==================== About the author: Data & AI expert, behavioural economist and Forbes columnist. And yes, a sci-fi writer, too. ====================
📚BOOKS ==================== 1) Fox Theory 2) Scripter - The Dragon Well ====================
Some large banks still use COBOL. Do you think they are just going to AI generate all their existing apps and then fire all the devs lol. They would love to but thats 10 years out at best.
Layoffs are not related with ai. Are related to the degrading economy. There are no projects created exclusively with ai, actually there are no projects at all in the climate of the software business. LLM will not replace programmers, will open opportunities for a different scheme of creating content. My opinion.
There is no difference today between #Nokia and #Tesla. Both have seen their sales collapse under the gun of intense competition. And, after absorbing all of the market's first adopters, neither company can afford to create a product for the next tier of buyers below the "1st adopters." 🦅 5:31
You literally understand zero, try looking at the margins Tesla can make on a EV compared to every other motor manufacturer, they are Apple not Nokia on this analogy .. since when did their sales `collapse` as well?
Great analysis of the Ai angle and how tommorow will decide the future of AI. I would like to augment the breakdown with tesla's optimus robot (an even bigger market than EVS) Robotics is no longer a hardware problem, but a Maschine learning AI problem. and embodied AI is a major milestone in unhobbling AI
OMG, this video (and your view about Elon) is such a big fat L for this channel. IMHO Elon is not an innovator nor a creator. He’s a charlatan best described as a modern era snake oil salesman. 🐍 The jail time he’ll eventually face (for scamming investors) will make SBF and Madoff look like boyscouts. 😅 Here in Finland we still have a big fat target on Stephen Flop’s back, he’ll no we collateral victims of Nokia’s downfall voted to his golden handshake. That man was a disaster not only to Nokia but the whole country (which was overly reliant on Nokia..) I love your videos and hope future ones will be “Musk-free”. And whatever they tomorrow vote on, it’ll have no effect on future of AI. My 2 cents 😇
Neither Elop nor Elon deserve any money, because they both destroyed their companies. But what's worse about Elon Musk is he first built Tesla up with endless false promises that he knew were not true. He got away with it for so long because he was able to pretend to be a technology genius to get investment money from stupid people. He created a cult following of people that believe everything he says without question. Nevermind that his whole career has been an endless string of failures and false promises: Hyperloop. Wasting SpaceX money. Lying about self driving. Cybertruck. Tesla Semi. Earth to earth rocket transport. The Boring Company. Tesla robotics. Buying twitter for way more than it's worth and then naming it X (zero business sense). It goes on and on. It's insane what he's gotten away with for so long. He's basically Elizabeth Holmes. I think a lot of people are now realizing that he's just a conman that has a talent for playing the game of public perception, but he's not going to get away with it for much longer. And he knows this. At least Elop only tried to take $25 million. Elon wants 2000x that. Do you see how insane that is? Elon Musk is cashing out before his house of cards comes crashing down. I hope he doesn't get any more unearned money. Sadly, you seem to be slow to figure this out. You obviously are part of the uncritical cult of Elon Musk. This lowers your credibility in my book. You should do some actual research on what Elon Musk has done so you can see him for the lying conman that he is.
I don't fully agree that this decision will influence AI development substancially. If Elon gets the bonus he will probably use it to pay off debt from his genius Twitter aquisation. Yes Elon has multiplied Tesla's market cap, but the company has definiteely seen better days. The growth is largely attributed to Elon's endless fake promises, fake demos and hype statements. The EV market is pretty much dead now and the future is bleak, since China is already outcompeting Tesla by a large margin...
Somebody else said there are only 4 reasons for shareholders to vote no. 1. They are communists 2. They are virtue signaling communists. 3. The bought shares at 400 and now they are 170. 4. They were a TSLA short just before it 10x'ed
Excellent video. The whole thing is for the Democrats to 'punish' Elon for buying Twitter and opening it up to all sides of the political spectrum. I already voted yes for my few shares.
this is complete nonsense. these people do not understand programming. like you can just describe what you want the code to do. let’s see how many people can do that and logically describe what they want. we can’t even get a user story right
That is true: "The system is designed to transfer wealth from providers of labour to the providers of capital. It is not a bug, it is a feature of the system design. Labour providers are paid much less than providers of capital." 👍
How do human teach/train/program/instruct babies and kids? Through natural language that is no different to prompting. So Jensen is correct programming can be done only by natural language because we already do that from ancient time.
Have you seen the graphic designers' lawsuit against openAI regarding the plagiarism generated by these companies when training their models without paying royalties?
I really like the unique look into insides of AI by Maimonides Scripter. This seriers reminds me of vibe in the book "Inside the Aquarium" by Viktor Suvorov. And its refreshing to find AI hot takes that are neither P(Doom) or e/acc, yet his hopeful "Survival Guide" hints at a P(regime change) ala Loonies in "the Moon is a Harsh Mistress". I personally don't think a force multiplier lagging Lunar OS LLM like "Mike" in the book is feasible, vis a vis the current AI "Iron Law of Oligarchy" and admits the growing national security interest(Aschenbrenner). Unlike most Ai youtubers Scripter has invaluable direct experience and practical insights into AI revolution. My critique is that he focuses to much on Hyperstition and Cliodynamics of AI history, while leaving out for example; the impact and context of Alexey Ivachenko & Vladimir Lapa “Cybernetic Predicting Devices” or even Richard Werner's " Quantity Theory of Credit" on the AI "techno-capital machine". Additionally, he doesn't emphasize enough the consequences of unhobbling AI models and unlocking their latent capabilities on the world order for my taste. But that's probably just me.
I like Jenson Huang a lot, but just because a 10 million people know how to program does not 'leave the other 8 billion behind'. There are also about 10 million doctors in the world, so does that mean the rest of us are 'left behind'? Come on.
@johnmarshall4_ Of course it wasn't a 100% fair statement. Because we indeed can apply this logic to almost any other profession / human and justify its redundancy. To some extent, this argument is similar to "AI will create new jobs, so don't worry. And shut up".
You have a lot of useful stuff but you are spending precious time explaining things everyone already knows, like how important the internet is, you don't have to explain such things in detail for coders. We are looking forward to the survival tips and practical advice!
ok, liked part one. As for this one - too much redundant information. If this is a series for the coders, they don't need to be explained during 10 minutes, who are frontend and backend developers.
7:39 A significant number of those cashiers were compelled to transition into the emotionally draining roles of telemarketing and customer service. In contrast to their previous retail positions, there are no periods of respite when customer traffic is low, allowing for brief breaks. Instead, an automated system meticulously optimizes the volume of calls they handle, ensuring that there is never a moment of pause. While their former jobs were physically demanding, they often provided a sense of fulfillment derived from assisting others. Regrettably, this is no longer the case. Each call has become a challenging endeavor, either to appease a disgruntled customer or to promote a product or service of questionable value. Consequently, they return home feeling exhausted and apprehensive about their upcoming shift. However, it is anticipated that even these jobs, which can be emotionally taxing, will soon be entrusted to tireless machines that never require breaks, succumb to illness, or necessitate coaching to enhance their efficiency.
Excellent content. It's funny how those who don't to accept the ai takeover try to undermine your very valid points. I have been a software engineer for years, and I know my job as I know it is coming to an end. I have already thinking about a completely different career change because my job will not be needed in a few years time. Thank you for telling us the hard truth. Many don't want to accept it, but at some point they will have to whether they like it or not.
Thank you for talking about this topic at such an important time in humanity's history. Only a few people are talking about this topic being unbiased. You are knowledgeable, which is reflected from the content you create. Wonderful! Junior coders: How to use A.I to make coding easier Senior scientists: How to build A.I to replace coding with prompting
@@fernandohiar9985 Humans will have two jobs - either improve A.I to make it answer the question(by prompts or compute or streamlining efficient algos) or solve it by themselves. For now, most mainstream work can be automated which is a disaster for the future as children will need to take loans for higher studies which is another way of saying "If you cannot pay the loans back, you ain't getting your house back"
@@fernandohiar9985 Yes, there is a huge possibility that that may happen. Let me ask you a simple question - I can use CFCs in my A.C to make my room cooler, is there an issue? Now we know that there are downsides, but only after the harm was done :) People do not care about the long term effects if there are immediate benefits. Maths and reasoning fails in this case predictably.
I think you are stack in the past. The future us going to be better than your past. You only have to have your own free energy which is above your house or property. Having free energy and AI you have 1000 employees and you can have everything you want. The only thing you have to consider us the government policies that will allow your to have zero cost energy
Thanks for all the content man, you have a nice perspective to keep tabs on and you were one of the people that further kickstarted my curiousity. A few months ago as a coder I was curious to uncover the possibilities of AI but then I started to realise the real implications of this next step in our evolution. After that I also got back into the cryptocurrency space, as it unsurprisingly turns out AI has also found it's way in the future of the internet. I got deeper and deeper into all of this and did you know the foundation is being laid to tokenize practically everything and put it on the blockchain? I believe all of these advancements will play a crucial role in what's to come and for example to stay in context, this whole subject is basically wealth being transferred and AI and bitcoin together I believe will be the biggest transfer of wealth our society has ever seen. Curious to hear your thoughts on this.
@jensbuekens2543 I agree - AI in conjunction with Bitcoin / independent currencies, will be an absolute game-changer. In the future, we will cover this topic a lot. This will need a lot of research though...
@@Scripter_story Glad you feel like that, I suppose I’m frontrunning you😂 One more point I’d like to share for now is that I believe decentralisation is key. As in for example I know of software companies that don’t use chat-gpt because they want their data protected. Now the whole point with decentralisation is that their data would be theirs alone. Other than that another obvious option is running llm’s locally but that requires a lot of compute and electricity - also a subcategory in the current cryptomarket:)
