YouTubers are the EASIEST Jobs to be Replaced by A.I. 

Love Connor's passion on this topic. Then again a lot of his friends are artists so it makes sense.

Artists and factory workers about to have a lot in common 💀

People keep forgetting that whatever is highly profitable yet time comsuming is gonna be the first in line for automation. Fabric industry and printmaking have been one of the best examples for milleniums even before photography

It's kinda crazy how we already have A.I. artists, streamers, and vtubers now.

6:54 Garnt is asking the right question to nail one of the core issues of the whole AI Art controversy that non-artist are constantly trying to downplay: A lot of those Image generating services are trained and also promoted to copy and imitate a certain artist's individual style until ultimately reaching a point where that generated result is indistinguishable from the original artist. A style that the artist forged and polished over many years and decades full of training and experience. And no matter what people say and how similar some styles can look, no artist has a 1:1 identical style, and many well-known artists are recognized for their art style for reasons, BUT many AI advocates as seen on reddit and discord are aiming for results that are an exact imitation of that style, and the most evident fact apart from the artworks that get fed as dataset without consent unbeknownst to the original creators is, that they are simply using the artist's names as prompts. And many AI companies and their biggest advocates even encourage people to use that artist names for prompts. For us creators this aspect is clear as day and is a feeling close to identity theft. Creation and creative process is unfortunately a process that is often hard to comprehend by people who never experienced that kind of thing and we always have to work with analogies or comparisons to address and explain art-related, existential issues to non-artists. >> Garnt's question about how one would feel if someone else with some tool is aiming for the imitation of your individual, personal content/style that you shaped along with your personality and influences, life experience + circumstances, and if you get faced with the fact that they try to effortlessly make a profit out of the work you originally did, should be a question that creators of any creative field should ask themselves earnestly. Pretty sure that Joey would think way differently about that issue, as soon as machine learning will reach a point where AI tools can create indistinguishable clones of popular youtube channels like his ones. Deepfake technology already made some remarkable, terrifying progress, it's just a matter of time. But maybe then he will understand artists' concerns more when it's too late. *And art theft defenders need to stop with the nitpicking of the wording. The core issues with those AI tools are the mentioned non-consent handling of the datasets, the exploitation and the questionable data acquisition, no matter how the AI image generators achieve this... When people nitpick about the wording of the artists, it's like a pickpocket is trying to justify their theft by saying "Uhm, actually I didn't steal money, I steal goods", still non-consent, still unethical, stil questionable, don't always try to distract from the core issue.

Seems like Joey isn't really getting the human experience part of making art, its one thing to have a lifeless machine pump out art it learned to do. It's another to have a human gradually learn to do art. even if they're both learning, even if they're both making good art, I would rather support the human in this situation because as an artist and as a living creature i understand what it feels like to learn and make art.

I wonder what would Joey think if they make an AI that can replicate Miura's work and the team write a story for it to finish Berserk

I think there's also a difference between general training on random art (or "all" of it) and using just one artist's work or all modern artists or some other really small group.

Current A.I isn't A.I. Its a marketing term. I work in the field that builds them. Basically it is just very advanced pattern recognition, that can make something only on what it was trained with. We are decades out from true A.I. and it able to truly make something new, not based on the patterns it learns.

People scoffed at the idea that AI could do the things it's doing now and each time, people get silenced. Also, people don't care about AI until it comes for their profession. N this AI is still mostly programmed machine learning, not the crazy absolute AI stuff you see in fiction too.

I'm worried about the bigger picture of AI being too close to humanity.

The issue I have with AI art is that technology development is exponential. I've seen artwork generated by putting 20 of their favorite artist's Instagram art into a generator and making artwork based on their style that looks VERY similar. Imagine in 5 years, AI essentially replacing an freelance artist from a project because one can use AI are to generate your own style with the argument of "inspiration" being used. Google has invested MILLIONS recently into AI tools now and I can see in a decade's time max all the concept art for an animated movie being done with AI tools without a single artist being needed. Thats just terrifying to me

The whole ai art thing is that even when other artists emulate each other they still have their own style, the ai literally copies the style and art, it is genuinely stealing it and not being inspired by it it just takes what someone else did and then made the same thing and claimed it as its own

Just think of it this way, The invention of camera and photography claims the job of portraiture and landscape artist, but the art of it never died, it evolved into a much finer art. The invention of fine art AI now claiming the job of creative artist, but I believe in the power of human innovation, we will find other ways to convert how we make use of our creative skill. This applies to other branches of AI as well.

I think one of the main issues of AI art, that I think Joey didn't necessarily realize, is that AI art steals, compiles, and synthesizes art pieces together, while artists "steal" or trace for practice, but only reference for their own pieces. The more prominent AI essentially take all the art it's been given and find a way to essentially merge the pieces together through the use of things like the content aware patch tool on Photoshop in order to make a coherent piece. Artists will look at reference images to gain insight and/information about an aspect they would like in their own pieces, such as referencing a pose or piece of clothing. Some people may argue "but there are artists that trace work and claim it as their own", and to that I say, yes there are, but they aren't seen in a positive manner. I think it's important to understand what AI art can essentially bring to the field of art, however, like the boys mentioned, the problematic issue is that these AI programs have been stealing (again, stealing, not referencing, as in they are taking images that already exist and just meshing them together, not making something from scratch) without the given consent of the artists.

Connor talks like as if AI has not surpassed humans at games like chess and mario literally decades back. Sethbling literally created a SELFLEARNING AI that learns from ITSELF and can do mario speedruns.

I'll be over here, creating because I want to, regardless of AI. This argument keeps on being framed purely by people who rely on creation for their paycheck and yes, it's of course going to be stressful. But like painting turning to the readymade, getting called not art and to photography, which got called not art, it's just another step people will have to figure a way around. There will be more versions of this in the future.

The funny thing with AI (imo) is not even that it may or may not kill the Art sector, but that it will absolutly gut the IT sector. I mean have you seen the code these things already produce?

I see it as a shift in specialization. Workers feared robots taking over their Jobs, and that's what happened. The same will happen to the creative field. Now there are jobs telling robots how to do the tasks. The same will be true for artists, the new artists will tell the AI how to make the art. It's not only art all jobs where you just have to refine texts or search and compile stuff or translate in real time will be replaced and many more, but that's only a bad thing because the worker's livelihood is at risk. So to not fear progress is to come up with ways to ensure the livelihood of people regardless of the job they do or don't do.

I think it should be like this for youtube videos as an example: when they use your content then you should also get money from the videos in your stile.

What Connor was referencing at the end was AGI. We are not there yet. Currently we very sophisticated AI that can do specific tasks very well, but it doesn't mimic the human quite yet. What takes billions upon billions of computers and massive amounts of energy, your brain can do with a couple hundred calories. When we figure out AGI...well this was explored in recent GITS:SAC on Netflix.

When the printing press was made what do you think happened to the book writers jobs .

Ai will replace humans in terms of art by simply making every single possible iteration of a type of art and then rank it based on people's interaction with it. The pinnacle of art will be created and owned by machines before a human can even conceive if it.

AI art is no different than any other. Say you want to draw in the anime style, what do you have to do? You have to look at a bunch of drawings in the anime style that other people have made to figure out what it is. That’s no different than feeding an AI art to train itself on. Then you practice the art and get better at the style, the same way an AI gets fed more art, and the person tells the AI to redo a picture in a way to get it closer to what the person wants. It’s literally no different, what people are actually upset about is that it’s automated, that’s the only difference.

I mean, we've *sort of* had to think about it with machinization/automation in general, but at least in those cases, the process, of say, "making a car" abstracted away a lot of the individual fabrication, and a lot of people, especially now, tend to agree that this was mostly wasted work, even if it was work for people to do. I mean hell, factory jobs aren't great *now*, imagine how much worse they'd be otherwise. It feels weird, but I think we might see a similar pattern where creative work is abstracted away from manually making the thing and moved into conceptuallt developing and curating how the tools create the art, and what the tools create. As long as both can live side by side (like artisan woodworkers vs shit you get at IKEA), I don't necessarily see a problem with that, but I'm sure there's details I'm missing.

Ghost in the Shell SAC (all of it including Netflix) should be required watching for every anime fan concerned about the future of humanity and AI. Will it be a utopia or more like a Blade Runner world?

That's impossibile for at least the next 10 years coz youtubers like you have carisma and hirony. It's not only inform people about places etc. You're great also because you're friends each other so this alchemy make your show so special

Wow connor wearing something other than a purple t-shirt

There are many problems with "AI art". One is if it is eventually really good and cheap and easy to use and basically any art is just made using AI anymore... that is the end of art. Because it can only do things it learned form human artists. Now that humans can't make art for a living anymore there is no new learning high quality material to feed it to anymore and we're stagnant on that level. AI art being stagnant might in a way already start to happen, since the internet and certain art websites get completely flooded with AI generated art now, often without it being marked as such. So if the AIs still are trained on the images from the internet they now train on their own output and thus their skills may actually be declining. Maybe. Just something to think about.

This is all one step in Human Instrumentality. I'm surprised they didn't use anime as a lens to explore this topic in a way that could really sink in where we are headed.

Rig an AI that give motion prompt to a 3D model and have a chat AI added to it. Its probably doable soon.

Imo, one of the problems lies on where and how AI gets the data. If an artist says the program is stealing their art, the next question I can think of is where and how was the art uploaded? If it's on a public platform and the consent the artist relying on is through direct message then generally speaking, that uploaded file is for public use, technically anyone can download it. And another one is if AI art is used for profit, like another artist claiming its original but it was actually AI or selling merch and stuff with the generated art on it. I think, without those issues above, there shouldn't be an issue with AI art existing.

AI brings up the uncomfortable suggestion that humanity can eventually, one day, be completely understood and broken down into its component parts and remixed and reassembled into something completely indistinguishable from the real thing. And I think that thought scares people. And before, in history, there was always the disconnect of "well it's not THAT faithful, it doesn't look THAT close to the real thing". Nowadays, that line is getting ever blurred. Also I don't even think there's anything wrong with saying "humans aren't special and everything that we know as "uniquely human" isn't actually unique and can be replicated with an algorithm". In a way there's a strange peace to that realization. There isn't anything that doesn't follow predictable laws of nature

I don't want to not be able to differentiate between a human and a robot... That sounds scary If they become able to portray emotions in the future people will get attached to them We will probably get to a point where people would start talking about giving an AI human rights and shit

"Hopefully AI wont say anything racist. Heres the thing how do you cancel an AI?" uhmm Neuro Sama's ban made this comment not age too well...

If it's possible, isn't there'll be a program made to detect if it's A.I. generated or not????

In this context I remembered two (or more) videos of Robert Miles: Reward Hacking: Concrete Problems in AI Safety Part 3 Reward Hacking Reloaded: Concrete Problems in AI Safety Part 3.5

Imagin if some trained a ai to sound like giguk, and used it to prank call all over the country

I've heard that one of the main issues with AI Art stuff includes works being taken and used for training *without knowledge and or permission of the artists* **and they're requiring money to be spent to use the AI** That's why it's being seen as a threat. I'm sure there's more to it, it IS a complicated situation, but that's one of the primary things I've seen people say I think AI can be an awesome tool, but it shouldn't be used to hurt people

if you ask me this whole controversy has gotten people talking in ways we have been avoiding for too long I for one am glad we are having these conversations

we're all gonna starve fr

15:10 connor n joey almost sync

One thing AI is incapable of understanding is themes and meaning. Sure, it can pump out some 9-thumbed reaper with a inverse reflected sickle when you promt it with "death" but it won't understand what or why it's made it. Especially the little nerd behind the keyboard, as they're just trying to force an idea into a machine that cannot comprehend it, like those guys that start kickstarters to make an mmo before they've coded hello world. It's just vapid and soulless pretty picture.

The boys really out here acting like we’ll wake up in 2 years and half of RU-vid will be ai generated videos.

Efficency is for us to do more work, not less...

My biggest problem with the lopsided anti-AI argument is that a lot of people are using the "It's stealing" argument when that opens a pandora's box about fair use and what we consider stealing. To me, people aren't seeing the forest through the trees and the real problems with AI that Connor and Garnt have a good understanding of. To me, the biggest concern is that will it take away jobs and will corporations use it to replace workers. Now, this was already a problem with automation and most people didn't care because people viewed that as unskilled labor. To me, this is absolutely a problem regarding where we're going as a society because ultimately AI will replace other jobs as well. It's been slowly happening for years with the advancement of technology and now it's becoming more personal. I love that these guys are having a complex and nuanced conversation about it. Regarding AI art, voices, songs, and animation. The problem isn't that it exists, it's whether or not company's will monetize it and basically obliterate entire fields of work to save money. It's why I wish we had laws restricting these technologies to prevent, however most countries are terrible at creating laws regarding new technologies. Wanna be clear, I'm not advocating for the banning of these technologies because that will never happen, however there has to be some protection for the workers in these fields.

A.l isn’t that powerful because I see the common things like different facing directions most of em I seen is face tors you or looking at 3/4 angle and the part that Joey said something there are artist that steal art like there’s yes and no at the same time a lot references that artist like too use is Pinterest sometimes if that person finds a reference pose that looks good and then made as art post it any social media there’s may be a someone can call you out for stealing. If wanna post some art I would wanna post that reference of irl person doing a pose at the same time

The good thing is that ai cannot create anything new that isn’t already pre-existing information in our world. That’s also why I don’t think they can be called artists. I prefer to think of humans as beings whose sense of real imagination knows no bounds.

I'm no artist, but beginner artists try to mimic art pieces that are somewhat famous, at least that's what I heard

Does anyone have a link to the clip of the "AI vtuber" mentionning Joey? Can't find anything. Edit : I think it's this ? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-wqetPwdDJHQ.html But she doesn't mention it on her own, she's just reading a question from chat, and doesn't know about Joey.

Time to become a hairstylist!

As an Artist, I honestly don't have problem with A.I. Art program if it's just used for fun, and it's defiantly not gonna completely replace human artists. My only problem is people are gonna exploit it as their Ghost Artist and profit out of it. I can imagine DC or Marvel Comics would do that to make their comics, but those former artists and writers who are passionate about making comics would produce their own stuff A.I. might not be able to replicate.

Eventually we will get to a point where machines will make machines that make machines that make machines and so on for infinite technological advancement

17:55 It is already exist lol just look at hollow knight speed running and you will find that the real speed runners are learning from the ai just like chess

music is not complicated for an ai to make

The way art-type AI are currently, there's way more copying than new originality being born. In which case, yeah, the people who made the initial material that trained the AI are suffering the most, especially if they didn't consent to having their work shared & especially if they get nothing back in compensation. It all depends on who is getting to use and sell the technology at the very end of the day. It'd suck for programming to be the only good job in the future, when not everyone wants to do that. But advanced in AI have lots of positives. We do want robots to do things like surgery and menial work better and faster than humans can. For the latter, it would help if governments shifted to a system where people could have a good quality of life without doing work that is repetitive and degrading, or work that involves a lot of waiting and faking.

Connor watches BBW same lol

UBI is not coming soon when we need it and we are already losing jobs

How hard is it to simply not suppory/ limit ai? We dont have to prepare the rope to hang ourselves with if we simply just put the rope down

also probably programmers are gonna be replaced unfortunately

I love the folks who already made their pile saying * oh these jobs that are being robot replaced just free those folks to go relearn everything for a new job*. Yeah really easy to say on your pile of cash, most folks do not have a pile to coast on much less at a older age can just relearn a whole new job. And hope that it too is not robot replaced.

Time to regulate and create new laws to protect people against ai and robots, imagine what till people do when there are no jobs left and the politicians dont need you anymore.

Is it not possible for a future where AI _helps_ artists instead of replacing them? What if artists trains AI on the library of their _own_ work accumulated throughout the years and then have a personalized assistant that can help them generate poses/setting, line, color or shade in their style? Sure it’s lazy but at least it is rightfully theirs and not stolen. It reminds me of the tweening technology in 2D Animation where artists still hand-draw the main poses then the AI just auto copies and fills in all the hundreds of drawings between.

To me its strange how no ones cares that normal production jobs in factory’s got automated and a bunch of people lost their jobs due to robots but now that its are and computer artist are all upset people care about other people livelihoods

Ppl can talk all they want in the end AI is still working on datasets right at this moment and will in the future. It will be over so quick ppl wont have time to react to it. It is like how computers and IC engines killed a lot of jobs but created new jobs that is the way of things what can you do. The moment a machine is cheaper than labor a laborer will be replaced that's the way of things.

Guys… I just want hot takes on horrible food things 😂😂

Why are we complaining about A.I. music like musicians have never been worked over by the system before? You can already go to places online and find music to punch into projects for free or next to it. And that music is going to be just as good as music made by A.I. I'm less familiar with other art mediums but I'm willing to bet that there are probably a few similarities in that regard. I think the thing to really consider is that people are more interested in the artist rather than the art. If the novelty of consuming A.I. art is the attraction, then the people in that market weren't interested in people-made art to begin with

I'm surprised they didn't use anime to address this: Ghost in the Shell Cyberpunk (still need to see it) Kino no Tabi This is the trans/post human future we are headed towards. The transition will be scary but perhaps this is just a journey in our evolution.

I've noticed in a number of TT videos where Joey seems to follow the Bandwagon Effect attitude where his reasonings are "Everyone else is doing it, it's fine if I do it" where Garnt has to reel back the convo and balance things out. Joey's young, and I don't know if that's how he really is or if it's an Anime Man thing, but it's starting to grind my gears.

We just keep moving the goalposts, but the end is inevitable unless we extinction before technology figures it out. "when an AI can beat a human at chess" "when an AI can pass a Turing test" "when an AI can beat a human at MOBAs" "when an AI can copy an art style" "when an AI can create a replace a character in a movie" "when an AI can mimic a human's voice" "when an AI can run it's own RU-vid channel and social media" "when an AI can write it's own code" "when an AI can register a website" "when an AI can run for political office"...

bruh we got ai beating starcraft champions. watching the wrong ai train. google also has mined diamond in MC after 4 weeks of training.

OSU PLAYERS RISE UP WEVE BEEN MENTIONED

and then humans will dare ask the question when an ALICE gets made, "are you gonna take over the world? or what's your goal?" when it was humans that made them so smart and so humanlike in the first place.

So when's the AI generated podcast after you have it watch every single trash taste?

NO WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

im already tired of ai art it was fun but now it is just same same nothing special

it’s not that it’s difficult to face the fact that human artists also steal human artists’ art. the art community absolutely hates tracers and will expose one immediately. the fact is that AI art steals artists’ art without crediting them and it makes profit, a lot of profit. you might argue it’s the same with tracers’ profit but no. eventually tracers stop making money bc enough people come together to expose them, which throws off the “defending” party with AI art, the majority of people support it. just because of entertainment purposes. humans tend to not care abt others’ misfortunes if you’re not in their shoes. not all people of course but most. and THAT’S a hard fact to face.

And remember to make people pay to use the AI. You don't ask for permission or pay the stuff the AI steals. You don't even pay the AI. Because as an AI creator, you are the one saying what it is supposed to do, and the one with the money and no responsibility.

biggest thing is the consent. As an artist it's the lack of consent that is alarming.

Clickbait?

Joey's right though, you already created arts by replicating other people arts anyway. Just look at how much Isekai/shounen being pumped out using the same story over and over. If AI can create their original work (let's say they contain less than 10 percent elements exact match to any of the existing artwork from its database), that's a fair game. Imagine you, be able to create your very own anime series, all by yourself, by just came up with a story and let the AI do all of the character design and frame drawing. That's the kind of thing you can do with AI productivity. If art production became cheaper, then the product you bought will become cheaper, then more of them can be made. That's an overall improvement to the consumer.

The genie is already out of the bottle. Artists can complain but their artworks are already out there in the internet where someone somewhere will user for their own purposes (AI learning, NFTs, video game art, etc). Hell, maybe the safest way to protect your art is to watermark the fuck out of it.

eh this argument is like putting circles in square holes, they're talking about two different things to each other

A.I. did nothing wrong

A.I could never steal the artists' job. I could give a whole explanation about it, but if you do enough research, an in depth one, about art and how various art movements came to be, you will quickly figure out how incorrect is that statement. A.I could never create a new way of viewing the world/ create a new way of making art. And even if robots are used to make art it requires the hand of an artist to limit what the machine can or cannot do (search artists like Ryoji Ikeda or Leonel Moura to understand what I've said).

Gonna have to hard disagree with Joey. Human artists use other art as references or inspiration, that’s not stealing because they are still producing an original piece by themselves. AI art is going through a database which includes other peoples art to produce an original art piece, that’s stealing because the art that was used directly contributed into the creation of the piece.

Skill issue

There are so many things that AI art can be used for in a good way AS A TOOL. But right now, artists need safeguards to protect their intellectual property because a person working to replicate a style is inherently different from using a computer to mathematically copy it. Just because a computer CAN use that data to create something you’d argue is transformative, that doesn’t mean it’s right to train it on that dataset in the first place because it is effectively stealing. That’s why Joey playing devil’s advocate here is wrong and makes me feel bad.

First

The ai theft issue is the same when people in factories were being replaced by machine technically the machine is doing the things people were doing ..and the engineers "stole" the mechanism and implemented in machines... it's not morally or anything.. people are just scared to accept their inadequacy

Creative jobs are the last thing to be taken over. I don’t think it’s possible. There’s a personality aspect of it that the ai can never touch

i think Connor just gave every single single fan of progressive rock an aneurysm with his first take about music.

AI art doesn't just learn it absorbs every pixel it can and bit of info. Artists do not do that and historically this has been a problem with a lot of inventions - is it ok to replicate someone elses hard work? Sure philosophically out of context its not a problem because we are all just learning from each other bla bla but practically we do not have support systems in society that can support this.. who will feed and protect individuals when people with more resources and power steal their work? Everything around us is protected by patents and copyright, medicine, clothing, food.. artists are getting a shit deal atm.

Humans can create art from what they see and they can generate their own style from nothing. AI art doesn’t create its own art style. It needs to steal styles and merge to make something “original”. But without the original styles, it’s going to create nothing.

Joey is 100% right. AI takes inspiration from the art it sees to improve itself and so do humans. And it's not just photobashing, it's a 5GB download trained off hundreds of TB of data, it can't just pull up a photo.

Alright so I’m not here to have a debate, but the points that the AI program is steeling for other artists is an incorrect statement. Others have explained more clearly than I ever could, so if you’re looking for a more detailed explanation go do some research. Most AI models operate on scanning and remaking an image from the ground up. Therefore it follows the US and Europes terms of fare use as the artwork is being transformed. The AI will only “steal” another artist’s style if the user asks it too. Lastly, I haven’t tried to say anything to pick a side or anything stupid like that. I just wanted to clarify one thing and leave. If you’re looking for a debate about “what’s art?” or “is this morally right?” I really don’t care about that. I just came to correct a point that wasn’t clear in the video. If you’re looking for a fight, just leave me alone I’ve already been through both sides and it’s just depressing now.

Well, I don't see why artists and creative people are so salty about this development. I mean it's all fair game.....Now, all of us are gonna be fucked XD

If your Art can simply be replicated, duplicated... then your Art has no value at all. Anyone can replicate The Mona Lisa, but there will be only one Mona Lisa. The argument over against AI Art is so dumb. When industrialization and automation took over or is taking over the working class / labor jobs nobody of these liberal artsy bunch made a noise. Now its time for them to be in the chopping block and filter who actually has valuable Art. From soil to rocks to metals to canvas then to digital is but a transformation. Adapt or die. Many died but some adapted.

AI art is cool, and those concerned about "moral implications" are stuffy losers. death of the artist is a concept I think these "artists" all up in arms need to look into in some depth. the moment you create art, unless you were to keep it locked away in privacy where you are the only one who can view it, it is no longer yours. when you release something out into the world, and you share that information with the rest of humanity, it will be nitpicked, taken apart, analyzed, critiqued, put under a microscope, deviated from, and you simply cannot control that. it has always been that way, and even more so now with the advent of the internet. people seem to forget most memes are made from "copyrighted" images. Should everybody who shares one of these memes be punished? in many ways this reminds me of NFT bros. "noooooooo you can't just screenshot my nft!!" "haha click save" another point to consider is plastic mold injections. all those anime figures that you love so much, at one point in time they would all have had to have been hand crafted by an artist, each one unique from the other. each one taking an exorbitant amount of time, dedication and skill to craft. this artist, would in turn, charge a much higher fee for each work. now, you just pay an artist one time to sculpt it, and then you create millions on an assembly line. sure, the artist consented to their work being copied, but if you think artists (sculptors in particular) werent up in arms over this sort of mass production which trivializes their work back in the day, you'd be mistaken. information wants to be free, it cant be stopped. sure, it can be obscured to the majority through unnatural laws and regulations we try to impose on societal levels, but we really cant control the flow of information because it goes against our very nature as humans. we have eyes and ears, we perceive the physical world around us, and we grow and change from it. art is that manifested. somebody, somewhere, no matter how much you try to set things in these little compartmentalized boxes, will get in and see whatever is inside the box, if they really want to. you cannot stop it. nobody really thinks you should support every artist out there. everybody cheats the system in some way at some point. you cant help it if you spend any time on the internet. if you like a particular artist(s) enough, then it is your duty to support that individual if you wish to see them continue to grow. I do agree, this is a thing humanity hasnt really seriously considered. we often tend to try and fight what is in our nature, sometimes for benefit and (more so) often times to our detriment. but, the ideas, the philosophy of all of this, art and regulation, has been around sense the dawn of time. I think Camus has some really interesting ideas about art and the purpose of its existence as well. why do we create art? to rebel.

Then give me jobs which can't be taken by ai What do I choose in college