AFMF Tested in 8 Games (AMD Fluid Motion Frames / Frame Generation) 

I believe AMD will make a bigger fuss about this when it "officially" launches early next year. At the moment we are all BETA testers, and I am perfectly fine with that if it means they release a good product eventually. So far I have very little complaints, except for UI elements in some games. But I do think it can be improved with a bit of time, but it's really not a bad piece of tech this. As mentioned in the video, if a game supports FSR 3 you'd be better off using that as it never dynamically disables, and UI elements are kept mostly intact. However, on games which wont get any official frame generation updates, this is really good.

That first preview driver was rough, but this oct 13th one I've been using (think it's the 3rd?) has been almost perfect. Not quite perfect, but darn near close enough where I want it on so far on everything I run.

@@chrislemery8178 Yeah exactly, the first one was pretty rough as it didnt even want to install on my RX 7600 test system! They fixed it a day later and I was able to test it then, but it was quite buggy for other games. The last one seems to do okay with all the games I have tested and if you can look past the few UI issues I dont see why not to use it in all games at this point. I reckon there would eventually be a game where it is completely broken, but so far so good.

They don't talk about it cause it is on beta stage

I tested the recent preview drivers and honestly most games felt worse with afmf, despite showing more frames they felt less smooth @3440x1440. I’ve heard great reports at 4 though, maybe its the resolution. The only game that feels alright is forspoken demo for me. In gta v I was getting 144 fps and it felt weird moving the camera, without afmf it felt a lot smoother.

Thanks for the visit, I really appreciate the comment!

Thanks for stopping by, glad you liked the video. Appreciate the comment bud!

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews Good luck with the future mate looking forward to it

It really is!

I appreciate that! We'll take it bit by bit, next stop being 1K, so close! And then, who knows, maybe we'll get to 500K eventually and we'll absolutely love that! Appreciate the sub and comment!

Thanks bud, appreciate it!

You have no idea how much I appreciate this comment. Probably the nicest comment so far! I appreciate you trying to encourage others as well. As for video quality, I hope it improves. I have a few plans and ideas that might make it a bit more exciting but also be very simplistic in its delivery, meaning you'll get all the info you want without me boring you to death with unimportant details. Once again, really appreciate the comment and the sub. Have a good evening!

​@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews heh, either you took it wrong or you're just being really nice, to keep people happy... either way - i'm one of those peeps that will say what they think and HOW they think... and F any1 that didn't like my opinion. i am certainly not going out of my way to make somebody else feel better, JUST BECAUSE. i actually liked the video. it was informative. it was not an hour long and with 10minute long cheese-offs every 5 minutes. and you didn't run it on some funded high-end PC. that last bit, on it's own, might actually resonate with the actual majority of the gamers that cannot afford 2k gpu, 1k cpu and some 340mhz 4k screens. info you've provided will be more useful to, what, like 80% of actual pc gamers? that is good. that is nice to see. i wrote what i wrote because i saw a lot of good things about your vid. i am not encouraging or supporting you. this was constructive criticism on my behalf, and i basically saw nothing wrong with it. one suggestion and even then, not critiqueing - might want to experiment with voice. either higher sensitivite and further from the face, either vice-versa. fluff on, fluff on. not saying that there is anything, in particular, wrong with it... just if i watched 2 videos of yours and then had to pick YOUR voice out of random 3, i could not. see where i'm going? this is multimedia platform. more edges - better known, easier to remember. THANK YOU for this video. it was concise enough, informative enough and in this particular case, having the 2 meters running and explaining why, was really educational. thank you.

Haha, not at all, I took it in the good spirits I believe you meant? My comment is genuine, it really is one of the nicest comments anyone has ever left here, true story. I'm a very thankful guy, and appreciate it when people take their time out of their day to watch a random wannabe benchmark RU-vidr. So I am being sincere, and not just trying to be nice to please people. Some of my other comments will attest to this 🤣

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews aw... that's nice. either way. good vid, keep it up! and most certainly - THANK YOU. i got info i needed.

Thanks bud, appreciate it. Will keep what you said about my voice in mind, see what I can do 👍

Thanks for the tip, appreciate it. Will check it out!

Appreciate the comment. Yeah, vsync helps with the frame pacing and feels much better with it on.

The RX 7600 is a decent 1080p GPU, and even more so with AFMF enabled.

imput lag?

@@Kevin-cv4ib i got used to it but it's not good, good enough on controller for me though

I think it should be very decent by next year when it releases officially. Might not be perfect, but it's pretty good.

Thanks! I use an external capture card fir all my recordings, and on the capture card it shows up fine 👍

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews oh nice. Which capture card are you using can you tell me exact model of it?

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews and one more thing are you using capture card in the same pc? Or do you have a seprate pc for it?

It's an Elgato 4K60 Pro MK2, and it's in a separate PC so as not to affect performance when recording.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews thanks for the info ❤️

I only tested it briefly and frame pacing became quite a bit of an issue, where one frame for example would take 5ms to render, the next 15ms, and the next 3ms etc etc. And those are noticeable. But Daniel did a good video on this if you want to check it out! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-WjAp45M-MHk.html

Yeah indeed, at 240fps final output you'd need hawk eyes to notice any issues with the interpolated frame. It's good at 60 going to 120, but it will be awesome going from 120 to 240, and the input latency increase would be almost imperceptible.

The FPS on the left is what you'll get without AFMF, and on the right is what you'll get with AFMF. The one on the right is about double, but AFMF does dynamically disable frame gen when there is a lot of movement, and then the numbers will be the same.

I hope it gets it because it is a game that can greatly benefit from it. From what I know the tech drivers dont include AFMF for Alan Wake 2 yet, but I am busy recording an Alan Wake 2 video that will include AFMF, if I can get it to work. Even if it doesnt, it should get support with the next tech driver update, or soon after, but would like an FSR3 implementation!

I explained in the video. MSI Afterburner does not account for the extra frames when using AFMF, so the one on the left will be the base framerate without the generated frames, and the one on the right is counting the generated frames too.

I've only seen this happen once in Alan Wake 2, but my guess is it's because the game isnt officially supported. It's also a tech preview driver, meaning there will still be some issues. What game do you have this issue with? Or is it all games?

It's all games tbh, but i've just done a complete playthrough of RDR2, and it turned off after an hour or so like clockwork, had to restart the PC and it'd come back on fine for another hour or so @@Mostly_Positive_Reviews

I need that placebo effect it provides, makes me feel good about my PC haha

It's definitely a great feature to have in slower movement games. The way it also switches it on/off so quickly is pretty neat.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews It will be epic when the 8700G release with its monstrous 780M iGPU. Cannot wait to order it and test this. I m a huge APU enthusiast.

@@PurpleTeamer Yeah for sure, and then if FSR 3 comes to multiple games the handheld market will be quite interesting. AFMF will also help in the handheld market for sure. Exciting times!

That's actually pretty cool! Does it work well enough?

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews Yeah it improves performance for all games, you may able to see it on my channel I have 3 games right now with it working :)

Havent tested it myself but I think it'll work as AFMF works on a software level, kind of like a post-proccessing feature.

Yeah, unfortunately these tech preview drivers dont get updated as often as WHQL drivers, but once it launches officially it should be included in the normal drivers and get updated frequently.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews yeah that would be awesome cannot wait.

@@Steelninja77 Yeah indeed, same here!

RU-vid is limited to 60 fps, and so is my capture card, so you wont notice a difference visually unless you see it directly from the monitor. Higher can sometimes look worse on RU-vid than lower due to the dropped frames caused by uploading it at 60 fps (which is the max RU-vid supports).

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews makes sense. so far I'm getting some nice FPS boosts from this new feature. Definitely feeling a difference personally.

Interesting. I'll test the Doom games and see if I can get them working there as well, thanks for the tip!

Rdr2 vulkan olmasına rağmen çalışıyor muhtemelen vulkan için test etmediler ve sadece dx11, dx12 destekliyor dediler

Rdr2 vulkan olmasına rağmen çalışıyor muhtemelen vulkan için test etmediler ve sadece dx11, dx12 destekliyor dediler

@@merta0567 Yes , DXVK = Vulcan works as well = older DX9 Games which work with DXVK can run as well , i tested it with GTA IV ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-At7O6lPGz1k.html

I will be testing today. If there are significant improvements I might make a new video 👍

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews wicked!, I’m stuck working out of town and can’t update my system to see the changes, I never used the beta drivers!

I left a pinned commennt on the original video, but replying here to you. The performance differences are between 1 and 2%, so within margin of error really. But definitely try it out to see whether you like it or not. Seeing that you havent tested with the BETA drivers I reckon you might be pleasantly surprised. Just remember that it turns itself off during fast motion, and it can cause visual artifacts. So best is to try it out and see whether you are happy with the results!

You can just google "amd afmf driver download" and it should take you directly to the download site. I pasted a link as well, but not sure if it'll be blocked or not: www.amd.com/en/support/kb/release-notes/rn-rad-win-23-30-afmf-tech-preview

Yeah, the inconsistency is quite jarring. The thing is, normal frame gen needs to be implemented by the game itself. Whereas with AFMF it is driver level. When implemented in the game itself it's UI aware, so UI artifacting is kept to a minimum. Driver-level Frame Gen cant be UI aware, and that is why it disables during fast movement, or at least one major reason. But the big reason is artifacting during fast motion unfortunately. I still dont know what this is made for though. Maybe 2D side scrollers? Or Top-down RPGs? Any first-person shooter is a definite no go, and so would 3rd person shooters be.

@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews Could be made to hold us over as barely any games offer FSR FG support currently. We may not see the benefit, but clearly they can't get enough of adding worthless features to their drivers.

@@rx1834 Yeah, good point.

It seems to be limited to 6000 and 7000 series AMD GPUs, but I cant give you an official answer as I havent tested it myself unfortunately. It's driver level frame generation so I dont think official drivers will support it. Maybe when it officially releases you might get modded versions that will.

I can say as a former rx580 user, no

Would definitely benefit greatly from FSR 3 or AFMF, if you dont mind some UI elements having some artifacting! AFMF drivers should be ready by Q1 2024 so it should be quite a bit better than it is now with the tech preview driver.

Did you install the latest tech preview driver? It works on 6000 series as of 13 October with that driver. I linked it in the description 👍

​@@Mostly_Positive_Reviews спасибо, щас гляну, вышла новая версия.

Скачал новую версию драйвера, эта функция не работает на моей 6900xt , точнее amd fluid monitor frames , ползунок передвигаешь а толку ноль . Не активируется как на видео.

Может надо что-то отключить в amd адреналин

To many, apparently. I have always loved frame generation tech. AFMF is far from perfect though.