as a gm fanboy i can honestly say i love the 99-04 mustang in fact i actually like it more than the catfish camaro. sophomore in hs and my goal is to get a 99-04 Mustang GT, i can find decent ones for pretty cheap but the insurance is gonna be a real bitch
I love how there's still an ongoing internet battle over these cars after all these years. Both cars were good bang for the buck and both had their pros and cons as do all cars. One thing that I didn't like about the F bodies was those damn buttons on the radio and that infamous dash cracking. The Stangs had some crap too. All in all fun cars for the money. Some don't realize that you get what you pay for and these weren't "high quality" cars by any means when comparing them to what's built today or the last 5-7 years. A blast to drive nonetheless.
I remember drag racing as a kid and this was the huge fight, camaros guys and mustang guys. I always felt the z28 was more in line with the cobra of that time but the price is what made the camaro so incredible. I was always a mustang gt guy with a 98 adding every bolt on that newer would've helped against the z28.
I agree. Seeing the SVT Cobra review for the same year, I was thinking the same. The Z-28/GT faceoff was more appropriate, where the SVT Cobra could go against say, a Mecham Trans-am or maybe a Firehawk.
just got a 2014 Camaro v6 6 speed...black on black...wicked fast !!!...picking up a 2000 black on black mustang gt 6 speed...my 5th stang...going back to my roots...love that STANG !!!
Nah, I noticed that too. The modular series of engines replaced Ford's previous OHV design, with the last Ford small block OHV V8 being killed off in the Ford Explorer in 2001, or 2002 in the Fold Falcon for Australia. The last time they put the small block OHV V8 engine into a mustang was 1995, with both the 302 (5.0) in the Mustang GT/Cobra and the 351 (5.8) in the Mustang Cobra R.
This 4th gen is my favorite design for the Camaro, well this and the new 6 gens. I own a 2000 since I bought it off my dad in '03. Now I rarely drive it. It sits in my garage as my prized possession. Sitting in it takes me back to the early 2000s. Never giving it away, it's my first car.
Yeah, my '02 GT in stock trim put down 220 RWHP. After a tune and exhaust I was at 247RWHP. My car ran 13.30s at 103mph with the addition of 4.10's. Not to bad for gears, exhaust and a tune : )
@@zeuzvalencia4672 would be the 1/4 mile by the numbers otherwise it was slowest mustang in the world if that was 1/8th mile. 1/8th mile slow times are like 9 seconds
@@CamoShirt 9.0s in the 1/8 is like 14.0s in the 1/4-mile, according to conversion charts. I've so many 9.0s and am struggling to get my 06 Charger R/T to break into the 8.9s with intake, exhaust and tune the only mods.
Boosted GT or perhaps GM has to many muscles cars playing around ? Camaros , corvettes , monte Carlos , trans am , Gto , gt8 , caprice , impala , GM had to many dealerships fighting each other , not to mention that the reason Camaro left the show was because they focus on the corvette
Goku Kakarot lol be quiet. Everyone knows the Cobra killed the camaro for like 5 years. Heck, it nearly killed the corvette too. That’s why GM remodeled both after the Cobra came out.
4.6 2v vs ls1, yeah this outcome was expected. It's hard to get power out of a 2v 4.6 if you're going all motor. The 3v 4.6 is much better if you're naturally aspirated
The 3v 4.6/5.4 are sacks of shit. Internally they're OK....but fuck the heads. I love Ford (and GM)....but my 3v 5.4 was possibly the WORST engine I've ever owned. I should have listened to all the Ford forums before buying that engine.
I just bought an 02' from the original owner, looks just like this 99'. 35000 original km, T-tops 6 speed. Garage kept it's entire life. Car is showroom condition inside & out. Also has Hotchkis suspension, longtube headers/Borla exhaust, no cats and it's supercharged! I still can't believe it's mine! I love it!
What I hate is how Camaro fans keep saying that their Camaros make 310 HP to the wheels.They are on an optimistic Dyno because you just seen what they make, Around 290 at the wheel.And don't try to say I have the SS so it makes more.The ram air induction does nothing when you're not moving and even when you are moving it doesn't add much power.Its more of like a pep boys add on mod that gm could add and make more money off of you.The cars, Camaro, Firebird, Trans am were underated,I owned a 2002 Camaro SS 6spd so I know.Ram air or not they make the same power on a dynojet or mustang Dyno because they are the most accurate and they don't inflate your ego like other dynos
Agreed , my 98 Z28 6 speed made 305 rwhp/317 rwtq on a dyno dynamics after I did long tubes , ory and slp air lid. Stock they are not making 300 rwhp on a chassis dyno . 280-290 is more realistic
wait. the z28 is the highest spec that the camaro came in in 1999 correct? then why are they comparing it against the gt? which isnt the highest spec for the mustang. the cobra was. theres no real point to comparing these other than the give camaro guys a hard on. and im not a ford fanboy by any means. i actually really love the z28 but this is just an unfair match up.
Gee I dunno, maybe it has to do with price. They are both in the same price range, barely $1000 price difference. That's how most cars are classed together to compare as direct competitors. How much was a brand new Cobra back then? Edit: I decided to look it up. The 1999 Cobra MSRP when brand new, was $28,000. That's over $5000 more than the one tested here, the GT. The Z28 still beats the Cobra in performance as well.
In these yrs the Z28 was pitted against the GT. The 6cyl Camaro had no real designation and was pitted against the 6 cyl Mustang. The SS was the performance option just like the Cobra was to the Stang. The SS was the Highest rated spec. HOWEVER, Chevy admitted they downplayed the HP rating in Camaro cause you could get the Camaro for LOTS cheaper than the Vette which had the same motor and they worried rightfully so that people would buy the camaro over the stang if they wanted just pure power. Sure the vette was little better but to a true racer that would be semantics and could get the maro much cheaper (and parts LOL)
I have a 2000 SS, I eat the same generation Cobras all day. Stock for stock. I’m a Ford guy for my trucks but you just couldn’t do better than an LS motor back then. Especially when SLP put their touches on the SS, mine is as it was sold new dyno’d at 350hp. Mustangs are also very frumpy looking, I personally prefer the more aerodynamic sleek styling of the Camaro more IMHO.
@@angelgjr1999 adjusted for inflation 25 thousand 1999 dollars is equal to 38 000 dollars today. You can look up an inflation calculator to see for yourself
The 5.8L would be a beast if it was dropped in a 99-04 GT. Many people are dropping Coyotes into New Edge Mustangs and I have heard of some running low 11's with just bolt ons, tires and tune.
Faster does not automatically mean better. Everybody factors in the overall package of the car when making a choice, otherwise we'd all just be riding liter bikes if speed was all that mattered. Ford just had a better package, that's why it outsold the Camaro despite costing more in similar spec. The LS1 was decent for it's time but not everyone wants a massive car with Cavalier interior. Chevy even left a hump in the passenger floor board to clear the driveline, and didn't even bother to put a proper dual exhaust on it that's how cheap and lazy they were. The Camaro looks like it's suited more towards floating on water than driving on pavement. But yes Ford guys need to admit the Mustang was slower, even the N/A Cobras - although they still put up a good fight. By 03-04 the Mach 1 was able to keep up and in some cases beat LS1 cars and the supercharged Cobras wiped their asses with them. The moment you sit in a Mustang, turn the key to watch those gauges sweep past the SVT logo, and hear that unmistakeable exhaust note, you know you're in something special. Can't say the same about a Camaro.
@@yardmeat7499 Mustang is more of an everyday family vehicle, imho. Way more headroom and back seat space. They sold more because they had a wider audience.
The 94-04 mustangs are slow but they are fun to drive. I myself would still prefer a mustang over a Camaro even though the Camaros had more power I just think they are not very appealing to my eyes.
@@angelgjr1999 the Terminator was fantastic for its day, but its day is long past. Talk to a current owner, it really isn't fun, its almost as bad as owning an RX7. Things break, they are hard to diagnose, parts can be a bitch to find, and even donor cars are horrendously expensive. All for what? A mid-12 second car? A new 5.0 can beat that with a tune and tire alone, no boost.
@@angelgjr1999 With a limited run the Terminator undoubtedly will soar in value over almost any modern Coyote, but in terms of speed, modern technology has more than narrowed the playing field. But like I said before, the Terminator was a fantastic car in its day, but its age makes ownership a major pain. They aren't horrendously expensive anymore, you can find one with over100k on the odo for as low as $15k. But again, I'd probably just buy a Coyote for that price, they are more reliable.
I test drove both of these back then. The Camaro was a better driving car.. but was just too hard to see out of. You felt like the Camaro was ten foot longer from behind the wheel. The Camaro was a few hundred pounds heavier too, which did not help. The Mustang was easier to live with as a DD and that's why it sold better. Quality control wasn't amazing on either of these cars, but the Camaro I test drove had a lower dash with plastic damage that would cut you- it looked like somebody took an old fashioned cheese grater to it. Looking back.. how the heck did Ford make a modern Over Head Cam V8 engine breathe worse up top than Chevy's pushrod V8????
For this year for did make an engine that would’ve outclass the LS one or at least tied it. It was in the form of the 32 valve twin cam 4.6 L that was found in the SVT cobra. It was an all aluminum modular V8, which made about as much horsepower as the LS one.
@@BlindMansRevenge2002 Delousal Ford guys LIES. Y'all couldn't get it rt bk then an still couldn't get it rt in 2022 that's why Gm had to show y'all . How to build a overhead cam motor. Nothing no delousal Ford guy can tell me. I ran these cars. And even with the well will just factory power add a super charger in the 03 svt corbas. Gm Ls F body cars was still putting Spaccce on Ford factory power add cars. Good ola RU-vid drag racing footage from bk then to now . Videos don't lie. It's a shame a factory Po add 03 coubra get out ran by a N/A LS base gen 3 mind you all motor car. 😆 Lol
@@BlindMansRevenge2002the cobro 32v v8 was no match for a ls1....not even close. This test is not accurate at all. No way in hell a 2v is running at 2 car lengths less than a ls1. A pi 4.sux won't even bust a 13 sec pass. The ls1 will run mid 13s with ease. Low 13s and even high 12s has been done with good driving and decent track prep.
Hey thanks for your reply, I know, I love the body style of this Mustang, the '04 Mach 1 is quick, looks mean too.. the 2005 GT has more power (315hp I think was rated, not sure.) different body style tho. did 0-60 in 5.0 seconds with the added power, I wanted one back then, now I love the modern 2011+ 5.0L, :) I drive a 1995 Lincoln Town Car tho..lol the 1st to get the 4.6L V8, it did 175hp/234trq in the dyno, Stock. gonna dyno it after a few mods I finish putting on it. ;)
Honestly all the new "muscle cars" I feel like there sports car now. I rather have a muscle car then a sports car. The only car I cars I can think of that's has that kind of feel is the dodge challenger and the new 2015 camaro z28
Mustangs camaros and challengers were classified as Pony Cars. The only true “Modern Muscle Car” right now is the Dodge Charger but I don’t even consider them Muscle since they’re Four Door Sedans now.
@@rivercitymetaldetecting9854 nope sorry, a WS6 Trans Am was practically a factory car from Pontiac just with more options, now the Cobra comes out of SVT which is Fords performance division, it's like comparing Oranges to apples.
@@adelaseeri768 you are aware that the SVT division was in house right? Same as SLP which did work on the WS6 Same as Mustangs with a Shelby badge on it(350/500) currently are. 🤣 ...same as SRT was which was initially a group of tuners that were brought in house just like Mercedes did with AMG. The WS6 would have gotten destroyed against the Terminator Cobra. Then again so would the Firehawk which was the top dog in the FB/TA line above the WS6. I owned both the Firehawk and a Termimator. The Firehawk could'nt run with the Terminator. Then again the Mustang had a 45hp advantage stock so.
@@adelaseeri768 you should do more research. I've been working on vehicles for close to 4 decades. SLP had a hand in the WS6. Not my fault you are not aware of that. Look up the history of the LT1 WS6 v The LS1 WS6. You will learn something.
why I love the mustang : 1. the engine is a 4.6 so it's normal to have less hp, but it responds very well to bolts on (1500$ bolts on will give you that 280whp) and not to forget that mustang weight is 500lbs less 2.it's built tough and parts are widely available 3.it's easy to maintain
Just personal preference actually....my first car as a freshman in high school was a 2000 SS with an LS1 never did anything to it performance wise, but had nothing but problems....I sold it and bought a 96 Firebird Formula with an LT1...I had a job and since i was still in school I put all my money from my job into it....Only problem I had was the damn optispark got wet (notorious on LT engines) it lasted me all the way through high school until I flipped it a few weeks after graduation.
Its Funny to see all these Mustang fans talk shit about the Camaro but when it comes to engine swapping they love swapping out there 5.0 and/or 4.6 for an LS1 or any LS for that matter
You have it backwards... Chevy guys are taking the only good thing the Camaros have - the LS and swapping them into a better platform. LOL even Chevy guys know the entire car is junk. A Mustang guy would only swap a modular for an LS because it's cheap to get a truck motor from a junkyard, but you never see 2011+ cars ditching their coyote for a LS.
Casey Young lol you camaro fans are really salty because the 04 Mustang Cobra killed your camaro for like 5 years out of production. :) Sales numbers don’t lie buddy.
Chevy has always needed 350 cubic inches to keep any sort of advantage over Ford with 4.6 or 5 Liters. It was dumb on Ford's behalf to limit themselves to such small displacement. If they would have upgraded the 5.8 Windsor for High Performance and used that as a Mustang engine then the 350 powered Camaro would have nothing on the Mustang.
Jim Garrison the 302 was a good engine, but the 4.6 is a turd of a "performance" engine, LT1's and LS1 were eating 4.6 mustangs for a snack. a slightly modded 3.8 supercharged was faster then that and it had 2 less cylinder. ford no longer uses the 4.6 in a mustang because it sucked
BULLSHIT people werent buying for performance...... LT1 vs. 4.6, LS1 vs. 4.6 your joking right. a 1996 z28 made 285 hp STOCK LT1 the 4.6 a measly 225 look it up 60 hp less
andrew donohue Just what I thought you're one of those fanboys that makes assumptions based on what's written in a magazine, typical GM lover. Fyi, Camaros, Z28s, and Firebirds get their ass handed to them by Mustangs on a regular basis, especially that model. As for the 4.6 in '99 being 225 stock try 260 stock not that it matters anyway. The 5.0 in the Fox bodies had even less than 225 stock and absolutely destroyed Camaros.
i drove a ford F150 wiith a 4.6 it felt like the turd had a 1980's carburated 305. had to floor the POS up hill with a small empty trailer to gain any speed. it was a gutless pig and it was bad on fuel. the only 4.6's that remotely had any balls were the 3V and even more exotic 4V. get out of you disillusion the 93-2002 camaro Z28, SS and the trans am WS were murdering the 4.6... the 302 was a much better engine but for pulled the plug. still a built 302 is still not much of a match for an equally built 350. the 4.6 2V is a worthless "performance" engine. stock for stock the mustang GT was not a match for a camaro Z28 all throughout the 93-2002 time period, its a fact. the fox body was a nasty little car but that is mostly because they are so light, the are great in the straight line in cornering the camaro again kills it, even back in the 80's iroc Z28 5.7 tpi
ive driven both. i like driving my 01 gt better than any f body ive driven. and plus the mustang is easier to work on. but ford prolly just knew it was gonna break down more often than a chevy so they addressed it early on lol. some days i do regret not just buying a trans am but i do love my mustang.
***** I love cars as long as there good in some way.. I just feel like ford let everyone down with the 2v GT. I mean th 3v was way better and the current 5.0 is pretty nasty. I feel the problem with most cars are the owners. I have other video racing my friend in his yellow mustang and we made fun of 1 another all the time lol .Just good fun .
Necrometalfist Then your 2v is modded or they cant drive . Because a 2v GT is way slower then a 3v. Thats a simple fact . Before I forget . I went to your channel so I could see this magical 2v GT and lord and behold no videos posted. You get that this is youtube and not a chat room right .
Josh Patterson Yeah, I don't record myself racing on video. So what? You still keep using crap written on paper or Internet results while my results are based on real world experience. If you want to go that route a couple tenths of a second isn't shit. Of course my car isn't stock anymore, but when it was it already was quicker than some posted times for 3v GT's.
Necrometalfist Which is fine. Videos do help make you a bit more credible on the topic of cars if you actually race cars and can proof it. Pictures worth a 1000 words and video is 1000s of pictures :)
still got my old 98 trans am . got it back in 01 . the 98-02 F-BODY are like the fox body of today the high-schoolers are getting them . old girl still runs good but been through like 15 headlight and window motor's jk lol
You know Chevy fans are lying to themselves they say the interiors are nice.. I can't even ride in my friends 99 Camara the stupid hump in the passenger side floor makes it useless to anyone with legs
***** you take 1.2 liters more to make 6 extra hp in the sad excuse for a modern motor and you also lose in the quarter mile with 30 pound feet (20 for 2015) extra torque. Also your car is heavy as shit. Time for chevy to go back to the LT5 design. They had a great modern engine then they went with the modern equivalent of a flathead powered car in the 70s
***** i know theyve both been around a long time. but a dohc 4v per cylinder will be much more efficient per cube than a pushrod 2v design. it breathes better. and it will rev higher. a dohc v8 will always make a good amount of torque. the new 2015 mustang 5.0 can do 11.78 with an intake tune and tires (not slicks). i doubt the heavy maro can do that. we dont need as much torque to go fast and the 2015 is only 20 lb ft less than the camaro and still much lighter. so nuff said
90s camaro's interior is 90% the same as a caviler and a lumina. cheap ass gm couldnt design more then one set up for the interior so they just stuck it all their cars. stupid import company.
Is it that it has the better technology with single overhead cams please the Ford at the time was way more efficient than the old LS1 look at Ford now it's up there sorry but true
This is coming from a Mustang owner the Camaro while having a few quality issues as far as I'm concerned completely stomped this mustang also whoever launched this Camaro didn't know what they were doing Also want to point out that the Camaro all the way back in 93 was using a three link live axle with Panhard rod that Ford would tout and the s197 which is what I currently own 12 years later in 2005 I mean this thing is making 330hp had better suspension geometry than the sn95's 4 Link live axle and the Camaro was lower and wider which is usually a good formula for keeping the tires planted. What killed the Camaro is that like today Chevy kind of neglected the occupants the interior on these didn't age well when it was new and the interior plastics weren't long for this world not to mention and this is sadly a side effect of GM making the fourth gen F bodies a sports car like as possible is the fact that getting in and out of a new edge was a lot easier than any fourth gen and to head off anybody at the pass I had a 96 Camaro RS and a 2001 Mustang and I can tell you the mustangs interior has aged just a little bit better or at the very least didn't disintegrate even though you have to just avoid looking at the place where the center stack attaches to the console because those two dudes who designed those parts weren't talking ever
I’m also a Mustang guy and I agree with all of your points. The Camaro bested the Mustang in the muscle department, and still does. I had a friend with an 2002 SS that ran a 12.8 showroom stock with stock tires and all, that’s what a 03-04 Terminator Cobra ran with a supercharger, albeit with less cubes. The Mustang has always been just a tad more user friendly and reliable. They always seemed to priced a tad less which always helps. All in all, I’d be happy with either one these days.
As an outsider "So to speak" I have a 90 Miata with 240 crank HP. Don't laugh, it goes 12's. Anyway, for whatever reason the mustang guys are all about running my car. I'm 7-0 vs Mustangs. Camaros are way harder to beat, I have only run 4 of them and I'm 2-2. I don't see what the arguing is about, the mustangs are slow, that's all there is to it.
Agreed, but they will argue the fact all damn day. You never hear of a GM guy turning into a Ford guy, but you hear the opposite all the time. And if they are still Ford guys, they run a GM engine lmao.
fuckucatchme1000rr Yo dad, come on man, your a foreign car junky, and a plastic toy bike rider who thinks his 100 pound plastic piston bike is fast. By the way your super fast miata is making less horse than the 99 gt big guy. Bring both of your foreign junk toys around here and I will show you what a so called slow detroit iron mustang will do!!
Is it possible you were racing V6 'Stangs? Those are the Honda Civics of mellowed out sports cars in terms of how many people buy them and install shitty customization items.
That would be nice, the new "tech." on these engines is what makes these new Mustangs faster today. That and the fact that today's Muscle Cars are allowed to make 400+hp stock/from-factory.. :)
I have a 2001 GT Bullitt. It's a well known fact that the 2v mod motor has terrible heads that run out of breath while others are still winding out. Porting helps, but not enough. You need trickflow TW heads to truly overcome the breathing issues. So, you gotta throw money at a 99-04 GT just to get it ready to run close to the 4v. It will outflow a stock 4v with said heads. That'll get you running with those LS motors...as long as you force induction, because the 4.6 low end torque isn't enough either, lol. Yeah, you can beat lots of cars in a 99-04 GT, just slow cars. You wanna go fast? Heads, forced induction, (preferably turbo). It is what it is. At least you'll sound and look better than an F-body. No offense, the Ls motor is terrific, I just love the style of my Mustang, despite the extra money needed to go fast.
IDK why people hate on the 4.6. i have a 2000 Mustang GT and it isn't slow at all. has a few mods to it and an exhaust but nothing crazy. sounds like a beast too. always get compliments on the sound
My little cousin has a 03 mustang GT and he just added slicks to it and that car has a nasty launch and a lot of people can't believe how good that car is from a dead stop, I'm a LS1 Camaro guy but my cousins car is a good sleeper
i think people sleep on the 99-2004 GT's! I know I did underestimate them until I got one. They're fast and produce a sound like no other especially with a nice aftermarket exhaust.
what the yeah I know I did under estimate them because I have a 02 Camaro ss and I would always beat him and still do but I don't really like to compare my car to his, but when he's racing new cars and Keeping up if not beating them, I gotta step back and give those cars respect and he has installed a X pipe with no cats, 03-04 cobra exhaust with SLP LM2 and has a CAI BBK throttle body and slicks and people think he's slow but really he's not lol
+Robert Ponce yea the 4th gen SS definitely comes from factory with a little more power than the new edge GT's. I've yet to race a Camaro.. only other Mustangs and Impala SS's.
LMAO Please stop making a fool of yourself... LS especially the LS1 are famous for being one of the most reliable v8's around. And who ever said "Hey, lets SBF swap it"?
go walk around a few junk yards, you will see 9 out of ten mustang there are wrecked with good motors in them. you will see 7 out of 10 camaros there are not wrecked and are there do to motor issues. trust me i looked for my self and found it to be true.
TheFassold That's why everyone is swapping Ls engines into all kinds of cars from japanese to europeans, and even some mustangs. Please lay off the crack and stop spreading bs lies.
LS1 is one of the most reliable motors ever, I know many people with over 250,000 miles on them and still running strong. You see more mustangs because they are a bitch car.
I'm out, there's too many Chevy fanboys on here in a race to suck each other off. They can't accept that Mustangs have always been a better car than the Crapmaro in all it's varieties.
Necrometalfist A Fanboy would be someone who refuses to see the fact about a car because of them liking it I like cars . dont care who makes them as long as there good . I daily drive a E36 BMW 325i . The only fanboying going on in here is you . I made claims of how the cars stack up at the Track followed by me posting not 1 but 3 , 5 MIn + long videos of me racing everything from the fox bodys,Mach 1,N/a Cobra,2v GTs,roush stage 2 , and 3v Gts . Thus backing up my words with my own actions in a 1998 z28 . Also its a fact we 2 so called GM fanboys were discussing this. I told him that I did not think a Stock 96 Lt1 Z28 should be beating 3v GTs,N/a Cobras and Mach 1s . Something no fucking fanboy would say . Because All they would say is stuff you have been saying . Stuff like a 2v GT is faster than a 3v gt ,which is nonsense . Your choice if you wanna leave on extremely ignorant and defensive post .
why is there an argument camaros are better hands down. Cobra mustang pshh let me supercharge an ls1 and it beats your new mustang 5.0s. The new z28 2014 beats the boss the gt500 and the gt all in a straight line so whatever. Chevy also makes Americas fastest sports car in the Corvertte zr1. Not counting like exotics like the henneesey viper gt even though it uses the corvette zr1s engine ;). The ford gt is good but is 150,000 dollar car and is built in Germany.
the 99 to 04 gt was and still is a nice car miss my old one overall a funer car but the old Ls1 are fast even with some bolt on's i could just hang with a z28 both are super good DD's my bro just got a 02 z28 with 170000 on it and it sitll runs nice and my gt add 150000 on it when i sold it.
Oh look at me Iam old and care so much about comfort that I choose the mustang even though it is slower, unreliable ,ugly,stupid,boring, and way weeker....idiots if your a real gear head you get a CAMARO all the time it beats the mustang in everything and the reason why the hump is on passenger is because the car is so sleek that their is nowhere else to put it. The engine is low for better center gravity and pushed back for more balance as a sports car should be that is the recipe to a real performance car that's why bmw Ferrari Mercedes use this recipe and mustang no because it's always been a girl car no girl would drive the CAMARO my wife is actually scared of it .a 6 cylinder yes but they will still be like... I can't see over the dash ohhhh... but a mustang a girl wouldn't care getting an 8 because their so week anyway and thats final
Let me give you some history, but before that I'll say this.. I like both cars, their is nothing I hate about them, if I were to choose between the two, I'd choose the mustang, a few bolt-ons & you unleash a beast. It's funny how people like you say the mustang is for a "girl", I wish you would've said that to Carol Shelby (RIP), Steve Saleen, & Jack Roush, they would have laughed at you so hard in your face. You ever wonder why the camaro stopped production in 2002? Or the trans am discontinued in 2002? I'll tell you why.. Because in 2003 Ford Released the all new 2003 Ford "Mustang" Svt Cobra, code name "terminator"... Chevy knew about it, and they didn't have anything to back up their plate but a little ls shit motor... Yea that's right, I can see you getting red, so they stopped before it was too late. and to this day, their is this rivalry going on, about who's faster, I honestly don't care, I just wanted to remind you of some history before you keep most likely commenting on every mustang, or camaro vs mustang video you see....
a girl wouldnt drive a cobra moron stop hating on mustangs just because you prefer camaro. it has 5.7 liters ffs of course its faster then the 2v GT. btw camaros cant compare to mustang in the sound department.
