Тёмный

Beyond the Superorganism | Nate Hagens 

Entangled World
Подписаться 1,1 тыс.
Просмотров 3,9 тыс.
50% 1

Entangled World explores the interrelated, existential social, economic, ecological, and technological risks we face, their underlying drivers, and how a more beautiful world might emerge. Entangled World is a labor of love, I am deeply grateful for the generosity of my listeners and fans. Please consider supporting the project at / entangledworld
My guest today is Dr. Nate Hagens. Nate is the Executive Director of The Institute for the Study of Energy & Our Future (ISEOF), an organization focused on educating and preparing society for the coming cultural transition. Nate is also a fellow podcaster as the host of The Great Simplification, in which he has conversations with experts in energy, ecology, human behavior, geopolitics, technology, and the economy to provide a systemic view of the world around us, inform more humans about the path ahead, and inspire people to play a role in our collective future. As a backdrop for The Great Simplification podcast, Nate also produced a short animated film by the same title that you can find on RU-vid. And he has also co-authored two books Reality Blind - Integrating the Systems Science Underpinning Our Collective Futures - Vol 1 and The Bottlenecks of the 21st Century.
In this episode, we talk about our current collective predicament, especially, a way of life built on unsustainable energy consumption, also known as the energy dissipating “superorganism” of humanity. One core aspect of our current predicament is the climate crisis and many people believe that all we have to do is get off fossil fuels and transition to renewable energy but this is an ecology-blind view that ignores the fact that the minerals that power our EVs and solar panels are finite and their extraction has devastatingly complex environmental and human costs.
Nate emphasizes how our cultural values, goals, and aspirations must evolve if we want our technological advancements to affect positive change rather than accelerate our current unsustainable extractive way of life. Nate paints a picture of the bifurcations between technology and ecology, masculine and feminine, right brain and left brain, and how these forces have fallen out of balance throughout human history.
We also talk about Nate’s recent visit to India, where he experienced firsthand some of the differences between Eastern and Western cultures, and close our conversation by honoring ancient traditions and opening an inquiry into how we might both remember the wisdom that was hard earned over thousands of years by our ancestors and apply it to our modern-day metacrisis predicament.

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

 

8 май 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 39   
@treefrog3349
@treefrog3349 19 дней назад
Nate Hagen's the Great Simplification podcast is the conversation that America SHOULD be having with itself. His perennial list of knowledgeable, wise and kind human beings are the diametric opposite of the pablum we get from Capitol Hill and mainstream media. I cannot recommend it highly enough.
@joe.redston
@joe.redston 15 дней назад
This is a brilliant episode - love hearing Nate on the other side of the mic for a change.
@dharma_404
@dharma_404 16 дней назад
Thank you for hosting Nate. Looking forward to hearing future guests respond to hard questions without mainstream media's partisan bias and issue dodging.
@allyscott1590
@allyscott1590 19 дней назад
Love when people I read/listen to/follow crop up together. Thank you both
@mikeecker146
@mikeecker146 7 дней назад
Great interview of Nate by Najia. Najia you are a good listener and don’t talk over your guest like so many other interviewers.
@TennesseeJed
@TennesseeJed 19 дней назад
Love Nate's work, it is so important... maybe the most important work of the human story going forward or extinct.
@TennesseeJed
@TennesseeJed 19 дней назад
Holy cow, Nate mentioned Moloch the immortal race to the bottom!
@treefrog3349
@treefrog3349 19 дней назад
I concur 100%!
@President_NotSure
@President_NotSure 18 дней назад
I have a denier pile on, in my notifications everyday. Imagine if all of us leaned on them ... and not just me and you @TennesseeJed thanks for taking some of the heat.
@treefrog3349
@treefrog3349 19 дней назад
Nate Hagen's combination of a deep-thinking mind and big humanistic heart is the antitheses of our politicians and plutocrats today. His heartfelt, informed wisdom coupled with his innate curiosity stand in stark contrast to the "boilerplate" story we are being fed through the mainstream. He is an unsung and unassuming, national treasure.
@jjuniper274
@jjuniper274 18 дней назад
Nate, I come here for sanity and reality. Thank you.
@flow963
@flow963 17 дней назад
Anima (soul) unites us all - humans, mammals, animal & planet. A critical factor determining our success in progress will be our ability to restore soul to its proper dignity.
@garyhoover9750
@garyhoover9750 7 дней назад
Than you for this conversation! It is a joy to hear Nate interviewed so carefully, and allowed to reflect in an unhurried way. terrific questions, also. I do feel that we humans already find the ecological tsunami overtaking us, but few are aware. I don't see enough continuity to allow for adaptation. I see too much immediate disruption of an ecological nature combined with increasing rdical disruption from intensifying human violence. Even so, this conversation is essential to have to make an openig for humane responses given the slight chance that some folks will go through the bottleneck. I'd love to hear more reflection on the prospect of surviving the brutal game of “musical chairs”that is ongoing as the human niche shrinks on planet earth.
@treefrog3349
@treefrog3349 19 дней назад
The unspoken "elephant in the room" is that all of our astute human analysis is about HUMAN life and not about the myriad other forms of "life itself". That arrogant naiveté is the heart of our problem. Humans have been led to believe that they have a "god-given" right to the Earth itself, instead of recognizing that we are merely one humble participant in the miracle.
@PimpinNinja2U
@PimpinNinja2U 18 дней назад
There's another elephant in the room that no one in power wants to acknowledge. Overpopulation.
@clarkdavis5333
@clarkdavis5333 7 дней назад
A must listen.
@treefrog3349
@treefrog3349 19 дней назад
Ultimately, AI will only help to serve, multiply and exacerbate our historically-demonstrated capacity for self harm. Human hubris is infinite!
@kenpentel3396
@kenpentel3396 18 дней назад
Thank you
@greggardiner895
@greggardiner895 17 дней назад
When there is only one toaster, there will be community
@jjessicalynn
@jjessicalynn 18 дней назад
I emphasize with her a lot about parenting. It’s tough trying to think about what kind of future to prepare my child(ren) for.
@gigabane7357
@gigabane7357 18 дней назад
Thank you for bringing this mans name back into my observed realm. I need to dig deeper. I must say though, I do not understand in this day and age of 'enlightenment' one can still call themselves a christian or muslim or any of that human jazz when we have revealed the truth in the quantum field. The universe itself is the only being that exists. we are materially not even real. The knowledge we gained really quite recently points to it all. Take for example, the double slit experiment and how it leads us to simulation and conscious universe theories.. We just figured out that ALL matter melts back into the realm of quantum possibility when not observed. it is ALL to do with the quantum field, infinite possibility, quanta being able to exist and not exist at the same time and observer status. as in needing a mind to observe to make real. We also know the concept of time is a fundamental limitation of our universe view, but is not even a thing in quantum. beginning of time, end of time, all the same one story. A single event of possibility in an infinite field of quantum energy. All gods exist, all life is one, time has no meaning. there is only one commandment and one intent. And the commandment is intent. all life speaks a universal language, including the universe... 'I do not want to end.' because of our new understanding about particle wae duality, we can now also figure out the true death of the universe... when our matter cools enough, the universe simply fades to never having existed at all.. This frozen light we call matter simply unmakes and becomes the quantum field again. this is death for our universe and it is afraid of it. entropy equals oblivion. every sentient being is an observer and part of the single sentience. our shared story is one, our beginning and end the same. imagine the headline floating around 'Using AI to talk to Whales'... that is our job, our reason to be... to make the sentience singularity happen. imagine forming a citizens assembly using anything our knowledge can manifest such as AI to join the dots... so every human gets to think their view and for it to have equal weight in the combined descision. now imagine inviting in the whales, and dolphins and fox and rabbit... Imagine being able to facilitate the understanding and communication so that the fox understands and agrees to stop eating the rabbit once the bacteria start feeding the fox directly from sunlight..... what would this singularity do?? why does it exist?? To pbserve the universe with the universe at every scale and level imaginable... and to apply the brakes on entropy as best we can at any given moment. because entropy is our final countdown when we look at existence as the single 'we'.
@alfredmacleod8951
@alfredmacleod8951 6 дней назад
Nate Hagens thinks we are leading to a Great Simplification because we are going to lack of this abundant and cheap energy. I agree. We are in finite world. Infinite growth in a finite world is physically impossible. My fear : are we going to change our route (to reach the great simplification) without wars, without civil wars, without a great violence ? My question : what must we do to make the great simplification desirable ?
@crisismanagement
@crisismanagement 18 дней назад
Alternative media has been around but few pay attention until it's too late.
@clarkdavis5333
@clarkdavis5333 7 дней назад
Last hours of ancient sunlight....
@xikano8573
@xikano8573 17 дней назад
Took up the great Vandana Shiva's offer to have chapati at her farm, I take it... 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
@kiedranFan2035
@kiedranFan2035 18 дней назад
the challenge is to create a technolgy that creates life by default. The one thing that i think would do that is synthetic biology. Your create life as other life dies, sum is zero while life is put on a fast track to adapt like it never did before as we reduce our impact. if synbio could be designed with simple tools then energy and reasource use would be negligable as a stablizing counter to inorganic tech
@john1boggity56
@john1boggity56 17 дней назад
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-MvJD7PRG81Q.html Just being listening to this podcast and thought these two might have something to contribute to the conversation about impediments to resistance in the climate/carbon pulse space. The central thesis is that it is impossible to draw away from the system - we are very controlled. They set their argument but critiquing Rousseau's social contract theory. I thought they were brilliant!!!!
@philovon
@philovon 18 дней назад
Nate + Schmachtenberger = God
@PeterTodd
@PeterTodd 18 дней назад
Natiel Schmachtenhagens?
@philovon
@philovon 18 дней назад
@@PeterTodd no, Date Hagchtenberger
@emilymiller1792
@emilymiller1792 18 дней назад
Suppress your identity to converse with people with differing views? Sounds more like suppress pridefulness. No need to suppress your identity; that sounds detrimental. Seek Truth and walk humbly and follow the Golden Rule.
@tedhoward2606
@tedhoward2606 18 дней назад
Nate puts all the pieces out there, then fails to come to the conclusion that this suite of problems can only be solved by fundamental reform of the economic system. And that is a deeply complex set of problems. Around 44:20, Nate says nothing can solve it. If one is thinking within the current economic paradigm, that is true. But when one is able to see beyond the existing economic paradigm, and see the depths of complexity present, and the space of all possible paradigms, and useful ways to simplify those (which can only be seen once one has seen the complexity), then something else becomes possible. Around 49:10 Nate talks about space from the perspective of continuing the existing paradigm. I agree that looking from that perspective, it doesn't go anywhere. When one can look from a perspective beyond existing economics, when one can see the fundamental role of cooperation in the emergence and long term survival of complexity (with all the exponential complexity implicit in the systems required to maintain cooperation); then technology in space is required to give a reasonable probability of long term survival. I am all for long term survival, and it will demand levels of responsibility and cooperation commensurate with the complexity present; and demands seeing ourselves as part of the natural world, which I find easiest when using the definition of life as: Systems capable of searching the space of possible systems for those which are survivable. The notions of search embodies the idea that freedom (going beyond the known) is fundamental to the very definition of life, and the idea of survivability imposes responsibility appropriate to each level of freedom claimed - as there are far more vectors in the highly dimensional space of all possibilities that lead to death than there are ones that lead to survival. Sure, there are vast issues with existing economic and political systems, and those issues are solvable, but not within the paradigms that gave them birth. Around 57:20 Nate accurately says we are part of life, and need to see ourselves as such. He then goes on to explicitly state the problem is with the economic system, but fails to take that next step, to demanding reform of that system. Perhaps just a step too far.
@EmmaSolomano
@EmmaSolomano 6 дней назад
I'd encourage you to look at some of his other work, because he and his team are working on a suite of economic policies that can be used in future when the current economic paradigm falls apart. I think he just didn't take the economic arguments further because of the questions asked by the interviewer and the time limits. But he is definitely across the economic ramifications of these societal changes coming up, and has written extensively on it.
@tedhoward2606
@tedhoward2606 6 дней назад
​@@EmmaSolomano I don't think we have the option of letting the existing system fall apart. I live in Kaikoura, New Zealand. We had a 7.8 earthquake here 6 years ago, and almost nobody was prepared for it. I was prepared. After we bought our house 26 years ago, we needed to do some extensions to the small 2 bedroom house we had bought, to add a bedroom and an office, and my instructions to the engineer were - "Make it stand up to an 8.5 quake". I moved here with the intention of living here for about 1,500 years, then leaving the solar system for other places, and only coming back for visits every few million years. So not the sort of timeframes most people plan on. In 1500 years I expected about 5 major earthquakes, but there is no mechanism to predict exactly when. So when the earthquake happened, I was delighted in a sense, in that every one of my measures worked, and we didn't lose a single item from our pantry. We had 4 months supply of food and water, and indefinite energy supplies. But we were the only ones so prepared, and those reserves would not last long shared among the community. That bought home in a visceral sense, that preparation for disaster has to include everyone, or it really doesn't work. I require technology for long term survival. A low tech future is not a survivable option for me (or anyone else, not on the sort of timeframes I think about). So allowing the existing systems to collapse is not a survivable option. And they will need to get dangerously close to collapse before those dangers will be sufficiently obvious that many will be willing to act. 50 years ago I was a very lone voice in this space. Now there are many more, not enough, but growing rapidly. The double exponential advances in AI give us a very short timeline - about 17 months left. Much to be done, on many different levels. And a fundamental part of it is getting general acceptance of the fact that thinking about evolution just in terms of competition is dangerously overly simplistic. It is beyond any shadow of reasonable doubt that all new levels of complexity require new levels of cooperation to emerge and survive, and maintaining cooperation rapidly gets extremely complex, all levels. Nothing simple! So while I align with many of the themes and general directions of Nate's thinking (and I have followed his work for several years), the idea that anyone has a significant probability of surviving total societal collapse is not one of those. It seems very probable to me that we learn to cooperate, at scale, with all the multiple levels of complexity and uncertainty embodied within that, or the human experiment ends. I really want the human experiment to continue. So do many others. Not sure if there are quite enough of us yet.
Далее
The Unsustainable Green Transition | Simon Michaux
1:31:19
100❤️ #shorts #construction #mizumayuuki
00:18
Просмотров 13 млн
The World’s Coming Energy Catastrophe - Nate Hagens
1:15:42
Are we heading towards the end of civilization?
45:04
Mindscape Ask Me Anything, Sean Carroll | August 2021
3:11:13
Продавец года 😂
0:59
Просмотров 2,4 млн
Утро в поликлинике 😐 #shorts
0:25