Big thanks to Fuell for sponsoring this video. More details about the FLLOW can be found here: :www.fuell.us/products/fuell-fllow-e-motorcycle?Second+Gear
İf u want Sport Touring the best seat position in its class. You can ride 3 hours without stop you choose ninja650 2023. İf you want a race bike and only ride 30 minutes because of riding position choose 4rr. İf u want comfort choose ninja650 if you want just race speed some on track choose 4rr. If u want to ride in city or 3 4 5 hours journeys choose ninja650. İf you want short rides choose race bike. they cannot be compared because their riding purposes. are different. Ride safe take care. Both cool bikes!
Thanks for the great comparison video. Both fun bikes from Kawasaki. I have a '21 Ninja 650 and for 20 years of riding motorcycles, it's perfect for my riding style, but can still easily get one into trouble with 127+ mph and 0 to 60 in 3.5 seconds. For the 4 gallons, I get 200 miles range, which is great. The low end power is able to lift the front up a bit with just the throttle fully opened from low gear. Very flickable and easy to control, which surprised me. A very practical, comfortable motorcycle.
I love my 650. If i race. I will choose zx4rr. But every day is not a racing day rather a day going through heavy traffic in all weathers. All i know is my 650 can go up to 350km by just pumping gas of 14 liters
If even it was Ninja 650 vs Ninja 400 I'll would choose Ninja 400 as Ninja 400 has +2-3 kmph more per gear top speed and Ninja 650 has limiter on 213 and Ninja 400 has limiter on 216. So here I would anyday go for ZX-4R
@@no_name4080 Not really. Unfortunately a Ninja 400 because of it's torque advantage actually can beat a ZX-4RR on track. Good rider on track prepped but still cheaper overall Ninja 400 can beat a good rider on a ZX-4RR with a exhaust. The ZX-4RR is a very good bike, I'm glad Kawasaki made it but compared to the ZX-6RR chassis and suspension it's lacking in quality. Which would be fine if it was lighter, it's a bit too heavy. Reduce it's weight but still being able to ride it on the street and have fully adjustable suspension in the front then it'll probably smoke the Ninja 400. However as it sits right not we can't ignore the torque advantage a P-twin like the Ninja 400 has, and we also need to remember that the Ninja 400 is also quite peaky, unlike the bigger Ninja 650 which is way more torquey. However the Ninja 650 is a bad bike, or at least a absolutely horrible Kawasaki Ninja bike. Shouldn't be compared, it should be out of production instead. Good torque is good, but it has no peaky power which is what a Ninja should have. It has the worst power and worst torque numbers, and is commonly compared to the way better, but of course less powerful Ninja 400, and not it's competitors. Kawasaki is such a cool manufacturer right now, the best currently, except for their middleweight 650cc bikes which suck compared to even the old and aging parts bin bike MT-07, and especially the new and great GSX-8S and Hornet 750, and if you got the money a Tuono660/RS660 or a Duke 890. I wouldn't say the Ninja 400 is obsolete as it's a very good bike for beginners, and unless you have money and you really want to rev the shit out of your bike with a cool sound then you should get the Ninja 400 and not the ZX-4RR as your beginner motorcycle. The Ninja 650 however has been obsolete from the start, garbage bike.
@@eirikaustad7580 you sound like you want a ninja 650 flashed to enjoy its power and confort but can NOT afford it! Because is 3 grand more for the extra cc’s you sound very hurt!
@@EdDesan77 You seem to have very basic understanding of motorcycles only thinking of extra displacement. You know nothing about my financial situation or the pricing for bikes in my country and continue to comment. I can afford it but it ain't worth 13k $ quickly converted over to dollars.
@@no_name4080 Z650 is naked bike with same engine, red line and torque. Its not the case. But that gloriuous 4 cylinders sound is just amazing, you should go for 4RR only of this )
@@no_name4080 I currently own a 2009 ER6n .. yeah, it's awesome .. great torque , very easy to handle .. great all rounder bike . I plan to buy the MT 07 someday when I have the money .. even more torque + 270° crank parallel twin..
@@InegoMinblan not everyone likes flatplane inline 4 sound. I'm one of the very few people that like the exhaust note of 270° parallel twin/Crossplane 2 , Vtwin more than flatplane inline 4.. But my most favorite is the Crossplane 4 .
@@InegoMinblan not a fan of flatplane inline 4 sound. So I would choose torque. Also the 180°crank parallel twin sounds boring on low RPM , but mid to high RPM sounds great .
Getting bored of these comparison vids where you compare two completely different machines. Do an r1 vs sv650 next. Or a harley sportster and a 765 street triple.
