AGGRESSIVE F-16 DEMO !!! 

A qué"+

69th like

fr

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-XIZ1CZoCuYo.html

@Angelo Landon no

@nicoloco9974 Wow this guy has a lot of flight hours on the f 16.

Funny thing is you can steal these in gta but there called the p996 lazer.

@@rowanmakesmemes7301 i was searching this comment

dinosaures from real life guys birds

Would be funny if someone actually went after him.

Odelin Serrano Could say the same for the Super Hornet. Older design, but still deadly in the hands of a skilled pilot.

how the fuck do you call this a grandpa jet? you rich or something'...ima use this plane to get your good earned dollars

Designs don't age. Materials do.

@@WhipRunner Technology on the other hand, does age.

This is more like a cool uncle

Albert Archer Thanks, Al !!

Thanks for watching captain and shift commander LaBonte. Air mobility command.

all pilots are like that but they don't show their ability to people .

Ha-ha-ha. You must see what MiG-29 can do.

Тодор Живков What, go low and slow performing high bleed maneuvers that will only get pilot killed in real combat? What you saw here is what pilots talk about to keep alive in a dogfight, which is to maintain energy. You don’t see the MiG 29 pull as many high g’s. It’s one of the reasons why the most advanced Fulcrum, the MiG-35, didn’t fare so well in the MMRCA tender. The only area it did well was top-end speed. When it came to instant and sustained turn rates it did not perform as well as its competition. The prime reasons why it failed were its engines and its radar failing to reach desired acquisition ranges required under the tender.

Yes. The su 27 is an amazing aircraft so is the mig 29.

Quixxlez Well said! What is seen here by the F-16 is never losing energy, pulling high g maneuvers, that is rarely shown in Russian demonstrations. What the Russian trolls cannot seem to comprehend is that most dogfights are not one versus one, but several versus several, and going slow doing fancy flips might look nice, in reality only makes them a sitting duck. That’s why when aircraft compete for military sales, the maneuvers that you see by Russian aircraft are not criteria used to make the determination which aircraft is better. For dogfights specifically they look at instant, sustained, and roll turn rates, and the ability to recover from high bleed maneuvers. The F-16 displayed all those traits here. For BVR it’s avionics, situational awareness, sensor fusion, radars, stealth, all areas exceeded by western aircraft.

@@Thetequilashooter1 What's your background? (If you don't mind me asking.) You seem rather knowledgeable on the subject. Thank you all for the comments in this thread.

Thetequilashooter1 the Su-27’s Cobra maneuver everyone orgasms over is impressive to watch, but like you said there are more than just the Sukhoi and the guy behind him involved. Pull that maneuver with an F15 on your tail and yeah, he’ll probably overshoot, but then you’re at 150kts, still in controlled flight of course, but with no energy to get away from his wingman. Slow isn’t good. Low and slow are even worse.

Speed is life. In a world of HOBS missle launches in dogfights, it's impossible to dodge an AIM-9X while you are at 50 knots ;P

Yes, one might even coin the slang word, _"GANGSTA!"_

Christopher Smith yea it was.

Can you specify the time?

Christopher Smith cu

+Muhammad Umer Toor 2.43 ~ 2.47. I particular liked this demo flight by this pilot!

XD

Hahahahaha wtf was that!

It's called Discipline and protocol.

hahhh

LOL!!!!!!!!!!

yea that was my favorite maneuver he did

klaas klapsigaar haha inderdaad

The lazer is also based on a mix between F35 and F16

@@kixakii436 actually its just the f16. However its counterpart the hydra is based on the f35 as well as the English. AV AB

@@rowanmakesmemes7301 lazer's rear is taken from the f35

because it light

Me either. It almost looks like its thrust vectoring. But the engine nozzel isnt moving.

The F16 started the whole "unstable with avionics (what most jets are today)" thing moving nozzle or not it can do some nice moves :)

USA classifies a lot of things, i was surprised too, they dont say much about their jets

Handbrake to a screw

I didn’t either. There’s a video on RU-vid of a Swiss F-18 legacy hornet doing some incredible stuff, better than this even, and in the comments some guys are saying it has advanced software updates. It’s pretty incredible! Does several cobra maneuvers and flat spins that I thought could only be done with thrust vectoring.

Lol a small sports car with SIDEWINDERS, it's got to be a bad day if you piss this thing off.

Hopefully now you understand why thrust vectoring technology isn't needed

Braden A hnbbgvvvjnnbfsM

It was designed to be a dog fighter from scratch. It still has the fastest turn rate of any American Jet except the F-22.

@@joshuareed6894 the F22 has a better turn radius while the F16 has a better turn rate (meaning the F22 would favor a 1-circle fight while the F16 would favor a 2 circle rate fight)

@@ariane19. Ah, but does it? Depends on the configuration of the aircraft. The slick version of the F-16 might squeak a tenth or two of a degree per second of turn rate. As soon as you start adding missiles to its wings the F-22 is gonna dominate it because of the increased drag. The F-22 doesn’t suffer as much due to its internal stowage bays.

Gonciu Sebastian why do you want to dogfight F22 and F35 then ?

Greetings friend! From USA

Gonciu Sebastian greetings from the USA! Romania and USA could be great Allies!!

@@pritikoukoui3548 F-16 is an awesome fighter jet! And with the block 70 coming out it will be around for another 20 years!

I think he is saying it can dogfight with those planes. Hello from the USA 🇺🇸 my Romanian friend.

my first duty station was 50th TFW Hahn AB Germany. '86to'88 sheetmetal backshop. the fighting falcon will always be my first true love.

Yeah me to. I hear its like riding on a rollercoaster traveling at 1,000 MPH

It absolutely ruined roller coasters for me. I still enjoy them somewhat but just don't get much of a thrill from many of them anymore.

They can put you to sleep pretty easy if you're a backseater "guest" in an F-16D. 9 Gs will do that. Whether or not you toss your cookies depends on your attitude, lol. If you make any Top Gun or Maverick comments or talk smack about the little old F-16 or have a "been there and done that attitude", hold on to your ass, lol. There are barf bags in the rear cockpit normally but you have to be humble enough to grab one right away. Hard to get a hold of one when the ride starts. That's another good way to try to ensure you won't need one. The VIP/PR flights are recorded by a rear-facing camera and the passenger gets a copy. The pilot can see the video real-time on a small display. If you grab a bag early and show proper respect you'll at least get some consideration and some warm-up maneuvers. What makes most people sick is fear rather than motion sickness because visibility is no problem at all. And the cockpit atmosphere and pressurization is a little different than what you get in an airliner and that has an effect too. So does forgetting to breathe. The pilots don't really like making people puke because it costs them cold beer or whatever on the ground when ground crew guys have to clean it up and they want people to enjoy their flights and the aircraft. But some people have to be humbled a little bit before they lighten up and let themselves become little kids at the amusement park again.

You need to ride better roller coasters. I'm not saying there's a comparison because there's not. That's the point. There are things that plane will do that no roller coaster ever could and vice versa. Roller coasters are more dangerous, too.

This aggressive this dude is pulling so much g's

F 15 ; AND TORNADO ARE LOUDER

@@rguigRG The F 16 can still out fight the Tornado. Nothing and I mean NOTHING handles like it

Mrguig Rguig no mirage

@@smithnwesson990 I'm pretty sure an F-22 can out maneuver the F-16

@ Stevo.. The perfect analogy, my supremely intelligent and honest friend. Thank you

IMO An F-35 sounds just like that and is just as loud too. It is cooler seeing and hearing the Thunderbirds tho

@HyperNova What country do you live in mate?

The block 70 is just a really heavy 16 Because of the radar mounted on the spine... Sure it's got a slightly powerful engine but still

The Viper West and Viper East demo teams put on a far superior show than the Thunderchickens in my opinion.

Jef Damen Do you mean 3:33 ?

Its black terminator

@@Thetequilashooter1 Nah i meant the spike and the taxi man. The flying is cool too obviously?.

Maybe, but there are very very serious contenders in this category most notably the Spitfire in it;s era.

It’s between F16 and F15

@@MrDayjur the bf 109 was better

Roger Jones I agree. For straight up eye candy, I’d have to go with the Spit for prop driven planes and F16 for jet. I always thought it be the P51 for me then saw one next to a Spitfire at an air show, no comparison.

I wouldn't say that. Definitely among the most iconic, but there are many jets that can compare to it.

@Virtual DCS Fighter Pilot one of the jealous person ever!

ruicravomarques in old times ... but now.? Is just a little memories from the past

ruicravomarques: “F-16: ‘Like admiring your Great Grandmothers Whale bone Corsett!!!”

Still is

So wie der Mann aussieht, scheint es ihm nicht's auszumachen. Ganz im Gegenteil.

Under the table everything is possible.

@Luke Wilson 🤣🤣 can't even win against terrorist Taliban.

@Luke Wilson oil in Afghanistan? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Stop speaking from you 🍑 mate.

Plus it’s really adorable

they didnt show the transitions

That is pretty obvious. Even considering that the pilot still had that afterburner ripping!

@@devontreleaven534 yeah true. watched again. he took seriously sharp turns returning

it was good, they do much lower 90 degree bank these days

Crip Skillz i know this is over a year later but, it’s “precision”

imagine one day the f35 being the main performance of the show. it will be kind of boring because how poorly it moves compared to the f16.

MrOrthogonalization what do you mean they won't sell them to us. they are the largest defense contractor in the world and we have the most defense contacts with them? they develop things for us . ? we're just obsessed with 5th gen aircraft.

because Lockheed is also developing the F-35 to replace the F-16.

MrSuperkaji I know :( all I'm saying I don't see why we wouldn't be able to still buy the f16 because it's still in production and is extremely cheap to produce. even with maintenance costs etc. I wish the us didn't order so many f35 s (I know they had to to make the cost go down)we should produce f16 to save us some tax dollars.50/50 would be ideal America is too obsessed with 5th gen aircraft that will soon be obsolete because of radar technology. and after that it sort of is a turkey. we're going all out and I kind of think it's a mistake. I'm not saying the f35 is bad. just expensive and terrible agility which none of us can deny. ( I know thrust vectoring , good aoa but it still isn't good. nowhere near a f16 at low and high altitudes) truth is we would never use that many stealth aircraft at once as no one in history has. undeniably a complete waste of money.

well not the best agility. maybe not terrible but you get what I'm saying