Тёмный

A real look at GW vs OPR 

Warboss Fitz
Подписаться 2,5 тыс.
Просмотров 8 тыс.
50% 1

In this video I compare the games of one page rules and the companies as a whole. I try to remain impartial and give a no BS assessment on 11 points between the 2 companies and their flagship games, Warhammer 40k and Grimdark Future.
music by ‪@WhiteBatAudio‬

Игры

Опубликовано:

 

27 май 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 217   
@silentjoe4475
@silentjoe4475 29 дней назад
Another good thing about OPR is a lot of older gamers are blowing the dust off their minis and returning to the gaming table. I've reconnected with people I haven't seen in twenty years.
@House-Atreides
@House-Atreides 29 дней назад
Agreed. This is a key demo for OPR. Cheers to Dadhammer!
@suddenlysarablog
@suddenlysarablog 29 дней назад
LOL I dusted off my 20-year old Necrons with all the green rods in their guns in prep for 10E 40k, thinking I'd get back into it after all this time. I took one look at the new prices and the absolute maelstrom of rules changes and complexity and Nope'd right the hell out. OPR was there to catch me on my way back OUT of the hobby and now I've got several friends all interested in playing, so my 20 year old models get to see daylight (and fresh paint!) again!
@YeAuldGrump
@YeAuldGrump 28 дней назад
One of the OPR players in my group is using 5th edition Brettonians that he got from his dad. The figures are older than he is. His dad was intending to use the lizardmen, but got distracted by a 3D printer - he now has an OPR Saurian army.
@jeffruss8769
@jeffruss8769 29 дней назад
I don't care about tournaments! I just want simple rules that work so I can use my models to play with my friends in my club. Thanks OPR for doing that.
@YeAuldGrump
@YeAuldGrump Месяц назад
In general, publicly held companies are horrible for creative endeavors - be it GW or WotC. Folks sometimes blame the 'bean counters' for the problems, but Reaper Miniatures was founded by bean counters, and is one of the better miniatures companies. (Accountants whose biggest clients were in manufacturing. So, in order to understand manufacturing better, and become better accountants, they started their own manufacturing firm, originally using molds from a defunct company, then expanding from there. They are good folks!)
@fart7361
@fart7361 29 дней назад
Reaper kicks ass. I get like 90 percent of my minis from there. Best quality ive found for the price.
@DominatorLegend
@DominatorLegend 29 дней назад
I swear WotC and GW are fighting to become the worst game company on the planet.
@IHaveAName1824
@IHaveAName1824 21 день назад
this comment gave me flashbacks to the insane ranting of kevin
@samhale5413
@samhale5413 Месяц назад
I had avoided WH for years, but recently life events brought me to it. During my research I learned about OPR. Not having come from a war gaming background, the rules for WH and even OPR didn't make any sense without seeing an explanation video on YT. All this to say, from a new player's perspective, OPR is a clear winner for actually playing a game with friends on a weekend. WH has better lore and pretty models, but that isn't what I'm in it for.
@dickassley5171
@dickassley5171 29 дней назад
I use my warhammer models and lore in one page rules game so i get the best of both worlds
@suddenlysarablog
@suddenlysarablog 29 дней назад
My husband is not a wargamer either, and I've asked him about getting into 40k several times which he's always been hesitant to do. The moment I showed him OPR, he was super into the idea, and we even made a few army lists together that he seems very enthusiastic about printing!
@toastle8005
@toastle8005 29 дней назад
Have fun mate! :)
@toastle8005
@toastle8005 29 дней назад
@@suddenlysarablog good luck to both of you, what’s he playing?
@SigmaUrash
@SigmaUrash Месяц назад
I'd argue that Battletech is comparable to 40K in lore depth and fiction published.
@jocylinfrancis930
@jocylinfrancis930 Месяц назад
I’d have to look it up, but considering it’s been around longer than 40k I wouldn’t be surprised
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
thats true. Battletech has been coming back to being a popular game again. I remember playing when I was much younger with the "older gamers" at the store and having a blast. literally. My LRM ammo detonated.
@molenat9973
@molenat9973 29 дней назад
@@jocylinfrancis930if it is longer, it’s not by much. That being said, there have been numerous companies holding the Battletech IP, so the lore and minis have had some real rough times. I’m not a huge fan of the current holder (CGL) due to their political stance on some things and bringing that to the community, and on top of that, the recent kickstarter debacle. Overall though, Battletech is arguably more popular than it’s ever been I think. I play and it’s quite fun
@suddenlysarablog
@suddenlysarablog 29 дней назад
@@WarbossFitz I'm 44 now... I grew up playing Battletech in HIGH SCHOOL. I have such fond memories of it. We played it more as a roleplaying game than a wargame tho, with our personal stories played in Mechwarrior being punctuated by in-mech battles using Battletech. That's another major bonus of Battletech is the ability to do that!
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
@@suddenlysarablog I would love to play in a MechWarrior RPG. I even set one up to be the GM of a periphery states MechWarrior lance game dealing with pirates and other weird edge of the galaxy stuff but I could never get it off the ground with the group I play with.
@strohslights4996
@strohslights4996 29 дней назад
11th point. How does each company work with others? Warhammer uses constant copywrite strikes bullying small publishers that can't defend themselves and sue small companies that don't bend to the yoke. Onepagerules embraces their competitors and welcomes them to the fold enabling them to make their own rules and be published within their app. Point OPR.
@ilmozzo
@ilmozzo 29 дней назад
If I started counting how much money I have given to GW in over 10 years of hobby, I could afford to go to Nottingham and demand to stay with them for a few years without spending a cent...I've had enough, and they will never see anything from me again.
@joshgrillo2482
@joshgrillo2482 29 дней назад
Geedubs business practices will eventually crater the company in pursuit of the short term cashgrab. When that happens, I hope that someone with the resources can salvage what's left, take it private, and make it about the games again.
@suddenlysarablog
@suddenlysarablog 29 дней назад
Honestly, tho, people have been saying that for decades now. The problem is the ubiquity of their name in the hobby space. There are legit people (in 2024!!) who didn't know there were other wargames besides 40k/AoS. Even if you go online looking for ancillary hobby videos like painting vids, 95% of them are painting GW miniatures (and almost always space marines). They've secured themselves as synonymous with Miniature Wargaming the same way D&D has secured themselves as "THE" TTRPG. It's going to take a LOT for them to lose that place in the hobby space, and it'll most likely take another company stepping forward and outing them from their throne to do it.
@Yurikan
@Yurikan 28 дней назад
@@suddenlysarablog Technically Warhammer 40k is the center piece and AoS is kind a distant second.
@ravenRedwake
@ravenRedwake 29 дней назад
40K is billed as a 5 turn game but practically it’s a 3 turn game, that calls itself a 5 turn game.
@terrainaholic
@terrainaholic Месяц назад
Love the over view!!!! I'm an EXTRA smooth brained orc because I could never wrap my head around warhammer fantasy or grim dark:)!!! Now after watching you explain the rules I DON'T FEEL SO BAD!!! Any ways down loadable files for pennies on the minis for the win!!!!!
@makdaddi3921
@makdaddi3921 29 дней назад
GW and GW apologists claim GW is primarily a miniatures company. Miniatures shackled and driven to rules renders this argument quite disingenuous,
@BAGELMENSK
@BAGELMENSK 29 дней назад
You gotta tone down the rhetoric bro you sound like a twitter person
@lemongambit
@lemongambit 29 дней назад
GW is a miniatures company! Until you say then make the rules free and the codexes based on art. Then GW is a tabletop game company. Unless you want to print proxies. Then GW a miniatures company again and you're hurting artists. Unless...
@joshuafarlow-wolgast8082
@joshuafarlow-wolgast8082 29 дней назад
For years, I have been annoyed with it being a public company. The only time I really liked GW as a company was the time when they released the "Start Collecting" boxes when the new president came on board. Actual deals were good. Now I look at the Seraphon Spearhead, and it is almost double the price in 5 years really makes a statement. The only things I really would want to buy would be the launch boxes as they have actual value to them. I have wanted to try OPR for awhile. It sounds good from what you have laid out.
@nathangerardy2669
@nathangerardy2669 29 дней назад
Great vid! I have so many minis from games that are dead now. Wrath of Kings for example had some cool minis I plan to design an army for them in OPR. The fact that I can even do that makes OPR better in so many ways.
@masterwilliam8704
@masterwilliam8704 29 дней назад
Ever since I left GW I have never regretted it. Loved the community video, hope there will be more.
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
There definitely will be 😊
@LifeofSquidMann
@LifeofSquidMann 29 дней назад
OPR solely for the fact that you'll never need to rebuy your army to keep playing.
@classiccraftdestined.7596
@classiccraftdestined.7596 29 дней назад
you can still play old units in 40k with your friends which is how most people play so it makes one page rules useless. and OPR is one of the biggest rip offs in existance.
@LifeofSquidMann
@LifeofSquidMann 29 дней назад
@@classiccraftdestined.7596 There are units and characters with no datasheets in 10th Edition. Not even in Legends.
@D_A42
@D_A42 29 дней назад
@@classiccraftdestined.7596 Yeah! Spending $5 one time -and canceling immediately- to get a balanced ruleset to play with friends, using any model you want is a scam. Instead, we should spend $100 for the core rules, $60 for the codex (Both will be out of date by the time it is in your hand), $40 for every basic infantry unit on a 20 year old sprue, another $36 for each HQ unit on a 15 year old sprue, another $60 or more per tank/apc on a 20 year old sprue. Once we have spent the price of a pre owned car for a 2000 point army ($1200 - $2200 depending on army and available bundles), we can spend every waking moment keeping up with erratas, rule changes, and trying do decipher arcane language just to be sure neither of us are cheating on accident. You sir, are a smart consoooooooomer.
@Impleione
@Impleione 16 дней назад
@@classiccraftdestined.7596 how's OPR a ripoff? I mean it's literally free, at the base level... not a lot they're ripping there IMHO.
@mattbuckley6928
@mattbuckley6928 14 дней назад
​@@classiccraftdestined.7596 if you mean rip off as in "stolen ideas" you -really- need to see where 40k got all of its influences from. It's ripped off everything from The Foundation to Judge Dredd. That in itself is fine but if you're going to criticise anyone for ripping off GW is right up there and way above OPR.
@nathangerardy2669
@nathangerardy2669 29 дней назад
Heya Fitz great video! I would love a video series showing how to get started with OPR. From deciding on an army, deciding on an army list, to getting your rules and then a simple game then advanced rules game. A guide for the interested but no idea where to start noob.
@raeishimura
@raeishimura 25 дней назад
I've enjoyed One Page Rules more in the maybe 3 years i've been playing than I had in a decade with Warhammer 40k. And the fact i can easily use my old 40k armies or 3D print new stuff or really do anything i actually want has been a huge push for me creatively. The ability to do that has pushed me from a mediocre miniature painter to having won my first painting competition. It also got me started looking into many other tabletop games, expanding my horizons and having a lot of fun with a ton of new things. I think the biggest advantage GW has is brand recognition, like Kleenex. Since i started trying new games, I've discovered that there are so many games with just... better gameplay entirely. Just objectively better really. Honestly, if GW had released Warhammer 40k as it is today at the same time as the many fantastic tabletop wargames that have come out recently, I don't think they ever would have lasted. The only thing they have going for them is their brand recognition and pop culture status.
@elizabethmilward8301
@elizabethmilward8301 14 дней назад
They do have the lore, which matters to a lot of people. But yeah, I don't think they'd do too well if they didn't already have a massive player base and huge name recognition. The prices and the endless rule changes are really offputting to me as a new wargamer. The only reason I wind up considering Games Workshop is that it is what almost everyone else is playing, plus the lore. Then I look at the prices again and all the drama and rule change shananigans again and go nah.
@MiniWarMutt
@MiniWarMutt 29 дней назад
Awesome video! Thank you for sharing. Yes, your channel and the others you advertise all been a part of me getting into this OPR game. I'm hoping to have my very first GD Firefight video up soon. Yes, I'm sure there will be flaws, but this looks like it will be my jam! Keep up the awesome work!
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
That's great!
@DominatorLegend
@DominatorLegend 29 дней назад
I still haven't tried OPR, instead just went back to 4th Edition with some homebrew rules. That said, it's baffling there are people who say 40K is "the best it's ever been". 10th Edition is absolute trash- boring, heavily streamlined and sanitized for the worse. I swear at this point it's just some sort of buyer's remorse.
@bonkstrum9555
@bonkstrum9555 29 дней назад
I love the complex8ty of 40k but my friends justv want to role dice. And iv grown to love opr. Our group playes once every month and we always order out. I love this more than a tournament feel. With fewer minis and agn9stic are group can get stuff ready faster and have multiple armie for cheap.
@yingling69
@yingling69 29 дней назад
This video appeared in my recommended playlist after looking for 40K alternatives for the same reasons you presented here. I’m a cranky, old grognard who’s been squandering his time and kids’ inheritance on British metal / plastic minis since 3rd ed. and have no more patience for GW’s foolishness. I can’t change the world, but I can change where I spend my bit of disposable income. Thank you for this presentation. I will definitely look into OPR more closely. I may even be able to finally get a 3D printer with the savings! Subbed and looking forward to seeing more of your work.
@danielhall5554
@danielhall5554 29 дней назад
Brother, you earned a sub from me earlier today even before I saw this video. I've been enjoying your army breakdowns! Keep up the good work.
@Dominik189
@Dominik189 29 дней назад
I wholeheartedly agree with everything said in the video. Great video. I love 40k, but I refuse to support GW. Print my minis myself and play my own home-brewed OPR ruleset. It is absolutely brilliant. I have gotten family members who use to call me stupid and make fun of me for it into now having several armies and making time on weekends to come visit me and play a game or two. OPR to me has the potential to blow GW out of the water, simply because they're not miniature specific on their rules.
@MrBlackgobbo
@MrBlackgobbo 24 дня назад
OPR was a safeguard for my miniatures. I was thinking in selling all of them because I'm fed up of GW lies and its expensive and constantly changing rules. 9th edition started with what it seemed to be best price unit boxes; a couple of months later, they started doing again the same expensive unit boxes with the first codex. This edition, they promised at least a free detachment for every faction and the combat patrol for playing in a more simple and cheaper way... They are erasing each free detachment when its codex is launched, they haven't launched anything new for combat patrol, just downgrading the one's with most value (sisters of battle, Genestealer Cult...), etc. Every edition, same lies and worst deal for its clients. Possibly I will keep buying second hand GW miniatures, but without the feeling that I need three units of all for playing properly
@eldergeeks7301
@eldergeeks7301 21 день назад
19:20 BattleTech is the only one that rivals it.
@thel1chking
@thel1chking Месяц назад
I literally thought you were Wargamer Fritz this entire time 😂
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz Месяц назад
lol I get that alot
@Fat-Gnome
@Fat-Gnome 29 дней назад
I feel that OPR is more fun to play. The rules are streamlined, so only two rolls (one from each player) are needed to hit, instead of WH's three. Many other aspects are also simpler, sensible, and straightforward. Don't get me wrong, I love rolling dice, but having to succeed a ballistics check, then an accuracy test, then a defense roll seems a bit excessive and cumbersome. OPR is easier to learn and teach (and understand why a mechanic works the way it does).
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
I'm leaving your other comment unlocked for now so I can find it when I get home to give the list of OPR creators
@milanstehlik5969
@milanstehlik5969 29 дней назад
I have bought OPR worldbook, and while I didn't expect much, it was still disapointing. While there are some interesting ideas in there, and I approciate the new art inside, writing itself is pretty subpar, and there are no themes that would get me hyped up.
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
The world book vaguely set the stage for the Sirius sector. As a setting it has its merits, a little more star trek than I was expecting but the grimdark is there if you look for it. It's another "give it time" situation.
@milanstehlik5969
@milanstehlik5969 29 дней назад
@@WarbossFitz more like "give writer some writing classes and actual themes to work with". I like OPR system, I have bought several ppl to wargaming because of it, but because of it I am also aware of things it does poorly. And this book was one of them . I hope worldbuilding gets better, but as of now, I cannot recommend anyone else to buy that book.
@Rikalonius
@Rikalonius 22 дня назад
I have been doing tabletop since I was about 16, I'm in my 50s. Nobody, and I mean nobody holds a candle to GW for most convoluted system. I think I really got into it in 8th edition but time and money have only served to make GW worse than they've ever been. As you said, no formula for points (which to me is the worst kind of game building), constant changes to make gaming as a service, and the primary concern being to keep whales whaling. I found out about OPR about a year ago, and I liked it, but didn't really get into it. I didn't play WH40k because of the cost prohibition anyway, but I'm revisiting. I think more 40k players need to break with the abusive X, as you aptly described, and put their time and money to better use with an indy company. We all are too eager to play the industry leader because they are the industry leader, and their is a stigma against any lesser competitor, but OPR Grimdark future, is, in my opinion, better than WH40k.
@N4CHobby
@N4CHobby 8 дней назад
Excellent video! For me best option is playing one-page rules with GW minis that I really like, but I'm happy to play with other minis thanks to the minis agnostic philosophy of OPR
@PerfectionHunter
@PerfectionHunter 28 дней назад
A Tier-List sure would be nice
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 27 дней назад
its kinda coming. Im going to do a star chart and overlap them with allies to show some powerfull things you can do with the armies. There will still be few on either end of the spectrum though.
@theAV8R
@theAV8R День назад
I'm GW's target market: "price-insensitive". However, two non-cost problems killed it not long before buying 2,000 point armies for six factions. i) the fact that I can't get all the rules in one place. Even if I buy all the codices, its still a major pain in the ass to figure out what my opponent can do. I need a bunch of separate pdfs or books to search through for every game. ii) the extremely short rules life cycle. The 10th edition is still only half baked, halfway i to its release. This shouldnt even count as its own official release until 3 years after rules are finalized. Or Hell, 8 years after rules are finalized. These guys want to be the porsche of games, and I respect that. However, they need to learn to treat their customers as such, with automatic pdf copies of updated books with each change. This last balance patch had all a bunch of separate documents! Not a single revised main rulebook. Jesus these guys are freaking amateurs. Imagine, they could have had $25,000 from me on day 1, and gotten five in my family hooked, had they not cur off their nose to spite their face.
@madrobot711
@madrobot711 29 дней назад
sold!!! thanks for the info.
@JuanOchoa
@JuanOchoa 27 дней назад
I resisted wargaming until printers and OPR made them affordable. No turning back now.
@saunteringspellcaster
@saunteringspellcaster 29 дней назад
To me the whole "OPR is just Kirkland Warhammer" misses the mark. OPR not only has armies that Warhammer does not such as Jackals Duchies of Vinci Infected Colonies and Ratmen Clans, but the customizability of OPR allows for people to make armies for just about anything. I have seen people on the Community List make everything from Napoleonic Armies to Arrakis to Helldivers to people even making it their job to create custom armies such as what happened with Sin's Miniatures and his Catmen army or the Fae Petal Courts which is just one army. Honestly If I gave it enough time I could probably make an army of my own. Probably Bee People because I think it is neat. As far as lore stuff is concerned it is true that characters like Caiphas Cain Gotrek and Felix Thanquol Trazyn and even fan characters like TTS Emperor are more famous but as you pointed out they have been writing for almost forty years with a team of professional writers. I think people could make their own lore and that it could wind up being famous or at least appreciated as well. To me though the real selling point of OPR is that it is not only incredibly accessible but that it is built for people who like games. I do not feel like I am being treated as just a source of income. I feel like a customer and someone who could make my own fun with the game. The craziest thing is I haven't even played an actual game yet and just watching you play I can see that anyone can come to understand this game which to me is a good sign.
@Rakaziel
@Rakaziel 26 дней назад
Flying and Poison across the board, a unit that gives out honey for Regeneration and maybe a Queen that spawns more warriors? - Sign me up!
@saunteringspellcaster
@saunteringspellcaster 26 дней назад
@@Rakaziel You actually are very close to what I made. Flying across the board and a Queen that spawn warriors are things I made for it.
@CTX-lk8hf
@CTX-lk8hf 29 дней назад
Love the video. Have had a 3d printer for awhile now but never printed anything but bases for my minis however after starting to get into OPR and looking a all these designers of some of the stl's out there I am amazed at the talent many of these guys have. GW's claim to the best minis in the world is nonsense at least from a design perspective.
@JerryTurner
@JerryTurner 29 дней назад
Great even overview. I agree on pretty much everything. I love OPR and think that they can and will have a great future. Warhammer has the one thing going for them, history. Being around a long as they have been, it is hard to knock that they have books, lore, minis, etc from generations back. With the community getting more involved with OPR, I hope that there is some sort of base lore that is provided by the OPR group that allows for people to build off of.
@KristovMars
@KristovMars 8 дней назад
Damn, glad it's not just me. I've been describing James Workshop as my abusive ex for years now, having quit all their main-line games for nigh-on a decade now. Luckily I'm old and ugly enough to be able to buy minis from whomever and use whatever rules to play. Thanks to Uncle Atom for putting OPR in front of my eyeballs
@centristcontrarian3344
@centristcontrarian3344 27 дней назад
This is a good video. I like the balanced, fairly neutral angle. I like GW's miniatures, but damn, their rules hurt to keep up with.
@deckrect
@deckrect 29 дней назад
One page rules is basically Warhammer 40k second edition. It is far more simple, for sure. But it doesn't add much to any gaming experience. After playing Kill Team and Combat Patrol, - this one, supposedly indicated for beginners, I noticed the most problematic problem about Warhammer 40k, as rules set, along the years, is the fact it is hugely focused on people who already have most of the rules embedded into the brain. So, you kind of need adding layers and layers to keep, dimension, flavor and- the most important fot the current community- freshness, as the new players demands regular novelty. I recommend people who wants a simple Warhammer 40k, take a look specifically at second edition.
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 27 дней назад
the rules changes became a problem for veteran players too. I would be playing a game and my mind would slip pulling a rule from older editions.
@oldAzekai
@oldAzekai 29 дней назад
Digging the channel, Fitz. I came into 40k in 4th, and am saddened by the late-stage ‘line must go up’ mentality of the modern game. I agree with your sentiment, OPR is where it’s at.
@libraveggie4451
@libraveggie4451 29 дней назад
I'd love to give OPR a go with another player (been consigned to solo play) But main issue i run into is that nobody will freaking try it! Stores i go to around here are populated by die hard fans, ancient veterans, and a few uh.... problematic new players. (One wore an entire damn Afrika Korps Wehrmacht uniform to his first game...) Not many stores around here but yeah. Thats a slight issue to get through to "willingness to try" i suppose.
@CantusTropus
@CantusTropus 28 дней назад
There's always Tabletop Simulator, if you're up for it. Healthy community for that on Discord.
@hughmac7423
@hughmac7423 27 дней назад
I've been into collecting and painting models since the 1990's, I started with Epic, moved onto Warhammer 40K, then got frustrated with the rule changes in 2010, and stopped with Games Workshop. I agree with everything you are saying, but I'm a sucker and got pulled back into 40K with Kill Team in 2022 and then 9th Edition, I'm dabbling with 10th, but being careful on what I spend, as I have a massive collection from the 1990's to 2000's, Orks, Space Marines, Dark Eldar, Chaos and Tyranids, and I can still use half of these. I have been a backer of OPR for a couple of years, collecting STL's for a future 3D printing adventure. In between I got into CMON Zombicide Black Plague, Massive Darkness 1 and 2, Zombicide Invader, and Cyberpunk, now I have too many models to paint, delaying my 3D printing plans. Not a bad problem to have :)
@billdithers6288
@billdithers6288 29 дней назад
I feel like certain comparable negatives to GW werent brought up that are negatives for OPR. Like poor and rapid rules updates that recently plagues OPR with the kneejerk reaction from OPA to undo the publicly released rules. These rules weren't even given a chance to breath before they got sent to advanced rules, and the entire point system changed on a dime. There are a lot of new players who got shafted by the immediate change that seemed to come from a poorly taken temperature test of the community from OPA since people just complained in his ear about, even though a lot of people like myself liked assault. Leadership is important and as such OPA seems reluctant to spearhead any real growth on the competitive side of the game. GW meanwhile has a very specific and clearly laid out "if you want to play competitively do x,y and z" while OPA is more "do what you want" which is a half solution to a question posed. Another is model availability. Not everyone has access to an affordable resin printing space. Resin printing takes a dedicated space, ventilation, and a commitment to an entirely different hobby which just isnt managable for some people. Meanwhile GW has ETB kits which a child can snap fit together without glue. I like OPR for its conveniences that fit my life style, but that just doesnt apply to everyone.
@tomasv8732
@tomasv8732 29 дней назад
The rules updates is fair, but the model availability is not a complaint at all. If you don't have a space for 3d printing, you have infinite buying options from other companies and etsy, including those pushfit kits gw provides. 3D printing is the best option, but it is by far not the only option
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
So this is going to take some nuance. First I recorded this before the switch to 3.3.1 so that's why it isn't in the video. When 3.3 came out there was a very large pushback against it in the places that OPR sees. Whole short stories of how the game has been irrevocably changed and that the rules were too complicated. So with that level of player lament that I don't think OPR has seen before the decision was made to change the main rules back and move rules to the advanced book. It wasn't for about a week that there was any positive coverage of those rules. Once the rules were changed again there was another outcry from players. This time not that the rules had been changed. The subject of the wailing was the fact that the points had changed back to what they were before the 3.3 change. Most people had not even played a game with these new rules and points but we're still upset when number go up. The phrase "lot of new players who got shafted" sounds a bit hyperbolic. What happened to the new player? Is it that the new rules got moved to the advanced rule book? Is it that the points on the army they just chose and havent played more than 2 games with changed? This isn't GW that player having their army list changed doesn't screw them. They weren't forced to buy a $100 model just for it to not work anymore. A free ruleset updated the free rules and points on models that could be paper cut outs or popcorn kernels. The rules changed for 2 weeks then changed back. The most upset I saw was because number go down and then number go back up. Now when games workshop doesn't update it changes a whole lot more than that and it cost you $60 for a new book compared to free. Point for one page rules
@suddenlysarablog
@suddenlysarablog 29 дней назад
@@WarbossFitz Exactly this. When the change happened, it didn't "Shaft" me, it moderately annoyed me for 5 minutes because I had to adjust 30 points worth of stuff in my Robot Legions list. Then I didn't think about it again.
@billdithers6288
@billdithers6288 29 дней назад
@@WarbossFitz If this was made before that then I can't hold it against you. I saw significant amount of new players on reddit and the OPR discord at the sudden change, some had printed new rulebook materials and others had created and printed armies for use for the change without any ability to get back their saved lists or armies. The army forge is currently not tuned to point costs of assault being a part of the game, so there is room for a bad feeling of wanting to use the rule. I feel when making comparison videos its best to avoid the Halo effect and give a warts and all approach to analysis. OPA does a lot right, and i'm glad he has brought this game to us, but he does have some issues and as the sole vision maker of the game they're bound to come up again.
@toastle8005
@toastle8005 29 дней назад
…then again, on that last point, OPR is a rules system, with advertised miniatures if you want or need them. OPR isn’t ‘less accessible’ because people ‘need to have a 3D printer to have the models’- just buy GW models, eBay models, or pre-printed. In contrast, GW is a model brand with a game system somewhat tacked on, at this point. You can’t play the game ‘officially’ without their models. OPR just markets itself as ‘what to play once you already have miniatures’. That first point is bang-on though, and a very valid criticism. He seems to be way too quick to change things in a fret, while way too hesitant to fix other things that should be first-priority by comparison on the grounds of ‘not wanting to change things’.
@Fat-Gnome
@Fat-Gnome 29 дней назад
Could you provide a list of fellow OPR content creators?
@briancripps496
@briancripps496 25 дней назад
Paused the video at this point (~8 minutes) and wanted to comment a couple things before I continued: 1) GW didn't cancel a bunch of content creators with cease and desists. To my knowledge, actually there weren't any actual C&Ds sent out or, if so, maybe one or two. And before you comment, Text-to-Speech wasn't canceled due to a C&D. The creator stopped because he was AFRAID HE'D GET ONE and didn't want to deal with the constant fear of that hanging over his head. None was ever sent. And while that does still sound bad, it was built up by the fans, themselves, passing this false rumour around, like you just did. All the content creators stopped because, instead of GW's lawyers slapping them on the wrist, GW instead went "Hey, wanna work for us, instead?" and they, almost all, said "Yes" because steady job with steady pay is better than nothing. Then there was that one guy that wanted to, but then got bullied so fucking hard he declined it and ran away from the internet, because anonymous online fans are fucking monsters. 2) I see a lot of negativity in these comments as I browsed them (to make sure my above comment wasn't made by someone else yet). It reminds me a LOT of the great 7th Ed exodus into Warmachine/Hordes. As someone that didn't leave then, I was on the other side of the fence of that one, and it was toxic as fuck. I am seeing the same thing here but now I'm on this side, and it's worse, 'cause the stench is coming from my yard. A bunch of you are acting very much like you're toxic as fuck, and I strongly caution you to stop and reflect on that. I'm not a GW apologist. In fact, I'm the one that got my friends into OPR. We all like it for a lot of the same reasons others here do. Mostly "it's simple" when most of us can barely get out to play once a month (and even then, half the time, people cancel on it, anyway....). The important thing is "We play OPR because we like OPR." We don't play OPR because we hate GW/40k/AOS. There's a very important distinction. Most people I ever dealt with relating to Warmahordes played it because they hated 40k, and it reflected BAD on the community. And now, 10 or so years later, what system won that fight? Don't poison OPR's community in the same way.
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 25 дней назад
These are people who are voicing their opinions. They have found a new community that has had the same experiences they had with GW. Theses comments are acting like a support group. Leaving GW is hard, it takes time to work through the mental gymnastics that one goes through when they leave a relationship like that. For many in the OPR community that is still fresh and they are going through the anger stage. What your comment does is label newer players that have come in from GW as toxic. They just left a company that has very publicly told them they will not be missed. Let them vent, let them play. You can gatekeep your gaming group, there is no need to try and gatekeep OPR as a whole.
@Merrexz
@Merrexz 29 дней назад
Well, yes.
@DrZalmat
@DrZalmat 29 дней назад
Did i understand it right with the Codexes? Some faction players don't have rules for their armies until the edition is almost obsolete? How are they playing until then? Old rules? Guessed rules?
@nathansmith5738
@nathansmith5738 29 дней назад
so... it depends. for example in 9th edition, if you didn't have a new codex you were expected to use the 8th edition codex. the rules were designed to be compatible enough to be able to do that. 10th edition... all the rules were thrown out. so to play your codexless army, GW gave a free 'index' filled with just enough rules to get you by... until you got the codex and they yoink the index away to force you to buy the codex. Ironically 'Index Hammer' (the period of when no one has a codex so everyone has to rely on an index) is probably the most accessible the game gets.
@stephenphilp8222
@stephenphilp8222 28 дней назад
I totally agree. I am at core a historical wargamer and the difference between GW and every other wargames company out there has always been significant. I also played 40k (from 3rd to 5th) and WH Fantasy until GW killed it, although I never bought figures direct from GW. I used to buy Citadel historicals back in the 80s which were really nice figures compared to their SciFi stuff (GW-Spacefarers) at 3 times the price and nowhere near as nice. Now if you compare GW plastic to Victrix historicals for example the difference in quality is just the price. You get 60 excellent quality multipart figures for 32 quid compared to 12 figures for 37 quid from GW (or one character figure if you're lucky). Incidentally, GW might be a British company but they're not the only one, there are a lot of good British wargames manufacturers out there - none of which are 'pay to win corporate monsters' like GW, who visualise their customers as nothing more than a pound sign (or dollar sign in your case). They are also not the biggest manufacturer of wargames models by volume. They might have the biggest IP boosted by their product diversity but there are other wargames manufacturers that sell more figures than GW worldwide. Good luck to OPR and their democratisation of the SciFi and Fantasy side of the hobby. Long may it continue. The only down side is that as a 3D printing enthusiast my armies have begun to own more floor space than I do in my house... I'm sure you can relate WB Fitz! By the way - you're a machine. The rate at which you produce your stuff is not human.
@joshuawilson8804
@joshuawilson8804 29 дней назад
I've only played Warhammer Fantasy ones and I hated it. I was told it was balanced me having two units of elves that could fight and shoot while my friend had the empire which had muskets pikeman and a freaking cannon. It did not feel fair. I've actually been playing a lot of OPR with people who've never played war games before and we can get it done so quickly that they are already designing their next army.
@Tehstampede
@Tehstampede 29 дней назад
I remember having a discussion with a competitive player on another YT video where he made the claim that nobody wanted a balanced game more than competitive players. I agreed and pointed out that this is the root problem; competitive players want a balanced game with all other considerations secondary. 10ed is overtuned, greywashed boring garbage. It's not fun to play unless you want to be competitive, in which case it's boring but functional. I want a fun game, and that means that there will be some unbalanced rules or factions. I would not be surprised if 11ed ended up being everything hits on 4+, wounds on 4+, and saves on 4+.
@Direwolf1771
@Direwolf1771 29 дней назад
At that point they should just play chess. It’s what they really want, apparently.
@chadnuttall9117
@chadnuttall9117 24 дня назад
Well I appreciate the comparison on a major point for games workshop that you neglected is how likely a new player is to find an existing community near their home supporting one-page rules or Warhammer 40,000. This is one of the most important things to mention because no one wants to play by themselves. I would venture to guess that the majority of one-page rules players started by playing Warhammer 40,000 which means most communities will support Warhammer before one page rules. While many of the aspects that you mentioned about one page, rules are very favorable, especially for me the rules that are not changing nearly so often it can be difficult to find games against anyone let alone people who have never played a tabletop war game before.
@alanjackson1568
@alanjackson1568 8 дней назад
Bit of an old post, but I still want to give an opinion here. OnePageRules is easy enough to play, that you could play with people who have never done tabletop wargaming before. And with multicolor plastic 3d printers, the only real barrier to entry (assembly/painting) does not have to be a problem, theoretically. If cost is not an issue, people might be able to "paint" their own models on a computer program, and order from someone who has a multicolor resin printer soon.
@lamMeTV
@lamMeTV 29 дней назад
Worth mentioning that One Page Rules is deleting any old version unlike GW
@toastle8005
@toastle8005 29 дней назад
I get the feeling that GW would if it could, but it is a genuine criticism regardless
@kameronredford7545
@kameronredford7545 29 дней назад
ACTuallY! 40k has the bigger competitive scene. So that means it's superior by every metric. 10 out of 10 review would watch again. Jokes aside, enjoyed the analysis.
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
Bro! The new rules came out and there is a weird interaction that lets my units teleport anywhere on the board and get a 2+3++4+++ when they do it. Then shoot with dev,shattering,sustained, big pp shots because the comma is in the wrong place. I know it is going to be FAQed in 3 months but the TO is my friend who I have brow beat into allowing it because of RAW. Now I just need to buy $300 of models and dab 3 colors on them to get them on the table fast to own noobs. Fast forward 2 weeks. Awww man gw released a faq early. They destroyed my army. It's all their fault.
@kameronredford7545
@kameronredford7545 29 дней назад
@@WarbossFitz Bruh, the 40k younger me felt that. XD
@SquareTableUnion
@SquareTableUnion 29 дней назад
Kirkland 40K lol. Good video buddy.
@sleeplessknight99
@sleeplessknight99 29 дней назад
I'm sure OPR is great, a lot of fun, balanced, and isn't toxic and predatory in their business practices. But players will never have the street cred potential that modern kids want.
@CantusTropus
@CantusTropus 29 дней назад
Eh, whatever. It's a better game and system, and that's what matters to me. Sure, it'd be nice to get new players, but getting too mainstream is a very mixed blessing, at the best of times. Often it leads to the downfall of a niche hobby.
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
I'm not sure what you mean by this. So modern kids want what exactly? Street cred from a tourney win? The game has street cred?
@sleeplessknight99
@sleeplessknight99 29 дней назад
@@WarbossFitz they want views and internet likes, acknowledgement and praise from complete strangers, having their name on a national ranking system, playing in a tournament wearing a jacket covered in sponsorship logos, RU-vid influencers talking about their tournament winning army lists. Even if they're nowhere near actually achieving it, the mere possibility of that happening is much more likely with a game that has massive corporate backing and a larger fanbase. Y'know, street cred.
@techpriestalex8730
@techpriestalex8730 25 дней назад
@@sleeplessknight99 I am one of those modern kids (genZ) and I have no idea what your talking about. games being some esport like kills them.
@laszlovarga6953
@laszlovarga6953 28 дней назад
Since this is the first time commenting under your video: I love you channel and love your videos, hope you'll keep it up for a long time! But I don't think you've managed to be as fair and objective as you wanted to be, and I felt that you still owe GW a grudge, overexxagerating negatives of WH, being biased towards OPR or unintentionally omitting details that would favour GW. -You don't need to buy the core book for the rules. The whole rules section is available on the Warhammer Community website for free. -The length and the understandability of the rules are not as bad as you make them out to be. If we took out all the art, the empty spaces diagrams, example pictures, the redundant summaries, I'm pretty sure it could be condensed down to 30 ish pages, like the Advance rulebooks. Also, the language isn't that big of a deal either, maybe a tiny bit more boring than the OPR rulebooks. -You compare the WH Core rules to the GF Core rules which, while their names are the same, is like comparing apples to oranges. The WH equivalent would be the Quick Start Guide, which is 3 pages long and containts about the same amount of information. The WH Core rules is more similar to the Advanced rulebooks of OPR. -About model agnosticism: now, maybe it's just me being a newbie, but I don't understand how WH or any other tabletop or boardgame isn't model agnostic. The only thing that is fixed is the base diameter and maybe the model dimensions. If you play at home with a friend you can use whatever you want, if the local gaming store/gameclub allows it you can use whatever you agree with your opponent and from what I've heard tournaments sometimes allow using proxies. The only place where you can't use them for sure are official GW shops, but I wouldn't count it as a negative, since OPR has no equivalent to that. It's also worth considering that the number of stores where people play OPR games might be less than the stores that allow 3D printed armies, so OPR is even less accessible than Warhammer. -With 10th edition, you don't neccessarily need to buy the army codices. You can download the indexes of each army, which include a lot of units and their special rules, plus one detatchment and its rules. Of course these become outdated once the codices come out, but again, if you play with friends or you can agree with your gaming partner, you can use the indexes instead. Also, as of right now only 8 out of 27 codices were released, so more than a dozen armies still use these rules. -Subscriptions: WH+ has dozens of painting tutorials, dozens of batreps and hundreds of magazines. OPR has STL files which are irrelevant to those without a 3D printer (a very big chunk of the population), 2D miniatures (which like before, will probably be free after release), advanced rules (which you only need to get once, after that it's irrelevant), mission rules, armyforge access, beta access and a discount. Again, it's oranges to apples and, unless you have a 3D printer, those apples are very sour. -About game feel: You have two sources for rules, the core rules and the datacards with the army specific rules. The former is condensed into 3 pages, and the latter is neccessary anyway for the stats. The stratagems are a lot, but they are limited to 17 (11 core + 6 army specific), and you can always ask your partner to show and explain them. You can also agree to not use them at all. When it comes to game length, I think it's worth pointing out that the average army of GF is around half the size of a WH army. Making the number of units roughly the same would probably narrow the time gap. (Plus there is the Combat Patrol format - with free core and army rules - which probably falls between GF and GFF in scale.) One might also say that the armies of OPR are very basic and there is no identity or character to them, or at least it's less than the GW counterparts. My judgement on this might be off (especially the last one), because I haven't played a single game of either systems and only watched batreps, but it feels like you slapped your hands together and said OPR is better because you think it's better. Sooo yeah, I think the final score should be 7 to 8, both scoring 1-1 point at the topics I've covered.
@BlUsKrEEm
@BlUsKrEEm 28 дней назад
My main problem with One Page Rules is the name. It is a pretty awful name, IMO. That's about it. Pretty much everything else is excellent. I really dig the starter aets dor Grim Dark Future and Fantasy too. They are really well put together and they give a great taste for the gane worh obvious places to grow your interests if you like the experience. They dont get enough credit for that. I wish they could get them physically produced for shops, but as a 3d printed digital starter they are near perfect. The website is better than Warhammer, too.
@nurglerider781
@nurglerider781 29 дней назад
I'm not going to defend GW, they deserve, hell they ASKED for, the hate they get. There is a ton of great stuff about OPR, not the least of which is a business that isn't run by bloodthirsty vampires. But I will say that the rules leave a lot to be desired for me. I do still play it occasionally but it lacks the crunch that I want. Having said that I have been and will continue to be a tier 2 subscriber to OPR. And certainly, any person new to the hobby should be pointed to OPR and NOT Warhammer.
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 27 дней назад
the rules are on the simple side but you can add anything you want to it. Being less of a time sink the group I play with throw in all kinds of rules and play games just to see how it would work. And absolutely I would steer a new wargamer to opr over 40k, just for the mental load alone. Get them in the door then they can move to different systems that they find interesting.
@YanniCooper
@YanniCooper 29 дней назад
One point in favor of Warhammer is it is likely easier to find a game at your FLGS - not sure that's enough to tip the scales
@Tugar-747
@Tugar-747 28 дней назад
Regarding depth of lore Id say battletech is probably second. Tex from Bpl jave very nice lore videos id say on par with Lutein and Baldemort imo.
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 27 дней назад
I do love battletech as a game. I was young when I got into and then out of it and I bounced off the lore hard, mostly because I was 16-20 at the time. In the last few weeks I have been getting recommended b-tech lore videos and have been listening to them while I paint. I didn't know how in depth it was and can say you are absolutely correct.
@buttemountain
@buttemountain 29 дней назад
Just to be clear cuz I’ve been confused, with OPR $10 patreon tier, they’re sending you 2 armies of STL’s not physical miniatures right?
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
yes they are sending the stls to print parts of 2 different armies. They put out about 3 units for each army every month so to get the whole army takes around 6 months and they are staggered. Like it was dwarf guilds and vampiric undead. Then vampiric undead and high elf fleets. now this month they started a new fantasy army and its high elf fleets and shadow stalkers for fantasy.
@buttemountain
@buttemountain 29 дней назад
@@WarbossFitz sweet, I don’t have a 3d printer but that’s a pretty big incentive to get one. Besides there’s a loooot of cool Orc minis out there I’d like to get my hands on lol
@dakotawharton
@dakotawharton 28 дней назад
They do bundle sets to. If you aren't subscribed to the patreon it costs about as much as a 40k battleforce to get all the STLs for an army. The patron gets you a pretty good discount.
@johnbrennan9617
@johnbrennan9617 29 дней назад
I'm probably going to be in the minority here, but I don't necessarily agree with the premise of this video. I'm a strong believer in comparison being the thief of joy. When I own two board games like Risk, or Catan, I don't compare them against each other. I view them as separate and different games that aim to provide fun and amusement in their own ways. I can gladly sit down and play a game of One Page Rules with some friends when we've got an hour or two, and it can be really fun. Or I might have more time and can spend an evening playing Warhammer with those same friends. OPR to me is a really great introductory game into wargaming, and is cheap, affordable and easy to get into. Warhammer then becomes the next stage up where you want to play more tactical and nuanced games. Both are very good for what they deliver.
@toastle8005
@toastle8005 29 дней назад
…this would be a good argument, if modern 40k was nuanced or tactical. If we still lived in a game of armour-facings, flanking and comparative-weaponskill combat, I might agree with you. But in current 40k, movement is one of the last few tactical ‘war game’ things in it, and a lot of our local veterans of 30 years are growing sick of the lack of skill and expressive fluff/crunch rules. I’d honestly have to say that with alternating activations, OPR has a different layer of depth that modern 40k doesn’t touch, despite its simplicity. With how hampered 10th edition tactics are… Nowadays, the simple game has depth and skill expression, and the huge complex game has the nuance and depth of a puddle. A lot of our veterans are heading back to 3rd, 4th and narrative games of 2nd.
@mr78K
@mr78K 29 дней назад
Fitz I'm starting to worry GW might order a hit on you soon! By the way is "Fitz" name from the Royal assassin's Robin Hobb books?
@Lakefront_Khan
@Lakefront_Khan 29 дней назад
I actually disagree on the subscription. What if you don't have a 3d printer? You lose 70%-80% of the value
@elneeth
@elneeth 29 дней назад
You get access to 2d paper models of minis and terrain so you can print and play with a normal printer.
@agent_dex8996
@agent_dex8996 29 дней назад
They do have a cheaper subscription for people without 3d printers. You get files for printing paper models which the art looks pretty darn cool. You get the rules as well and I think (could be wrong on this point) you get a discount on their physical models store. There are also businesses on the internet that will 3d print for you for a decent price.
@bonkstrum9555
@bonkstrum9555 29 дней назад
​@agent_dex8996 I have the cheaper one for the advanced rules. And I don't mind paying 5$ a month to support a product I actually play
@Lakefront_Khan
@Lakefront_Khan 29 дней назад
@agent_dex8996 OK, but does that beat receiving very decent to good shows, physical minis, and books? Plus, things like the old WD backlogs.
@agent_dex8996
@agent_dex8996 29 дней назад
I guess it's really up to what you prefer. I don't care much for the shows, that's just personal taste though. The minis are cool, just not worth it for me. I do wish opr had more in universe books though which I know they are working on. I think I answered your original question decently though, about not having a 3d printer. There are options, it's just up to people if those options are worth it. I think my biggest answer to not having a printer is you can just use the models you already have. Ya opr has their own models but it is a models analogous game. Of course, if you have gw models, you might as well play gw games.
@uwesca6263
@uwesca6263 20 дней назад
I think some points are a bit stretched(?) Like the rules. Warhammer has free starter rules andyou have an index for every faction. Sure those who have a codex had them removed but it aint hard to find them in the net. Then the miniatures. You compare one group that has special made minis for sale vs one that doesnt. And then coming to the conclusion that the one company without minis has better minis because you can use whatever you want when playing with friends while the other one is worse because you cant use other minis at the official store. Which btw differs from store owner to store owner. Similar for availability. You forgot to mention that there are 3rd party sellers for gw stuff. And (at least my experience) i never had an issue with models flat out not available. i could by any box i wanted. This might differ in your local area. For the goodies that the opr patreon gives to you: i am sure its overall still slightly better than warhammer+ but without an 3d printer the deal is quite a bit worse than advertised. And at last game duration: How big is a 40k game and how big is a opr game? Like how many models can i expect? And are there different game sizes? Would be interesting to know to better jnderstand a comparisson. And dont forget that we basicly have 4 game sizes for 40k so dont compare the ones maximum with the others minimum to make a point. A more nuanced view on it would be interesting. Also what interests me is the longevity. How often can i play till its starts to feel dull. How exciting are new games? You made some solid points about the tournamend fokused 40k community and other things. I just wanted to mention these points.
@alanjackson1568
@alanjackson1568 8 дней назад
Fair point with the models, you can use whatever you want to play 40k. Though, the point stands that there are much better looking models out there, than what GW sells. One Page Rules matches need at least 50% more points to have the same number of models on the board. OPR is faster because it get's rid of the toughness vs strength dice roll, and OPR does not have random damage weapons. Also, onepage rules does not have that faction complexity which turns 40k into a game where new players have to stare at their rulebooks for half, (at least) of their turn. I have no insight into longevity yet, but, with a more casual game it should be easy to invite more players, and come up with rules for 2v2 etc. If you want something more complex, and has more fleshed out/well defined rules, you might want to give Warsurge a look. Warsurge already has recommended rules for games with more than 2 players, and they give recommendations for different ways to alter the game to keep it fresh.
@cristhianmlr
@cristhianmlr 29 дней назад
14:07 *codices
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
Dead trees
@toastle8005
@toastle8005 29 дней назад
Tree’nt
@alphanerdgames9417
@alphanerdgames9417 Месяц назад
Aww man! I didn’t make the cut on your list of creators.😭
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
sorry, I didnt know about your channel before but now I am subbed and I cant wait to see what you do with OPR!
@alphanerdgames9417
@alphanerdgames9417 29 дней назад
@@WarbossFitz I’m going to blame the losers who run the algorithm.
@toastle8005
@toastle8005 29 дней назад
I was about to say ‘well screw you, I’m gonna go and subscribe to you anyway how do you like that’, only to click on your channel and found out I was subscribed already 🤣 something on your channel must have been good
@alphanerdgames9417
@alphanerdgames9417 29 дней назад
@@toastle8005 🙃
@CantusTropus
@CantusTropus 28 дней назад
@@alphanerdgames9417 Sadly, I don't think there's ANYONE running the algorithm. Odds are nobody at RU-vid actually understands how that thing actually works anymore.
@elizabethmilward8301
@elizabethmilward8301 14 дней назад
From what I've seen so far, the biggest downside of OPR is finding other people willing to play it with you. A lot of people have never heard of it and don't know what it is - no, OPR Age of Fantasy Skirmish isn't Warcry. Sigh.
@alanjackson1568
@alanjackson1568 8 дней назад
Finding people to play tabletop games with, is daunting. It might be possible to get family and friends into OPR, because it is so easy to learn. The only real barrier is cost for models, assembly, and painting, which is a problem multicolor 3d printers, theoretically solve. The resin multicolor printers are still too expensive for the average person, and will not solve the cost problem, but for some, being able to essentially, "paint" their own models on a computer screen, and then order the mini's, which will be printed with the desired look, could be worth the cost (though few can afford the printer itself). And the 4 color plastic printers should be good enough for casual players, while solving cost, assembly, and painting, all at once.
@elizabethmilward8301
@elizabethmilward8301 8 дней назад
@@alanjackson1568 Oddly enough, using multicolor 3D printers would take away most of what attracts me to wargaming in the first place. I love making terrain from scratch and painting the miniatures. The games may end up being more of an afterthought than anything. Fortunately, I have now run into a small group of people in my area who are into One Page Rules, so I may be able to find people to play this with after all.
@alanjackson1568
@alanjackson1568 8 дней назад
@@elizabethmilward8301 Nice, and good luck getting those games set up. But, keep in mind that other people, (like me) who don't like painting might be able to join as well, if they know their options.
@elizabethmilward8301
@elizabethmilward8301 8 дней назад
@@alanjackson1568 Fair enough, and if that works for you, by all means do that. But I suspect the number of new wargamers willing and able to shell out for a multicolor 3D printer is pretty low.
@alanjackson1568
@alanjackson1568 8 дней назад
I used to have no problem with publicly traded companies. Now that it comes attached with buzzwords and propaganda wherever the large investment firms go, while they vote in shareholder meetings with the money that is not even theirs, (pension/401k etc.) I vastly, vastly prefer private companies.
@TheAstroRain
@TheAstroRain 29 дней назад
Good video. But, Strategem critique is outdated for about a year. 10 edition let you have 18 shared stratagems and you pick one table with 6 army specific. Yes, its still more, but not as bad as before))))
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 27 дней назад
I stopped in 9th edition and when I saw that the space marines had 56 stratgems across their chapters and detachments my eyes bugged out. So i was wrong about that, kinda.
@mjolasgard2533
@mjolasgard2533 29 дней назад
Im not sure the point on Lore is right, Mr Warboss. Your point seems like 'Warhammer has a lot of lore. It has built up that lore by making it specific.' I'm not sure this is a strength. The real strength of the WH40K Lore used to be that you could play whatever you wanted really - evil pirate space marines fighting for the Emperor? Sure. But with the new focus on lore (and more books they can sell you), the galaxy shrunk to focus on a few powerful individuals. Now, the game is about them. OPR GDF has that old-school feel where the universe is vast, where there aren't specific individuals who fill up that space and allow players to create their own narratives. Idk, that's my opinion. TL;DR - its not about the amount of lore, its about 'just the right amount' of lore. Anyways. Great channel! Thanks muchly!
@laszlovarga6953
@laszlovarga6953 29 дней назад
Which part of the lore stops you from making a renegade pirate chapter?
@mjolasgard2533
@mjolasgard2533 29 дней назад
@@laszlovarga6953 Oh that wasn't my point. My point is that GW's lore is moving away from 'a vast galaxy of infinite possibility' and into the realm of 'the events of the galaxy revolve around these individuals'. They're making their lore as brandable and controllable as possible. In short, it used to be vast but now it feels much more closed in. Not a criticism, just an observation.
@toastle8005
@toastle8005 29 дней назад
Completely agree. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not against specificity in the lore, but I feel the imagination and push for creativity in building your own army has been strangled.
@J.Buffer
@J.Buffer 2 дня назад
What kills the tt for me is the constant update and changes in the WH books. Idk how the games are so bad you cant stick to one set for long enough for me to even consider getting it.
@kellinbray5347
@kellinbray5347 29 дней назад
Opr is the best happy to find something that isn’t predatory
@suddenlysarablog
@suddenlysarablog 29 дней назад
Amazing what happens when the people writing the rules aren't also the same people selling you the models that use those rules!
@tuheroe
@tuheroe 25 дней назад
One page lore.
@techpriestalex8730
@techpriestalex8730 25 дней назад
I think one think you forgot to say was the easy of painting OPR minis vs GWs. cause lately GWs minis are bloated with too much details that its annoying to paint. OPRs mini are simple and easy to paint.
@thrrax
@thrrax 29 дней назад
So basically One Page Rules... rules.
@supernonfriendo
@supernonfriendo 29 дней назад
Plagiarists deserve no respect
@Ironfrenzy217
@Ironfrenzy217 22 дня назад
This was the "chill" version? Not that I disagree with your points.
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 19 дней назад
it took me a few drafts. There were even parts of this that I cut out of the final edit because they were shots across the bow at certain elements of the 40k hobby.
@roshee5573
@roshee5573 25 дней назад
Depth of lore in print ? I’d say Battletech is just as good as 40K
@greydeathangel
@greydeathangel 29 дней назад
I've slowly at first got more and more into OPR, and now am even planning of supporting the Patreon. Not sure on the tier that I plan on going with, I don't have a 3d printer (even though i really want one, just don't have the space yet for one, that and have to figure out a solid air filtration system to minimize the negative effects that printing has on me). I was looking at re-creating my old homebrew codices (yeah I've got some homebrew codices in the works, even started updating them to the 10th edition, but they are not done) and am now been playing around with recreating them in the OPR system. Really looking into both GDF Future and their Firefight systems....love to play some Zone Mortalis style armies, and would also love a place for all these awesome Horus Heresy minis, and not having the awesome minis being relegated to "Legends" where they find an unfortunate place on the shelf is also very appealing. What I've done so far includes... Xeno hunters (a Deathwatch plus inquisition army design inspired by the old 3rd edition Daemon hunters and Witch hunters armies) Witch Hunters (very much an updated version of the 3rd ed. Witch Hunters) Daemon Hunters (like the witch hunters, all three of the hunters armies have some fun items, for one the inquisition feels stronger, they also have their storm troopers back) Elven Corsairs (based off of the Doom of Mymeara Eldar Corsairs lists, I really want to see that one return). I would also love to read the lore for the OPR world, who knows it might influence me in my homebrews. Either way I really enjoy this ruleset, your channel is also fantastic, and I really hope you have a solid year.
@grisch4329
@grisch4329 29 дней назад
I desperately want to love OPR, but it suffers from the same thing as GW games, blob combat. Your units are just blobs and the models are just health point markers. Ever since the concepts of ‘pile in’ moves and models outside of base-to-base being able to attack in melee, these games have all turned into basically playing a spreadsheet. You barely even need the table, the models and all the pretty terrain. Where you move your stuff on the table hardly impacts the game. I’m so sick of people yammering on about how ‘simple’ and ‘streamlined’ the rules are. I want some freaking engagement from the game. I want meaningful player choices outside of list building. OPR is perfectly poised with its latest release that goes toward ‘modular’ rule packs to introduce an advanced/tactical module that makes the games more engaging. Please, someone, have mercy on those of us who don’t want to just spend hours mindlessly rolling shoeboxes full of dice and picking out the ones that rolled over a certain value.
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
I think you might be looking for a different type of game entirely. It sounds like you want a more grand strategy game. Look up Avalon hill. I don't know if the company exists anymore but whoever took over their licenses should give you that strategic feel your looking for.
@grisch4329
@grisch4329 29 дней назад
@@WarbossFitz No, I’ve played stuff like that. It was way too boardgamey. I’m looking for a miniatures game that offers meaningful player choices (beyond list building). 2nd Edition 40k did it. MESBG has it. The earlier versions of Warmachine had it. Games where you’re playing with miniatures, but your actual movements on the tabletop matter. I mean… do people not realize how meaningless most of the decisions and actions they take on the board are in AoS/40k/OPR?
@whichDude
@whichDude 23 дня назад
Started in late 9th. Have witnessed 3 price hikes so far. I knew the hobby was expensive, but $40 for a single small character is absolutely garbage. New rules every 3 years also screws over armies that have bad rules. Admech got their codex early 10th, but they have been absolute garbage the entire edition. Will probably only get decent right as rules get changed
29 дней назад
So you have to use official GW miniatures to play in official tournaments and stores but you can play OPR with alternative models or even some made out of paper. Point for OPR? The question is: Are there any tournaments or stores where you can play OPR with alternative models that _also_ would not allow you to use alternative models for GW games? Another point: Why is there no comparison between the price of GWs plastic miniatures and 3D pre-printed ones from the OPR store? The prices are shockingly similar...
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
To the first point. The first official one page rules tournament is happening this weekend at uk games expo. GW has had events there in the past and you needed to use GW miniatures so yeah there is. For the second part just get a printer. Printing services are all about making as much money as possible and as GW raises their prices the printing services think they can raise theirs too.
@milanstehlik5969
@milanstehlik5969 29 дней назад
Yeah, while 3D printing can be cheaper than plastic minis, accounting for all the costs of files, material and wear of your printer, and lowered durability or resin models, you should generally 3D print because you like minis from 3D files, not becuase they are cheaper. Apropos, some of the OPR own minis (their actual business model, as far as I know) are pretty nice (Saurians and Vincis come to mind), but others (e.x.: Blessed Sisters or new High Elves Fleets) are just not very well designed. Maybe they changed their sculptors?
29 дней назад
@@WarbossFitz No, the point is that places that allow you to play OPR with proxies would also allow you to play 40K with proxies. I doubt that there are places or events where you can play OPR with whatever miniatures you like but but at the same time, at the next table you can play 40K only with the original GW miniatures.
29 дней назад
@@milanstehlik5969 Yes, its a hobby on its own. Many "pro printing" channel try to sell it as a way to get miniatures for the price of the resin used and thats just really dishonest as not many people print multiple armies. I agree on OPR minis too, the Saurians where some of the best ever while the rest leaves me pretty cold.
@suddenlysarablog
@suddenlysarablog 29 дней назад
OPR is, by design, a miniatures-agnostic game. OPR only has those 3D models as a courtesy to their players, they're not the "OFFICIAL" models that "MUST" be played with in any way. Therefore, literally every single game of OPR, tournament or otherwise, uses "whatever models" the player has, whereas GW is famous for being strict about use of their models and no others in organized play.
@marcosborregales1569
@marcosborregales1569 29 дней назад
Ok now fair is fair. No one has the RIGHT to make fan works. This is the risk of doing fan work.
@user-uj9tt7dl3h
@user-uj9tt7dl3h 29 дней назад
There is 0 presence of OPR on youtube. No one is playing and no one is watching. That's how I feel it. It gives me malifaux vibes and I don't know why.
@JoshuaCunningham2397
@JoshuaCunningham2397 29 дней назад
Yeah, I'm hoping to see more eventually, but it hasn't really taken off yet.
@mikewyant6919
@mikewyant6919 29 дней назад
Your statement is incorrect, OPR does have a RU-vid presence.
@CantusTropus
@CantusTropus 29 дней назад
It also has a sizeable presence on Discord.
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
Well my existence proves that people are playing and people are watching. Give it time and I believe we will get there.
@JohnSmith_1331
@JohnSmith_1331 29 дней назад
I have a feeling that you are a victim of the algorithm. There might be zero presence of OPR on YOUR youtube, but on mine I see recommendations all of the time. Including this video.
@Winter420
@Winter420 29 дней назад
These comments are unhinged and I'll informed. Gw is a media company, 40k is a self referential game based on the 40k ip, its no longer the primary method of expanding the 40k universe. OPR vs gw is not like comparing apples and oranges, it's like comparing a small business to a country. People buy 40k models because they love warhammer. Few people play warhammer compared to the amount who just buy. OPR is boring and uninteresting, even if it has good rules it's not something that can be compared to gw. You are still ranting and you really don't understand how any of this works. I guess in your 7 editions if 40k you never looked at things objectively
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
So in a video comparing the game of Warhammer 40k to the game of grimdark future I got it wrong because I compared a game to a game instead of a game to a media empire?
@paytreonsuhks
@paytreonsuhks 29 дней назад
the problem is opr is just a warhammer rip off. the community needs to explore all options instead of sticking to gw vs opr
@classiccraftdestined.7596
@classiccraftdestined.7596 29 дней назад
opr should just make their own setting.
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 27 дней назад
with the army builder that OPR has anything is possible. You can go look at community armies for everything from hell divers to Predator, Fall out to cyberpunk, gnomes to MLP armies
@classiccraftdestined.7596
@classiccraftdestined.7596 29 дней назад
One page rules baby downs the rules and kills the fun for me. i would rather burn all my models then play OPR.
@Direwolf1771
@Direwolf1771 29 дней назад
Nobody’s putting a gun to your head. Hell, if you don’t want to be there, nobody else wants you there. Feel free to not play.
@WarbossFitz
@WarbossFitz 29 дней назад
You could do that. I won't stop you.
@supernonfriendo
@supernonfriendo 29 дней назад
OPR is not an independent game, it was made as a free 40k. I am all for competition, but this is just plagiarism - it deserves no respect
@drhumupower8570
@drhumupower8570 29 дней назад
I mean, it borrows mechanics from several wargames, not just Warhammer. By your logic, 40k is just plagiarism because it borrowed from other war games that came before it on the game side, and it's plagiarism on the Lore side because it stole from Dune, Starwars, Terminator, Lovecraft, etc, and their fantasy stole from Tolkien and others. So does GW then deserve no respect by your own logic?
@saunteringspellcaster
@saunteringspellcaster 29 дней назад
@@drhumupower8570 Michael Moorcock would be there as well. The truth is everybody is inspired by stuff.
Далее
Is This 40K Rip Off Any Good?
11:59
Просмотров 122 тыс.
Is onepagerules competitive? How?
8:30
Просмотров 1,7 тыс.
🎤Пою РЕТРО Песни ✧˖°
3:04:48
Просмотров 1,7 млн
Жидкие носки)))
00:19
Просмотров 1,2 млн
If I Was Starting WARGAMING in 2024
15:38
Просмотров 113 тыс.
Who Sells The Cheapest Wargame?
12:24
Просмотров 11 тыс.
Which is better in 2024? 40k or Legion
15:14
Просмотров 1,5 тыс.
Games Workshop: The History & The Hate!
13:07
Просмотров 40 тыс.
3d printing vs Citadel Miniatures Prices
11:19
Просмотров 2,4 тыс.
Age of Fantasy Army Tier List
11:00
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.
40k Isn't THAT Overpowered
26:26
Просмотров 466 тыс.
What's One Page Rules Been Up To in May?
12:06
Просмотров 1,6 тыс.
Which is better: Games Workshop or One Page Rules?
17:03
Grimdark Future: How to play Human Defense Force
1:18:41
Просмотров 3,9 тыс.
ВСЕ СЕКРЕТЫ КОТА В ВР ( I Am Cat VR )
22:46
МОЙ ПУТЬ В ТОП 100 - НАЧАЛО
21:01
Просмотров 333 тыс.