DEPOIS DO 9-11 A MICROSOFTER TIROU A REALIDADE DE ACIDENTES ,POIS ACHARAM MUITO MAL E EM RESPEITO AOS FAMILIARES DAS VITIMAS ,ALEM DE MUITAS PESSOAS ESTAVAM SIMULANDO O DIA DO TERRORISMO .
It speaks volume that 4 years after the release MSFS has almost nothing to offer compared to XP12 except the visuals and that all comparisons avoid to speak about all pros of of XP: easy installation, no mandatory updates, seasons, better replay, fly-by, tower-view, better weather-effects like turbulences in stormy-clouds, true alt density, building up precipitations and melting/evaporating with brake-coefficients simulated accordingly (quite inacurate in MSFS), icing in n the windshield according to the wind-direction, more accurate lightnings (almost non existant in MSFS) better ground handling, better flight dynamics, more intuitive popout-screens, unlimited zoom, more failures, aircraft-modeller allowing to test its own modelled aircraft, a true 3D weather-radar in built coming for next version, an inbuilt map showing the whole weather around, not as much good longhaul-addons etc. Gamers having no clue about aviation will of course only base their opininion on photogrammetry and ground textures lol.
@FULTON OFFICIAL - LOL I'm absolutely gobsmacked at how horrible your MSFS scenery looks in this video. It appears that you used a psychedelic mushrooms shader cranked up to 11! It couldn't look any more unrealistic and over processed! Maybe you're trying to make crappy bland Xplane look better by comparison? My advice is to immediately nuke this video and redo it without the 1960s hallucinogenic treatment! After all, your channel deserves it if you want it to grow.
why is msfs in this video comparison over-saturated. Doesn't look good at all but in general MSFS surpasses X-Plane graphically. WIth all the changes made to the physics very soon that will almost the same
@@FULTONOFFICIALKFV yes, always. In my opinion X Plane had its day when it became 64 bit before the MS based sims. Even against P3D it was decent. But now for me it’s history.
Are you a fan of msfs or what, there are lots of things that xplane does better like collisions, wind, hard landing... and you still put the point for msfs it's big rubbish, your advice are of no use except to denigrate xplane.
about the hard landing one in ms2020 he lands a LOT harder with a bigger negative angle about 17 degrees of difrance in mf2020 he lands at around -17 degree in xplane he lands at around 0 degree or level and in ms2020 he land at 95 knots but in xplane its 70 and also the weather looked pretty different in ms2020 there where clouds and in xplane it was broad daylight
MFS 2020 est un joli GPS mais pas un simulateur d'avion. J'ai malheureusement acheté moi aussi le jeu mais je le regrette, je ne suis que sur DCS depuis
