One thing I've noticed about chess is that its incredibly easy to spot bad moves when observing. When you're the one playing you don't realise half of what's actually happening.
@@SenaZephyr I'm talking about your brain's skill at chess. You're not going to magically become a grandmaster when you have a gun pointed to your forehead.
It's never okay to lose. When you lose you degrade your soul, you bring shame to your family, you bring shame to your ancestors, you bring shame to your descendants.
If i was that dude at the bar i would go slipping into random conversations and go like "have i told you about the time i crushed the chess world champion?"
first you have to setup it a little. "Damn Bill your wife's divorcing you? Your kid calls the mailman dad now... rough. She's acting like a real queen, you're not the king of your own castle anymore. This is no time to act like a white knight Bill, you'll end up being her pawn- it's time to be strong like your favorite character, Bishop from Aliens. You're running out of time, it's a black and white issue, make your move! This is a game of chess now, call a lawyer. That reminds me..did I ever tell you when I beat a world champion of chess?"
@@derkommissar4986That's because they actually know what their doing when they sac their queen.But when you sac the queen,you have no idea what to do next since it just a full lost of a queen
"I’ve missed more than 9,000 shots in my career. I’ve lost almost 300 games. Twenty-six times I’ve been trusted to take the game-winning shot and missed. I’ve failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed." - Michael Jordan. There is no success without great suffering in any sphere of life, it is simply so natural
Just because someone is really good doesn’t mean they can’t over analyze and then forget a simple blunder. Mistakes happen and anyone has a chance to win
Winning and losing is a part of a game but the best thing to learn from losing is making you more stronger and faster next time. So, always learn from losing❤
I just see ordinary good chess here Champions lose matches but they always rise up back to glory, that's what defines a Champion Carlsen is really the strongest player to exist in the history of chess
It's impossible to say really, because the conditions have changed so much. Morphy played games that the computer ranks near 100%, but he never had opponents as strong as the ones Magnus did. Fischer achieved what he achieved without computer analysis. Magnus has spent hundreds if not thousands of hours analyzing with computers. Plus, he has all the games of people like Morphy and Fischer to look at. Unlike Spassky, he didn't have his childhood interrupted by WWII. Unlike Alekhine, he didn't have to take time off to be a soldier. Unlike Morphy, his path wasn't limited by the lower level of his opponents. Unlike Kasparov, he never had to contend with the Soviet mind games which extended far beyond the board. For example, Korchnoi's son was arrested during the world championship match.
@@andrew_owens7680 @bartholomewkuma467 What I write here is what he is as compared to what others are and have been, not what he could have been as compared what others could have been. It's always quite impossible to tell what they could have been Andrew
@@7stringwings7 in high elo chess people think ahead like 20 moves+ they have seen and memorized 99% of the possible outcomes, at that point if he doesnt think he can win then thats because he wont if the opponent doesnt turn into a toddler for a move
I don't know what's more embarrassing. These losses for Magnus, or the commentator making incorrect calls for the squares on the board at least 5 times throughout the video, not to mention the atrocious calls on many moves claiming them as "mistakes". Clearly this wasn't made by an experienced chess player, nor did they put in the effort to actually point out all of the real mistakes by having an engine point them out for him.
The "UFC" style is also annoying. All those close ups on the moves actually made them harder to visualize. The King of chess narration/analysis is Sagar Shah, followed by Gotham.
Great Video, entertaining and instructive. Please, what's the Name of the Violin music at 10:30, when Magnus plays "A"? Love this my whole life. Thanks in advance!
2:33 Magnus misses a chance to save the game with QB8+, winning a rook and possibly the game. With time pressure at 8 seconds, it's certainly hard to see.
You cant perform QB8+ from Qe6. You'd have to be on Qe5 or Qd6, because the queen has no legal move to go there. If you look carefully, the queen can perform QC8+ if that is what you meant. This does exactly the same thing and doesn't put the queen in danger.
It's also when people make videos about your losses that you realize you are still the greatest. If you weren't, it wouldn't be so shocking when you lose.
Are these actually quick losses or just for Magnus. I ask because in a few of the games the clock got very low. Also I wonder what the move counts of each game are.
I could picture drinking with magnus at a bar. You guys get into a heated discussion and than instead of leading it into a bar fight he challenges you to chess 😆
Can someone explain to me why he took the knight with his queen at 12:32 ? I mean what would have changed if black didn't take the pawn on E4? He would still lose his queen
No one ever brings up the fact that Magnus doesn't look like a normal human being. He is obviously in pain because his brain is much too big for his skull.
