As good as analog FPV can be | Caddx Ratel Pro

Подписаться 48 тыс.

Просмотров 3,7 тыс.

50% 1

SUPPORT ME / pawelspychalski
Caddx Ratel PRO bit.ly/43uGBN6
Is there any room to improve image quality of analog FPV? I think not. Caddx Ratel PRO is the newest analog FPV camera and if you ask me, it’s as good as analog ever gets. So if you want to buy new analog camera in 2024 Ratel PRO is more than valid option. Nice colors, good shadow and high dynamic range performance. But is it better than other good analog camera? Hard to tell.
FPV University Newsletter bit.ly/3I3qnAJ
#fpvuniversity #fpv #caddx

Наука

Опубликовано:

7 апр 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 34

@AB-sk4kz 2 месяца назад

Looks nice! Happy flying

@jaysonrees738 2 месяца назад

In this shot, it looks basically identical to the Ratel I currently own. Very strong reds, yellows are a little muddy, and the sky looks nice if it's most of the image. Still doing a lot of flying on analog as it's cheap and easy to get going, but I have been liking the exceptional penetration of Walksnail.

@MCsCreations 2 месяца назад

I'm really impressed with this camera, Pawel... In low light it's fantastic. Anyway, thanks for the review! 😊 Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

@bobboberson1928 2 месяца назад

You should have tried it in low light, that's where they say it's the best now, it's also got a nowrower field of view that makes it better for wings then for drones.

@MCsCreations 2 месяца назад

Oscar Liang compared it to the Night Eagle 3 and the Cat 3, if I'm not mistaken... And, well... It's really impressive indeed.

@Sugalime3D_FPV 2 месяца назад

Ratel Pro: Optimized for evening flights (e.g. after work, before or after sun set). However, only FOV 125°! Advantage of this FOV: Natural image, Disadvantage rather less suitable for freestyle. The Pro is really good in the dark! Ratel 2: With 165° perfect for intense freestyle. Just as large an image sensor as the Pro. However, at night the Pro is clearly inferior...

@Sugalime3D_FPV 2 месяца назад

I'll try to get a 165° lens on the Pro at some point in the future. Then I have a quad so I can go flying after work shortly after sunset... And my FPV activities aren't just limited to the weekend...

@Sugalime3D_FPV 2 месяца назад

Check this video with Duchess of Bits and Bytes FPV : Aktuelle Low-Light Cams im Vergleich - Walksnail Moonlight Walksnail Pro Caddx Ratel Pro

@lalilaloe 2 месяца назад

Analog is still alive and kicking

@ChrisGripeos 2 месяца назад

I wish they'd use a wider band and add progressive analog feed. that's be a nice upgrade.

@bentravis99 2 месяца назад

This looks great, but I find the biggest problem with analog cameras is the magenta and green shimmering in fine detail, eg: leaves on trees. If they can fix that, it would be a noticeable improvement.

@mariomedina311 2 месяца назад

Everytime i kill a vtx i'm reminded why i can't move to any other system.

@artifixprime 2 месяца назад

Is that a converted Lidl glider?

@trumblez 9 дней назад

I still fly analog, It can have good range and it has great latency and is super cheap

@skyforce1983 2 месяца назад

@dronecamps would’ve said it’s the best camera he’s ever seen

@cybermega29 2 месяца назад

now that comment made me chuckle

@alasdair4161 2 месяца назад

That must have been the shortest production run of all time... brand new and the AE link states 'this product is no longer available'.. lol

@ondrascz1 2 месяца назад

Why the image from the camera is letterboxed to 4/3 while the footage is obviously 16/9?

@FPVUniversity 2 месяца назад

I cropped it a little

@donphobos 2 месяца назад

It has some strange image phenomenon, when you have roll bouncing back and forth. The trees look upright, but their angle is a bit strange. Almost like rolling shutter image phenomenon. The viewing angle is very narrow, but for a plane perhaps enough. On a quadcopter this would be way too narrow for me.

@gustofpv4470 2 месяца назад

FOV is only 125 degrees....I would say pro means racers......I like much wider FOV.......

@DreamFlyEcuador 2 месяца назад

Yeah, snipper vision - not impressed.

@Sleeperknot 2 месяца назад

Wider FOV comes with a lot of barrel distortion. I have a foxeer Razer Mini2, has wider FOV but distortion is quite significant

@gustofpv4470 2 месяца назад

@@Sleeperknot I use caddx ratel with 165 degree FOV and I think it has a pretty good image!

@flat-earther Месяц назад

@@Sleeperknot yes. that's why I prefer narrower FOV. I wish there was FPV camera with rectilinear lens

@lasersbee 2 месяца назад

Your product link states the Caddx Ratel Pro "is no longer available"

@Truth12345 28 дней назад

I think if you like the small fov you're better of buying a foxeer predator. It has probably a better dynamic range than this camera. The ratel pro is more of a evening camera. But we aren't allowed to fly at night anyways.

@RockFPV 2 месяца назад

Analog is just fine for Practice

@madladdan 2 месяца назад

The whole point of the ratel pro is the low light performance...

@Daidaho 2 месяца назад

It is not quite true "we can't put anything new" on analog market. aHD is a thing, and people successfully put this analog standard in the air. Do i think anyone is interested enough to put money and effort into decent aHD vtx+vrx? Unlikely. But it certainly can be done.