Audi vs BMW vs Mercedes Benz Active/Adaptive Suspension Technology 

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-H8eQVJNpoVI.html

Lol…… one of the best

The BMW suspension shown here is the _lowest_ functionality of all three designs. The other two can actually lift the wheels _up_ to maintain steady pressure across bumps & dips. All the BMW design does is vary the stiffness & rebound. If BMW used a Bose suspension design, their cars would p0wn those other cars even harder than they already might.

@@prophetzarquon1922 and I have to believe you? Coz I've heard quite opposite!

@@danielosdinia4258 Well, if you watch the video more carefully, you'll see that the BMW system doesn't lift the wheels, only adjusts the dampening & rebound. Fully active suspension feels "numb" because it keeps the pressure of the wheels against the ground much more steady, resulting in less chassis movement, less tire deformation, & a near constant level of traction, right up until lateral forces overcome grip. Racing & sports car drivers tend not to like fully active suspension because the disconnected feel makes it harder to judge track conditions, but it's great for plush luxury cars where a floaty feel is more desirable. The BMW system shown here doesn't even try to do some of the things fully active suspension can do (such as lifting the wheel up as it contacts a speed bump). It has fewer features. That's not opinion, that's quantifiable fact. I'm not saying fully active suspension is _always better,_ (a lot of people dislike it, actually; plus it's incredibly expensive to repair/replace) but anybody who told you the BMW system is more advanced either didn't know what they were talking about, or wasn't being honest. BMW doesn't offer fully active suspension. Audi & Benz do. Period.

@@prophetzarquon1922 Thats correct! Thank you for this commentary and answer. It has nothing to do with subjective opinion. Its fact, that the ABC/MBC of Daimler or the eABC of Audi are the only full active solutions on the market.... Price incredibly high and therefore practically not in use (take rate

bmw best one? poor interior quality,bad car for daily uses,bad design. MB, worst than BMW at interior quality,Audi good balance bewteen sport and comfort,good in town or offroad roads,best at design and interior quality.

Ahmad Khairi VW is audi

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-H8eQVJNpoVI.html

But this demonstration was for M Sport suspensions

Exactly. I will always drive Audi. The rest are overrated.

I think you make ultimate maintenance machines

@@XxGrimReaperX8 first of all toyota build great cars with durable motors Second i have an audi so stfu

@@sicarface Audi ultimate carbon build maintenance machine and consume engine oil

yeah, Volkswagens are nice

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-H8eQVJNpoVI.html

No matter ABC or E-ABC, which are praised as full active, it cannot avoid its natural instinct. the gimmicks shows off more than practical performance. Now even E-ABC is not available on new GLE any more.

Not in this particular case, it's not.