"You've asked me twice, I don't think it's a penalty" 🔎😬 | Ref Watch ANALYSE Forest penalty claims 

megamind lmao 💀

Literally did for the final decision

😂😂😂😂😂😂

It's sponsored by pgmol

You obviously didn't see him disagree with the 3rd one? Just another sheep saying the same crap about him

Sky Sports not even hiding their corruption at this point.

Its a ego back slapping exercise for VAR so they probably wont

😂 they should call it var excuses show😂

It's so badly done the whole show

The rules are the way the are so the refs can call it how they like

​@@Tom-im5xenot true

95% think all the decisions are 50/50. Prob one pen out of the 3.

I'm an Everton fan and even I agree that all 3 are penalties. VAR in the prem is a shambles, no consistency, always making excuses. It's favoured us this week massively (not complaining) but next week it could go against us

I think Betting Companies are behind this and they were bet on Everton.

The only truly debatable one is the handball and proximity saves Young in that case. Those pens have been given but glad it wasn't given with the distance away

Yep and even more with Nottingham in general after what their council did 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

He was a ref for how long? He was involved in match fixing for a decade and is a disciple of the PGMOL. Skysports and the refs are partners.

we all know ref had his money on Everton

He's not wrong though; first one not enough contact for a foul, the handball is very borderline (the issue is more inconsistency with handballs) and the last one was a stonewall pen

@@jimjogger306just ask the dermot fella to run with the ball and kick through the back of his leg with that force… he will change his mind on the first one

@@williamhobbs4202 1. "First one not enough contact for a foul" - I agree it's light but they've literally been given this season and if the ref on the pitch gave it there's no chance it would be overturned. 2. "the handball is very borderline (the issue is more inconsistency with handballs)" - I agree but it shouldn't be borderline if they just tell us what they want a handball to be. It seems like for significant portions of this season it's any contact with the hand or arm if its "away from the body" (Very technical description) is a penalty but then they occasionally say stuff like "not enough for me" or "it's very close". They are responsible for this and the PGMOL are the only ones who can fix it yet they don't seem to care 1 bit. 3. "Last one was a stonewall pen" - Agreed. I'm a Villa fan so I really don't care but it's just wrong and the fact that the PGMOL can be so incompetent and there won't be any repercussions makes me feel sick.

Not the handball

Which one?​@@mi-di2jy

@@mi-di2jyit has been given many many times mate… why is this any different?

Forest fan. Hope we both stay up. Tbf if the handballs given against you you’d be gutted it is close. But if it’s haaland getting kicked through the officials on the day are giving it and dermots sucking them off for how good the decision is. The league is corrupt. Have to say I know Everton, Burnley wolves have had some shockers as well. But with Forest it’s genuinely been every game since November apart from one where these things have happened. And that is a bit of a joke. Seems like they’re out for the owner tbh. Granted we give soft goals away every game and the money hasn’t been spent well. But if your having game changing decisions every game very blatantly go against you I can understand why the club is saying g corruption. Also a technical point at the city ground there’s not enough cameras for the offsides. And no cameras on the Clough stand side for checking handballs or penalty claims on that side. Good luck to Everton lad, club should be in the prem. And by history an Irish team so I hope we’re both staying up.

@@felixfernando2751 if similar ones were given, they shouldn't have been

And he said the third was

Zero

@@unknown1859yea that was the joke 🤦🏻‍♂️

I can't tell you no more he's another one that can't talk will be fired

​@jameshansing5396 yea I got the joke.

😂😂

Quit watching it then

⁠​⁠​⁠@@user-kg9rt3jh1z is that one of Neville, Carragher or Dermot?

@@stefanfernandez7680 no it's not 🤣 the refereeing has been poor this season I agree but what I find more off a disgrace is that forest missed two great chances in wood and Gibbs white also the defending was a disgrace for the two Everton goals, my point is players and officials make mistakes all the time , you just have to get on with it and move on, their is no conspiracy or corruption going on, wrong decisions has been going on all season for alot of teams, if Gibbs white and wood put their chances away and got a result at Everton nobody would be talking about the bad decision made,disgrace is a strong word.

@@user-kg9rt3jh1z but you said to someone to stop watching if they weren’t happy. Like people aren’t allowed to have an opinion? If people don’t speak up no chance of any change. I would prefer for the incompetence and inconsistencies in officiating being fixed rather than defended by the media. Don’t give them the excuse mistakes happen all the time, they shouldn’t - you wouldn’t accept that in any other job. There does need to be accountability

@@stefanfernandez7680 yes people should stop watching if they aren't happy with other people's opinions or they get that frustrated, my son watch the game on Sunday and because the referee didn't make the right decision he swore and called the referee so I've grounded him, it's unacceptable swearing or the calling the referee because off a bad decision like footballers they are human and mistakes will always happen, what var and the officials need to do is try and learn from these mistakes and move forward, but abusing and calling officials is unacceptable when you playing or watching the gsme

Licensing. On the tv they show the whole clip, not on RU-vid.

Didn't he just say the 3rd one should've been given? Quit ya crying

Why are Sky paying him for this though. Everyone is in agreement it’s a pen apart from this little merry band of dweebs (Gallagher, Dean and current refs) it’s truly bizarre.

Everytime I hear the phrase clear and obvious, I want to lose it

@@VaeVictis96 There We Are Then...

@@VaeVictis96 No, he didn't quite say that. He said it could have been. But he kept saying that even if Atwell had been sent to the screen he still might not have given it. I think what people here are detecting is that Dermot approaches these segments with a mindset of trying as hard as he can to justify the referee's decision, and the contortions he often has to perform get there render it a pointless exercise. Can't remember the last one of these where I - or juding by the comments, most other people - came away with an improved understanding of the situations covered.

Yep. I was going to comment something similar. I personally like a higher threshold for a foul/penalty, but changing the rules with 6 weeks left in the season is not on.

@@iancoughlan5I don’t think the rules have changed, I think thats just Dermot trying to justify a reason as to why they weren’t given. Would bet my house on similar incidents happening in the next couple of weeks and they’ll be given. No doubt in my mind

Spot on!

I couldn't agree more

@@FelixGallardo1946 Yeah, you're right there.

Never

*Nonsense.*

Anyone who thinks that ridiculous dive is worthy of penalty needs their head looking at.

@@Bleech606Go watch another sport. Football is clearly not for you.

Exactly.."Referee has the best view"..yet,there is an Everton player blocking his view 😂

Agreed! The first two were definitely not penalty worthy, for the first incident Young makes minimal contact with the Forest lad and he went down far too easily, for the second incident Young's arms were in a natural position as he was running and as he attempted to block the cross, he can't have his arms behind his back, have some sense people! Now the final incident was a stonewall penalty, Young went through the back of him, it was a definite foul! Forest's statement was ridiculous, Atwell is a professional, they shouldn't suggest he was biased and two of he decisions were correct and Atwell wasn't the on field referee!

​@@IronhidePrime_84whilst I get your opinion that the first was not enough for a pen....by current standards of penalties we see given week in week out.... that's a stone wall pen. If you want to start a discussion on penalties being too soft that's fine but that tackle in the box from young would be a pen 98% of the time by standards now and anywhere else it's a free kick.

this is part of being "expert" these days, you are being paid by big corporations to shill for them

I'm sure he said the 3rd one was a definite pen? What you chatting u blirt

@@thusspakemike1204He said the first one was not a pen, forget the 3rd one, Young got a habit of doing that, watch on Wednesday if he gets in that situation again, he is clumsy

Michael oliver top tier y Taylor Webb who else citeeeeee couppet 😎😎😎e

Almost like watching the BBC

Give it a rest both were pens then Coventry were cheated out of the game

@@pusb_87english63when does he say wan bisaka’s handball wasn’t a pen

Wait till you see refereeing in La Liga 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

​@@pusb_87english63yet Grealish's wasn't 🤷

@pusb_87english63 how were they cheated out of the game??

Especially the third one as the referee showed the signs that defender did play the ball, which he didn't? What a nonsense

Need to stop using the phrase “clear and obvious!” And change it to protect my mates!

I feel like they did discuss why VAR did not intervene very well. Probably the only thing right about this 10 minute convo. IMO the real question should be how can they improve the process so it's not so person dependent

Cause it's a Luton fan 😂😂😂😂

It's called corruption

That sums it up

Good for you 😂

As a Derby fan absolutely agree with you.

@@keithc9461 not good for them though

Did you even watch the video? Dermot clearly said the last one's a penalty

@@frankonah8055 OP was talking about the first one.

@@frankonah8055 He meant the first one. That's a pen as well.

@@frankonah8055 yes I watched the video but I think the question is more a case of "Did you even read my comment" as I quite clearly mention the first one where Ashley Young comes through with the tackle from behind...the other two comments quite correctly have already pointed this out and they had no problem in reading and understanding what I said so to quote the legendary film Usual Suspects "it was your mistake..not mine" 😉😂

Normally I would agree that refs tend to lean towards big clubs, but I’m baffled by refereeing the last few years, there isn’t a club 8n the league that can’t put together a compilation of shambolic decisions. The whole system is broke and clearly there is a culture among th PGMOL officials to back their mates

​@@LukeD-Alwayscity can't they only had one delicious gone wrong

@@LukeD-Always 💯

Dermot says the officials did everything right and this takes corruption out of the question 🤔🤔 b💩💩💩💩💩💩 it's about time officials got same punishment as forest will get

He said the third one was a definite penalty you spoon

You mean mental gymnastics.

But I think the panel cast at least for voted for there being a penalty. Maybe you didn't stay till the end

@@kevdaag2523 Yeah I was writing while watching and at the end I heard them give a maybe even tho its definitely a yes, so they get a half mark for that. still a 0.5/10

Every other game has different rules. Insane what City and the Pgmol have done to the integrity of the league

Yup, I did mention the United incident & how it was given against United.

It's all about the final outcome. If forest win the game, the relegation battle becomes less interesting. For Chelsea, it was vs varchester city don't really need to say much more and for Coventry, you can't have a championship team making the final the same week we're cutting games. But yeah it's just inconsistent and not corrupt at all. All these decisions work for 1 thing.. the most profitable outcomes

@@ashwilliams4959according to you Cityphobes we’re a small club, yet we somehow have enough sway to make decisions go our way? Make it make sense please and pick a side.

​@@libby4608 small club, rich owners there u go that's your answer

It was worth going back! 😂😂😂

same thing with PhilFoden nk one was complaining about that.

I didn’t call you boldy boldy

Oh, I assure you he has a clue. He knows what he needs to do to line his pockets.

@@deadby2moro YUP

The bald dude is the epitome of a corporate stooge.

I thought it was 22

no its 5 because they always get it wrong

“Could have been” could…. Quite crucial

@@jameshansing5396 yea “ could” if we are being honest with ourselves and it was any of the top teams it happened to. Surely 1 of them would have been given.

@@phizocyril3489 swings and roundabouts, like everton havent been denied obvious penalties in the last few seasons.

I don't follow Forest but hearing from Huddersfield fans that they owe their Premier League existence to benefiting from two dodgy penalty calls in the play-offs. Moral of the story, you win some, you lose some.

@@joeroberts7298because that justifies more wrong calls 🙄🙄 you people are disgraceful, ruin the sport.

Absolutely...VAR is owned by Sheikh Mansour.

Not against em though😂

​@@happyaslarry5839😂

​@@neilfitzsimmons1800How come City never got 3 penalties against Chelsea in 1:1.

@@finalfrontier001how come graelish didn’t get one but wan bissaka did. Same occurrence same field same box same game scenario

Not at all. All 3 were actually subjective and therefore not clear. Ref was right on all 3.

And it was a straight red card with no apology afterwards, so therefore pgmol think this is stonewall pen and a red card.. unless you aren’t in a title race with city apparently

@@Nunyabusiness40Oh my days, someone’s a little obsessed with Man City 🤦🏼‍♂️

@@bobsocks7575shhh

@@bobsocks7575hes right though isn’t he

@@simonlewis720 Nope

😂

That's how 90 percent of the world works these days

Give varchester city treble part 2

No such thing as sportswashing, made up liberal term that has no value or meaning.

They have brainwashed the nation to think handball is not handball. Its just an accident. His hand was in a natural position so it doesn't count. What a load of fake crap

Go and read the rule book

@@PorthLlwyd yeah, just change the rules and then that makes it OK 👍 are you for real or what?

@@adam.677 the original post said any striking of the arm that stops the ball going into the box is "hand ball 100% no questions". The current rules say otherwise. So yes, I am "for real".

@@PorthLlwyd they change the rules every year guy, sometimes in the middle of the season. So then some pathetic idiot like you can go "REaD the rULeS... its in thE ruLe bOOk" you are the perfect example of a brainwashed fool. Well done👍

Could not agree more , thank you !

You sound extremely dim.

@@JamesHussain82 he stated truth, after fans backlash they need to shill even harder

@@WRNWRW no he didn't. Two of the three "puppets" said 2 of the 3 were pens. And the other "puppet" said 1 was and the others weren't. The handball isn't a nailed on penalty.

They're a disgrace* lmao. I'm sure he said the 3rd was a definite pen?

@@JamesHussain82you are dense 😂

If he had given all 3 it wouldn't even be a discussion because they were clear penalties.

Exactly he would definitely had said it was.

The grealish one was terrible. 10 yards between grealish and the ball, and it wasn't exactly hammered at him. Why that one wasn't given is unfathomable.