60-130 Test.. Camaro SS vs. Challenger Scatpack - Here's the proof 

Its a good looking car for sure..

Eh, I disagree. It has shit visibility and a really tight interior and not in a good way.

@@GearheadK20C4 I've driven my friends enough to know that I'd never get used to it over my Lexus ISF.

@@GearheadK20C4 I'm not shitting on the car. They're nice cars, but having to get used to the visibility doesnt suddenly make it a good thing in my book.....

@@GearheadK20C4 ya, that's really up to the individual to decide anyway. It offers alot of other great things that can offset it

Much appreciated my friend

I fully agree..

Can u change the gearing on the scat to make less torque but more top end?

@@alexander_3923 a cam would make more power on the top end

That’s because the challenger is designed and tuned for 1/4 mile drag racing from a dig. It’s specifically built for drag racing.

Thank you brother

I have never seen so much FACTS.

So true! Thanks!

Preach bro

this

Camaros the best sports car in the class easily

Thank you my friend

Thank you my friend

Absolutely

Thank you Jaye

You bet 🤜🔥

Thank you my friend

Thank you my friend 👍

Absolutely 🤜🔥

Thank you my friend

For sure Mike.. on a roll the tire variable is taken out of play luckily but yes the weight is a huge factor

Factory weight was around 37-3800 vs 41-4200 last I checked. 400 lbs not 600

Thank you Eric

Thank you Robert

Don't listen to that guy get the best grades you can and work the hardest you can and you will get whatever it is you want

Yes dedication starts with applying yourself.. working hard.. and staying determined! Don’t ever let someone tell you that you can’t 🤜🔥

@@b.valdez2426 grades aren’t everything 😂 you just got want it badly enough for you to wrk your ass off

Going to have to agree with the first guy. I had terrible grades in highschool. I bought my Mustang at 24 because at age 20 i was tired of working horrible jobs, that's when i started working hard for my dreams.

dont listen to the idiots that say grades dont matter. They say that just because they had shitty grades and never took school seriously. Once you get your career going you'll be driving around in whatever you desire.

Thank you my friend

Thank you Brian.. much appreciated

LOL yes I had to bring back sombreros for everyone ..

@@RacerX9 my Scatpack is so much quicker than it was when it was new.. feels like it isanyway. And if you put anything but 93 in it it’s a turd

Yes it certainly would

@Shaun yeah, a little weight loss is definitely, one of the most important and noticable mods you can ever do to these rides!

I would love to have a lighter challenger but on the same side i like them thick sofa seats, door panels, spacious interior etc etc. Its more comfortable

If you want somthing with less weight get a mustang or camaro Challenger is the last of their kind

I don't think Dodge cares because people keep buying them.

Thank you my friend

Thank you Chad..

Yes the Mustang really moves on the top end 👍

@@RacerX9 i got a 2018 GT A10 if your interested im in Dallas

I have outrun a 10sd coyote in my Scat. We only went to 100. On the street from 0 to 100 is the magic place to be good at. And driver skill always plays a part. I know the Mustang would have caught and passed me after that. The weight and lack of aerodynamics is too much to overcome in the Scat.

Gt or 2ss ?

@@xxsilver_gamingxx389 GT has the 10R80 10-speed I thought. I was talking about the 8L90 8-speed found in the '16-18 Camaro and the 8HP70 8-speed found in the 6.4 Challenger/Charger

ForNoRaisin Ohhh, I was talking about which one is better

@@xxsilver_gamingxx389 Both. Honestly all three (Ford, Chevy, Dodge) have points where they edge the others out. Automotive makers have designed these three pony cars in a way where there really isn't one best one to choose. It boils down to which one you prefer. I personally have an liking towards the way the Challenger feels, but that is entirely a opinion of mine and mine alone. All three of them are fantastic cars that are soo close to each other with performance that I can't ever say one is better then the others. I know that doesn't really help to answer your question, but it's a question that just has to be answered by oneself after having taken a trip in all three. I have a buddy of mine who will ONLY drive a mustang and swears that its the best. But then again, I have another buddy who will not give up their 1LE for anything. I am personally wanting a 6.4 Chally. If I can save up enough money, I'd get the Hellcat. But my heart truly wants a Demon but my wallet absolutely won't let it. At the end of the day, you have to decide which one you think is the best one.

ForNoRaisin you actually wrote a whole essay haha, you are actually very very correct it all comes down to what you like best 🤷‍♂️ and what like everyone says ”there is always someone faster than you” and I agree but I love all three tbh but I've always had challenger's in my heart 😈

Much appreciated my friend

Yes we have some room to play here in Texas.. depending on where you are. I will say that the camaro is a nice driving car. Both cars certainly have their merits

Yes the idea with these tests is to be at full throttle well before you hit 60mph. I actually tried leaving at 60 in my initial testing of the draggy a while back .. everyone kept asking why my times were so slow. You can still do the test that way but you cant compare to others since typically everyone gets a full head of steam prior to hitting 60.

Yes.. I’m going to make a run at it tonight

@@RacerX9 under 5 seconds!!!

@@RacerX9 so what was your time??

Thanks buddy

Can you explain how you class a car muscle or sport? I feel like the mustang and camaro are too heavy to be called sport.

@@StillElias more track focused, 69 maros and mustang are more of a muscle car compared to todays models

@@Salim_shahidy the widebody challengers are supposed to be more “track” focused does that make them sports cars? they don’t have to be big, heavy and can’t take corners to be muscle cars. it’s about the raw power and performance.

@@jcartier9yearsago403 the widebody is just like a kid that wears a cape to try to be superman but you do have a point

@@StillElias I think the fact that the challengers have retained the classic muscle look might be what he means. The cameras and the mustangs look absolutely NOTHING like the classic muscle cars do. The challenger is the only car left that has retained that classic American Muscle look. Some people, like myself value that a lot because I love old school American Muscle. Like if you offered me a 1967 Shelby GT500 I would absolutely take that over any dodge. But if you offered me anything after like 1990 I would probably throw up in my mouth a little bit. I guess in short what I am trying to say is, these new camaros and mustangs are not camaros and mustangs. They have ZERO resemblance to the legendary cars they once were.

Thank you Clint

Peitz performance in Houston.. no worries

The camaro definitely has a different look and feel. You sit way down in the car.. takes some getting used to. The scat is definitely the more comfortable car of the two.. Mopars have those big plush seats

Still slower

People like to compare mustangs n stuff with these monsters of cars like try putting a 392 into a stang I bet that thing will just spin rather than move dodge has the weight yea but u can’t compare to these engines

@@HiRy420 The 5.0 is also a beast on its own, it'll handle a lot more power adders. Personally, I see the mustang and maro as muscle-like sports car where the challenger lives up to the classic muscle criteria.

@@yesirsky4456 I never said it was faster lol. Camaros are 🗑 still

@@Beernutz71GBD yeah but you were making excuses, Chargers & Challengers are plain and cheap af, that’s why even has them, cause they are way cheaper than camaros

Yes I agree

Yeah it will then the scatpack grabs a second wind, well my charger does anyway, it seems to slow a bit 100 to 130 then goodbye.

@@overboosted3.5 Is this on a scat?

Mrs. X has a 87mm ported TB.. seems to work well

Better looking? 😂🤢

Whatever these cars do. The V8 Mustang of your time period is always the benchmark for a “fast” car.

From what I know it just puts the power down quicker

it was probably in track mode, it calls for more aggressive shifts so i wouldnt expect it to be as smooth as the camaro

Yes they make a couple ..

@Jr Jr no it ain’t ....

Check mine out

Much appreciated

I will see what I can do..

Lol.. sometimes gotta go without the hat

For sure Steve

Challenger RT.. great package

@@RacerX9 i agree. My cousin bought a new 2011 challenger rt with the pistol grip 6spd in plum crazy purple and that car was an awesome daily and had respectable performance.

Why lol i wanna kno

Hell of a car for the money. Its a no brainer for me.

Base for base they are actually only slightly more.. the scat has a base price of around 40k.. with both cars it depends on the options .. a mustang GT with the track pack and all the goodies can approach the mid 50's and of course so can the scatpack if it has all the bells and whistles.

They do take some getting used to

I have a hard time fitting in those. I'm 6'1 and 230lbs, much more comfortable in a Challenger coupe verses a camaro coupe...lol

They are not light lol

@@RacerX9 hey fat kids need love too brother!!! lol

I think they went over 1970 weight

Google machine says 1970 R/T 426 hemi weighs 3800 lbs

@@samholcombe3129 it's pretty close. Especially when you compare it to the others. Granted Camaro and Mustang aren't Muscle Cars they were Pony cars in the 60s. I think the weight actually helps the Challenger/Charger with some amazing road manners. Especially on long road trips.

Power to weight, gearing, and aero .. those are the factors

Dodge cars are geared for low-end acceleration as they are heavier. Honestly with this in mind, I'm very impressed with how well the 392 did.

The best results were came from firmly rolling in at 25mph and having it all the way down at 50.. stabbing it in 2nd was slower.. leaving from a dig was slower.. RPM was not a big factor as long as you were at full throttle by 45mph. Manually shifting the cars also proved to be slower and less consistent

Good Vid! I own a 2020 Ss and I will tell you that on a roll she pulls best by putting the car in paddle shift mode and holding it paddle down and that puts the car in its most optimal gear then stabbing it then immediately throw her back in auto and she pulls like crazy.

Or imagine that same guy walking in that told you he wants to use your cars to promote their dealership and its highly likely that more that 50,000 car people will see it in the first month alone.. which will actually reach more target audience than a commercial run on a local network that could cost anywhere from 15-20k .. then imagine he says he's going to do it for free! Hmmmm maybe there is a reason that more than a dozen of the local dealerships keep asking me to come review their cars.. go figure lol

@@RacerX9 badass response 👍🏻

Thanks buddy.. much appreciated

Your ATS-V would trap 135 in the 1/4 mile with just tune downpipes and e85?... I call bullshit

@@techmaster777 more around 137-138 I’ve posted my runs on the draggy app just got a 6.36 last night 60-130 😁 world record holder for the V

I think the DA was actually somewhere in like the negative 800 range lol.. 40 degrees outside.

Still love the way the scatpack drives on the street.. tons of fun

@@RacerX9 Let the 392 work it's voodoo!