@@justbob1581 if you add more coils you change automatically the impedance. That means that the frequency and other parameters can be changed as well. So It can NOT work properly!!!
@@gsav2504 Do you know of Rick Friedrich? The way I understand it is 1) When you energize a coil, a magnetic field is created. 2) You can duplicate that field to infinity with similarly tuned coils. I have duplicated his experiment myself and that does seem to be the case. I am lighting as many lights as I can, and with a little frequency adjustment here or there, my input stays the same. My lights are 5 watt and about 60-70% brightness. My problem is, I can't figure out how to ramp up the circuit?
@@justbob1581 Yes! I thing it is similar to this experiment. I’am tuning the back EMF to the outer coil to generate impulses, just to demonstrate the cold electricity phenomenon. If you add more similar coils, the energy can be split and you can power other loads. It is the same thing. The power at the output can be achieved up to the 80%. With fine tuning using pulse width adjustments can be more….
@@BrentLeVasseur you can read the hairpin circuit, patent of Nikola Tesla. If you take a look on the oscilloscope, then you may find out, it is about sharp impulses and resonance of higher frequencies.
@@gsav2504 Do the coils need to be wound around cardboard tubes? Or can you use some other material? Would it be possible to power the Mosfet with the cold electricity end, so you don;t need to use a heat sync?
@@gsav2504 I am familiar with Tesla’s hairpin circuit and to my knowledge, it doesn’t generate cold electricity. Also a lot of other inventors have tested high voltage impulse coils, such as Master Ivo with the bifilar coils using mosfets, and they don’t generate cold electricity either. So it must be something else that is causing it to work.
caballero buenas noches, ante todo muchas gracias por compartir sus conocimientos, hice este circuito varias veces y no me da nada, lo he revisado y revisado y nada, podria darme alguna clave, muchas gracias
Thanks for the nice video :) Is there a surplus of energy in the system like a gain, like a over unity thing going on when the receiver LC is turned of? Can you expand on that please :) What is going on? Thanks
@@gsav2504 thanks for the reply :) what if there are more recivers will it create overunity? my experience is that they start working as transmitters aswell.
@@martinetellerandet8566 I did already this experiment. The transfered power is being splinted in two parts (2 receivers) exactly as with wires!!!! It is amazing.
@@variousexperiences6485 Very simple. On a 8mm cylinder wrap 20 turns of 0.5mm magnetic wire. make a tap and turn 6 more turns in the same direction. For the connection, look the circuit diagram!
High voltage + filament vacuum bulb equals x-rays. From all my research my understanding is if you are going to do this be sure that the filament is broken and cannot boil off electrons.
I understand I noticed in the video that the filament was broken. However I thought it important to include this tidbit of information. Well done I really enjoy your videos. Your most recent one on the Tesla transmitter
I like your setup for this. Great idea to use those variable capacitors. I wonder if you could extend the receiving distance. It's a very good demonstration. 👌👍👍👍
Здравствуйте G Sav, Just for understanding, If you make the ground, same at the Receiver and the Transmitter. The distance is not important it can go as high as 15 m or maybe even higher. But you showed us at 09:19 , grounds are different and the distance is just 30 cm. So the main idea is, resonate the frequency and same grounds. Did I understand it correctly sir. Lastly do you have something in your mind to improve the distance without same ground. Большое Спасибо
The Video at 9:19 shows that the transmitter ist already connected with the ground of the house and if the antenna und the ground (wire) of the receiver have the same length , then by approaching we can achieve energy transfer with no wire connection at all.
In this case is like an induction circuit but with a great efficiency. 30cm is with 0.5w. Can you imagine how much more efficient it would be if the power of the transmitter is higher???
@@gsav2504 It would be fascinating to see. But do you think the amount of noise that transmitter created could cause some problem on other receivers like our phone ? Thank you for your answers. I'll be waiting for your new experiments. Have a good day.
Awesome videos on your channels. Thanks for sharing? Really good how you explain it with the schematics. Can you name me the type of your variable capacitor? Thank you.
I don't know anything about electricity. But I can see the wire you call "ground" is connecting both sides of the setup. For me, that makes it seem like it's not wireless, but is just going through the wire? Why not try to connect to the real ground to see if it still works? Otherwise, maybe the power transmission you are experiencing is just going through the cable? Also, how do you get the signal to 16 MHz? What part of the circuit generates this oscillation? Is it just a function of the design of the coils? Are the coils free metal or are they coated with an insulator?
The “ground” can be connected at the part of the transmitter with the same results. It is a real wireless transmission of energy. If you want to use a real ground then you need power.
Super cool!! and too think Tesla was doing this 100 years ago....The powers that be certainly curtailed electrical research for a very long time. keep up the great work...
The spark gap should be in parallel and the capacitor in series, one of the reasons is that it extends the oscillations and increases the economy, furthermore this is meant to be a reactive power producer circuit that occurs from the free oscillations bouncing around in the circuit at its resonant frequency per spark discharge, reactive power cannot be tapped directly since it kills the oscillations so another trick is required. Tesla's tech is meant to go beyond energy, reactive power is where he was headed into and the hairpin circuit is an example of such a device, but tapping it directly is not how it's meant to be used.
@@gsav2504 There are plenty of experiments around which you can see the effects of what I'm talking about, furthermore study the designs in Tesla's Colorado Springs Notes, especially pages 56-58, he states the exact reasons for the design choices and has clear similarities to the hairpin. It's all there for you read, the device is a reactive power oscillator, read Tesla's own words and think about why the circuits are portrayed as they are and what they do. I suggest watching "2018 ESTC Panel Discussion 2 - Energy Science & Technology Conference"
Hi, nice demonstration. I do several own simlar experiments and I'm an electrical engineer. Your measurement should be enhanced zu real and reactive power measurement. Can you please use your oszi with math function. U×I and look. May your oszi has Powermeasurement like on rigol mso series?
Hi! My oscillator doesn’t have this function I think. Match measurement between square pulses of 70% and impulses of several nanoseconds have no meaning. The difference between input and output is 20W according to my experiment. The impulses are more than 400V (peek) and they may destroy the oscilloscope as well, that’s why I use a resistor of 2M.
Subscribed! I like that you're using real resistive loads to test the circuit, I've seen so many bad experiments where they just connect a bunch of LED's and determine the power based on how many LED's light up.
I am using resistive loads. Two incandescent bulbs of 200W each!!! LED Lambs are no problem here. You can light up many of them. It depends of the output. That’s why I adjust the duty cycle a lot.
Nice. Have you made the water test on this setup? Cold electricity should be able to jump the water surface. If it's just regular HV/RF then it should produce hydrogen bubbles.
thanks bro. i liked your video that where u explained it on the schematics for free. You embrace the idea of truly free energy, at least thats how i see it. I salute you!
I believe you can remove CD4093 as you can reverse the TL494 output signal by itself. I did the same thing long ago, I know your point is about the kind of electricity, not the overunity. The main reason for that is due to the very low resistance of the output coil compare to your skin/body. Same phenomenon with the hairpin circuit although you're using solid state and has a bit higher resistance (impedance) coil. Thanks for sharing.
@@gsav2504Why you need 99.9% when you actually need lower than that? When we look at the scopeshot, it's not about 99% duty maybe around 80% or below but the TL494 can go up to 90% or maybe a bit higher.
@@JB-20 for experimental reasons only. It depends also on the frequency you wanna choose. Don’t use it anyway. You will get cold electricity at the output.
