2022 Trek Top Fuel Review | All-NEW Frame & Geometry, With A Whole New Attitude!

Подписаться 76 тыс.

Просмотров 127 тыс.

50% 1

The Trek Top Fuel has long been known as the American brand's flagship full suspension XC race bike, purpose-built to to compete at the very highest level of the sport. In more recent years however, the Top Fuel has steered in a different direction. With the short-travel Supercaliber taking over duties for World Cup XCO racing, Trek has softened the Top Fuel's serious, race-focused persona, adding travel and bulking it up in the process.
For 2022, the Trek Top Fuel makes its biggest move away from its XC racing roots. Equipped with a brand new frame, an updated suspension design and some thoroughly modern geometry, the Top Fuel aims to retain the pert pedalling performance of its predecessor while significantly boosting its all-round capability. So, has Trek succeeded?
See the full review here: flowmountainbike.com/tests/tr...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Love mountain biking? Be sure to follow Flow Mountain Bike for all the latest bike reviews, news, videos, travel features and more!
Website - flowmountainbike.com
Facebook - / flowmountainbike
Instagram - / flow_mtb
RU-vid - / flowmountainbikeyoutube
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trek Top Fuel Video Review
0:00 - Intro
0:26 - Trek Top Fuel Overview
0:42 - Suspension & Frame Details
1:35 - Integrated Storage
2:10 - Trek Top Fuel Geometry
3:08 - Trek Top Fuel Price & Specs
4:07 - Trek Top Fuel Weight
4:17 - Trek Top Fuel Sizing & Setup
4:50 - Strengths
7:02 - Weaknesses
8:32 - Flow's Verdict

Спорт

Опубликовано:

22 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 148

@benwildman6164 2 года назад

The most thorough and detailed reviews available at the moment. Kudos to Wil for putting in the hard yards.

@MTBs 2 года назад

My number one go to channel for reviews of interesting bikes that I cannot get my hands on myself! Very accurate, to the point and detailed videos that are easy to digest. 👌

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Right on mate, glad you dig the video reviews and appreciate you letting us know - we'll keep 'em coming! [Wil]

@mwinner101 2 года назад

Well done. Best bike reviews on the net. 👍

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Thanks very much mate, appreciate the feedback! [Wil]

@GFClocked 2 года назад

Absolutely amazing review. I love this!

@bimmerfan729 2 года назад

Excellent review as always Flow MTB! This new Top Fuel certainly seems like quite the perfect bike for way over here in Minnesota!

@Jon-nz3dm 2 года назад

Same for here in Dallas! No elevation really, so this looks like the perfect bike for our trails. I wasn't really digging Trek bikes the last few years but they really got my attention in 2021

@ryanr4128 Год назад

Great review! Im stuck on if i should get the new trek top fuel 5, giant trance 2 or rocky mountain element. My local trails are pretty rooty with some steep climbs but not so steep decents. If you were to pick one of those 3 bike which would you choose and why? Thank again for the great review guys!

@maxMax-ns9pg 2 года назад

Man I love these reviews!

@chloet7385 2 года назад

I have the 2020 top fuel and although these new updates are pretty sweet, after changing mine to a 130mm fork I am super happy with it.

@cliffclermont Год назад

great review....seen several 2023 9.9axs arrives in 2 weeks. beyond stoked.

@MrGpat21 2 года назад

Great review! These bikes look awesome and may very well be my next ride!

@trevorfilipiak1247 2 года назад

I just bought a Top Fuel 9.8 like a month ago and have been loving it. I was worried this one would make me feel buyer's remorse, but I don't think that's the case. I use the lockouts often when connecting singletrack via road, and the geo has been fine for me. It seems like this new one is well and truly a "trail bike".

@spiral99able 2 года назад

it's been bike vaxxed. No more xc dna.

@rwilliamjacob 2 года назад

@@spiral99able it’s still an XC bike for sure. Go ride one. It’s fast.

@luchocatano1772 2 года назад

I will . Wonderfull review. I have a question: in my country the brand only sello the aluminium versión (9.5), and i like It but i m also want to turn It in a xcm bike. Can i do that, It can be a good purchased? What Will be your recomendations? Thanks for sharing

@tamasvarga67 2 года назад

Awesome review as always and a sweet looking bike!

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Cheers Tamas!

@durcell123 2 года назад

curious how it stacks up to the transition spur!!

@Mockle07 2 года назад

Gold standard review as always ✊🏻

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Thanks Michael, appreciate it! [Wil]

@empty0701 2 года назад

Nice review! Trek is inching closer to Ibis Ripley's geo and some of its market share.

@matthewserna7475 2 года назад

Everyone is going for that Geo and market share now

@jeromekanny7071 2 месяца назад

awesome video. great unbiased video. makes u want to buy a bike

@likeris2 2 года назад

tell me please which bike better this one or epic evo? and why? and which ones wheels are better in carbon range? Thank you!

@williebotha1173 2 года назад

Great review!

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Thanks Willie!

@rigorhead01 2 года назад

Great video!

@juliandlamb 2 года назад

Outstanding review of an interesting bike, love your style.

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Thanks for watching and for the feedback mate! [Wil]

@lukasbormann4830 2 года назад

Still the best reviews out there

@Samooray Год назад

How would you comprare this bike to Scott Spark 960? Scott's tempting because of sus blockade (Idea for doing XC races and fun trails).

@antoniofeliciano2813 2 года назад

A complete and honest review.

@michaelpenrose1 2 года назад

How did the frame finish stand up to use?

@michaelpenrose1 2 года назад

Will, the moustache is looking very cool. Great review, keep them coming.

@leonardsgherza4756 Год назад

Would you think this is a better climber than the 2021 giant trance advanced?

@javisoto5572 9 месяцев назад

Hola soy de Chile y quería saber realmente para qué tipos de terreno es a mi me gusta hacer rutas largas en medio de los bosques. Saludos

@jasonsalt524 2 года назад

Review on the Trek Fuel Ex lineup?

@nbatornado4592 Год назад

Should i buy top fuel 5 2022 or marlin 8 2022

@bpisan 2 года назад

Not the gap between Top Fuel and Supercaliber is even bigger. I feel like they are skipping a bike that a lot of people actually want.

@ClarkBark14 2 года назад

I feel like those people would just run some XR2 tires and set the sag % slightly lower. Maybe downsize if the longer reach/wheelbase has you between 2 sizes.

@bpisan 2 года назад

@@ClarkBark14 yes that is obviously an option but not perfect. Plus is doesn't make up for the fact that a 9.8 is still 27.5lbs. Its basically a full on trail bike at this point and on paper barely different than my 2019 Fuel EX. By contrast a 2018 9.8 barely broke 24lbs. I'm not against modern trends just speaking to the fact that many people still want the 100/100 Style XC bike that hits 22-24lbs.

@richardsteele-gray7473 2 года назад

I agree, unless they are introducing a new bike we don't know about this move makes no sense to me at all. I'm already trying to get my existing top fuel to be lighter. I wouldn't move to the supercaliber for a stage race so it's a total fail from me.

@Whyusadd 2 года назад

Treks frames look so good

@mountainbikingfortherestofus Год назад

Such a professional and easy to watch review. Thank you. For me the lack of the lock out and 120mm fork is a show stopper. Not starting off with the 130mm is a mistake. Heck, my XC Niner has a 120mm with 100mm rear and handles without issues. I know I can upgrade but not keen to dish out another $1k to get 10mm of fork travel. Seems this bike is in a limbo niche. Not really a XC bike and not really a trail bike either. Too bad as it sure is a good looking bike.

@eric3007 Год назад

nope, I have one and putting a 130 makes it a light trail bike. The geo makes it a ripper. It's basically a 2017-18 fuel ex at this point.

@solsunson262 2 года назад

anyone done a mernuo new fashion bicycle review??

@ketchupallen1 Год назад

Can I put 700c x 42 on this bike?

@HLDefender 6 месяцев назад

So it's not an XC bike anymore. That being said, would you recommend the 130 fork to cross fully into short travel trail territory? To me it looks like the most suitable fork choice...

@mtbrwannabe5484 2 года назад

Awesome review. I’m on hardtail, my son has a canyon spectral 150 back 160 front. I reckon this trek is a bit short for me. Really want to get a heavy hitter not a burly xc bike. Your review helps me get there 🤘.

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Right on mate, thanks for the feedback! [Wil]

@johnnnewmex 2 года назад

Yeah I think the industry went overboard toward the long travel segment and now the same towards the short travel segment. The middle still is best for most of us who want an all-around bikes. When I see SID suspension...I know they're too far in the xc direction. Especially since 130,140ish bikes pedal so we'll these days. This is definitely a bike for someone that values speed and efficiency for 20+ mile rides.

@eric3007 Год назад

@@johnnnewmex nah you can run a 130 upfront and its a light trailbike. I put a fox factory 130 and this thing rips!

@biggiecheese345 2 года назад

Hey can you review the YT Izzo? Thanks

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

I've been keen to test out the Izzo for a while now - hopefully we can get YT to send one in for a review! [Wil]

@Ceriva09 2 года назад

If i could make a guess i would say they want to push the fuel ex more towards the All-Mountain category with the topfuel filling the trail gap then So i wouldnt be suprised if the next fuel ex got more rear travel in its next revision

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

I totally agree - there's definitely room for some shuffling of the lineup between the Top Fuel and the Slash. Then again, we're also wondering what might happen to the Remedy, which hasn't had any substantial changes for some time now. [Wil]

@MrGabrielallon Год назад

I love this product !

@markpotts4428 2 года назад

Do you thinking putting a 130mm fork on would make much difference or not woth it?

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Geometry-wise it would be a pretty small change - you'd kick the angles back a touch and lift the BB slightly. I think the main difference with going to a 130mm fork is that you'd open up your options to something like a Pike Ultimate or a Fox 34 GRIP2, which offer better descending performance and more high-speed control (at the expense of losing the lockout). Mick recently reviewed the new Fox 34 GRIP2 fork, which he tested on his Santa Cruz Tallboy (120mm rear travel, 130mm fork travel), which is a similar setup and type of bike to the new Top Fuel. It's an amazing fork for sure, though it's obviously not an inexpensive upgrade! You can check out that review here if you like: flowmountainbike.com/tests/fox-34-grip2-review-2022/ [Wil]

@nealart 11 месяцев назад

I just bought this bike now discounted $500. It’s perfect.

@fvingerhoed 11 месяцев назад

I better start saving .. ( have a 2018 now)

@marcbaptista7381 2 года назад

I’m torn between the Fuel EX 5 and the Top Fuel 5. They’re identically priced, but different bikes. I am looking for a general knock-about bike with sometime trails and want a bit of future-proofing. I’m not a young pup, but I still enjoy some easy trails with a full sus. I will also use it for commutes et al. Your recommendation/suggestions would be most appreciated… Thanks for your excellent review(s)…

@haneiramen579 2 года назад

What did you get marc?

@wieser98 Год назад

@@haneiramen579 i ordered the top fuel

@haneiramen579 Год назад

@@wieser98 that is a sick mt. Bike marc, enjoy bro.

@andreamantovani5354 Год назад

Top Fuel much better

@driftattack11 2 года назад

Curious how this stacks up against the specialized epic evo

@likeris2 2 года назад

this is my dilemma too

@scottburleson4882 2 года назад

I can wait to get my m/l 9.7, March 2023 is the expected delivery date.

@technovelodos 2 года назад

Is this in Oz?

@scottburleson4882 2 года назад

@@technovelodos US

@lee.j7077 2 года назад

Hey will!,I am the same height as you would you pick the medium or M/L?thanks

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

That's a very good question! At 175cm tall, Trek recommends the M/L size for you and me, which has a very generous 465mm reach. In the past I've generally preferred a reach measurement around the 450mm mark, which is what the Medium comes with. However, the Top Fuel does get a fairly steep 76-degree seat tube angle and it comes stock with a very short 45mm stem. Both of those bring the effective top tube measurement in by a fair way, helping to reduce the stretch over the cockpit when the saddle is at full pedalling height. It also gets a high rise (27.5mm) handlebar, and that further chills things out a bit. My most recent comparison is the Canyon Lux Trail, which I tested in the Medium size that had a 460mm reach. However, that bike had a much slacker seat angle (74.5-degrees) and a longer 60mm stem, which created a very stretched out riding position. Once I slid the saddle forwards and fitted a 40mm stem it fit really well, albeit in more of an XC riding position than feeling like a cruisey upright trail bike. I reckon that setup would have been fairly close to the M/L size in the Top Fuel, so that's personally what I'd go for. At our height of 175cm, I think you'd only size down to a Medium if you had quite a short torso/arms, or you lacked flexibility. Mind you, at that point the Fuel EX may be a better and more comfortable option with its more upright riding position and suppler suspension. Hope that helps mate! [Wil]

@lee.j7077 2 года назад

@@FlowMountainBikeRU-vid thanks Will,yes was surprised when I seen the sizing chart,if I bought this bike I would probably put a 130mm fork on it which would make it a long bike,I’m leaning more towards the new trance now thanks

@kingrat738 2 года назад

New Fuel EX MX??

@user-zq2ut5fh9z 2 года назад

The remote lockout is a game changer, not sure why they dropped it, gladly stick with the 2021. Also, why wasn't the 9.9 discussed? Will Trek still have a 9.9 with AXS?

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Hi there! Yep, Trek will be offering the Top Fuel 9.9 as part of the Project One bike builder in Australia - this is mentioned at the 3:10 mark in the video, and there's more detail in the full review here too: flowmountainbike.com/tests/trek-top-fuel-review-2022/ Cheers, [Wil]

@tinthein5782 2 года назад

very good

@CR-di1lg Год назад

The Trek website list the Line Elite wheelset at 1890g total but you say it’s +2000g?

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube Год назад

That's right - I believe Trek doesn't weigh its wheels with the TLR tubeless strips or valves, which accounts for some of the difference. To be specific, that carbon Line wheelset came in at 2,071g on our digital scales. [Wil]

@CR-di1lg Год назад

@@FlowMountainBikeRU-vid makes sense. The tlr strips are heavy and would basically account for the extra weight recorded 👍🏻 Thank you for a good review. I have a GX AXS version on the way.

@aaronkerth1171 2 года назад

Can one extend the SID fork 120MM to 130MM?

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

It can't Aaron - the SID is limited to 120mm max travel. [Wil]

@richardsteele-gray7473 2 года назад

I have the 2020 top fuel, pretty disappointed that it's going in the trail direction instead of more marathon / xc focussed. You aren't going to ride the supercaliber on a marathon course like the cape epic (at least not me).

@neilmacpherson260 2 года назад

exactly... big gap in Treks lineup now.... plus all the fun the old 2021 top fuel added to big climbing/ descending and racing while prepping for events like that.

@macdaddy1617 2 года назад

Yea now I’m looking at the Scott Spark

@ivostarmans1199 2 года назад

And it is heavier now then a fuel ex.

@richardsteele-gray7473 2 года назад

@@macdaddy1617 exactly, me too

@morethanbikes Год назад

I went 130/130 on a fuel ex 9.8 (gen 5) and it feels faster than my top fuel. That may be a good option for you.

@conman1395 2 года назад

Wait, WHAT? So this full carbon, nearly top of the line bike is only 18 GRAMS lighter than the aluminum 2019 Giant Trance 29 1 that you tested a ways back?

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Hmm, not quite. The alloy Trance 29 1 we tested back in 2018 weighed 13.06kg, so about 200g heavier than this particular Top Fuel. [Wil]

@rwilliamjacob 2 года назад

I have the out going, and this new XT model, and the new bike is way more fun and it simply just destroys the trails, even on the more XC style trails, it just chews it up. I do race XC in season and I am not super keen on the remote lock out missing, but I am dealing ok. Only other gripe, the dropper post is useless.

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Cheers for the input mate, and glad to hear you're enjoying your new bike! Bummer about the dropper post - what's going on with it? [Wil]

@rwilliamjacob 2 года назад

@@FlowMountainBikeRU-vid Will- it just never wants to come back up, regardless how much I try to set it up, the last one was the same way. I took it off and put a carbon post in. Shaved a pound and it’s more comfortable.

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Yikes, sounds like there's a bit of an issue with that dropper for sure! Were you able to get that sorted under warranty through your local Trek dealer? We've tested a few Treks over the past year with the newer dropper post design, and while the action isn't as slick as the likes of Fox and RockShox, we haven't encountered any critical failures so far. Regardless, I believe Bontrager components come with at least a 12-month warranty to cover manufacturing defects, so it may be worth getting your local Trek dealer to inspect it for a fix or replacement. [Wil]

@birdbro1990 2 года назад

Yet another bike approaching the Santa Cruz Tallboy geometry

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Goes to show how much Santa Cruz had its finger on the pulse when it launched the Tallboy two years ago! It is a curious progression for the Top Fuel though, which has been known as an XC race bike for a long time. And judging by some of the comments on this review, it seems that not everyone's stoked about it heading in more of a trail bike direction. [Wil]

@lio220 Год назад

I dont understand why such bike like this one doesnt have a remote locker. Not to blok the damper, but at least to turn it from trailmode to descent mode.

@beverywhereyouare 2 года назад

What's the general difference between this bike - and the fuel EX ?

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Hey Chris! We've actually put a detailed comparison between the Fuel EX and the new Top Fuel in the full review here: flowmountainbike.com/tests/trek-top-fuel-review-2022/ Hope that helps! [Wil]

@beverywhereyouare 2 года назад

@@FlowMountainBikeRU-vid awesome thank u

@madhavlchand8481 2 года назад

i like watching things i can't affoard!!

@trentvlak 2 года назад

480mm reach, 66hta on a 120mm bike. With so much weight over the rear wheel, it sounds like a lot of work to corner.

@matthewserna7475 2 года назад

I understand why they did this, but should have bumped the fuel ex travel up, because I don't see why you would buy this over the fuel ex for a general trail bike

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Our guess is that the next generation Fuel EX will get an increase in travel and updated geometry, though it's anyone's guess as to when that will happen! [Wil]

@UltimateTuner10 2 года назад

I have a 2021 EX 9.9 and it’s definitely a bit overkill for most of my local riding and while the old TF climbed better and would certainly put up better segment times, I felt like I wanted more of a “party bike” and stuck with the EX. If I was buying now, I’d probably go TF since it is now seemingly the best of both worlds, a FUEL EX Lite

@jaselikesbikes 2 года назад

12.88kg is pretty hefty for a down country near top of the range bike.

@richardsteele-gray7473 2 года назад

I agree, very hefty.

@ivostarmans1199 2 года назад

Top fuel 8 now 14.2 kg heavier then a fuel ex 8.

@andreamantovani5354 Год назад

That's why as a light trail mtb the Epic Evo has no rivals

@Drogos79 2 года назад

wouldnt be surprised to see fuel ex pushed to 150mm fork in new iteration

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

I'm pretty sure the current Fuel EX frame is rated for up to a 150mm travel fork, but I reckon you're right that we'll see the new iteration being purpose-built around a little more travel. Or maybe they'll just call it the new Remedy?? [Wil]

@Drogos79 2 года назад

@@FlowMountainBikeRU-vid there is a gap in 29" trek line up...120mm, 130mm, and we go straight to 160mm...I think Fuel EX is great as is. I owned it, it's literally do it all bike, minus big park jumps but overall tendency of going bigger might push it into all mountain category...not sure if that's good.

@lee.j7077 2 года назад

@@Drogos79 the ex is 140mm

@Drogos79 2 года назад

@@lee.j7077 fork, frame is 130mm

@lee.j7077 2 года назад

@@Drogos79 oh yeah sorry thought you were talking fork length

@reedmelicher8658 2 года назад

Shimano & RockShox is the way to go

@likeris2 2 года назад

are those wheels good, because they cost not that much?

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

We've had great experience with them so far, though as mentioned in the review, they are quite heavy for a 120mm travel bike like the Top Fuel. We've tested a set on the Slash, another set on the Top Fuel and a third set that Bontrager sent us last year, and we've not encountered any issues yet. They do come with a 2-year crash replacement guarantee, which is nice peace of mind. [Wil]

@thedalillama 2 года назад

I hope this is part of Project One. I'm beyond tired of bikes that match my BBQ and the cost of these bikes are at the point to where you should be satisfied by the paint scheme.

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Certainly is mate! As mentioned at the 3:10 mark in the video, and also in more detail in the full review right here: flowmountainbike.com/tests/trek-top-fuel-review-2022/ [Wil]

@thedalillama 2 года назад

@@FlowMountainBikeRU-vid I posted too soon. I knew better too. You guys are so thorough. Thanks!

@silver_c1oud 2 года назад

their design Almost looks like Giants Anthem...

@johnr5001 2 года назад

2700g is too heavy for 120mm bike these days.

@andreamantovani5354 Год назад

Absolutely. Epic Evo is much much better

@CCWclassic 2 года назад

That's awfully similar to the transition spur 🧐

@ChopperChad 2 года назад

But 2.5lbs heavier

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Perhaps a little burlier than the Spur? The Top Fuel also uses a genuine four-bar suspension design rather than a single pivot flex-stay, so we reckon it's a little closer to the Santa Cruz Tallboy and Pivot Trail 429. [Wil]

@CCWclassic 2 года назад

@@FlowMountainBikeRU-vid I dunno... I used to ride a fuel ex for my shorter travel bike and traded for a Spur this year. I feel like that spur is every bit as capable as the Fuel was.

@Angrylittleboys 2 года назад

2x Trek boys testing a Trek. Maybe get a Scott or Specialised guy to do a non biased test 😇

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Hi there! Thanks for watching and for the feedback. Just to clarify, we actually test and review a whole load of different bikes here at Flow, including Trek, Specialized, Cube, Giant, Merida, Santa Cruz, Curve, Norco, Canyon, Pivot, Polygon, Cotic, Marin, Orbea, Scott and Commencal - just to name some of the brands that you'll have seen on the website over the past year or so. In regards to this review on the new Top Fuel, in addition to his experience within this particular category, Ben actually owns the existing Top Fuel. That made him an ideal candidate out of our test crew - not just because he can offer a qualified critique of the changes Trek has made, but also because he's testing the bike within its intended purpose. For what it's worth, Ben's not actually into the changes that Trek has made with the new Top Fuel. While he had fun on it, he personally prefers the existing bike. Ultimately our reviews aren't here to tell you whether we like the bike or not though - that's totally irrelevant. Instead, we're here to inform our readers and viewers what the bike does well and what it doesn't do well, in order to help them make an informed decision. Hopefully that clears things up for ya! [Wil]

@francisbrooks8533 2 года назад

$1600 cheaper despite being similar. Hard to explain? Not really. Trek were trying to rip us off before. You can thank Canyon et al for forcing Trek to get real. I have been looking hard at Canyon, even though I think Trek are the more innovative and better design, my finger has hovered over the Canyon buy button on more than one occasion recently. Trek just werent a good deal, unless you can beat down the dealers, which ruins the buying experience. Make an enemy of your trek dealer? Why? Good think I saw this review. Trek are back on the menu boys. As long as they can deliver a bike sometime this decade.

@thesupernad 2 года назад

looks like a 2019 gen fuel

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

It does look very similar doesn't it Jordan! Makes us wonder what's in store for the next generation Fuel EX 🤔 [Wil]

@bradyb2482 2 года назад

replace the wheels, forks and bars and its up to scratch, errr, next

@gedward4335 2 года назад

Not as much of a review as a reading of the press materials.

@lee.j7077 2 года назад

Can the Sid fork be bumped out to 130mm?

@FlowMountainBikeYouTube 2 года назад

Hi there Lee! 120mm is the maximum travel the SID can be set at. You'd be looking at the Pike if you were after a 130mm travel fork from RockShox. [Wil]

@lee.j7077 2 года назад

@@FlowMountainBikeRU-vid id probably look at the carbon model with the fox 34 just to have that option thanks

@lee.j7077 2 года назад

@@FlowMountainBikeRU-vid can you do a review of your top 3 trail bikes please?