You're Immortal And I Can Prove It 

If your viewport was so big galaxies were as small as atoms too you, I wonder what you would see. I wonder what kind of stuff trillions upon trillions of galaxies could make.

Great comment😆

Thank you.

When I really think about it, quantum intelligence might come across as multiple personality disorder.

That would be trippy asffff

Sorry to hear that man, stay strong

Reincarnation starting to make sense now

Death is what happens when an organic structure ceases to function and decomposes. You still “die”. But that doesn’t mean your consciousness ceases to exist, and with the concept of something like quantum information, there’s at least a scientific pathway that could indicate that consciousness is completely extraplanar to our existence

@@AlphonseJames-FxWorth It's a cool video. I definitely enjoyed it. But it does give people a false sense of hope. Don't loose your objectivity. There's a reason you don't remember being alive before this.

@@johndor7793 It's just science

So that means I am very ancient This is so cool

I’ve been studying a lot of this kind of stuff, I figured that if mycelium is essentially a neural network and we are direct descendants of them (they first appeared 800 million years ago so it’s impossible we’re not.) my theory is that they give us quantum linked consciousness, in that way as long as earth never dies we will continue to live, the best part is this directly supports string theory, if you don’t know what that is look into it, it’s so interesting.

Its true we are made from star dust!

holy fck that fcking awesome

you *were* a star

"We are all made of stardust".

@@Forsakianity For real, your atoms were inside the star and i reffer to the heavy elements!

We have already 42 likes in this comment, please skip to the next one.

The fact that this fact guy keeps giving us facty facts for facts sake makes me factually say thanks fact boi for facting us facts for so many facty fact fact fact facts and in the future i fact for more facty facts hopefully in the name of facts. That’s what you sound like.

ok

@@nmcgunagle roflol

'This guy's' name is Arran Lomas and respectfully, I submit that we should try referring to him by his name rather than just calling him 'this guy', considering the amount of knowledge and entertainment he has provided us with through his scores of videos ✌️🙂☮️

i knew this just your not immortal your consciousness is destroyed because the stuff that made it up isnt there so nothing functions

@@zman91510 the thing is we don’t know what consciousness is

@@epicenterbasshd9636 yeah but still the brain is gone so it would make sense

@@epicenterbasshd9636 oh also heres the definition of consciousness the quality or state of being aware especially of something within oneself

@@zman91510 Oh my bad, I was talking about the hard problem of consciousness, nobody knows what that is. Ed Witten himself said it may remain a mystery forever.

i mean your atoms could turn into a baby after your death, this could be my 10th reincarnation

Okay

@@maven9323 That's true, yet astronomically unlikely. Considering how many atoms there are in the universe and how entropy likes atoms to not continuously be in the same place/formation. (Don't r/woosh me I know that I'm good at ruining jokes you don't need to tell me)

@@maven9323 I think that every single conscious being is just the same mind put into a body unaware when you interact with another mind you are really just talking to yourself getting tricked by the concept of time. You are god and I am god every conscious is you! We are the same mind just experiencing life at different times but at the same time. I hope you understood its hard to explain.

LOL

But acording to the law she should be at least 18 billion years old

Aint no way bro 😂😂💀

13.6 billion

in MY defense your honour she wasnt 12billion years old but she is actually 12 bilion years old

Yes, say we put our head onto a AI

@@le0redd104 the government will still find a way to hack your mind and put your conscientiousness into a regulated simulation just to maintain control

There's a difference between invisible and microscopic.

No not technically, atoms have mass and we're made up of hundreds of millions.

@@ChiTownGuerrilla is there? the definition says seen can’t be seen with eye

Lol

Stop It With The Plot !!

We can call Beerus and Whis!

I would love to me immortal I would love to live forever no matter the cost

@@dragontamor7784 you do. death doesnt exist. this is all a reflection from within.

​@@justamadmax3849 pretty sure the people who died show otherwise

I'm remembering a VSauce video where he poses the question, what if we replace a human being cell by cell. at what point if any would you be considered a new person? There's another theory about information. That the thing that makes a person is not the atoms, but their arrangement. This leads to the black hole information paradox and is what gets smeared over the surface of a black hole as the atoms themselves are lost in a black hole.

@@oracleofdelphi4533 eh, the paradox is no longer a paradox. Steven Hawking radiation man... "Hawking radiation is thermal radiation that is theorized to be released outside a black hole's event horizon because of relativistic quantum effects. It is named after the physicist Stephen Hawking, who developed a theoretical argument for its existence in 1974." Also yes, it is a full blown theory and not a hypothesis.

​@@EC-dz4bq Yes, but it is exactly that, a theory. Until now, there's no proof Hawking was right. I personally have no doubt that he was indeed a genius, but there's still the possibility that he was wrong. I mean, we're talking maths so advanced that many of his colleagues weren't able to follow, as far as I know. But more importantly, a theory is no ultimate truth, especially not if there's no evidence by experiments supporting it yet. It's a *prediction*. But it wouldn't be the first time physics surprise us with something completely new that we don't understand and seemingly doesn't fit our current models.

I think conciousness is just a physical phenomena, thats beeing experienced seperatly between individuals, but essentially is just one unified law of nature/the universe. Now the question here is what is life itself? what does have a conciousness and what not?. I'd argue life/conciousness is a spectrum. Starting from the simplest of organisms up to the most complex ones. the more complex it is the more alive it is. Now what defines "alive". Well pretty simple actually. theres pretty much nothing else in the universe that can act/react based on past events and future predictions than life itself. So anything that is capable of that can be considered alive. Ironically this'd mean we could label a computer, or smartphone also somewhat alive due to them beeing on that spectrum. Just my own theory about that lol. To get conciousness you need 3 things. A past, a future, and reality where it can reside/exist in. Kinda like you need oxygen, wood and a lighter to create fire.

In order to give you life your wavelength must be put into a S curve shape, thats the soul or sol. Think of it like a serpent sine wave coiling through cycles of ups and downs around a zero point trying to reach unity gain or zero or neutral. Changing your S curve (curse) into a N or Z. I'm speaking symbolically but everything is frequency that's why they call us freaks. Consciousness works just like Radio. Signals and Stems.

nah ur wrog dude coz the atoms of u always are alive but the displacement of your body atoms causes ur soul to die but your atoms still stay alive for eons

You are you consciousness

@@Calamitas797 even worse buddy... it defo even more means UR not immortal.. 😂 also you are a MULTICELLUR ORGANISM.. concious or no concious its still ur body.. or rather ur concious BELONGS TO UR BODY.. remember its not about "YOU" its about all the peices that make up YOU.. which includes the concious and sub concious and etc..

you are pure consciousness, everything including what we refer to as death is a reflection of within. stop limiting yourself. we are truly limitless beings.

@@justamadmax3849 what you mean, consciousness cease to exist when brain stops it's activity.

Consciousness is formed at a quantum level and there is evidence reality came after the Conscious mind meaning we actually don't know if "you " are made of particles that break apart when you die

@@kariuki925 To say that "consciousness is formed at a quantum level" is to show you don't know much about consciousness, or quantum mechanics. Everything is "formed" at a quantum level or nothing is formed at a quantum level, depending or your definition of "formed". The evidence for "reality coming after consciousness" doesn't exist. You can't even point to an experiment to show the difference between the two hypotheses. You might be thinking about double slit experiments and the effects of an observer. If this is what you are thinking about you are falling into the common trap that "observer" means something completely different in quantum mechanics as you probably think it means. The observer in quantum mechanics doesn't need to be conscious.

@@BrianBors there is evidence because nothing is objective outside of a concious mind meaning our consciousness creates reality math language color these concepts dont exist in reality because they aren't actually real everything we feel and see is subjective its not objectively real in the sense that without an observer that is consciousness all concepts of reality fall apart into nothing its pretty clear consciousness forms reality the existence of consciousness is proof of that

Is 'you' really the recipe formed of ingredients though? As noted in the video the conscious mind can go in either direction, assuming itself to be essentially material and thus perishable or delving in to unfamiliar territory.

@@BrianBors most creators of quantum mechanics believe the mind is eternal so I'll trust the words of them. Also quantum mechanics isn't close to being understood by anyone anyway.

Nahhh.. dont fall for that BS... you're just a bag of meat and water and you're not "immortal"... you're going to die just like everybody else.

@@birdflipper I will thanks

God's love

Darn !! What too me 30 years of substance abuse too imagine explained in 10 minutes and 59 seconds 😆 Not even funny !!

@@birdflipper TWF is amazing :)

Moby was once wise. Now he just screeches about veganism at people.

@@aneejit9079 he’s still wise , you just stopped agreeing with him you snowflake

@@aneejit9079 very true, it’s a thin line between pragmatism and idealism

We are the Star children.

If you want to try measuring/observing 7000000000000000000000000000 atoms at once hahaha... But you are correct...

its more like your pausing the wavellegnth of the elctron to see where it was at that one time so mabey its more a problem of we are not able to slow down enough to take a better picture?

I was told in physics the Rutherford gold foil experiment was the justification for saying atoms are almost entirely empty.

@@Not-The-Fox Doing a little read-through on that experiment, they were using a radioactive beam to reflect alpha particles when the beam hits mass. This shows that the nucleuses are spread out and the atom is 'mostly empty space'. But, because the beam was reflected by mass, they wouldn't have been able to see the electrons/electron wavelength taking up the space (back to the point where the nucleus holds most of the mass). So, they proved that the mass resides in the center of the atom, but not that it's mostly 'empty space'. More that the space has no mass (well -- extremely small mass in one spot at a time 0.00001%).

@@Not-The-Fox Yeah that's fair to say, but the entire thing with quantum physics is that regular physics is out the window. It's not a play on words, it's literally how believe they function. An electron truly is everywhere, to us, until it's observed at a random single point. And I was saying that all of its mass is in the middle, so when it was measured through the beam, there is the appearance of empty space. Which I suppose is true, but isn't. Quantum physics man.

That's true, it's impossible that any water around the world wasn't processed at one time as waste thru some system.

absolutely love your statement!! i’m almost argh! 77! i loved science, also, and majored in bio and psych in college. i don’t understand physics very well at all. (i do get the electron cloud.) and i know some basic chemistry. like mix an acid H+ and a base OH- and you get water H2O, not a cleaning mixture. keep safe and have a great day 😋🌷🌱

I’ve drank water I’ve created from o2 and hydrogen

As to whether it's pure water depends on how you define pure, the average person does do so not by the number of molecules that are of the substance they call pure, thus it is pure water.

​@@birdflipper heckle fish!!!!! ❤

please not 😂

Oh no

Is thoughy2's name Aaron?

Dreams about wormholes are better than blackholes...

Don't know what a wormhole is, though the thought of floating in millions of particles in space is & was pretty errie to say the least.

Yeah. They could talk, once; or they may well do sometime in the future.

Judging by his accent, I think he might rather be a "chap" instead of a "bud". lol

I feel like I'm being hit in the face watching him.

The first few seconds aye? I see why... Lol

the new animation is kind of excellent

Let me do you a favor here... Stop digging for answers and knowledge, spend your life doing fun shit. You dont want to meet the beast, and you'll just waste your life for the prize of ruining it. And i mean RUIN it.

@@user-jy6ur8gb1c thanks for the advice. Not so sure I am following/agreeing with everything you said, but I appreciate the favor :)

They are OUR atoms. *Russian anthem starts playing*

No. That’s called consciousness kind of like a computer but super advanced and when you die it shuts off leaving you six feet deep under earth. And consciousness is what led to people to create religion and make themselves believe there is a heaven.

This made sense, so I researched it. This is what I found. “Sometimes physicists calculate a velocity that corresponds to the amount of energy in the electron cloud. This approach is beyond my understanding. But I’ve read on-line in a couple of places that if the energy of an electron orbital in a hydrogen atom were translated into velocity, it would travel over 2,200 kilometers a second. At this speed, if the electron were to orbit, which it doesn’t, it would travel around the Earth in a little over 18 seconds. So, an electron orbital has a lot of energy, but it doesn’t have a velocity.” - quantumphysicslady”org”what-is-the-velocity-of-an-electron-within-an-atom (Broke link on purpose, google) I also looked up several statements that all basically say something similar. That is, saying that they don’t normally exist in a ‘fast as light’ manner. Not that they can’t be induced to do so… However at operational speeds. That seems to largely not be the case. Even more so in a vacuum. From the research, it’s not even correct to even think of it as an orbiting thing, but more so an orbital “cloud like’ component. Even so the clouds movement…. “The state of an electron (or electrons) in the atoms isn't an eigenstate of the velocity (or speed) operator, so the speed isn't sharply determined. However, it's very interesting to make an order-of-magnitude estimate of the speed of electrons in the Hydrogen atom (and it's similar for other atoms). The speed 𝑣 v satisfies 𝑚𝑣22∼𝑒24𝜋𝜖0𝑟,𝑚𝑣∼ℏ𝑟 m v 2 2 ∼ e 2 4 π ϵ 0 r , m v ∼ ℏ r The first condition is a virial theorem - the kinetic and potential energies are comparable - while the second is the uncertainty principle. The second one tells you 𝑟∼ℏ/𝑚𝑣 r ∼ ℏ / m v which can be substituted to the first one (elimination of 𝑟 r ) to get (let's ignore 1/2 1 / 2 ) 𝑚𝑣2∼𝑒2⋅𝑚𝑣4𝜋𝜖0ℏ,𝑣∼𝑒24𝜋𝜖0ℏ𝑐𝑐=𝛼𝑐 m v 2 ∼ e 2 ⋅ m v 4 π ϵ 0 ℏ , v ∼ e 2 4 π ϵ 0 ℏ c c = α c so 𝑣/𝑐 v / c , the speed in the units of the speed of light, is equal to the fine-structure constant 𝛼 α , approximately 1/137.036 1 / 137.036 . The smallness of this speed is why the non-relativistic approximation to the Hydrogen atom is so good (although a non relativistic kinetic energy was assumed from the start): the relativistic corrections are suppressed by higher powers of the fine-structure constant! One could discuss how the speed of inner-shell electrons and valence electrons is scaling with 𝑍 Z etc. But the speed 𝑣∼𝛼𝑐 v ∼ α c would still be the key factor in the formula for the speed.” (It probably didn’t format correctly…. physics.stackexchange.questions/20187/how-fast-do-electrons-travel-in-an-atomic-orbital) But basically the speed of such is ‘1/137.036’ the speed of light. Which is still a tremendous speed of course.

The Why Files did a great episode on Math that you'd probably like.

Depends on how you look at it. Our memory probably disappears, which would happen anyway even if we did live forever. However, we have no choice but to exist forever indeed. How? Well, once you die time will pass very fast for you, so fast in fact that your next "coming" will happen in an instant. And there is no reason why nature can't recreate whatever makes you who you are again. It did so once, so the odds of it happening again are higher than the "first" time for sure. So, what happens after you die is that you instantly start experiencing things again, forever.

​@@julius43461 My comment was intended as a joke, but I can only agree with you. That last sentence would be absolutely terrifying if we were to keep our memories each time. I can’t even imagine the boredom we’d experience after a few cycles, it would be a hell of its own at some point, with no way to opt out.

❤Only for fans over 18 year⤵ Alles sehr schön. Aber zuerst zusammen die Nummern 10 und 1. Eine beautyzone.Cam Brünette und eine andere Blondine. Es wäre unfair, wenn ich 4 wählen würde.

In a way yes. However your human form has only existed for 50+ years. Therefore you as a human haven’t always been here and when you die you will never exist again.

We're all afraid to leave here but we were once not here

We are literally eternal

Stop it. They just made a movie about Thor's hammer in space lol.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Me tooooo I always thinks it sound like he say, "42 here" lol.

Actually he is saying it, it's a reference to The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy. He said it himself in RIF Podcast(RIP).

@@himanshugirigoswami4573 I use 42 whenever someone asks a question I don't think they can handle or understand.

At this point he did this on purpose

Just like some Greek geek once thought that there must be some "smallest piece of matter" and called it ... , there must be a smallest piece of space as well represented by ... "smallest pieces of atom"...

You did write this poem?

ChatGPT

So where did Stardust come from? He was close but not close enough.

@𝙟𝙚𝙣𝙮 9 tf?

@@musachohan6898 spam bot. I wouldn;t click on the link if I were you

@𝙟𝙚𝙣𝙮 9 phishing scam. Don't click the link.

🤣

😆

@The Rotten💯 First tell me did you mean that in a positive or negative way? Edit: If you meant that how I think you did, then yes, those ideals are very very bad. Several million homeless people in USA, capitalism, Israel's Ge - no - ci - de of Palestinians, globalism, human rights violations with forced vaccinations for a plandemic, and so on. A "democracy" where incels like most and ultra-right wingers like him are against ABORTION rights... And so on. When soldiers of your "chosen people" shoot and kill Palestinian children playing ball across the border, do you tell me that is democracy or do you tell me that is How to be a Zionist. When NATO starts invading Russian integrity and provokes the start of the Special Operation of self Defense, you tell me that's a "war"? That are very very bad ideals indeed your 1st world countries like America and (today's modern) Europe (s - c - u -m) have.

@The Rotten💯 I got to know it from various things he said "in between the lines" in a lot of his videos. I've been watching his content since at least a year and a half ago. Edit: And by the way: 1.) He is British. - That means that he and I(+all my friends incl. those from Argentina and Romania) indeed have a vastly different standpoind about history and our ancestors. 2. (I think) He's a British nationalist, not a patriot.

@The Rotten💯 I think it's possible you didn't see the additional text in my first reply, since the notification window sometimes doesn't show Edit.