Honda 1.5 ivtec is the best NA option. While Fun to drive element is there in turbo but it's hardly 5% usage of car lifespan rest 95% have to deal with turbo lag. Turbos are supposed to be driven in Turbo rev range where the performance lies.
Sir g i have sold my vechile in cars 24 on feb 2019 abh thak rc transfer nahi huwa kuch proper response nahi kya karu ??? Bol rahe hai end buyer ka phone numbers switched off and not active
❤bhai bahut video dekhe, bahut reviews sune h. But jitna easy aur explain aapne kiya h wo kabhi nahi dekha. Turbo aur N.A. engine ko sahi clarify kar diya. Randomly video watch kiya tha par 1 hi video me subscribe kar raha hu 🙏
VW 1.0 TSI is the best 3 cylinder small Turbo Petrol engine in the market. Best NA engine is 1.5 IVTEC in Honda Elevate. Best overall engine is VW 1.5 TSI. Period sir.
My running in the city of Mumbai is just 22 km a day. When I drove XUV 3OO for the first time, I was so damn happy that all the other na cars are feeling underperformed. Do u recommend me XUV 300 TGDI
Im from Karnataka State Mysore Distt, recently purchased Tata Tiago Nrg Xz. Very good mileage superb driving dynamics. It is engine is not bad as u think it was before. Do try B6 phase 2. Noise is very very negligible. Thanks
Honda 1.5 ivtec is better than vw 1.0 turbo. Till most usable speed around 130 kmph the vtec has better acceleration , pickup , no lag and better fuel efficiency even though it has less torque .
Booked honda elevate ZX CVT, But getting confused between Skoda kushaq 1.0L TSI or any other.. it would be the first car in family… monthly usage km would be less, mostly in highway
performance and interior quality in Skoda kushaq is premium & top notch, But I felt the Honda is more comfortable, which made me to go for Elevate. But still having double mind for both
Anyday Honda for tried & tested with proven Reliability of 1.5 iVtec Engine. VW-Skoda offer very poor spares availability & poor Service Stn Network. VW-Skoda Service Stn milks their Customers Royally with unethical practices. In Short they loot you handsomely.
@@rajoosolanky780it's not correct, skoda 2.0 stragegy is providing service at reasonable rate and parts are also now localized to its is now affordable . Don't judge by hearing things need to research and understand. Skoda kushaq 1.0 and 1.5 TSI engine are far superior than honda elevate
@@DakshKaPaksh Bhai Aisa mt bolo kl hi delivery Li hai,,,,, but I have read Latin ncap is very strict ADAS and 6 airbags is a must for Latin ncap.......
Hello daksh C3 aircross ka review kab karoge ? C3 ke users chaiye to facebook group page per mil jayenge ? Ec3 ka ek group telegram per hai uske review ke liye user chaiye to mujhe batao
Xuv300 is offering you almost similar driving dynamics, better width space in rear seat so 3 can sit comfortably (better than Kushaq) at a price point of 3 lacs lesser. XUV 300 Good engine power (petrol) & driving dynamics but reliability is a question 3 ppl can sit behind. Less boot space Old interiors. Kushaq Driving dynamics best. Good engine Only 2 can sit in rear comfortably Good boot space. Better interiors than XUV 300. I am also stuck b/w Kushaq & XUV 300. Loved both of them. Waiting for XUV 300 facelift.
@@sreejithRsm Thanks for highlighting the points. we thought of waiting for XUV300 facelift but again they will increase the price and its always good to wait for sometime before buying newly launched cars. Hence going for Kushaq ambition. Main reason : no rear AC vents, less bootspace in XUV
Rear AC vents is a gimmick. It's just that 2min of air blowing on your face. Otherwise the car will take the same time to cool with/ without rear vents. XUV 300 has the dual AC feature & 3 power steering modes making it light/ tight/ comfort as the driver wants. No other brand offers these 2 features. Boot space yes, Kushaq has more. But remember, more than 2ppl behind for a 20kms+ journey would always be a pain in Kushaq. Only reason why I still hesitate to buy Kushaq. Just an advice, XUV300 facelift is worth waiting if boot space is not a necessity. What if Mahindra launches it at around the same price.
@@sreejithRsm yeah your points are right, we have faced difficulties of people in rear struggling when AC is on so we are preferring for rear AC vents and ventilated seats. We are buying the car for highway use and hence boot space matters and usually facelift always comes with price hike of 1-2L and waiting period of Mahindra is also more. We don't know what to expect in facelift hence decided to go for Kushaq. I guess it boils down to individual preferences.
Daksha Bro, I am a noob in driving, The budget is like 15-16 Lacs, Shall I buy City V CVT or Slavia or Virtus. Only City Running, 10% highway running and no hill running at all. Which would be the best in all of them.
Go for Skoda/VW only if there is service center in your city. For pure city driving, 1.0L TSI and 1.5 VTEC both will be good enough. Test drive all vehicles then decide
I have City CVT , poor build quality, low mileage in city around 7.5 in Delhi , not fun to drive, infotainment system is not at all good, just avg and sedan is not practical on Indian roads. Even in case I had to buy sedan I would go for Virtus. I have driven Virtus and is 1000 times better than City.
Boss, yu were doing good earlier, lekin abhi aap Bina baat ke kheech rahe ho video ko..!!! Aapne main muddha nhi bataaya, sabko pataa hain Turbo Engine ke baare main ki it's for enthusiasm, fast paced, lekin servicing main kiska kitna kharcha aata hain.
Hello Daksh - 100% city driving ke liye automatic car dekh rahe hain. On-road budget 16 lakhs ke Aas paas hai. Brezza ZXI+ AT, Honda City V aur Verna SX mein confused hain. Brezza ke ground clearance pe jaayein ya sedan ke comfort pe.
