ATHEIST Scientist SHOCKS Astrophysicist with his Statement on GOD-EPIC Moments  

We all have a creator.... their called your mother and father🤣🤣😂😂😂

After suppressing the truth in wickedness, they became futile in their thinking and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools.

Be ye not high minded. We see in part and we know in part. He has closed the door.

Wilful ignorance = dumb on purpose.

There currently is no scientific evidence for God, and for God creating anything.

The position that most atheists actually take. At least he's honest, saying NO EVIDENCE would convince him.

Unto thine own self be true.

“The wisdom of men is foolishness to God”

Peter is close minded. No amount of evidence would convince him. By this criteria, he would unable to convict anyone of any crime. No one would go to prison.

He is a fool. Plain and simple, and biblically stated.

In a certain sense he's already descended into madness. The scriptures refer to that as reprobate.

When a creature claims he doesn't have a Creator, that is surely a disconnection from reality!

Any man who believes his is wiser than God does not grasp how limited his understanding of both his understanding is, and what it takes to be a God.

In the first place, the Bible was never a science textbook rather it’s a book of theological messaging… This scientist would have to resolve how he can reject the Bible for not being what it was never intended to be… it is an illogical and incongruent argument… If he can make that argument, I can then reject my dog for not being a cat…

Modern atheism for many of its representatives has become part of the meaning of life and has become something like faith. Of course, one should be careful in such statements, that's why I wrote: "something like faith". But in a large number of cases it is. This is neither bad nor good, but if I were such people, I would think about it. In my inner search, including psychedelics, and in my youth I tried dozens of different substances of this group, I asked myself a question: if this is "proof" of the existence of something we call "The Devine", then I am rather an atheist. Since these experiences, although similar in many people (e.g. DMT), one might as well believe in same kind of hallucinations in a state of delirium tremens(a very crude comparison, to shorten the text). In short, I look at these experiences from Peter Atkins' point of view. I found God in a meaningful way outside of these practices. And I experienced him less colorfully, but much more clearly. I was baptized at the age of 7 on my own initiative, the first in my Soviet family (I'm talking about time period, not ideology), and my parents followed a little later. I became the first one rather by technical circumstances. But I believed in God with all my heart. With adolescence this faith left, left imperceptibly. More precisely, 100% certainty that Jesus was the answer was gone. Next, I searched anew for what was always in front of me. No, I did not become a follower of this or that religion, I read texts, studied scientific works on the subject of this or that religious doctrine, experimented with consciousness. But intellectually I realized that all this was not the same. God returned unexpectedly, but in a very "demonstrative" way, for which I thank Him very much. It is a great blessing when you are suddenly shown his presence so literally and unquestioningly. Perhaps this happened because I was not looking for "proof" but was persistent and consistent in my search. Only God knows why this happened. And I will answer the unasked question: I am a Russian Orthodox Christian. Thank you for reading this story and God bless you!

He is just smart.

If there is a God He does not want us to know He exists otherwise He would have provided evidence by now.

The issue is not that there's no evidence, but the suppression of evidence..

Unbelief literally means unconvinced

I think that Peter is mad when he said if presented with absolute proof he would instead think he was mad. I posit that is exactly what a mad person would say, we don’t have to wait for proof and this discussion is over….mike drop and I rest my case. Oh and call the men in white suits for Peter.

If nothing can convince him, why would anybody bother to convice him? He has made his mind. The Bible is talks a lot about his kind. It's a waste of time. Leave him alone and just let the man live until the Creator finally takes him.

Questions like, "What sort of evidence would convince you that God exists?", are disingenuous. There is no evidence I have seen that has convinced me. Therefore, it would need to be something completely new to me. I cannot imagine what that evidence would be. Do you think there is evidence to support the notion of a god's existence? If so, what is it? My only condition is that it must be evidence, not just another bad argument.

If a believer used HIS OWN logic "if proven wrong it would be because i've gone mad". He would scoff at them and tell them they're brainwashed. Atheist logic ladies and gentlemen!

Another sad case of projection. I know, because I've been there. Living in denial is not fun.

sounds like an intelligent scientist.

that ladies & gentlemen, is an unfortunate of arrogance.

It could all be summed up with: Romans one: 20 Luke 10:21

He has clearly path chosen his path, PRIDE. The Scribes and the Pharisees had Christ doing miracles before them and yet, they refused to believe.

This gentleman seems to have a very nonchalant attitude toward Heaven and Hell, claiming he would be bored in Heaven and would rather spend some time in Hell, almost making it sound as if God would allow such a thing, letting someone visit Hell to relieve the boredom. He is the kind of guy C.S. Lewis had in mind when he wrote the following: “There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, in the end, 'Thy will be done.' All that are in Hell, choose it. Without that self-choice there could be no Hell...There is no need to be worried by factious people who try to make the Christian hope for Heaven ridiculous by saying they do not want to spend eternity playing harps. The answer to such people is if they cannot understand books written for grown-ups, they should not talk about them.” ― C.S. Lewis: Mere Christianity If C.S. Lewis isn't enough of an authority on the matter, he may want to consider what Christ said: “I tell you, on the day of judgment people will render an account for every careless word they speak. By your words you will be acquitted, and by your words you will be condemned.” ― Matthew 12: 36-37 It's one thing to mock God, it's another thing to openly challenge him. There is a line from the movie The Usual Suspects where one of the characters said: "I don't believe in God but I'm afraid of Him." That is a more sensible position than the one taken by this gentleman. Or as Al Pacino put it when he played Satan in the film The Devil's Advocate: "Vanity, definitely my favorite sin."

What if a group of people, saw the same supernatural event? They couldn't all have the exact same delusion.

This video shows one atheist, who states no evidence would be enough to convince him of the existence of God. However, this proves literally nothing about all other atheists in the world and this video should not suggest otherwise!

Interesting, he didn't say anything about a prior commitment to naturalism and yet the voiceover says that's why he 'refuses' to believe. Just a strawman. I don't have a prior commitment to naturalism, it's just that all the best explanations for things are natural. There are supernatural explanations, but given only those 2 possibilities, miracles are by definition less likely. What I heard Peter say is that evidence of those grandiose type to him would be more likely madness or dreams, etc. Personally I don't know what would convince me either. I spent many years seeking. But god does, and yet chooses not to show me. Why not? Why does god create skeptics?

Peter has a small and closed mind. I find his arguments against God "LAZY".

"I would never have done it like this if I was God, therefore there is no God". That seems to be what most unbelievers are getting at.

You're wrong. He is saying that he can't imagine any evidence that would convince him of the existence of God. He is not saying that no evidence exists. Once again, the religious lie for their own purposes. Science is based on observational and repeatable truth. Religion is not just based on lies, it depends on lies to exist.

Those who seek god and find god are happy and reasonable those who seek god and haven’t found him are reasonable but not happy, those who don’t seek god and don’t want to find him are unreasonable and unhappy and they want everyone one to feel the same way

Some say ,why doesn’t God just show himself. Well he did ,and we sent him to the cross.

Well then there’s no reason for me to waste my time on you. Sorry but until you want to find God you never find him.

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. - Psalm 14:1

I know God is a Man.