Abasov Misses Winning Move, Carlsen Wins | Semifinals | FIDE World Cup 2023 

For Magnus "perfect" is flawed

Abassov, he has many opportunities to beat Magnus but couldn't see it. If Hikaru or other super GM they will saw it immediately. Sometimes, for first timer to play former champion and the number chess player could affect our game.

@@fadeighty2842 The awful opening with two sets of double pawns probably took him away from his game plan. The rest of the match was probably him improvising, which actually makes it impressive but unfortunately makes the board harder to read cause everything seems something new to you.

@@haroldcruz8550 that's not awful that's misleading opening from Magnus. He wants his opponent unprepared for his opening so that Abassov could not read his game plan. Basically, that's how should master do because for so many openings and games have been played and studied most of them know how to counter it.

@@fadeighty2842 I was referring to the awful result of the opening from Abasov, which was the result of the novelty move by Magnus with pawn to d3 if I remember it correctly (sorry too lazy to watch the opening again).

Don't be silly, it's a blunder, and the follow-up is a three move combination. It's not an obscure engine line, any top player could win straight away if they were told the move.

@@cz19856 ahahahah

You made up your own words, she did not say that. If you’re gonna quote at least do it correct.

@@Klont123 Yes, she didn't exactly say that but her question that she asked to Magnus implied the same meaning as it is in my question. Only difference is, the interviewer's question sounds diplomatic, while mine just blunt and direct. Also, for you, if you're gonna criticize me, at least learn how to use basic "ADVERB" in English. It isn't, "do it correct", but "do it correctly".

@@irvandipawangsa3609 Well that’s your interpretation of what she said. Which is fine, but then don’t quote. Also: English isn’t my first language, and pointing out grammar mistakes doesn’t help you making your point.

@@Klont123 Maybe you should learn language more so you can differentiate which one is "real quotation" like the ones used on scientific reports, and which one is "paraphrased statements". The question I wrote above doesn't have "quotation" mark, thus signifying it is a paraphrased version of a question from the source. A real quotation also has a source from which a statement is taken, while mine doesn't. It just simply says, "Question". if for example, I wrote, "Tania asked, "..........". Then that's a real quotation. Instead, I wrote, "Question", which refers to my interpretation (Which you also mentioned above). Also: Because of the fact that you need to learn English Language more properly, you're now thinking I'm misusing a quotation. It's because of your lack of knowledge in English that now you are thinking that way.

@@irvandipawangsa3609 maybe you should be man enough to admit a mistake.

Wrong if abasov find it and also find rg6 Carlsen will in big trouble it about - 2.5

@@jojoaja6106 No Matter if Abasov is Bishop up.. Magnus has the superior pawn structure TO KILL THE BISHOP as he did in 2nd Game!!

@@jojoaja6106 *WHAT'S MAGNUS BISHOP IS DOING AT E5????? HE CAN BLOCK ROOK TO g1 ROOK TO e1 QUEEN TO e1!!!!...* SO WHY ALL ARE SUPER EXCITED???.. MAGNUS IS GREATEST CHESS PLAYER OF ALL TIME NOT A JOKER!!!!