@simao000 My apologizes good sir. I understand the assumption lol (because of the channel's name). And I wish the best of luck to you in the future for tournaments and that sort of thing. :)
@Zaknafein999 It's useless to refer to a deck from a past format in the present tense. One would never refer to Caw-Blade as an Extended or Legacy deck simply because those are the only formats in which its currently legal. Caw-Blade, in its relevant form, was a Standard deck, period. For example, try playing Dragonstorm in Legacy. You'd be silly to even try, as it isn't a competitive deck in Legacy, regardless of its current legality. It's about context.
@simao000 This is legacy... Lotus bloom isn't even close to standard. Same for Bloodstained Mire and Windswept Heath..... Learn the sets I have to say.
@Zaknafein999 Seriously? First look up the usage of "to be" in the English language, particularly its use in the past tense. After that, I'd suggest you do a quick search on GP Kobe 2009. You'll find that its format WAS, indeed, Extended. Double fail.
