The goal of the channel is to share in a first time the 25 episodes of the 1962 interview between Hitchcock and Truffaut.
Now that all the episodes are online, I'll try to upload most of the british era films that are on public domain.
Listening to the interview was a milestone in my love for cinema, and if this channel can bring people to get into movies, explore the wonderful work of both Hichcock and Truffaut, then it'll be a success for the channel.
Français: Le but de cette chaîne est de partager dans un premier temps les 25 épisodes de l'interview de 1962 entre Hitchcock et Truffaut.
Maintenant que les épisodes son tous disponibles, je vais essayer de mettre en ligne une majorité des films de l'ère britannique
Ecoutant cette interview il y a quelques année a été un cap dans mon amour pour le cinéma, et ci cette chaîne arrive à motiver des gens a explorer le magnifique travail de Hitchcock et de Truffaut, alors cette chaîne aura remplie son objectif.
I like Alfred Hitchcock 's various movies that I love to watch over and over again. They 're such intriguing and incessantly inspiring! I like especially: Psycho and The Birds" .
After watching Murder, the film is really underrated in his body of works. Hitchcock's Murder! (1930) | Dolly-Tracking shot: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VtGFSO4Nv9Y.html
I hate to be critical, since this is such a great movie and one of Hitchcock's best films. The beginning premise is built on magical criminals, who the good guys escape from by bus but these special criminals know precisely where this complete stranger lives and on what floor. The wizards have his phone number even though they only know her false name and if they knew his name the phone would be listed under the contract with the owner's name, which is not on the lobby wall. But, but, never mind. The magical criminals know how to come upstairs and kill her, but leave him alone, so they can chase him all over Scotland. The movie begins when Annabelle dies. After that, I don't care. Like me, suspend disbelief for a few minutes, and accept it as part of a great film from a truly great director. There is no logic to the magical escape at the end of N x NW. So what? A great film.
Even though everyone in tbis interview has passed away. The interviewer and Translator need to chill. It takes a Hitchcock a while to articulate what he wants to say and all the talking over eachother is frustrating
They had this film on ABC (that’s Australian Broadcasting Corporation) decades ago with a score I’ve yet to find on here but I only managed to start recording as soon as the intro titles were finished. ABC has NEVER puts silent films on since. I love the titles that refer to the lodger as a “queer fellow.” I know it meant odd then, but nowdays it adds something extra knowing Ivor Novello (actor who played the lodger) was gay. I wish he’d played more complex characters on the silver screen, but I’m glad he did some sound films, & I’ve now heard his voice.
@@myname7056that's really interesting! Similarly, "silent" films almost never receive a broadcast here in the UK, unless it's part of a special season. Some cinemas may occasionally show them with a new or live score from a musician. Novello was such a talent, especially when it came to song writing. To be fair, I've only ever seen him in this and Hitchcock's other silent film with him, "Downhill" but will aim to check out more of his work :)
Ivor Novello is so beautiful in this... I love the tentativeness of his body and how he rarely follows where he leads with his eyes, almost like he doesn't trust its ability to move in the beginning of the movie, and how it sort of warms over the course of the story to where he follows where he leads his eyes. The worst things always happen to him when he seems not to spend an appropriate amount of time visually observing the situation in which he is acting, specifically because of his distraction with Daisy, such as in every instance in which he might appear guilty of murder (ie. picking up the hot poker to tend the fire, leaving the house and reentering, the mouse scene, buying Daisy the dress, etc). Is he an anxious man in love, slowly warming into movement from the kindness and lack of judgement passed by Daisy, or is he a killer? To me, he seems the first and perhaps somewhat, what we might call nowadays, autistic.
Obviously Hitchcock has a problem with Saul Bass. I take this as (almost) proof that Bass must have done the shower sequence. To paraphrase Shakespeare, Hitchcock "protests too much". This takes nothing away from him for he is still the director, meaning he decided what was in and what was out.
This is a rather silly and baseless claim. Everyone except Saul Bass who was involved in this film and has commented on the matter said that Hitchcock, not Saul Bass, directed the shower scene. For instance, Janet Leigh said that Bass was present at the shooting of the scene, but “he never directed” her: “absolutely not.” Assistant director Hilton Green didn’t place Bass on the set at all. He said, “I was there every moment, shot for shot for that thing, and [Bass] was never on the set. He did lay out the storyboard with Hitchcock, and all that. But I saw Saul years and years later-he’s dead now-and I said, ‘Saul, how can you possibly say you directed that?’ And he was very embarrassed.”
This is a priceless film Classic, a Masterpiece in the way that the film is been brought out, the plot twists, from beginning, to the end, it is Just Sheer Mastery at Its Finest.
My favorite Alfred Hitchcock film isn’t Psycho. My favorite Ingrid Bergman film isn’t Casablanca. My favorite Gregory Peck film isn’t To Kill a Mockingbird. It’s Spellbound.
Man merkt sehr gut, wer das Internet kontrolliert. Dokumentation vom Horrorproduzenten.... Hitchcock macht Sinn... Würde gerne eine Irak doku sehen oder Kosovo, oder Indianer oder Guantanamo, Vietnam oder Japan China... ach ja. Das ist eine oercerse Aufgeilung der Besatzer. Kein Respekt vor Privatsfähre... Nackte lebende duschen, tote ohre Anuse und weis nicht was ist keine Würdigung sond entwürdigend. Schande ist dieser Film für den Macher. Deswegen weigerte sich Hintcock seinen Namen unter diesen Film setzten zu lassen. Schämen aber für den der sowas aufnimmt und entwürdigend in Kinos laufen lies. Man muss ja nur mal sein Hirn einschalten und fragen wie lange für eine Doku gebraucht wurde und warum so wenig die Opfer selbst sagen durften.
