Тёмный

A 1611 King James Bible from GreatSite.com 

R. Grant Jones
Подписаться 11 тыс.
Просмотров 14 тыс.
50% 1

Greatsite's 1611 Facsimile KJV, Reduced-Size Reference Edition (ISBN 9781424323449), is approximately two-thirds the size of the original King James Bible printed in 1611. Even so, it is a large volume, measuring 11 1/8 x 9 5/16 x 3 1/4 inches in dimensions and weighing about 10 pounds.
This edition has a sewn binding, heavy cream-colored paper, and almost no ghosting. The cover is black imitation leather over boards. Unlike the Oxford and Hendrickson 1611 KJV reproductions, this edition is printed in the same blackletter (Gothic) text used in the original. You may find it challenging to read. I show some blackletter oddities starting at the 26:16 point.
The font is roughly 11 points in height.
The text is that of the "He" Bible of 1611, which Scrivener thought was the second printing, but which is now recognized as the first. It differs in many ways from more modern KJV Bibles. I discuss a few of the more interesting differences in the video, beginning at the 22:51 point. (The vast majority of differences are trivial.)
Detailed Contents
00:00 Dimensions, margins, layout, font ... (four charts)
00:37 Size compared to the Oxford Quartercentenary Edition and the Cambridge Cameo
01:15 Dimensions
01:30 Page layout
03:00 The font in the text
04:30 References, alternative translations, and literal renderings
05:30 The decorative drop caps, including Pan, Poseidon, and Daphne
07:40 Paper qualities
08:11 Print non-uniformity (fading)
08:28 The binding is sewn
09:08 The red and yellow head and tail bands
09:30 The copyright page
09:57 The illustrated title page
10:58 The epistle dedicatory
11:15 The translators to the reader
11:35 The calendar of readings for Morning and Evening Prayer
13:15 The readings appear to be the same as those in the Book of Common Prayer
14:00 The calendar is explained in an appendix to Gordon Campbell's "Bible, The Story of the King James Version"
14:16 The almanac, showing certain holy days between 1603 and 1641
14:40 A table for finding Easter
15:07 The table and calendar of lessons throughout the year
15:35 The table of contents
15:50 The Great Seal of the Realm
16:23 The genealogies
17:18 The map and map index
17:55 The "He" and "She" Bibles of 1611, Ruth 3.15
19:06 The duplication of text in Exodus 14.10
19:40 The original 1611 KJV does NOT qualify as a "Pure Cambridge Edition"
20:03 The KJV on the translation continuum
21:29 A close-up look at the font
22:02 The font compared to that in the 1526 Tyndale New Testament
22:22 The font compared to that in the Schuyler Canterbury
22:41 The font compared to that in the Cambridge Cameo
22:51 **Differences between the 1611 KJV and modern KJVs**
23:23 Mark 10.18: "There is no man good" or "There is none good"?
24:16 Ezekiel 24.7: "poured it upon the ground" or "poured it not upon the ground"?
25:03 John 15.20: "greater then the Lord" or "greater than his lord"?
25:41 Matthew 16.16: "Thou art Christ" or "Thou art the Christ"?
26:16 **Observations on the blackletter text**
26:28 Matthew 6.19 - the pilcrow (paragraph mark), the 'r' that looks like a '2', the long 's', the initial 'u' written as a 'v'
28:24 Matthew 4.18 - the 'I' that looks and sounds like a 'J', the broken 'w', the long 's' contrasted with an 'f'
29:31 Matthew 4.13 - the hyphen that looks like a slanted equal sign, the initial 'u' looks like a 'b'
30:38 Matthew 4.11 - the 'v' written like a 'u' in 'deuill',
30:58 Matthew 5.32 - a typo: 'saving' written as 'saning' because a 'u' was placed upside down
31:22 Matthew 5.15 - some typos in the notes
31:49 Matthew 6.20 - the ampersand
32:23 Matthew 7.6 - perhaps 'rent' meant 'rend' in 1611?
33:03 James 1.9 - the 'x' looks like an 'r'
33:24 The New Testament Title Page
33:56 Summary

Опубликовано:

 

27 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 108   
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
This Bible may be purchased here: greatsite.com/facsimile-reproductions/1611reduced.html .
@MrMarmar2014
@MrMarmar2014 3 года назад
R. Grant Jones Do You Have A Review On The Ethiopian Bible?
@MM-jf1me
@MM-jf1me Год назад
Great Site no longer publishes Bible facsimiles, which is a shame as this is a gorgeous Bible! Thank you for the detailed review. Maybe I'll be fortunate enough to come across an affordable edition on the secondhand market or hopefully another publisher will produce new replicas of good quality.
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones Год назад
@@MM-jf1me - That is bad news, M M, but thanks for passing it along.
@chrais78
@chrais78 Год назад
​@@MM-jf1me I was also disappointed to discover they no longer sell the facsimiles. I would LOVE to own such a Bible!
@deeemm8350
@deeemm8350 3 года назад
It's always refreshing to see the original KJV in its Anglican glory; with the traditional "catholic-esque" title page imagery, the Translators to the Reader, calendar of feast days, lectionary, the Apocrypha, etc... You know, all that Independent Fundamental Baptist stuff.
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
Great comment, Dee Emm!
@j.woodbury412
@j.woodbury412 Год назад
The lettering in this Bible is so cool! I've been trying to read some it and I find that I actually can read it pretty well. Some of the letters obviously look different from today, but it's really not that hard to figure out, at least what I've seen. The writing in that Bible looks like a piece of art.
@ThriftStoreBibles
@ThriftStoreBibles 3 года назад
This is exactly the kind of Bible review I subscribe for, I love learning about very unique and interesting Bibles like this one. I see elsewhere you stated the Study Bible video is forthcoming; looking forward to it!
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
Thanks for the kind comment, Thrift Store Bibles!
@micahwatz1148
@micahwatz1148 Год назад
I love the way this Bible reads. Its really easy on my eyes in person.
@helgeevensen856
@helgeevensen856 3 года назад
oh, the early days of book printing... it is amazing that they got the vast majority of the text (95%?) rightly printed.... the problem was that the types were set by the printers/typesetters, not by the authors or editors of books.... it was so painstakingly difficult to print such a large book as the Bible... it is amazing that the printers (typesetters) got it at least 95% (?) right... - fun to see all those typos.... and what a beautifully printed text... wow.... :)
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
The typeface is indeed beautiful. I've been using this copy almost exclusively since it arrived.
@AnHebrewChild
@AnHebrewChild Год назад
Much better than 95% actually!
@nottechytutorials
@nottechytutorials 2 года назад
Thank you for showing us such an indepth insight into this bible. It is interesting what you tell us of the first and subsequent editions of the King James Version, I don't know much about it, but its nice hearing you talk about it. And I can see why people would want a facsimile of this, it has a lot of neat pictures. It looks like a lot of work went towards the original.
@johnwilderspin1633
@johnwilderspin1633 3 года назад
Hi Grant, great review, thank you. I’ve been a fan of Great Site ever since they offered an original Tyndale NT with blood splattered over some of the pages, possibly belonging to the original owner. Blessings, John
@eclipsesonic
@eclipsesonic 3 года назад
I have this Bible. It's great! I love the fact that it's a true facsimile of the original 1611 KJV, in terms of preserving the true gothic-style font and genealogy charts, unlike the Hendrickson 1611 KJV that I own.
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
I agree. Thanks for commenting, eclipsesonic!
@JohnnyUmphress
@JohnnyUmphress 3 года назад
Great review, beautiful Bible. I really would love to have one. But at $300 and more, it is far out of reach of most people.
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
$125 for the reduced size edition shown in the video.
@ivanfourie
@ivanfourie 3 года назад
I always find it funny that KJV onliests will (1) condemn the apocrypha as complete useless nonsense as well as (2) deny any and all credibility and claims of the Septuagint as an earlier and authentic translation of the tanakh into greek. . . YET in the original KJV as you well know has the apocrypha included and translators themselves attest to fact that the Septuagint is an authentic original greek translation of the hebrew tanakh.
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
True, but apparently facts don't matter to them. Thanks for commenting, Ivan!
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
@@gts3004 - since the translators were members of the Church of England, they held to Article VI, which states that the Church reads the Apocrypha "for example of life and instruction of manners; but yet doth it not apply them to establish any doctrine." Had they believed the Apocryphal books to be "complete useless nonsense," why would they have included them at all? I know no one who regards the Septuagint to be a perfect translation. The key point is that the KJV translators did not believe, as certain modern people do, that the Septuagint came into existence *after* the New Testament books were written. They state, "But when the fulness of time drew near, when the Sun of righteousness, the Son of God should come into the world, whom God ordained to be a reconciliation through faith in his blood, not of the Jew only, but also of the Greek, yea, of all of them that were scattered abroad; then lo, it pleased the Lord to stir up the spirit of a Greek Prince (Greek for descent and language) even of Ptolome Philadelph King of Egypt, to procure the translating of the Book of God out of Hebrew into Greek."
@MinisterRedPill
@MinisterRedPill 3 года назад
Can't stand KJV only people lol the KJV has so many errors yet they claim its the "Inspired word of God in the English language". What about the Geneva Bible? People of that era used that Bible mote than they used the KJV.
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
@@gts3004 - thanks! I appreciate the encouragement.
@hassanmirza2392
@hassanmirza2392 3 года назад
​@@RGrantJones When I started to read Bible, I bought Oxford KJV Paperback edition. The Apocrypha section created a lot of confusion for me. Most Muslims dont know anything about it, they think that Bible has only Jewish books as OT and Christian ones as NT. It took me few months to figure out the details of Apocrypha dispute, which also tells you about the historical details about divisions within Christianity. Since I have read it, I think Apocrypha has some useful historical and wisdom writings but also a lot of fiction stories like Judith, Tobit, Baruch, Danial additions. These are all legends and not scripture. OT books read like scripture and were composed in the Prophetic period. Apocrypha should be in appendix only and not in OT. Septuagint is a historic translation, but probably what matters are the original Greek and Hebrew manuscripts and not translations like Vulgate and Septuagint?
@larrym.johnson9219
@larrym.johnson9219 3 года назад
Thank you, fascinating to learn about this Bible.
@micahwatz1148
@micahwatz1148 Год назад
This is some wholesome content
@zachtbh
@zachtbh 2 года назад
This is a great review actually. 👍 Wonder if you'll do other facsimiles like this from great site, or heritage bibles, etc in the future
@MannyBrum
@MannyBrum 2 года назад
The ꝛ is called R rotunda. In blackletter type it is used when the R comes immediately after a letter that is rounded on the right side. It's not something that was used much outside of blackletter/gothic scripts.
@MM-jf1me
@MM-jf1me Год назад
That's interesting info! Thank you for sharing it.
@ryansantoni
@ryansantoni 3 года назад
Thanks for the very interesting review, the Greek mythology in the drop caps is intriguing, I’ve been reading C S Lewis’ the discarded image in which he speaks on how much influence ancient texts had on late medieval and enlightenment culture. Perhaps Greek mythology was such a literary cultural phenomenon for them that it wouldn’t have been perceived as pagan anymore. I was wondering if Daphne becoming a tree in Romans is a representation of the ingrafting of the gentiles, I think I’ve done enough speculating lol
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
Thanks for commenting, Ryan! I've heard speculation that those drop caps were used simply because they were what the printer had readily available. I have no idea whether that's true. But I like your (humorous) speculation regarding Daphne!
@stephengilbreath840
@stephengilbreath840 3 года назад
I have a hardcover 1611 KJV 400th anniversary edition. I actually do read it on occasion lol
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
Thanks for commenting, Stephen!
@GuardianAngel..
@GuardianAngel.. 2 года назад
I have a question do you think this Bible can fit in my coat pocket
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 2 года назад
Lol. I believe there are coats - tailored for giants, perhaps - with huge pockets on them. But you'll have trouble walking without leaning to one side.
@Josh-yk6xk
@Josh-yk6xk 3 года назад
Looks like a good everyday bible
@fuddlywink1
@fuddlywink1 7 месяцев назад
My favorite bible BTW
@henkdevries1507
@henkdevries1507 3 года назад
Thanks for showing where you can order this, very interesting. Any idea when you will post the video about your favorite study bibles you announced some time ago?
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
Thanks for commenting! To answer your question, it should be within the next few weeks.
@teletheates
@teletheates 3 года назад
L. capitulum = lit., little head. Functional and linguistic equivalent of Gr. κεφάλαιον. It is the word that eventually gave birth to the Eng. word "chapter" via (O)Fr. "chapitre".
@-johnny-deep-
@-johnny-deep- 4 месяца назад
Hi - Have you reviewed the Bible Museum's "The 1611 King James Bible - Regular Edition Facsimile Reproduction of the 1611 First Edition King James Bible"? It looks pretty nice, and has the gothic typeface, but seems to not include 5 pages between the genealogies and Genesis. The KJV Store sells it for $140. Those missing pages include a very dense two page "An alphabetical Table of the Land of Canaan". [ EDIT: oops, I take it back. The KJV store does list that as "The Table of Canaan". So, have you seen this book, or know anything more about it? Amazon has a used copy available for $66. Not sure of the condition. ] [ EDIT2: And I just realized that this review of yours is in fact for this very same book! ]
@mb9484
@mb9484 3 года назад
Hello, I was wondering if you had any plans to review the New Catholic Bible (NCB) published by Catholic Book Publishing? I can find very little about it online, but it seems to have some rather unique features. It has endnotes rather than footnotes, and from what I have seen they seem to be more explanatory/devotional and less academic. I can find next to no information on the translation lineage or build quality, and it has had very little attention apart from being included on Bible Gateway.
@ymshao
@ymshao 11 месяцев назад
An excellent review, as always.
@AnHebrewChild
@AnHebrewChild Год назад
R Grant Jones - they are out of stock on this at GreatSites! Any idea where else, another reseller, where this facsimile can be purchased? In the last year... I've fallen in love with reading black letter. Thanks
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones Год назад
Thanks for commenting, danullb! No, I haven't yet heard of an alternative distributor.
@PrentissYeates
@PrentissYeates 3 года назад
I really wish for a well bound modern type set Geneva bible could be found in leather .
@profdomingokempis8390
@profdomingokempis8390 Год назад
I ask you as a request if you can install the king james bible 1611 in my android phone for my reference study. Thanks... Prof.
@HD23777
@HD23777 3 года назад
Thank you for posting this, it was the exact information that I was looking for. The Holy Spirit works in Amazing ways!
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
Thank you for commenting! I'm glad it was helpful to you.
@Tubby31310
@Tubby31310 Год назад
I have a question please. Is there an exact copy of KJV that no words were changed? I’m looking for exact KJV and unable to find it. Thank you.
@alter7521
@alter7521 Год назад
This is it I believe
@mauriciosolorzano3398
@mauriciosolorzano3398 2 года назад
Please tell me how I can get that beautiful bible
@enoch3874
@enoch3874 3 года назад
I have this bible, I'm very happy
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
It's an excellent Bible, Enoch. Thanks for commenting!
@evanyd18
@evanyd18 Год назад
Can you please show on this 1611 KJV the verse from Isaiah 11:6? Thank you 😊
@rachelkarslake7787
@rachelkarslake7787 3 года назад
Thank you for your video. I enjoyed the review. I find these facsimile Bibles fascinating, from an English-language perspective. I wonder if the letter difference is to signal a pronunciation difference. I have a couple of friends whom have PhDs in English from around this time period. I am going to ask them; I'm sure they know. If I find out, I will let you know.
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
Thanks for commenting, Rachel! I thought about rhoticity as a possible explanation for the 'r' variants, but that didn't make sense. (In principle it worked for the 'r' after 'o' as in 'for' -- although I was under the impression that a final 'r' was usually voiced in England in that time period -- but it failed for 'r' after 'b', 'd', and 'p'.) I'll be interested to hear what your friends say.
@Justadudeman22
@Justadudeman22 2 года назад
Beautiful bible.
@FernandoSerna1654
@FernandoSerna1654 2 года назад
There are some, like TBS, who say that the 1611 KJV is not as accurate as the KJV subsequent revisions, which is what we have in your typical KJV Bible read by people nowadays. So the David Norton edition, The Cambridge New Paragraph Bible, seems frowned on by TBS. Do you have any thoughts on the matter? One good thing about Norton’s edition is that it includes the Apocrypha. Blessings to you.
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 2 года назад
Thanks for commenting, Fernando! I know that the original 1611 had typos, some of which I showed in this video. And though some more recent editions also contain typos -- Nelson's Maclaren KJV has 'domination' instead of 'dominion' at 1 Cor 1.24 -- there are fewer of them. But I don't know much about the New Paragraph Bible or TBS's reaction to it. I've heard that it replaces some of the archaic language that attracts me to the KJV (e.g., begat and spake) and employs modern punctuation, but I would be surprised if those were the reasons TBS opposes it.
@mountaintop7683
@mountaintop7683 3 года назад
It’s interesting! Where did the title “God” come from?
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
I'm not an expert in the history of English, mt Kim. I don't know.
@jc6618
@jc6618 3 года назад
@Paul Whitman - I think you meant to say “but it sounds ghut” 👍🏻🙂
@edwardgraham9443
@edwardgraham9443 3 года назад
You could kill someone with this Bible. There are a few things in this book that would make kjv o people cringe, like the Greek gods you showed and the apocrypha. Other than not being able to identify some of the characters this one looks easy to read. Great review
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
Lol! Much easier to read than Wycliffe, that's certain. Thanks for commenting, Edward!
@edwardgraham9443
@edwardgraham9443 3 года назад
@@RGrantJones I'm wondering if good sense will ever prevail when it comes to Bible translations. I can never get this KJVO stuff. When one can say the the translation is better than the original, you know where they stand. I'm wondering what they'd think about the apocrypha, is it inspired? I mean, it's in the the God breathes KJV that Moses, Paul and the other Biblical writers wrote so it must ne inspired. Also, if the KJV contains Greek gods, they must be OK, right? After all they are found in the inspired KJV. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 As the Wycliffe, I tried to read it once and got as far as 2 lines and went no further. My brain couldn't take it.
@fuddlywink1
@fuddlywink1 7 месяцев назад
Well done A little ditty I've recorded, me playing all... Though I'd share with you You so d Good to us thanks...
@fatalframestar1593
@fatalframestar1593 3 года назад
Is there anything on an Ethiopian Bible on This page?
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
No, sorry.
@fatalframestar1593
@fatalframestar1593 3 года назад
@@RGrantJones Do you plan on reviewing a Ethiopian Bible in the near future? Great Videos by the way .
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 3 года назад
@@fatalframestar1593 - Do recommend a particular edition? If so, I'll look into it.
@fatalframestar1593
@fatalframestar1593 3 года назад
@@RGrantJones The Garima Gospels Early Illuminated Gospel Books from Ethiopia
@gtgodbear6320
@gtgodbear6320 2 года назад
Original 1611 King James Version? I thought the Apocrypha was the Dead Sea Scrolls? Okay I have a new rabbit hole. Is that more accurate than the modern KJV? Should I be reading the original 1611?
@MM-jf1me
@MM-jf1me Год назад
The Apocrypha in the KJV is known in modern Catholic Bibles as the deuterocanonicals -- the second canon, of books which were not accepted by Jews as scripture by the time the Masoretes put together their Masoretic Hebrew Bible around 1000, which many Christians assumed to be the oldest, most authoritative version of the Hebrew Bible (which is why Martin Luther wanted the deuterocanonical books excluded from the Bible -- because he doubted their provenance as we only had them in Greek, with none in Hebrew, and because Jews didn't accept it). The word "Apocrypha" is vague and includes the deuterocanonical books and/or other books of scripture which may or may not have been thought authoritative by different Christian communities. I know I'm throwing a lot of info at you. It's important to know that different religious communities considered different books authoritative. The Septuagint is a Greek version of the Bible that was put together long before the birth of Christ. Many early church fathers fought and disagreed on which books should be included within the New Testament. Jewish religious authorities disagreed which books should be included in their Bible -- two books which were particularly contentious were the book of Esther (as it's a comedy that never mentions God in its Hebrew version) and the Song of Songs, which is erotica. (The latter especially was argued about with some considering it base smut and some considering it the most sacred description of the love between God and Israel.) Interestingly, some of the texts found in the Dead Sea Scrolls include copies of some of the deuterocanonical books in whole or part in Hebrew or Aramaic as well as Greek. As for whether you should read the original 1611 KJV or the 1700s one that's common today: it's up to you, but this review shows some early problems with the text; the latter version is a clearer translation with less errors, but this 1611 edition is still valuable from a historical perspective: this is the KJV as it was read by its very first readers.
@Francis_UD
@Francis_UD 3 года назад
1 John 5:7 amen
@Mr-pn2eh
@Mr-pn2eh Год назад
Only the he Bible is correct
@micahwatz1148
@micahwatz1148 2 года назад
You your s’s are ear piercing lol
@RGrantJones
@RGrantJones 2 года назад
Yes, I know. Sorry.
@micahwatz1148
@micahwatz1148 2 года назад
@@RGrantJones wow i typed that bad lol
@ymshao
@ymshao 7 месяцев назад
This is made in China.
Далее
1611 King James Bible Regular Facsimile Edition
10:01
Просмотров 4,2 тыс.
An MEV Bible -- Personal Size Large Print
36:18
Просмотров 11 тыс.
Новые iPhone 16 и 16 Pro Max
00:42
Просмотров 1,6 млн
The Lexham English Septuagint, Second Edition
45:08
Просмотров 27 тыс.
The Oxford 1611 KJV, Quartercentenary Edition
25:53
Просмотров 24 тыс.
The Orthodox Study Bible -- An Overview and Critique
36:40
The NABRE, St  Joseph Edition
38:22
Просмотров 19 тыс.
The 1611 King James Version | Bible Review
19:00
Просмотров 20 тыс.
The Legacy Standard Bible, Handy Size Edition
28:45
Просмотров 10 тыс.
1611 King James Bible - Regular Facsimile Edition
22:31