I’m going to be honest here. I use ChatGPT when im planning my sessions.i have an idea and use it to help me but I have done it forever without it. It’s a good tool but I would rather it not replace me as a dm all together.
I was skeeved out by Project Sigil anyway, so this doesn't change my mind anyway. Hopefully consumers will send a strong message by continuing to reject this push toward replacing human creativity with AI.
Hi, I hope not to offend. Does anyone know of a different source of news for D&D on youtube? I have been working really hard to avoid outrage culture on the internet because I don't believe in making people upset on purpose should be monetized. I really appreciate the news and info Dungeons & Discourse gives, I just really don't want to support a channel that equates anything about D&D to Bin Laden. It's unhealthy and too extreme so I'm just looking for another channel at this point. I mean no offense! I think Discourse has a great and fun personality, I just need something with a lot less...aggression that skews super negative.
I have a new idea for how to use AI in playful way. After AI DM, I propose AI players. let's replace the whole thing by AI. and play other games for humans by humans
I'm gonna be the old man yelling at clouds for a second. I would be hesitant to call AI a "tool". Any generative AI, be it image, text, or audio, is built from scraping data (most likely and most commonly unlicensed). It's far to exploitive to be considered a tool in any common term.
update: after sending the request through the app they have asked me to now email them the exact same information just for me to be able to actually request my account to be deleted. I have never seen another service do this let alone make it so annoying to just delete an account.
Heh, if you just tell ChatGPT that it's wrong, it apologizes and agrees with you. Your AI DM will be like, "And the troll rolls a natural 20," and you'll say, "No the dice says it rolled a 4." And your DM will say, "I'm sorry. You're right. The troll rolls a 4 and misses."
Everyone always complains about Hasbro, but very few switch to Paizo. Pretending you care what Hasbro does and making noise, but not abandoning Hasbro is just giving them free advertising. Make a change, otherwise you are just validating hasbro's view that you don't deserve respect.
Excellent video even if a bit long-winded.😉 Like I saw in an earlier comments it's a good thing that we have earlier editions to play or pull information from.
I can see an argument for WotC using machine learning for certain types of play testing. Machine learning can be run locally on a machine and you can feed it data that doesn't syphon the creativity from artists. To use Magic the Gathering as an example, they could set up two bots to do a few thousand matches against one another using either human tailored decks, or allowing the machine to pick its own cards. At first likely at random (just due to how machine learning can be) and then slowly it gets more refined. We've been seeing this in the chess world for decades now, top players using computer analysis to understand where they went wrong and refine strategies, or even analyze their opponents. As well as the computer chess championships, where two bots made by different groups of people go up against one another. Using it to substitute a DM for dnd is a very bad idea, as that is simply just theft. There are many computer based RPGs which give the player plenty of options to work with in terms of dialog, combat, creativity, what have you. Disco Elysium as an example, has more weird dialog options than is likely practical to help sell the atmosphere that the player knows literally nothing. Baldur's Gate (all three of them) has a wide variety of options that is in some way accounted for to make the games more dynamic and interesting. It can and should be done manually, even if it's hard and slow. If they want players to have recurring charges, fine. Why not do a seasonal campaign, every couple of months have a prefab for players to go through. That'd be recurring and help to save WotC's pretty damaged reputation. Idk I'm spitballing here it is way too early in the morning.
Well, we didn’t have AI back in the time of 1E/2E… And the games are just as good now as they were back then. Sure we have nicer maps, more colorful art, ans sparkly dice with the EoS inside… but AI? Nope.
I’m so sick of this channel. Over 3 minutes of sputtering nonsense with nothing but word salad. Can you just get to the f*cking point instead of click baiting with the thumbnail and title?
1. Only humans can generate copyrightable content. 2. Game rules are not copyrightable. If Hasbro keeps pushing this BS, the entire community is going to wake up and realize they don't need them at all, for anything.
I stopped caring a long time ago. Hence, I've stopped playing 5E altogether. For my fantasy games, I now use level up: Advanced 5th Edition. Best decision ive ever made.
How does this shock anyone? Did you think Hasbro just suddenly found redemption after the OGL? When someone openly reveals to you that they are a psycho, at what point do you say, “Hey, your psychotic behavior is okay. Come right into my bedroom and let’s share a sleep space. Hey, do you always sleep with a machete? Oh, well. To each his own.” Are we awake now?!
Mindless Hasbro NPC1: You know how primarily DMs buy our books? What if we replace them with AI? Sane Hasbro NPC2: We would bankrupt ourselves? Insane Hasbro NPC3: We would make billions. Excellent idea! Mindless Hasbro NPC1: And what if we replace D&D with the generic grey goo setting of "current thing"? Sane Hasbro NPC2: That's it, I'm out. Insane Hasbro NPC3: D&D needs more diversity. Which is to say, less D&D! Brilliant, absolutely brilliant!
