Battlefield 2042 has a problem 

BF2042 had a problem but I fixed it, I cancelled my preorder. Problem gone

I have to applaud their effort to cater to everyone, but what I don't understand is why they decided to turn "classic battlefield" into just a side mode (portal) now, and then go ahead and basically redesign the main core game experience to such an extent that it doesn't really feel like "battlefield" anymore. That just ends up angering the community and all the veteran battlefield fans. Especially after all their talk about "going back to the roots of battlefield" in BF2042. Obviously, they were talking about portal. They're just shooting themselves in the foot when they do it like this. They should have been clearer from the start. We haven't really heard that much about portal yet, and a lot of people feel that they've turned battlefield 2042 into some kind of arcade superhero shooter now, with everyone playing as spiderman McCay, grappling from spot to spot. I think it would have been smarter to put the specialist system into its own dedicated mode instead, and then just stick with the traditional classes for the main game. That way they could still cater to everyone, but they wouldn't risk alienating all those long-time BF fans. :) The lack of communication is the main issue here. They give the impression that after the BF5 disaster BF was going back to its "roots", and then they show off a buggy beta that just doesn't really feel like battlefield at all, with a lot of classic BF stuff taken out, and everyone looks the same. Snipers with unlimited ammo and so on. At the same time portal is barely being mentioned. How could they not have anticipated this reaction?

It's very strange that we only have about 10 seconds worth of gameplay of hazard zone this close to release... I remember bf4 had a massive multi-player event at e3 or something where the devs played live on stage. That was pretty cool

Yoo that tank gameplay is off the chain

Specialists just should be reduced to class skins, and their gadgets added to the class gadget pool, and that's it

Portal isn't a "mode." It's the future of the franchise. Continuity of assets in an ever improving physical model / engine.

Battlefield 2042 doesn't have a problem, it has several problems...

I just want to play 16vs16 Rush on maps actually designed for Rush again tbh.

The problem is Specialist. The breakaway from traditional battlefield. God like class set ups (Medic self healing giving themselves ammo, motion balls and whatever gun they want). And a few others that are in the same realm of these problems again. They don't listen. They said they would and again they didn't. Example this game mode. How tf is this not FTP, it's almost as if they didnt learn. BF2042 is doomed to fail with the direction, and feed back they are getting. They need to listen to us the majority of the community that keep stating what we don't and do like. This being FTP could have brought so many new people and now well it's like a add on to a game that already is kinda unsure of what it wants to be. I kinda steered away from my original argument, but I think I got the point across. We support and continue to support them and they don't listen. When will it be enough for them to listen.

I think the real elephant in the room for Hazard Zone is: what if they want to build some kind of eSports, and they will focus on Hazard Zone?

I don’t remember once being revived in the bf2042 beta lol. We need classes

I think it will be fun once in a while. It's not unheard of a game mode dying though, just look at how many dead game modes BF4 has lol.

AKA-ART has the hottest non-shill takes on the Battlefield franchise. Keep up the good work mate.

Here is my biggest issue with portal. They literally made it to where they don't have to do anything. They don't have to make a good game. They don't have to make something balanced or cohesive. If they can have decent net code, their work is done. And they want 60 bucks for you to build your own game.

I'd say they could try to implement the specialists in a similar way than Heroes/Villains in Battlefront 2 might end up working.

Portal could be such a huge plus though. Look at the longevity forge bought all the connected halo titles. Firestorm flopped because it was a bit of a miss, and the base game flopped because dice refused to give the players what they wanted. Neither mode brought in players, and that just led to the whole player base being bled dry.

If there are only squads and no solo Hazard Zone will die very quickly. By the way, Firestorm would be great in the mordern setting.

Yea, BF2042 is very fast forgetting its battlefield...

To fill in the teamwork aspect to the conquest mode, I think I'll have to run a squad constantly.

"Battlefield 2042 has a problem" Yeah, it's not BF4

This shit got nothing to do with tarkov. Also, if they NEED hazard zone to be payed (terrible decision, smh EA), why cant it be like 10 dollars for people who dont own BF2042 to try it out without paying 60 bucks

BF2042 - Fixes and Balances, Game Mechanics and Visuals Needed For Launch User Interface & Heads-Up Display - The User Interface needs to be redone. It was well done in the previous games, but this is a bit bugged. Bring back the normal Scoreboard and Spawn Preview Box. - Loadout Menu: Use the Gunsmith System from Hardline for more in-depth customization. 5 Attachment Options: Optic, Barrel, Laser/Light, Underbarrel and Ammo. - Plus Menu: Optic slotted to the Top, Barrel slotted to the Left, Laser/Light slotted to the Right, Underbarrel slotted to the Bottom and Ammo slotted to the Middle of the Plus Menu. - The HUD is cluttered with every objective being displayed at the same time. Our screens are not supposed to be Christmas Trees. Tone down Objective opacity and Highlight the Objective when Squad Leader targets it. - Valuable assets missing from the HUD are: Scope Zeroing, Commo-Rose, Grenade Indicator, Nearby Friendly/Medic Indicator When Downed, Vehicle/Aircraft Directional Indicator for the Driver/Gunner, Damage Indicator and Squad Wipe Indicator. Movement - Bring back some of the Advanced Movement from BFV: ADS Leaning, Weapon Mounting, Crouch Sprint, Crouch Sprint Dive, Underwater Diving, Combat Roll (Only for 2nd Floor Heights), Grenade Throwback and Large Explosion Knockback. - Vehicles need more weight to them and ground traction, they slide and float everywhere. The flight models for aircraft are janky as hell, previous games had it good. Vehicles/Aircraft movement need work. Map Design - More destruction to buildings, they appear to be sturdier against explosives in this game for some reason. - Levolution events that actually change how the objectives/maps are played would be awesome to see return. Battlefield Moments. - Buildable Fortifications and Stationary HMG/TOW Emplacements would be beneficial for large open maps, that need cover. Resupply Stations near Objectives for Ammo and Vehicle Repair. Game Mechanics - Increase score and XP gain from Team Play Actions: Spotting Assists, Kill Assists, Heals, Resupplies, Revives and Repairs, Objective Kills and Captures. - Bring back Buddy Revive from BFV, takes a few seconds to revive players with 20% Health. Defibrillators restricted to Assault, instantly revives players with 100% Health. - Remove Auto-Repair from Ground Vehicles and reintroduce Self-Repair. Repair Tool should also be buffed. - Reintroduce Mobility Hit and Mobility Kill from BF4. - Aircraft: Buff the guns and nerf the rocket pods. Mainly for Helicopters. - Separate Vehicle Seats into 4: Driver, Main Gun, RWS Gunner and Spotter. Makes it necessary for at least 2 crewmen to operate a Tank/IFV. The Driver, drives. The Main Gun operates the turret. The RWS Gunner uses the Remote Machine Gun and Grenade Launcher. Spotter spots targets. - Ammo count is too low for primary weapons, give us the standard combat load from BF3/BF4. Squad Call-Ins: Artillery and Supply Drops requested by Squad Leaders, given by the Commander. - Remove Plus Menu and Armour Plates from Core Game and keep them in Hazard Zone where they make more sense. Battlefield Fundamentals - Reintegrate Faction Uniforms and Class Roles to the Core Game. This has been a Battlefield feature for decades, don't fix what's not broken. This is not Call of Duty or Apex Legends. - Specialists restricted to Class Roles defined by their Main Gadget. - Secondary Gadgets restricted to Class Roles. - All Primary Weapons open to Class Roles, but require Players to unlock them for each Class Role.

Portal, BFBC2 & BF3 Rush maps, BF4 gunplay and I’ll be happy.

The stated minimum game settings do not work.. 30 FPS the fall up to 15 FPS 👺

What I want to know is if Portal will receive more maps from BF3 and 4.

I think the Problem with firestorm is that it was a battle royal a game type players where getting tired of, but portal being able to make custom everything, hazard being a more tactical and squad based thing the base game mode seems to be pushed to the side

After the beta I know why they didn’t show too much gameplay in the trailers, I wouldn’t get your hopes up for another AAA game.

I hope they delay this game. After playing the beta i don't have a good feeling about this game releasing in 4 weeks.

i’m mostly looking forward to portal, everything else is just far from traditional bf games like bf3-bf4 and doesn’t interest me. base game is just a sad cod-apex-siege-just cause lovechild.

i actually had more fun in the 2042 beta than i did in the last 2 battlefield games.

I have a big problem with the battlefield aiming system ... with the right stick of the pad despite having zeroed the central and axial dead zone and having tried all possible aiming settings ... with the right stick I cannot track enemies ... in fact I have to move and help me with the left stick ... could you explain this to me and help me solve it!? ... thanks

Most battlefield players play solo and casual, so I don't see much of a sustainable future for hazard zone, I wish they'd focus their efforts on the Main game and the portal mode, those are the modes that make battlefield battlefield...

Can anyone tell me please, if I purchase the game for xbox one, will I have to repurchase when I upgrade my console to series s or x? Thx

Why not just do the four main classes, then add a fifth one, "Spec ops", kind of like in BF2, that way they can have the specialists in the spec ops class?

But the main conquest game is sound right ? not sure it deserves the 60 euro price tag at release though.

id like to see if they could somehow fuze the old and new class systems together to create a "star wars battlefront" type of system, but with specific goals to unlocking the specialist medic example: certain amount of hp healed grapple example: kills under a certain max range sniper specialist: headshots with bolt actions then we could also have differences between bots and player soldiers being that AI dont wear plate carriers or helmets. this wont affect their HP but make it clear if the "easy kill" you got was just a bot. im saying this as someone who has a visual impairment, i couldnt even see the BF4 doritos at close ranges so i went purely off of whatever armour the other person was wearing or i challenged my radar to a staring contest (and the accent of the battle announcer). i know im probably echoing the same complaints as everyone else here but the specialist system is *actually* almost unplayable for me. my eyes are looking out at the battlefield and i see all 127 other players as potential threats, if i can see them at all.

Battlefield wants to copy Call of Duty homework and Call of Duty wants to copy Battlefield homework.

Hazard Zone looks fun, but in a way is meant to compete with Apex and Warzone, but Warzone and Apex players won't try it because of the 70 dollar paywall, if it was free they attract Warzone and Apex palyer a lot more and sell their specialists skins as much as they want, and the BF community will stay for the base game. This way they can attract both communities.

I think portal is the game mode that will have the most Battlefield core players , those who want to relive some BF3 ,BF4 and BF5 , the hazard mode sound interesting if they implement that by playing that mode you can get incentives to unlock weapons that come from that mode , skins and stuff like that will make it more interesting to play it !!

Honest take - everyone should appreciate that from you. For me: There is too much height in the game... It will be a camp fest. The height also makes the maps "bigger" and thus more random (and takes longer to get to the action... or kill a camper.) At this point... 2042 is a pass for me (but willing to change my mind.) A winged suit and grappling hook doesn't make in better than BF4. The more I watch these videos... the more I want to play... BF4.

AKA-BASED back at it. Also my boy EB Knispel looking clean in the tanks :D

Where did dice asked the question about the class System, i need to answer that!

Cant wait to put my hands in bad company 2 M95 barret,after so many years.

my concern is if there will be a real reason to play it.. like, in the all out warfare you play to rank up, unlock new weapons and attachments skins, and so on... but in hazard zone, so far looks like you are just looting to then continue looting.. hope there's some sort of progression there, maybe some sort of exodus customization, unlocks and everything

Portal sounds interesting, but no way is it a day-one, full-price purchase, which is essentially a basic mod tools. And a mode which only has a few maps at launch at that. The base game stinks but portal has potential... And the only way I’m paying for this game is if it goes on sale, reduced by a fair amount.

I just want an stable version of the Game for PS4, when i played in it, it was very laggy and hard to land My shots most of the time. I don't mind specialists, but i want DICE to fix the lag, the revive button and all those several Bugs

I want the AK-24 to have less recoil and the same damage model as the M5A3 just because of its beautiful reloading animations. Hell I'd be fine with it being weaker than the M5A3. I just want it to be more controllable.

if they want to make a successful game, like the previous ones such as bf3 and 4 they should really listen to the community as they're the ones going to play it mostly

Love the idea for hazard zone having played hunt, but having the last extraction being so soon after the start of the round is worrying to me. But that’s just my opinion, if it came later (20/30 mins after the start) the game could be played more methodical, I feel like it’s gonna be played like a cod match when a more tactical game is more appealing imo. But I guess we’ll see

I'm very concerned about Portal, idk, to me it sounds like something way to ambitious for DICE, I'm sorry but I don't see they pulling that out without a bunch of problems... hopefully I'm wrong

if it will pe possible through portal to set up a normal conquest mode without specialists i will be only playing that, and of course any kind of bf42 or bc2 remake!

AKA, are you still accepting clips for BF5 and BF1?

I think the best way for Hazard Zone to make it would be for it to be free to play. I can see people probably playing it early on just to try it out but then just going back to Conquest, Breakthrough, or Portal.

Remember the "Incursions" mode in BF1?

Hz sounds similar to dirtybomb in cod. Bf players generally want destruction, rockets, vehicles, and teamwork spam. I don't think Hz will survive beyond novelty. I'm planning on playing portal so I can assure I'm playing maps with a lot of destruction--and less travelling-- per capita. The main modes don't seem to offer rewarding objectives for playing. Sectors ruin comeback opportunities, and breakthrough seems to be a generic mix of BF without any tactical goals

I think BF 2042(all modes include) going to be great im not negative about it, we have to wait the launch

Not bothering to play Hazard Zone at all but it’s because it’s not my type of game.Did enjoy the beta but let’s see what happens when the full game is launched.

I think that having the classes with other class gadgets is what is ruining a big part of what we call battlefield like I dont think its right that recon has rocket launchers and anyone could have it with any class if I can remember that was the main thing the engineers used

My main issues with 2042/ the direction of the franchise **1.Rigid character animations in 2042-** Since I can remember, the character animations since like bfbc2 have been great. I remember when bf3 was announced and there was a tech demo of the frostbite 3 engine and it showed the running stopping crouching animations, and I was in awe at how realistic it was in comparison to cod at the time. It was that kind of hunched over, ready to shoot, stance that I love to see in FPS shooters, because even though I've never shot a gun irl or anything, I think you have to kind of lean forward to help with stability or recoil control or w/e (I'm not an expert). I hate it when I see character models where there backs are straight up like in CS:GO or BF hard-line. and even in bf1 in some cases, but that was mostly on snipers if I remember correctly. In 2042 the stances and fluidity of movements is so rigid and lifeless and lacks realism (I know that battlefield isn't a "realistic" game, but the pseudo realism it DOES offer should carry over to the character animations). Love it or hate it for whatever reason, BFV's character models and animations are S TIER, and it's like they have gone back years in terms of animations? I just don't know how much I buy the whole "it's been in development the longest a battlefield ever has" line. **2. a lot of getting stuck on stuff-** Like in every battlefield up until V. I though this issue was done. **3. Floaty vehicles that have ice for wheels-** For a franchise that prides itself on the fact it is an FPS with vehicles never have I ever got in a jeep/ atv in a bf game (I'm pretty much useless in a tank) and said, "yes! This is a good experience" the way they handle is like you are on ice wheels, and the 3rd person camera?! Why does it only rotate on one plane of existence? If you can look around AND up and down in a tank. Why cant you in non lethal vehicles. Also how the vehicles, like lag when you collide with something ? Considering COD is COD I've had much better experiences with the vehicles in MW than I have in any battlefield game. HOW!!! **4. Shooting mechanics feel like they have gone backwards since bfv. -** I don't know exactly what it is but in BFV I feel snappy AF with any guns. The recoils make sense and my sensitivity feels great. Same with bf4. Bf1 I just hipfire lol. Something just feels OFF in 2042. At any rate. How weapons perform in BFV makes sense to me. **5. Weapon sights-** IDEK. So, In MW that game has some of the best sight attachments I've ever seen in a game. Anything with a holographic sight looks super realistic, with the model in general, and then the sight itself, how it has like ... Light rays (lol) coming off of the reticle shape. As opposed to like cold war and 2042 where reticles look like 2d images. Look at the monocle sights in MW and 2042 and you will see what I mean. Or you won't. **5. Graphic quality has gone down since bfv, only better thing in 42 is the "dynamic" trees-** I just feel like the details in BFV's environments and the in general look of it is much better than 2042. I think 42 looks like BF4.5 (not that bf4 is a bad looking game btw) **7. Basically everything revolving around the specialist system-** **7.a.** Specialists are an ok idea in general if this is the direction that they want to take the game (wether solely for monetary gain or not) but having the same ass operator on both teams looks so lazy for a AAA shooter. Why didn't they just use the same format of operators (or w/e TF they were called) in BFV. Instead of making a face for the specialist just make "specialists" a class and then you add 1 character per faction that does the same thing "hook guy" does. **7.b.** I HOPE TO GOD that they don't try to do some BS paywall/grindwall-esque system like in Apex for unlocking new operators. I will kick off. **7.c.** I don't think the decision to add in specialists were fully Dice Devs. You probably had theirs and EA's executives in their ears thinking up ways they can monetize the skins in bf. Because if we really think about it, I don't think that the battlefield franchise is very micro-transaction friendly franchise. So they are looking for ways to monetize it further than the initial £60. ** 7.d. ** I like different characters but giving them whole ass classes is shit when you could have just out all of their gadgets in a gadget slot instead. Wtf do I know though. On a side note there are going to be big problems in general with balancing specialists. **8. hazard zone not being f2p until they realise noone is playing it essentially making it dead on arrival-** The decision to make hazard zone not f2p will imo DESTROY the game mode before it can even walk. You'll get jack, westiie, Lossy, Stodd etc. Playing it for like a week or 2 and then they will stop because the content won't be there. Can anyone really imagine the likes of DOC or TIM to quit warzone and all that revenue to play this? I think it won't catch on because it is WAY too complicated for casual players and I think it will be hard to get a win for most. At any rate most of the people paying the £60 for 2042 are going to be buying it for the "BF experience, not to play hazard zone. Most of the player base will play it for a couple days or maybe just a couple times even then drop it. EA/Dice will panic and release it F2P but by that point the damage will already have been done and it will be dead. I hope it's not the case and I'm talking shit because I would like to play the game mode tbf. Also if firestorm 2 existed they could have done so much with that **9 bullet velocity is fucked-** The bullet velocity in this game is WAY too slow. Especially with snipers. On top of that, the bullet DROP is ridiculous also. Feels like bf4 or worse... Satisfying when you get headshots tho. **10.sound is HORRENDOUS like actually dog shit trash-** IDK if it was just me because I e heard some RU-vidrs say the sound was good. Although for me it was absolutely AWFUL. Just one bug drone of sound the whole game. Warzone Audio is better. **11. In general buggyness (minor as beta)** **12.poor performance across the board** 3600 5700xt 70-ish FPS @1440p on low settings with big stutters here there and everywhere is not acceptable I think. Maybe it's because it's a beta ? **13. Features in BFV that are not in 42** So so many features it in this game that should be e.g. crouch sprint. Prone mechanics. Supply station. Probably more but j can't think rn. **14. The overall problem with my favourite shooter franchise not having any direction and having an identity crisis** In between every release of a battlefield game it's like they try re-invent the wheel every time. I'm not talking about era's, weapons, or gadgets just even the game mechanics and how it plays. Imagine, if they just stuck with BFV'S kind of UI/gameplay mechanics but just refined them so that everything actually works as intended and the stuff that does work we don't even have to re-visit. It feels like sometimes the Devs want to make one game but the executives of the companies tell them they must add in this gimmicky thing. Every time basically breaking the game or taking resources from one department and moving them on to this gimmicky aspect. Leaving another core aspect unfinished. **15. Executives putting in silly things they think will make more money but just doing it all wrong** It's like they are shoehorning in these specialists straight from apex legends for instance. There could be more but this is what I can think of for now.

I agree with your assessment. I think they're chasing trends and will spread themselves too thin. What game mode(s) will they support? All of them? Not likely if skins, etc don't sell well

I can see myself playing hazard zone like once and never touching it again. Maybe if it was on it's own separate massive map I would but it's literally on the same multiplayer maps which doesn't make sense. Why not just put it in the server browser along with conquest, rush etc.

I said the exact same thing @aka-art. Dice is trying to do way too much . They should take out hazard zone and use that for a re-do for moh and just leave bf with portal and everything else it’s coming with.

On steam one of the descriptor tags for hunt showdown is battle royale

Soo...welcome back BF4, hype for new bf is gone.

This game has 3 major game modes, the vanilla game, portal, and hazard zone, no wonder they're adding A.I. If we're lucky only one of these modes will flop.

I'm curious to see if everyone's going to be in all at warfare or portal.

Another concern I have is the ps4/xbox one version. They are last gen for sure, but It's really hard to find a PS5, So a lot of people are stuck with their last gen consoles for now. I hope they don't forget about their last gen version and actually optimize it properly. BFV and BF1 run great on PS4. A similar level performance would be great.

Tbh, when BF3 came out people were sh**ing all over Premium because it "was going to split the playerbase" and yet it broke players records for almost 2 years. Might be just me, but after playing Warzone since MW launch, if HZ was FTP, I'd probably avoid it. So, making it part of the primary paid game also brings in players with a similar mindset.

I love how you are using the same thumbnail as gamesprout on their newest video

I loved firestorms , but I could never find servers to play on

Why is this thumbnail and GameSprouts the exact same? As well as being posted at the exact same time?

Hazard Zone is gonna be a mode I play a few times, and probably never play again.

I'll give it a try but already forsee it'll be for organised clans only. They can stack wins/credits and have a huge advantage so it'll be extremely sweaty and die in a few months.

The way I see it, i’ll be staying away from Hazard Zone… i don’t have friends. 🤷🏾‍♂️ it be like that sometimes.

I don't understand why they're trying to make everything at once instead of just focusing on delivering a solid game at launch and then add everything else in future updates. Having the base game, Hazard Zone and Portal at launch is too overwhelming and people will quickly get tired of these "extra" gamemodes just like what happened to BF5's battle royale.

Its entertainment for us and it's a business for them. I'm sick and tired of businesses that produce faulty products, then promise additional components and remedies of what was advertised (Promised). Yes, I'm stil furious about DICE BFV promising me 28 maps and 6 factions, along with a multitude of WWII weapons. Until the community is reimbursed for DICE'S deceptive business practices, I shall remind everyone daily of their unscrupulous behavior. BF2042 will be more of the same. DO NOT BUY BF2042...!

For squad(platoon) and teamplay, nothing beats planetside2

Will the game mode rush be in 2042..used to love that

That's exactly how the specialists are setup though? Medic, Support, Assault, Sniper...

I’m all in on portal. Probably not going to touch vanilla or hazard zone

I'm bitter about the specialists and the fact that there is little to no teamwork like previous games. I did have a lot of fun in the beta though.

I don't know if I'll bother.... I just really do not like the look of it. From everything I've seen I'll be sticking with bf4 for the forseeable.

They will add daily bounties for revives and ammo supply which will help. However if the animation is slow, then people just won't bother. BF1 was perfect with the syringe.

If you want to know what's Hazard Zone like, go play The Cycle: Frontier at Steam, same concept, different games.

I will give each mode a try on my first day of playing. And then play what made the most fun. Biased as iam already i think it will be conquest that gives me the most enjoyable experience, but who knows maybe hazard zone will kick me of my chair and this will be my go to game mode.

I do agree with all your points, but the missing rank system? Isn't it always like that with BR/extraction games, that players who played the mode longer have better loot and stuff. And also teams on Discord will have an advantage, yes, like in almost every other game, where communication is key. I really don't see your point there..

we need bf3's squad deathmatch back

I hope portal has a different engine . I dont get why dice is not making a remastered b3 and bf4. These games are so old and still so popular.

I just don't see how DICE will be able to finish all three modes in time for launch. Or, they could probably finish them but there will then be a lot of glitches... Hopefully they will delay the game a bit further!

Dang, im more excited for hazard zone than normal mode now. Sad to hear its not universal. But hey maybe we'll all get what we want.

100% agree with the specialist and classes

Got sick about that Battle Royale shit, they should make a mode like "Hunt for Freeman". Yes "Gordon Freeman" HEV suit on with all crazy weapons like Egon and Gauss etc. Meanwhile there will be teams which on search&destroy missions while Freeman trying to reach XEN teleporting location(s) (which is secret for players except Freeman) if a team managed take down Freeman they are winners and MVP will be Freeman in next match. If Freeman escapes then entire map destroyed by nuke.

"a problem"??!? lmao dont you mean problems

Honestly I don't get the whole complaint about the specialists. On portal you can leave them away - as far as I understand. And portal will offer lots of interesting game modes. It only doesn't offer Breakthrough and Conquest (maybe that is what people complain about: They want Conquest without Specialists?) Anyhow, I guess DICE can easilsy add these two modes to portal, if needed to make everybody happy, by Portal.

the title is understatement of the year

Firestorm is a easy fix 1. Make Firestorm deadly no running back into the fire 2. Add health regeneration and simplify armor 3. Simplify looting 4. 2 weapon pickup only primary and secondary same with gadget and grenade 5. One redeploy for solos and add a Conquest flag capture for squad/duos to redeploy teammates except add a longer timer and enemies can see the objective making it risky

hilarious that GameSprout uploaded the a video at the exact same time with the same thumbnail

Logic isn’t Dices strong suit. They changed after launch business models in a bid to stop splitting the fan base has just split the fanbase by offering g 3 gameplay experience in 2042. Guess their reasoning is CiD does it but theirs the different modes are truly unique from each other unlike 2042.

I'm not saying its simple but if they can deliver what they promise then its great but if they can only offer the core game modes like conquest thats fine by me I can wait for the other modes if they need time I just want that old battlefield feel I got from 4

I think hazard zone is really cool, I’m excited for the full game