Analyzing Alec Baldwin's Manslaughter Trial | Rust Movie Shooting 

Unfortunately with the "Judges" most recent rulings she basically handed Baldwin the ticket to walk. Sickening!!!! Masons stick with Masons.

No he says he did not pull the trigger. However, he was going to be pulling the trigger in that scene. So I don't even know why this is an issue, except for the time he may have pulled the trigger that discharged the gun--that could technically make him culpable for unintentional manslaughter.

👍

Yep, they had some security complaints.

Yup it should never be released!

What's sad is that her vision for this movie is lost. Looking through her work, it's obvious that she would have been such a success and highly sought after. Her work is beautiful and we all lost a wonderful artist that would have added layers of depth and power to films. But that pales in comparison to what her family and son have lost. The worst part is this was completely preventable.

As someone who has worked in the cinema world. I've seen this stuff before, I was offered to work with Hopsin, a pretty popular rapper. They were low balling everyone's pay because the ULTIMATE pay was being able to put on your portfolio that you got to work with Hopsin/Baldin. These people were all so terrible at what they do, every single one of them, even the girl that died sucked at her job. But because they think Baldwin would be able to boost their career, they did whatever he said, took the crappy pay, and guess what? Worked with other TERRIBLE people. If you feel like a Baldwin can boost your career, you REALLY need to reevaluate your life choices.

Her family is receiving a stake in it now after suing. I looked into this thinking how could it still be made, but her husband seems to think it's what she would've wanted.

There have been several big movies, that you never knew about, until you looked it up, where cast or crewmembers were killed, but were still released. A key question (without answer) is: Would Halyna Hutchins have wanted her final work to be erased, or would she wanted it released in honor of her memory?

How about his temper tantrums and complete disregard for safety? I would bet Alec is someone who pushes other's boundaries when they inconvenience him. Some ugly things will come out about his behavior in that court room....

@@jenerin905Baldwin has never recognized others boundaries @ home @work @ play . He’s been paid big bucks for being the Bully no one can touch. !!!

His interview with the police was pure arrogance and he was just so "giddy" in a way like look im a movie star and just talk talk talk

@dinguskhan733 Punctuation is your friend, my guy!

You're right. However, someone accidentally brought LIVE ammo onto the set and the armorer was high and didn't feel like she needed to shake all of the dummies. Hannah admitted to the fact that she shook multiple dummies at the same time. That technique would have prevented her from noticing a LIVE bullet in a handful of dummies, which is exactly what happened.

@@snowwhite2524 Actually, they haven't determined how those live rounds got onto the set and there was zero proof that she was high. Stop spreading rumours!

Alec and crew played with real ammunition on breaks,target practicing Alec was well aware of live ammunition on the set and did nothing.

@@charleslaurice that has not been substantiated. more rumors

@@charleslauricewrong. The ammunition was brought by the Armorer, it was previously used on a LIVE range used by the Actors of 1883. They mixed it in and then brought it to the set of Rust. Get your facts straight Moron

I also believe that this was an accident but it could have very easily been stopped and fixed and corrected and people would not have lost their lives but like you said pig head big head money man I do what I want

Gross negligence. It's a crime, and someone's dead.

@@pommiebears I heard somewhere that this is karma for Baldwin, because of all of the impressions he did of trump, that's just what I heard

@@JoeBlow-jm1bz lmfaoooooo this is so stupid

and the armorer and ammo supllier? they get off free?

This is more like the driver gets their brakes replaced, the brakes fail because of the incompetence of the shop the driver used, and a person is killed as a result while they were speeding. Is the driver culpable? Absolutely, but it's not as black and white depending on which jurisdiction and how they handle manslaughter.

Not all car accidents resulting in death are crimes.

​@@profd65Get real

@@Siberialover get real what?

Ammunition has a mix of protocols & common sense.

Sure he is, he's a liberal democrat who hates Trump. There is no law for them.

He's RUST. And he won. nanananananana

he was handed a gun, they pay a person to make sure its safe

Then buddy wait till you read into the film industry and how it works. Only one person is responsible and that was Hannah the armorer that was present high on coke and drunk. She was negligent in being armorer and she never checked the gun that's it wasn't loaded with live rounds. Armorer is responsible for that, not the director, not the producer, not the actors, not the camera crew, not grip and electrics. Read how film industry unions work and you'll understand, but your so ignorant in your statement against Alex.

​@@Punkfilms4605 You have no idea what my background is as it pertains to gun safety on or off sets. My statements weren't even about criminal culpability, but with regards to his hypocrisy. Cheers.

He has shown no blame or remorse for this terrible tragedy. I don't think a network would want to pick up his family reality show. It's in such poor taste, I could be wrong but I don't think that's going to go over very well.

Reality of not reading the room.

@@peggypeggy4137 Obviously you didn't watch the entire video before commenting.

​@@peggypeggy4137 Agree completely. Stupid decision on whatever network gave this a 👍 and for Baldwin to do it. Promo looks incredibly fake. This is not Baldwin's personality in real life. The wife comes across phony as well.

I wonder if his wife will have an accent or not 😂

👏👏👏👏👏

What did his wife do?

@@avo5499 for years she was acting like she didn’t speak English well. Everyone thought she had a Spanish accent. Turns out, she was born in NY and speaks perfect English

@@Miguel195211 This happened years ago hehas a family to provide for and has every right to do so.

Absolutely right!.💯

Well, the gun was pointing (or going to pointing at) Souza and Hutchins, as a fact where Souza was wounded and Hutchins was killed. Did they at any point ask to check the gun? Not victim blaming or trying to defend Baldwin, but what you said did not make sense at all

@@cosplayshopI think it’s been said that they’re not supposed to point it at anyone at all

@@lucym911 Well, first of all, you are supposed not to, but that's the best-case scenario when you are talking about 2 or maybe 3 (with the cameraman) on set. It's a different setting when you have multiple people on set, say 4 actors on set and 4 crew, however you try to avoid, and normal movie crew are in the low 20s (as in 20 something people) it's very hard to get an angle when you have a clear path. It's always going to end up with your muzzle pointing at someone. And then there are close up shot and mid-range shot, if you were to shoot a hostage scene when you have the bad guys pointing the guns at the hostage head, tell me how you can do this shot without pointing it at the hostage actor's head? On the other hand, do you know why Souza and Hutchin both didn't ask to check the weapon? Baldwin lawyer is going to ask Souza this question. "Why didn't you stop the set (He is THE DIRECTOR by the way) and check the weapon when it was going to point at your direction. And I think he is most likely going to say he didn't expect a live round is going to be on set. Why this is important? Because in law, you need to be able to proof foreseeability to get recklessness, and you need to be able to prove recklessness to prove manslaughter, because you need to know what you are doing is dangerous and you did it anyway. If Souza, the person who get shot, didn't see it coming, how do you think that reaction on Baldwin?

I don’t agree with this comment, he clearly trusted his team and wouldn’t think twice that the gun was loaded it’s common sense

A lot of MAGA retards in the comment section.

@@billyjewett5006 Wow you must of had training To bad judge is bought

@@billyjewett5006 Amen to that

There never has been but for some reason ppl kept giving him roles

He is on cops camera asking several times how victims were after incident

This is why lawyers tell you never to talk. The evidence and his testimony don't align, so what else is not making sense? This proves he's not a reliable witness.

I absolutely agree!

He has punched ppl in the street. He has been out of control bc he thinks he is entitled to do whatever he wants bc he is Alec Baldwin.

yes it was a right wing plan to eliminate a second rate actor. Do you ever feel stupid saying things like that?

@@roko6023 there are 74 million stupid people--wait for it

@roko6023 Calling Alec Baldwin a second rate actor is silly. I’m not at all talking about this case or the movie Rust. Alec Baldwin isn’t a second rate actor no matter how you feel about this case.

@@aliciacantrell5480 what has he done in the last 25 years or so, besides play Trump? Yes he's second rate.

The investigation into Kenny was one month after the shooting ...

​@@elizabethlacky6068I wonder what the investigation showed? I remember watching the trial and Sarah said she had received a phone call right after the shooting to get rid of boxes of ammunition. That struck me as odd. If there wasn't anything to hide why would they tell her to throw away any ammunition? 🤔🤔🤔

somethings fishy they are trying to cover up the crime for sure

That’s what I don’t get

Baldwin and the other producers (no, he was not the only producer) permitted or allowed live ammunition for this film. I can't imagine why - but there it is.

he is a bully all over!!

He was in shock!!

@@SAKILE1I don’t buy it. He knew he would be facing charges. He had to “act” shocked. IMO.

No he isn't guilty hannah brought the live rounds onto set she put the live bullet in the gun she's responsible

​@Gabriel-hf1yy he pulled the trigger. It's his fault. 😰🤬

@nate7724 no its not he didn't know a live round was in it..its hannah s fault she loaded the gun even if he had pulled the trigger if a live round wasn't in the gun it wouldn't make any difference.. no live rounds were not on set till hannah brought them onto set...

@nate7724 I agree he should be held libel for what happened he has many lawsuits...

I totally agree with you.

I think Alec Baldwin has some accountability especially considering he was a producer. BUT (as much as I dislike him and think he’s a pompous a$$), I agree the blame should mostly be on Hannah. She’s proved not only was she reckless but that she also took zero accountability.

How can you tell a real bullet by shaking dummies?

look closer at Seth Kenny, the head armourer on paper and supplier of ammunition and Sarah Zachery, who threw away all the ammo right after shooting. They both had access to the gun right before shooting. Both were given 100% immunity. There is an interesting video of those 2 with the NM sheriff office laughing and joking about the shooting with Seth Kenny saying he wrote '666' on all the live bullets he sent to the set. Hannah had 2 jobs not one. Something is fishy here.

You are like a person who advocates that drivers should drive without looking straight into busy intersections based on what a person next to them in the passenger seat tells them what to do.

@@SHADOWBLACKs650 Not to mention his annoyingly overbearing wife.

😂😂😂😂😂😂

As a juror you are instructed by judge to bring no prior knowledge into the courtroom and judge the evidence from the courtroom only, so you would not be a responsible juror in that instance

@@Irishwabbit59 I hear where you're coming from. Let you and I watch and see. I'm going to bet you the prosecutor is going to bring up Alec Baldwin's demeanor, and yeah, it matters. Many people who are sentenced received more harsh punishment because they weren't remorseful. I sat on two juries, and did just fine. A juror is a human being, they're going to be thinking all kinds of things about this guy, but yes, hopefully they will be able to stick to what both sides bring to this horrible table.

Halls gave him the gun.

AND . . . HE WROTE THE SCRIPT.

Produced by 7 people. Alec got top billing.

The armorer was chosen because of who her father is. Nepotism. The one and only reason.

She's one of the people at fault.

You sound just like Sarah Boone.

She's definitely one of the responsible parties.

Have you read the main safety bulletin? See pgs, 6&7. That's the main safety concern - treating all weapons as if they were loaded and never point it at anyone.

It doesn't say "blanks", it doesn't specify a type of ammunition.

@@Kay__Tee Oh, hi there. It's us again. Yeah, I've read it, I know what you are talking about. Since that is just a broad guideline, I think it means like "on your own volition" don't point guns at people. There's an implied exception when you are filming a scene that calls for such. If you didn't read it that way, then you'd never be able to make a movie with guns. Clearly there are many movies where they do point guns at people, and it's not all camera angle trickery.

@@AnnMo2 The term "blank", "blanks", or "blank ammunition" is used 13 times in SAG-AFTRA #1.

@@kdietz65 Okay. The rules I saw didn't specify but that's fine. I can't seem to find them again so I can't refer back to them. Fair enough! 🙂

Or maybe he didn’t care if the armorers was there on set. How is it that he even had a gun in his hand without her presence? Shows someone else handed him the weapon and he did not question it, didn’t check it and pointed it.

His whole interview pissed me off🙄

Totally

The medic and others testified that they told everyone who isn't able to help to get the F out and he, and others, left the church at that time.

On his phone.

Murder requires intent.

The trial BEGINS on Tuesday/Wednesday. It is not an "old trial".

@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 Well, it sure feels like it because they were talking about the incident like 1-2 years ago...