--- As a boomer, Josh, I must say that I agree with you 100%. --- it is about time that candidates for employment start treating companies the way companies treat candidates and employees. --- Most companies think nothing about firing or "laying off" an employee without giving a REAL reason except to say that "the company is going in another direction" (when they really AREN'T). However, even before THAT, the loyal employee first finds out about his firing when he arrives at work and realizes that he can't log in to his work account because he has been locked out of the system. --- However, when an employee announces that he will be leaving the company (and even giving the company FOUR weeks notice), suddenly, the employee's manager acts as if the employee has committed a crime. He's not congratulated or given good wishes in his future endeavors. --- However, he is spoken of, in the most unfavorable light, to other employees such that the "Sheep" among the 'employee corral' barely look at or talk to him. *** --- This double standard has got to stop at some point, and I'm glad there are currently workers who have the guts to make this necessary change.
"Your questions shouldn't be only about what you want, but about how you bring value to the company." ? How does that question look like? "I wanna ask if you're okay about me bringing a lot of value to the company?"
Something about talking about review manipulation in glass door then in your sponsorship talking about looking at the reviews on the companies website just feels absolutely hilarious to me lol
My company hires many remote workers... their performance is what matters, excuses are not as valid if we know they have multiple jobs, but get the job done correctly, I do not care what else is going on...
Listen that's the woman's choice. It's a poor one in my opinion, but hers nonetheless. Does it deserve praise? I suppose to the people that benefit from her questionable decision. If she wants to come to work, I believe it would be discrimination not to allow her to work. Her choice is her choice. I will say 100% without a doubt that the risk of infection in a dirty restaurant to the baby is very very high. That is my only concern, she can do whatever she wants with her body. The baby on the other hand doesn't have a choice.
Two days after giving birth, I can tell you the only grit and determination I have is the grit and determination to examine my inner eyelids. If there was such a mother coming in two days after giving birth, she wasn't thinking about her grit. She was thinking about how not to lose her job because she had those two sweet little things to support. It's sad that anyone would ever have to--or want to--go into work with a two-day old. Either way I find it equally sad.
2:13 they offer 52.000/year Is that what you are left at the end, or you pay taxes out of that? because everything above it is just horse manure, nothing relevant. Plus what you must do for that 52k?! Is this an entry level job without any responsability, where you just hang around all day, doing nothing? 52k would fit for a competitive base salary if it requires any work or being put on blast for various things by the bossman, then is not competitive salary
This happened to me when I interviewed at Apple. Made it to a final interview in 2013, but didn’t get it. Tried again and got to a final interview with the same manager as my first interview in 2015. They made me wait over an hour for the manager to show up, but I got the job. Needless to say, hated working there.
It's not that people "don't want to work", it's that bosses like these, in addition to the lousy pay that hasn't kept up with inflation makes getting or keeping a job impossible.
I worked for a company that decided to pull this kind of stuff on its staff on one of their sites. They had a quasi monopoly on the type of product they were manufacturing and despite having this monopoly, they alienated most of their talented employees who left. Problems started to pile up, customers became irate and moved their business away. The site closed down and I'm sure the management learned nothing as their were all rewarded with new positions in the corporate structure. Either way, a complete waste.
4 people understood time=money, the two remaining candidates are good at sitting around doing nothing. Meanwhile this company is going to wonder why none of their employees ever get anything done because they have the time management skills of a potato.
Does anyone believe this actually happened? First of all there would have been over 100 interviewing.... and no one would have stayed, with 3 coming back later to kick his ass.
I'm sorry, it's just SICK to brag about being on your computer by the pool while your kids are swimming. Those kids will remember Dad chose work over them. Cats in the Cradle vibes
If there was such thing as 'enough' .. then there would be no quiet quitters! Quite Quitting was born when the only reward for task completion was more work with no reward!
The big elephant in the room is wages. Most jobs pay terrible wages and expect 5* service !! And if people complain - like I did in my work - you are seen as a troublemaker. I did complain about wages to the CEO and he did not like it one bit .. but, I am glad I had the guts to do that....
