himself and then tried to play the victim card after verbaly abusing the host. That's just the cherry on top.

Didn't seem like he listened to the actual question regarding alcohol. Alex was very boring, but Peter was an arrogant self-righteous old man.

yep, the arrogance of him to come here and feel vindicated is fckin pathetic also

and boy did it move on

he bored me to fckin tears... I mean imagine thinking these type of drugs are going to be a net good.. it is thick

That's a fair point. Alex is a pedantic bore, but on the other hand, Hitchens should have just told him to move on from an exhausted topic.

I agree. I value his insights greatly, but he seems so bitter and defeatist now that he's become quite hard to listen to. He also sorely lacks his late brother's sense of humour.

Watch his channel. He is respectful and honest.

Agreed, Alex came off like an idiot

@@Animalistic9 yep, it was so fckin boring and Alex views are more cultist than JPs I have noticed - I doubt Chris would even have PH on because PH would destroy him if Chris actually had a viewpoint of his own

😂😂😂😂😂😂