Get Your Face Rated : badrbakhtari.g... My Website: www.nerofacera... My Instagram : / bakhtari_badr This video will talk about the looks scale explaining it and where do you sit on it , hope you guys enjoy this one.
For those who follow the path of looksmaxxing. It never ends well. You’ll only tear yourself apart, and even if you succeed and you become good looking, what will you have then? Nothing, emptiness.
@@G34SZN Not true. If you have a good BASE/FOUNDATION, then you can looksmaxxx and become attractive. If you are literally an ugly dude, then looksmaxxxing and going through surgery and pain is just useless, waste of time, and money.
Studies showed that looks is about 50% objective and 50% subjective (depending on the preferences of the observer). Therefore everybody can distinguish the difference between a good-looking person and a bad looking person. However, if you compare 2 good looking people you will get a lot of different answers who is better looking. Therefore those minute differences between top 1% and top 0,5% are really insignificant in real life...
@RakeshMalik-yc1tn when you are 180cm tall in the west you are completely average. If you go to South America or South East Asia at 180cm you are very tall. It all depends on the subjects judging you
The thing I don't like about your looks scale is that you don't separate the Low-tier Normies from the true Sub 5s. A low-tier normie can looksmax into high-tier normie status, but a true Sub 5 will have a harder time becoming above average. I like WW's look scale the best (2 8)
I soft maxxed from a 4 to an 7-8. No plastic surgery, fillers, botox, or veneers because I'm poor. Just doing every possible soft max. Each one only makes a small difference by itself but together they all add up to a big overall difference. Best thing is that I still look like myself, except better. No uncanny plastic surgery look.
The whole hunter eyes and strong brow ridge thing doesn't hold true in my opinion, these standards if pushed to the extreme, like with some of the 9s in the pictures, lead to relatively serial-killer looking faces, in the real world this is not the most popular look. Also that the photo selection itself is not completely coherent shows that an objective-analytical only approach doesn't work.
there is a study saying that women are finding attractive criminals/serial killers , also tom cruise , sean opry , richard ramirez are that type of people with hunter eyes and strong brow ridges but nobody says they are unattractive
Almond eyes are actually more desirable by the general public, hunter eyes are good for modelling but for some reason the bp community just (sometimes) thinks its the best(it's great but not everyone will love it)
@@asdds4042 those women are mentally unstable to find serial killers attractive. Also, the average normal women like young Alain Delon (who does not have hunter eyes). Hunter eyes look good for modelling, but do not translate well in motion. Besides, Tom Cruise has more male fans than female fans, compared to someone like Ryan Gosling (who has soft eyes) and more female fans.
Straight female here. To me the 6.5s are basically 9s. Avan Jogia is absolutely gorgeous, especially with long hair. Very masculine faces don't appeal to me. To me they look like statues or something. I could appreciate they look good but they don't really do anything for me. I like big expressive eyes and a kind of romantic look. There's nothing wrong with having one stand out feature as that can look interesting, which is better than perfect. That said I have been called a 6/10, quite average. My boyfriend is probably 5.5 according to this. To me he is handsome as he has lovely expressive eyes and kind of looks like Kurt Cobain a bit/same relaxed style. He is kind and warm hearted. You don't need to be a super masculine Thor look alike to be attractive. I'm not alone in my opinion either. But maybe prettier girls prefer more masculine...don't know. just my opinion.
Do you take birth control pills though? Studies have shown it can make women prefer less masculine faces and once they are off the pills, it goes back to preferring masculine ones.
@@ruslanzhao1926 that's not true. Just look at young Alain Delon - women found him attractive decades ago before it was common to take birth control pills, and he didn't have a hyper masculine face. Also Rudolf Valentino (1920s actor). Women dont like men who look extremely intimidating. Speaking as a woman - we have specific preferences. We like a guy who looks friendly and approachable, yet looks like he can protect us (strong), yet is vulnerable so we want to take care of him. A hyper masculine looking guy doesn't fit that. It's all about balance. (I've never been on birth control btw in case you're wondering).
5 is someone who just blends into a crowd. Sub 5 is people who stand out in a crowd because they look ugly, fat, bald, unhealthy or too short. 6+ is kind of hot to almost perfect.
4:53 Daniel Dae Kim is actually considered unattractive in East Asian countries Just because he has facial features that fit the beauty standards of Western society He is now rated at 8.0 out of 10 I can say this rating is BS and is only applied to Western society As long as you are not ugly to all populations in this world, you are good to go be confident and appreciate your unique features (e.g., epicanthic fold or brow hair far from eyes or monolids etc.) and do not try to remove the features to meet the Western beauty standards
That's right, the peoples he was rated at 9 not even considered attractive by women in east asia lol. the standard beauty of male in east asian have small jawline with tiny chin like Jungkook, Cha eun-woo, dylan wang , Xiao zhan and joseph zeng
Daniel is not good looking by Asian standards, he would be a 5, average. Tony Chung rated a 7 is correct, but even could be an 8, in the West which likes masculine faces, in Asia, a 7, because Asians also like a masculine face, not only soft boys.
One thing I can surely say that facial rating is highly subjective because of outside of West , most countries have really rigid Beauty Standards so the skin colour also matters a lot ..But due to globalisation I think with decent height and healthy physique one can be decent in most cultures..Like height , physique, hair and clear skin is legit in all over the world..
There are far too many mistakes in these photo examples 😂😂 There are a handful of people who are absolutely higher ratings than what they were listed, and there are people who should be swapping ranks with others who were ranked higher than them.
It doesn't take in the female gaze which is pretty much what's important for women ages 18-25 Bryce hall is absolutely higher than 1/3 men. In fact he would probably do better at that age range then 7s despite being a 5.5
@@Brandanmayhew A 3, in no one's world is ever a 9 or 10 to anyone. So there is some universal understanding of attractive VS ugly, outside of people's personal preferences. Also girls absolutely cannot rate lol. So their number ratings are completely inaccurate, only how they respond to you determines your attractiveness
I’m my city I would say maybe 90 percent of the people around their 20s are 5.5 to 6.5 on the scale. My city is pretty much normal as others nearby it so I think it’s a very inaccurate scale.
Those men at the bottom line of the dating rating system seems to suffer from any congenital disorder annomalies, more especifically speaking craniofacial annomalies (these annomalies can affect the neural growing development of their brain and also causing facial malformations due to the biological incompability of both genes) and that was mainly caused by some sort of genes incompatibilities that were gestated during its conception inside the maternal womb. therefor those men will be left out to die in solitude. inbreeding can be one of many causes for this. mostly in middle eastern countries and in Portugal were family members marry which each other giving birth to physically unpleasing beings.
Consanquine marriage rates are highest in North Africa, Mid East, and South Asia. But despite this there are still lots of very good looking Mid East men, so mid East men can be really good looking or really ugly.
@@Kōgan_Dekai Actually today I got some few girls staring at me like 5 the last one was biting her lower lip while staring at me and when I landed my eyes on her she look away I also noticed she felt kinda embarrased
@@josephcieplak8920You'll get looks if you are 6 or higher. If some women stare at you which means they are checking you out and are interested, but they won't make the first move unless you are 8 or 9
@@josephcieplak8920I believe you, because looking at your pfp, your eye area is very good, you're 7/10 Chadlite, so it's no surprise that you'll get girls staring
But these are all older men how about younger males like in their twenties for example pretty boys? Unless they’re all automatically above 6 due to the fact they look youthful, look more flawless, and have sharper features plus the height. And yea, gen Z is getting taller.
They'd be much higher. Younger men are obviously going to be more physically attractive to most women in terms of pure physical attractiveness. That's why the chart sucks. Pietro Boselli was in his very early twenties on the last chart though so he kind of counts
The probabilities on the list are absolute nonsense since the median man is a 3 with plenty of 2s and 4s around it. Mean is 3.X with X being some decimal since the data is right tailed
Within his age group he is pretty high smv (collagen hasn't melted as much as other older folk), but he was not that attractive when younger imo. Like maybe a 5 at best as a 20-something yo.
Avan Jogia is not a 6-6.5. He is higher. He has that pretty boy exotic look. Similar to Zayn but Zayn is higher / a 8-8.5 on a pretty boy scale. Especially with his tatts and bad boy look.
I disagree. Objectively zayn has a better midface ratio, filler lips, more defined jawline and overall better harmony. On the truerateme they don’t give af about tattoos, hair etc.
@@mijkwgeblwxz6853 yeah but In the real world, he will 9 out of 10 times slay any chick he talks with. His tattoos will help him a lot also. Plus he is a music artist, rich, and shit.
I do 100% agree with the percentages. 8s are less than 1%. And 6s are definitely in the top 15%. Black piller make it seems like chads are everywhere and they are thr top 20% of guys which not true
The models used are all older than most of us, they are like in their late 20s and early 30s right? It seems like male models do age like fine wine lol
It's false, totally false, but apart from 2 and below, this is the most" beauty is in the eye of the beholder" ratings I've ever seen. Some 8's are 5 max and some 4- 5-6 could be much higher
Hey nero, I was going to say this in a previous video. The trm scale and the wheat waffles scale differ quite a bit. The wheat waffles scale puts an 8 in the top 1% and a 7 in the top 10%. I think your face rating service puts scores more like wheat waffles. For example, Austin Dunham would be rated around 7 on trm but around 8 with the WW rating system. Cilian Murphy would be around 7.5 on TRM, but above 8 on the Wheat Waffles scale. From what I see, you use more like the WW scale for your ratings. Btw, highly attractive (aka chad) would be around 7.25 and higher on trm and 8 and higher on the WW scale.
it's just standard beauty of western society lol having strong bone jawline not even considered attractive in east asia, lot of women find them ugly. the standard beauty of male in east asian have small jawline with tiny chin like Jungkook, Cha eun-woo, dylan wang , Xiao zhan and joseph zeng
It kind of makes sense and no sense at the same time not above 9, since looks will have some amount of objectivity in it and a 10 wouldnt reflect that. Even as a 8 or 9 there would be people that prefer a 6 or 7 if its more their type even though they me be agree that this 8 or 9 guy is objectively more attractive. However what people often forget is you can give a set number to someone, the attractiveness of one person can drastically change from photo to photo and from day to day, on some days my hair is better than on others etc. so in a nutshell there are probably photos were you see guys that are 10s like some photos of heart struck or henri cavill, but they are not representitive of reality
Guys I feel like this whole looksmaxing has ruined the way a view ugly people for example anyone in my school who is sub 5/10 I now wouldn’t even consider being friends with or letting into our friend group just based off looks.
Yeah 10's do exist, albeit RARE. Truthfully humans DO NOT GIVE AF if an extremely attractive person's face isn't "technically" "mathematically" perfectly symmetrical. They are a 10 if they are completely attractive from Head-to-Toe.
10s don't exist. Even the most attractive people can look better with good photoshop work. This is the danger of being a perfectionist and never being satisfied, which leads to good looking people, athletes, and bodybuilders getting body dysmorphia.
@@AJBlueJay I get your view. I'd like to see in which specific ways the ultra attractive people can look "better" with Photoshop. Like which facial features can be nudged a couple of millimeters in a certain direction to technically be mathematically better, even though as humans absolutely NO ONE gives af, and the person still scores a 10/10 for having a perfectly fine face.
I would give the following ratings: (Add +- 2 points for personal preferences) 8 - top 1% 7,5- top 3% 7 - top 10% 6,5 - top 20% 6 - top 33% 5 - average (50%) 4 - bottom 33% 3 - bottom 10% 2 - bottom 1% Most girls (when asked anonymously) rate themselves a 7. If a chad (8) is not her type (-2points) he is a 6 and bellow her threshold. If a 6 is exactly her type (+2 points) he is in... However, that happening is quite unlikely, the 8 usually has significantly better chances. A 4 or worse never meets the threshold of a girls that thinks she is a 7. However, they might get lucky once in a blue moon if they meet a girl with low self esteem that thinks of herself as a 6 or 5 and the 4 is her type... But thats like playing the lottery...
I have been called a 6. The Hakan guy from the 4s is handsome. Lil Wayne has some charm about him. If he changed his look would be way higher. This is very subjective. Anyway..
like everybody it depends. however up to early 20's your body will keep growing so if you keep doing good habits like skincare and exercise you'll probably be fine. unless you are very unlucky and genetics decides to bald you or make your face weird
Yeah you know the ratings are a bit off when Bryce Hall, the ex boyfriend of Addison Rae, the guy that gets thirsted over by millions of women and the guy whoms dating history is filled with stacies gets rated 5.5 lol.
Cope lol, he’s clearly a 5.5-6 at most. He just had a high smv with the tiktok demographic because he fraudnaxxed with his musically/ tiktok videos. He’s not as desired from a beauty perspective now as he once was because he started posting his real face without the over the top lighting and angle maxing.
I feel like a 5/10, but ex's always say I'm handsome, and they seemed genuinely suprised about it too and constanly complimented my face... goes to show that life is confusing and never fully trust your own self-perception 😄
@@kingknights5107 Unlikely, women are a lot less picky than some believe, at least the ones you meet and interact with in real life. Of course if you have no personality your only chance is to look like a model.
This is bullshit these faces have wrong ratings. Ronaldo is not a 7 bro he looks better than most of these 7,5 guys u put there and Hernan Drago only a 9?? He is one of the most attractive people his face is 1 in 10 millions and u put him that low
Everyone makes a mistake by simply making the scales: 1 represents the ugliest man there can be and 10 represents the most beautiful. (regardless of whether it is not 100% perfect). And from that, those between 1-10 are chosen.
In real life (no tinder, no clubs etc) situations with grown women as long as you don't have a "repulsive" face you will be fine. More important to focus on immaculate body hygiene, dressing reasonably well, being able to hold a conversation and showing some humor. Also having at least one somewhat "female friendly" interest like dancing, going to theater/opera/concerts, riding or learning languages will help, that's not a must and don't fake it but it helps, doesn't need to be your greatest passion either just something you won't hate in the long run.
Meanwhile Ramirez killer of 11 and graper of 10 children, granies and women. Woman: "I like him, he is nice. I decided to not judge him based on the things he did." Grape victim: "He was hot"
@@bluegiant13 Hybristophilia, there are weird fetishes and orientations for any sh*t, be it kids, corpses etc. Doesn't change the fact that everyone else is disgusted by it. However the worshiping of serial killer eyes in black pill might be linked to some of the same insecurities women with Hybristophilia have.
The majority of ways ppl connect in today's world is through tinder and clubs so looks do infact matter lmao. There is no point imagining a world where tinder and clubs didnt exist, so many women go for only looks and dont give a shit abt personality (tbf there are also ones who do the opposite too)
How would rate Michele Morrone. I kinda feel think we have similar facials structure, I if change my diet and focus on face and body basically life style I can go little Bit above him (except height)
@@furiooo For those who follow the path of looksmaxxing. It never ends well. You’ll only tear yourself apart, and even if you succeed and you become good looking, what will you have then? Nothing, emptiness.
Even your top 1 % had a ton of variables and flaws. I’m. It buying that facial attractiveness means anything beyond a 6 your 6.5 and above would all get plenty of women and attention if they went looking for it, and many 5s 5.5s and 6s can get plenty of attention in their own right. There are women out their that are picky but it’s not the rule. And tho their is some research to back this up the same can be said for many thing even more outlandish than this. I don’t think any one of these men have women regularly walk up and ask for their number or anything. And on the flip side I’m a 5 6 at best and I’ve had women ask for my number a few times.
hrithik is like 7.5" due to asymmetries and other scientific calculation flaws but his features are way too harmonious and out of the world so its more like 7.5 on paper but 10/10 in real life, austin dunham is like 8 on the scale but hrithik mogs him in real life, harmony>>>>>symmetry/maths calculations,i see this in real life too, my freind is way more symmetrical than my cousin and prolly score like 6.5 on paper but harmony isnt there and my cousin has crooked nose but his harmonious features make up for it and hes considered more handsome in real life but opposite on paper
This scale is go gaslighting with the Western beauty standards. Choi Siwin rating 6.5 is the biggest joke. He is a legit 9 in Korean Standards Tim Chung in Eastern standards would be a 6 or 7. He does have that masculine features but that was all what appeal to the East
yeah, life is brutal. Everything just depends on how your face looks. I was like a 5 or 6 when i was young. Now i am balding and aging and am probably a 3 to 4 right now. Its disgusting how people actually treat you differently, even friends.
How can anyone put Sendhil Ramaurthy, Mukasa Kakonge, and Tim Chung above Francisco Lachowski in terms of attractiveness. If Francisco Lachowski is a 9 out of 10 in attractiveness than Sendhil Ramaurthy, Mukasa Kakonge, and Tim Chung, are all sub 7 in terms of looks!. This subreddit TrueRateMe is a complete joke if they think an ethnic face mogs Chico, when in reality he mogs them into oblivion when it comes to facial aesthetics.
@@Kōgan_Dekai jajajaja no it's a stereotype cause curry is the dish of that region. similar to that, asians are called ricecels because of the stereotype of every asian eating rice
There are many videos on looks maxing. However, no info how chads with noticable rotten teeth or other defects would be rated. How many scores they loosing for such things? Instant sub five?
Some of these are totally wrong. - Avan should be at least 7 (could rate him 8). If Avan is 6, then average is fucking handsome. - Choi up to 7. - Bryce Hall up to 6 - 6.5. - Ünder up to 5.5 (maybe 6). - Roy Kapur is 5.5 or 6 (totally overrated on your list). - Fabian Rios down to 6 as well. - Dae Kim down to 7. - Jordan Calloway down to 7. - Sendhil , AJ Harris and De Santo 9??? All these guys looks like 6 or 7.
loved this video. wished you did this for women too. and what do you think of websites that rate your looks based on a picture? everytime i take those tests, i get from 6.5 to 7/10
No way a 8 is 1 out of 750 its even more rare bruh and being an Indian Hritik roshan ia not a 1 out of 3000 type guy he ia more of 1 out of 10million in his prime😊
