Warships, warships and MORE warsheeps! Did you catch that last one? Welcome warships enthusiasts to the home of all things that can fight and sail on the high seas. This channel focuses on the both the history of naval warships as well as naval oriented games. So come and hang with this amazing community and enjoy your time here!
You can follow me on Twitter and like me on Facebook :D
Don't forget to subscribe as I will be releasing videos pretty frequently. Aside from that, if you have any questions or whatever, you can reach me via e-mail at chasegamingtv@gmail.com.
Aside from that, take care and I'll see you all on the high seas (at be prepared to get sunk!)
While i understand that you literally study the physics of ships for a living i am not going to step on your toes for that, But i will kinda explain how i think alot of these more hypothetical ship designs are justified, a huge portion of changes to a ship design are done to fit some kind of gameplay concept and in order to understand why Petro is what it is you have to understand the gameplay loop they want to fit in. Going back to its inception they made a replacement to moskva a much more accurate ship blueprint wise than it so it would fit with the line. Even thought moskva already fit the role of Heavy Cruiser. The thing i was always curious about is how do they justify it internally to them selves, do the gameplay people demand the modelers to make changes or do the modelers make something out of a blueprint with some artistic liberty and then the gameplay guys have to come up with stats for that one ? They havent touched on that process at all it would be interesting to see. Once you start to think of petro as a dumbed down moskva essentially all of the changes start to make sense, the slimed down freeboard is one but the crazy conceal comboed with the radar along with the crazier AP all essentially patched out moskvas weaknesses, now with the only one remaining being the poor turning circle and handling, I think Petro was created out of a need to take out moskva from the techtree as it "didnt fit their vision" of a heavy cruiser line so they needed a ship which was essentially like it but different so they just buffed all its weaknesses. If you apply this thinking as a whole alot of stuff makes more sense as to why they do it, though its never logical as a whole or has any consistency
Hope you are doing well. I recommended you for years to buddies in WoWS it would be cool to see you do a 3 minute video reflecting on wows current state of the game in a nutshell. No gameplay just your opinion. I think a lot of people would bless the algorithm to hear your input as your now a few years out of the game for a lack of better words
Can tell me what is the difference between your Flower class and the Bathurst class built and used by the RAN. One is a museum ship in Brisbane. It was built in Maryborough on the Mary river. Walkers foundaries constructed a number. Looking at specks they seem the same
My grandfather was on this ship when it was hit with the kamikaze and ended up in the water 19hrs with a huge gash in his leg.. men this world will never see again..
Whats the difference between actual bots in tier 3-4 and humanoid bots in tier 9-10. The low tier ones trade 1 for 1. The high tier ones just die in the first two minutes
What about a bulbous bow that retracts and grows like a penis? If the ship is moving slow, bulb short, it the ship go fast, bulbous bow go full angry erect
Cool video. It's sad to see our oldest ship that's now a museum peace is better armed then our latest warships. The Harry Dewolf class, though crew accommodation are much better aboard the new ships compared to the Flower class.
How do you freaking shoot a stationary over 60 degree angle Cruiser with overmatch AP battleship??? the AP battleship shells are always so dispersed when shooting AP at the stationary angled CA.. especially the Germans.
When I first unlocked the pensicola, I got 2 kills in my first game and 4 in my second by accidentally playing like this. The next few hours of sleep deprivation and fatigue lead to a terrible experience (but free premium time got me the New Orleans in the same day) This stuff works way too well
This game is OK but I always match with pros and I have no chance of survival so it’s kind of annoying at the same time like get impossible task half the time
My Father served on the DD-707 USS Soley. A Sumner Class Destroyer. He was the Radar Man, Well, one of... After his service, the ship was at some point modified to a power generator system for some port city.. Many adventures, Suez Canal, during the Egypt/Brit/French kerfuffle.. Eventually sold to Turkey I believe. *From basic memory, I could research for more accuracy but there it is.
I really am sorry, but that side armour bullshit does not help, everytime I've exposed a little of hher side, i get penned or citadelled. I even got citadelled by the Slava hheavy cruiser
i read a lot of books written by Douglas Reeman who served in the Royal Navy during World War II and when he talks about ships being "wet," he wasn't kidding. Especially with exposed bridges. Those were real sailors back then.
My uncle Burton Swiney was lost aboard the USS Drexler DD741, a Sumner class destroyer in action just like this. Two kamikazes hit. The second detonated the aft 5” magazine and ripped the ship in half.
You dudes make me laugh calling a metal ship hull a she..lame.. the fact you just reverberate without considering why you have been coax into calling it a she is questionable.. does a sheep bah... do they all bah back..
The HMS Ark Royal never should have sunk. She sunk not because of her captain or the heroine work of it’s crew. She sunk because she never had gotten a refit. It was said by some that the Ark had more cement in her keel then steel for her fights against the enemy. She sunk because throughout her service life and battle damage, her water tight doors were no longer watertight. Her bulkheads were damaged and bent with popped welds and cracks that were never properly welded tight and the torpedo damage was between a bulkhead. It split her in two across the beam. Then you got the gong show which eliminated two of the three tugs sent out too get her. This was the death blow because they needed three tugs to pull her home. Two might have done it but not one. She was to heavy to move with one tug and at the same time, fight the water currents that was pushing her out of the channel and into the Bay of Biscay. The rest is history, but I blame the Admiralty. It was the same Admiral’s that doomed the “HMS Hood”. It was the same Admiral’s that “DENIED”the HMS Ark Royal the rebuild and not just the refit. Just like the HMS Hood, who died partly because, before the war started, she was desperately needed to show the flag and “NEVER GOT HER REBUILD”, along with the carrier who was needed to badly during the first half of the war so she was never properly rebuilt. They were both sunk in 1941 a couple a months apart. Thank you too the Admiralty.
The armour plate they hit and penitrated was at POINT BLANK RANGE and could not penetrate the armour of the Yamato class armour plate (unless they fire at point blank range or 1000 yd.). By the bye, what’s with the metric systems? The gunnery system was never changed as the original system was more precise then modern computing as of the last upgrade. The Yamato class was not the wieners you believed they were. If the battle was one on one, Iowa needed to run if they were to service. The Scharnhorst class vrs the KJV class , it was not a lucky hit that hit the engine and electrical room of the Scharnhorst. Scharnhorst didn’t even know that KJV Duke of York was even in the area. Look it up and you will find the range was I believe around 11000 yds. KJV Duke of York also had radar which was superior to the USN as it was the RN that actually gave the USN its radar.
I would disagree with your options because the strike of armour that you as well as others that the armour penetration of the front turret armour plate found at truk that was part of the third Yamato class bb was at POINT BLANK RANGE. Therefore, unless a golden bb shot on Yamato from Iowa, Yamato would be victorious if, and I say IF, the Iowa could not escaped.
HMS Rodney trashed her teakwood deck along with the first three decks where all porcelain, mirrors and any other desks, dressers and any other type of furniture, along with 80% of its munitions but she put down the models of my favourite HMS Hood. If they had a bulbous bow upgrade she and her mate would have been the last thing the Bismarck would have ever seen. HMS Nelson might have been able to catch up with Gneisenau instead of just seeing her stern.
