Alexander Waugh 

A great man. A light and champion. Alexander Waugh, "may flights of angels sing thee to thy rest". RIP X

I could listen to Alexander Waugh for hours.....days.....a lifetime.

Great discussion. Alexander Waugh is a wonderful thinker and commentator. His presentations are remarkable and so much more worthy than anything offered in mainstream. I do hope very much his condition is improved. (=Ivermectin)

I often thought that Alexander Waugh was an interesting guy, but after watching this video, which has has shed so much more light on his thought processes, I now find him quite fascinating.

Alexander is fascinating .

Thank you, Gentlemen. A splendid discourse. I worked as Deputy head of Sound at The Royal Shakespeare Company, Barbican Theatre, London for 16 years. It was widely known that the pen belonged to Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. I worked closely with Chief Voice Coach, Cicely (Ciss) Berry. Ciss would catch my eye in the Green Room; bribe me with a cigarette and cup of tea. We would go to the Recording Room and hunt through mountains of quarter inch tape, cassette and CD to find her target dialect. I would then copy to short cassettes for Cicely to work with her required actors. Ciss was (I think she passed in 2018) an absolute Queen....of course I should say Princess 🤭. She was a force to be reckoned with. When she was on site in London she would conduct the daily pre show Vocal Warm-Ups in the Main House Auditorium. Ciss was so loved and respected that heavy duty Lead Actors would especially turn up. This was an incredible boost to Company Moral and the confidence building of young Actors. Ciss was down to earth. She had a profound feeling for the delivery of 'The Iambic Pentameter'. She knew ALL the cuss words and would not hesitate to deliver them with consummate aplomb when the situation required. Ciss had the twinkle of a ballet dancer and the audio lexicon of a seasoned Choreographer. The real deal. God bless you, Cicely Berry. ♥️

My college Shakespeare professor refused to discuss questions of authorship when students attempted to ask... sometimes he'd get visibly angry. I found out from one of his grad students a year or so later that he was indeed a skeptic, but was incredibly fearful of his peers, who were hardcore Stratfordians. Anecdotal, to be sure, but I think it speaks to the intense power that the Traditionalists have over those who doubt the official story.

Thanks for posting on RU-vid James. What a fascinating, wonderful and quintessentially English guest.

Best guest EVER! Love Alexander Waugh deciphering Edward de Vere's cryptic clues revealing the real Bard's secrets ;)

What a fascinating interview. I'm a huge admirer of Alexander's grandfather, one of the best authors in the English language. So to hear Alexander talk with such passion and eloquence about the authorship of Shakespeare's plays, and such topics as secrecy and official lies, just blew my mind. I cannot thank you enough James for this and everything you have done especially in the last few years.

The knowledge and literature stands alone for anyone to discover but it has been expropriated by the middle classes and denied to ordinary people by funneling them into state education. The best schools that teach it are reserved for them. What is worse is that we used to have a plethora of small independent book shops where people could discover interesting books outside the education system. Now they are gone and very few people read. We have entered an age of illiteracy that is ideal for the exercise of tyranny. Thank goodness for the growth in home schooling encouraging individuality and independent thinking. A small ray of hope amidst the descending darkness.

Excellent conversation. Thankyou James.

Absolutely fascinating, engaging and thoughtful discussion. I had the opportunity to meet and interview Auberon Waugh...and Alexander has the admirable and extraordinary best aspects of his father and grandfather.

RIP Alexander Waugh - a brilliant mind (30 Dec 1963 - 22 July 2024) 🙏🌠

Thanks for this really enjoyed it & very fascinating. My late dad was a huge Waugh family fan especially Auberon he would have loved this. Thank you

He made astonishing discoveries that amaze me still. So gutted. There's no one like him. I never heard him mention it, but I believe he was a direct descendant of De Vere through his mother, a Herbert.

Hello James. Thank you for another video cast.

Always a Treat listening to Alexander Waugh

One of your best yet . More historical conspiracy please .

Not even 10 minutes in, and oh how I would have loved to have been in this conversation with you gentlemen, absolutely love it.

Brilliant podcast!

Yes !! Tom Bree's book 'Cosmos in Stone ' is a must get !!👍😊🌟

Having watched a number of Alexander's videos beforehand, it is refreshing to hear him condense so many of his earlier significant points, while bringing out others besides. One's responses are obviously personal, but, for my part, I find I can relate most readily to Alexander's conclusions concerning the Shakespeare Authorship Question, and much else. FWIW I have an empathy also with the experience of Hank Whittemore, in his endeavour to fully understand the Sonnets. As bizarre as it may seem, I had my own damascene moment when addressing myself to the subject of the Whitechapel Murders, wherein one detects the subtle hand of Freemasonry, again manifest in a veil of letters and numbers. As Alexander recounts, it is far from obvious, but once seen it cannot be ignored.

Thanks James, really enjoyed this.

This is an outstanding interview! Alexander Waugh is every bit as interesting and original as his father and grandfather.

Alexander Waugh is the very type and strain of obstinant and plain speaking gentleman that makes the pretenders pale in comparison. I will forever sorely miss his great and humorous presentations, that put him for a time (in the most duplicitous of times) at the head of the illustrious Oxfordian phalanx that laid waste to the arguments of those who refuse to even consider our collected history might now and then be or have been false and misleading, not to mention deliberately obfiscated for profit or for slavish orthodoxy. Vale Alexander.

Wonderfully rich discourse. A moments pleasure separating the madness beyond. Thank you both.

Nice to listen to Alexander summarize what he explains in his videos, which I did not find boring by the way. And to touch on way more. Thank you.

Super!

Wonderful.

Only just started, and not subbed to your channel; but will be now! Many thanks for this. I came to know Waugh’s work through my many years of research into the occult, theology and so forth. He’s an amazing researcher and a great narrator, absolutely love his work. Got yourself a new subscriber for sure, thanks again!

Great pod.

What a sad reminiscence, now since Alexander died in these late July summer days of 2024.

Rest in peace Alexander 🙏🏿

I watched your conversation twice today, as I was doing chores-----I wanted to remember more of the details------thank you! I am posting to you, a URL of a New York Times article, talking about foods which fight cancer. At the top of the list (for me) are artichokes and dandelion roots, which cause apoptosis. (And you understand the Greek.) (I actually studied Greek when I was in college--it makes the world more understandable.) Even if you were to drink off the shelf dandelion root tea, it would help. I have a chronic blood cancer and my numbers are almost normal----I have never had to take chemo. I just want you to be healthy! About 8 months ago, I was watching German lessons (I worked in Germany) and RU-vid suggested your talk about the triple tau and such. It has changed my life. I watch a lot of your talks and the SOF---I am really happy to find out about Edward de Vere, as I have always felt uncomfortable about the Shaksper guy. A friend of mine recently asked me to read "Will in the World.'' When I was finished, I said that we would still have to agree to disagree, because the book was written in the subjunctive. A friend of mine, who has a background in philosophy, told me that since the Chinese traditional medicine, such as dandelion root and magnolia bark--have been used successfully for thousands of years, makes them proved empirically----almost as good as the scientific method. And all medicine was like this, before the discovery of germ theory. Here is the NYT article---------- www.nytimes.com/2023/11/27/well/eat/food-diet-cancer-risk.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Bk0.FDkI.X3z1lrYqFTqa&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

This subject is incredible

This was a fantastic interview and so interesting as I thought Shakespeare was Sir Francis Bacon, how wrong were those who thought it true! Alexander’s a true genius. I listened to this twice on the Delingpod as there’s sooo much information.

Very sad to hear of Waugh’s death on 22/7/24 from prostate cancer his work on De Vere is priceless

2 fine fellows.

Great interview. I wish Alexander hadn't diverted James from his question right at the end, it is an important and interesting point......

How did we get where we are today? Nominalism, and how it can be used for the benefit of oligarchs Also, Evelyn Waugh was absolutely right to be disillusioned with the RCC after Vatican II. Shows the sincerity and integrity of the man

I might be the only "Shakespeare" researcher to build a comprehensive genealogical "tree" of all the people surrounding the bard. The purpose of which is to construct an entire ecosystem that would point to the real person behind the plays, the sonnets and everything else. I have written a book of 1,000 pages dissecting these findings. It is called "Debugging Shakespeare" and Alexander Waugh has communicated via email with me sympathetically and encouragingly over the last few years (and is mentioned several times in my book). I respect him enormously. He suggested that I make some RU-vid videos - which I have now done. The latest of a series of about 49-50 of them can be found here: - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EEAxo4SPSYY.htmlsi=HjqJYsnV9akIQRUb

RIP. Work on Shakspere was INVALUABLE!

Think of the way the top Soviet apparatchiks lived; so little could be said without reservation. That’s the 20th century! The Elizabethan Era was just as laced with No Go’s & Ideological Landmines.

Very much enjoyed your interview with Alexander . I've been following him for a long time & always look forward to hearing from him. Something is bothering me though James, is Alexander OK? I thought he looked unwell, not like himself at all. Hope he's OK🙏

My rule of thumb is to never believe conspiracy theories unless they are more probably true than the alternative. They do, sometimes, exist. Almost always, they do not.

Wonderful! Indeed, It is fun to play the numbers! In Psalm 46, the King James Translators chose to place the word “shake” 46 words down from the top and “spear” 46 words from the bottom. More importantly, they put the key to spiritual growth in verse 10: “Be still, and know that I am God”. I can best put this in a poem: All numbers, be they even, odd, / When well-considered lead to God / The humble mind thus uses will / To know His graces and be still.

A good companion book to "The Secret History of the World" by Mark Booth is "Philosophy between the Lines" by Arthur Melzer, a history of esoteric writing. Alexander Waugh is an amazing man.

Second best bed could be a reference to the second best Ed, Edmund spencer being the number one. Ed de vere been the second.

Interesting, what are your thoughts on other famous authors not writing their own work though? In particular, I am think of famous women writers like Austen, the Brontë sisters and George Elliot - mainly because education wasn't regarded as something that women required in those days (so acquiring those kinds of writing skills seems out of place) and also the fact that women weren't really in the workplace during those times.

Now with some coad spelling. I thoroughly enjoyed this even though I’m definitely not the literary type. Well done and thank you! Just one thing. I’m very puzzled that you, James, think that Newton’s Principia is junk on a par with the current klighmατε ßolloχ. His laws of motion and his law of universal gravitation stand today. Admittedly they need to be modified when it comes to the very small (quantum mechanics) and the very large/massive and at very high speeds (special and general relativity) but one only has to work with them to see for oneself that how stunningly acute they are at explaining so much about the physical world and so incredibly accurately. But doing so requires a certain level of mathematics without which no understanding is possible. However, that acquaintance can be readily had by anyone prepared to make the effort and is no bar in the way you intimate. In particular Newton’s works are about as far from the utter lighs, schtt and ßolloχ of the κoммιε-ßstard klighmaτε phayckers that it is possible to get. By the way, Newton couched pretty much everything in the Principia in geometric terms even though equivalent constructions are more readily apparent when done using his calculus. But mathematicians and natural philosophers (physicists) were familiar in 1687 with geometry and Newton had not published his calculus. He wouldn’t have published anything if Edmund Halley hadn’t pushed him to do so. But when he did, he did so with his intended readership and their capabilities in mind. If you want an authoritative view on the Principia I suggest the book by I Bernard Cohen, ‘The Principia: The Authoritative Translation: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy’. About £15 for the 600-page paperback. For what it’s worth I agree with almost everything you say about almost everything. All the very best to you.

Is Alexander well? He looks unnaturally aged, although his brilliant mind is as sharp as ever.

Yes, Richard III was a hunchback. They discovered his body in parking lot under a slot with a giant "R" on it, of all things. Many people had "deformities"/"infermaties" at this time and no other characters are given "fake ailments".

Shake-Speare the spear shaker was Athena. But Athena was Britannia - the coin symbolism is the same and goes back to the Roman era of Britain. In which case, Shakes-Speare was Britannia - the nation. So the true author (Oxford) was writing for the nation. Which is true, because Oxford was being paid £1,000 a year by Queen Elizabeth to write these plays, for the nation. R

Not sure if my comment sent or flew off into the ethers but I was saying that AW and I sit on opposite sides of the boat, but are pulling in the same direction re the Authorship Question, and the fact Will Shakspur definitely didn’t write the plays. However, Francis Bacon was eulogised (and mentioned in life) as a great poet - see Manes Verulaiamina for starters. He also had the same money problems and there were many who ‘knew’ and left clues that he led the Scriptorium. It can create further misinformation when an unsuspecting public hang on to every word from someone, simply because they sound authoritative and come from a literary family. A better way - the middle way - is to present all the information and let people decide for themselves. My book presents the overall picture of what they were up to, whether De Vere, Bacon, Marlowe or whoever, and includes number symbolism, code , cipher etc. I’m not trying to sell my book, rather to sell another broader viewpoint. The Secret Work of an Age: Piercing the Veil. Just out on that big bookstore you mentioned! Amazon. Recommended by Masons even though I’m not one! It’s not true that one can’t know their secrets.

P.S. I really liked "The Loved One."

I follow Waugh closely watch all his videos and belong to the De Vere society. I also understand the shake -spear Athena stuff but is he saying De Vere didn’t know the man from Stratford who for some years at least worked in the London theatre scene? In which case the surnames were just coincidence ?? Maybe Johnson knew him.

Claire Cross in her 1966 edition of "The Puritan Earl" (p.45) states that "... publishing controversial works in his own name little became a well-born knight". It wasn't the 'done thing'.

I find it interesting that these guys agree on the Shakespeare authorship issue, namely that there is no evidence whatsoever that the man from Stratford wrote the plays and poems attributed to him, and yet they have no such issues with the existence of God.

No dinosaurs?

We need London Calling with James and Lozza.

Big fan of Alexander. It’s a sad to see him in this forum with someone who doesn’t believe in evolution, the moon landing, and dinosaurs.

ispirato - cerciamo sempre la verità

Minerva = "Pallas" Athena = Spear Shaking Athena = "Shakespeare"

Didn’t William Shakespeare call his son Hamlet or Hamnet (spelling was all over the place then as everyone knows)?

Hello. It’s impossible to comment here with any meaningful content.

1:15:25. Oh…ahem….did not have the ‘evolution, the moon landing, dinosaurs, and WWII’ were all lies on my Shakespeare authorship question bingo card.

"Cryptic" and/or "It's complicated" is the Go-To cop-out and excuse for all "Modern Academics". Not only does it insult the audience, but they admit their own inability to convey complex information others, as per their "Profession" as a "Professor". Run away!

For such an erudite man, why did he keep saying 'who' instead of 'whom' ? Has it gone out of fashion? Lovely interview, however.

4:43 That mathematics teacher wasn’t up to [substance taken up the nose instead smoking a cigarette - YT doesn’t like the word]. The proof of (-1)x(-1) = 1 is extremely simple. Here’s a laboured version to make the steps clear. 0 = 0 x 0 = ( 1 + (-1)) x ( 1 + (-1)) = 1 x 1 + 1 x (-1) + (-1) x 1 + (-1) x (-1) = 1 + (-1) + (-1) + (-1) x (-1) = 0 + (-1) + (-1) x (-1) = (-1) + (-1) x (-1) Adding 1 to both sides gives 1 + 0 = 1 + (-1) + (-1) x (-1) I.e. 1 = 0 + (-1) x (-1) = (-1) x (-1) QED, as they say. The algebraic properties of the integers used here are the distributive laws, a(b+c) = ab+ac and (b+c)a = ba+ca, and the properties of the additive and multiplicative identities, 0 and 1 respectively; namely 0+n = n+0 = n and 1 x n = n x 1 = n for all n. In the more general case, (-1) x (-1) = 1 holds true in any (so-called) ring with a multiplicative identity. For further info see, for example, the classic ‘A Survey of Modern Algebra’ by Garrett Birkhoff and Saunders Mac Lane. By the way, note that a proof should follow directly from the axioms set down for whatever system is under investigation and will be wholly independent of whether or not those axioms apply in any “practical” case. A “practical” proof, if it is worth anything beyond being a mere heuristic, is not mathematics, and as such is no proof at all.

Yes the deception does indeed go back to the biblical era. Read about the deceptions that covered up the true historical Jesus. “Je.sus, K.ing of Ed.dessa” R

Does it even matter who wrote the literature attributed to Shakespeare. You can spend years of your life trying to prove that someone else wrote the plays etc. But what if I said to you that God wrote the Shakespearian text. What do I mean by that? I maintain, that truly great art comes from divine inspiration. The artist is a mere conduit for what is received. Yes, he or she will gain a sort of earthly immortality as a result but if we fail to recognise the true source we profit little from the reading.

Adrenochrome 🤦‍♀

Great talk but the Francis Bacon Telegram group hypothesis is more convincing.

Shakespeare no. The bible yes? Jesus! That's loopy.

1-3-9