Boris the Balanced Bias - T-90A - War Thunder 

that is a really good comment 😂

Googly eyes lmao

@@sn0wm4n94 and better cannon, and better FCS and better optics... And a better engine.

@@sn0wm4n94 hull is literally from T-72B it's a T-72 with better turret xD T-90 is literally a deep T-72 modernization xd

@@sn0wm4n94 yes i can... the hull defines a tank... not the turret... a T-72 is a T-72 regardless of the turret... gun... thermals... and other things... if the hull had a drastic change for example addition of better reverse gears and different layout and different suspension it would be safe to say that's a different tank and not a T-72

He was shooting at the debris, if he aimed higher he would have gotten the kill

@@human1080 nope, the debris blocks it anyways....

@@IkeanCrusader1013 nah but that was his fault

He legit shot in the debris lmao stop crying so hard and improve your gameplay

@@thepatriots340 that shell shouldn't be stopped by the debris, and he didn't directly

Yeah its funny that most of enemies in his games behave like potato.

@@pesymistik ah yes, edit out the pain

I've been on the receiving end of his gameplay and can confirm. Whole team was basically wiped from his AMX-30 Super

except the 2A5 has been through nerf after nerf. what's beyond me is the Armor on T80U hull. like tanks that came 15 to 20 years after still can' t pen it yet the T64B from 60s can pen the 1990s NATO tanks like no tomorrow. Because clearly irl NATO tanks are far inferior to USSR tanks we all know that!

@@kiranplays2688 T-80U has kontakt 5. In the game, kontakt 5 acts like a plate that stops 120mm of armour. Instead of 780mm if armour, in tests, kontakt 5 stopped M829A2. And DM53 is a M829A2 copy. Not only that. But 1970 tanks can destroy 2016 tanks. Russian tanks were far better than NATO ones. Also, M829 can pen T-64Bs UFP. And that thing came 3 years ago!

@@kiranplays2688 T-64B from the 80s dude lmao. It has the 3BM42 Mango which can destroy NATO tanks. Kontakt-5 was designed to increase the protection for KE rounds.

@@stilpa1 Russian tanks were never better than nato tanks. Ok, the t34 was better than the Sherman, but that was before nato

@@kiranplays2688 The nato tanks in this game are already way better than the Russian ones, what more do you want?

Yeah russian mbt gets one thing better than nato - frontal armor. Now with leo 2a6 lost its last advantage.

@@pesymistik the 2A6 can penetrate anything in the game from the front when brawling

They can penetrated everywhere by the new leo

They are my second favorite mbts right after the abrams for me

Damn that's crazy, almost like they are modern

Talking about debris, did you know that fallen debris now have mass and thus momentum. When a piece of debris lands and stays on your tank moving becomes much more difficult as if it added weight of was fighting your tanks movement.

@@f-104starfighter4 Oh just found this out too, hitboxes of tanks remain as full, meaning a tank's turret can be physically blown off after you hit it's ammo, but the hitbox of the turret remains in place. So hull down behind a turretless tank corpse means your still stuffing you barrel in a non-existent turret basket, so when you fire - like I've said in the above, your round is completely absorbed by the invisible hitbox.

Hmm thanks intertesting, what about the “svinet rounds

@@Kingnickie Actually, "svinets" - translates as."plumbum"... (Pb)................. As (Fe) Ferrum - Iron.. as (Au) Aurum - gold..

@@user-qi8nz8gm7h oh ok didn’t know thanks for the info :D

@@Kingnickie according to the same logic, 3BM22 "Hairpin" should have been "Spil'ka" or Zakolka

Turn on thermals and then you know on 90% Or watch for hatches + one thing, i think you can see red eyes in sniper mode or binoculars.

Late green camo be like that doe

@@tomasrichtr9554 red eyes/IR lights are only turned on by either the APS activating or if the user has it turned on for some reason

DM53 going trough

@@csorbalaszlo1920 if you watch Snatch movie, you will get this joke hehe

@@johnschmidtz5337 i see it before and its funny as the comrade jokes... So its not

@@csorbalaszlo1920 well it's all over forum, if you know which is good :) Alright cheer, have a nice day comrade. I gotta grind this thing as well.

it should have been called one bullet one turret ejection

The people saying russian is op are the players that have never played its rank 5 tanks

@Leplivo that’s the same for top tier, but here Russians are rushing, then die, then complain on the forum. At least mid tier players have an excuse, they are just brain dead cuz of no experience. But top tier players?

@@TT-cf8dz How can Russia rush with 60 max speed and aroun 32 average speed 😂😂

Ayy blyat

That last part is just your opinion, Leo's and Abrams look cool, T90s look like a fucking box

Nah I think Strv 122 looks dope, it's frontal hull model makes it looks better than 2a5

If it aint the slickest Russian tank idk which is...

it absolutely is

t80u im guessing cuz turret era is smoothed onto the hull?

Well, it's subjective, i don't find the t-72 series good looking either.

@@m1a1abrams3 that's not the era, it's a skirt.

Definitely, love the Western tanks but they can’t compete with the looks.

@@dragoonTT I'd have to say I'm stuck between the Abrams and Leo 2a7 for my favorite. But the T series aren't anything to scoff at for sure.

@@mindfreak078589 it’s those tall blocky hulls that make them look a little less aggressive

@@dragoonTT hey man it ain't a tank unless you got the NATO hump goin on you know what I'm saying? XD

@@mindfreak078589 Every time I see a 2A6 on the highway I get giddy. They are massive and you forget how large they are.

HERESY!!

kinda the fault of gaijin I want to say

The series 2 did get a slight partial thickness increase on the turret and a few bits of bold on applique armour, but most of the changes were for crew comfort and reliability.

@@danielbromwich1827 and also a new round

@@arealbaguette5210 It doesn't. it has the same as the series 1.

@@danielbromwich1827 nope irl it can fire the OFL 120 F2, it’s longer and made in depleted uranium, go check it yourself

So excited to play USA with only one 10.7 tank

so excited to play japan with 0 10.7 tanks. or maybe china with no rank 7 tanks :)

that radar see throu smoke and can nail me from 2k out while i hiding in forest ): damn rockets are op

@@SougoUltimateSadist I’ve already got called a hacker for seeing through smoke

it should fire svinets with 650mm of pen

@@jungle6815 and leopard 2a6 has 800mm in real life

because secrit document comrade

Actually diesel engines are louder in real life than turbine engines but for some reason in previous updates Gaijin never fixed the volume of the engines so you could hear a turbine engine tank coming from a mile away while diesel engine tanks were so quiet that you could barely hear them at all. Also the Leopard 2's engine is actually louder than an Abrams engine, look it up if you're interested

Fun fact didnt even hear a abrams Like 0

It is about settings. You can turn off your engine sound and max other players engine sounds. It is relly helpful. Air RB, ground RB, doesnt matter

@@tomasrichtr9554they raised it recently the minimum own engine sound used to be 20% now is 50% I can't hear shit from my leopard 2s

Other than dead tanks being marked on the map

Imo its a useless gimmick on 10.7. its was better if they just add k5 blocks instead of red eyes. Tbh some bmp version has shtora-1 and on 9.0 it could be working.

@@pesymistik well, this is why RB isn't that realistic since it never takes into account some random dude just firing RPG on tonks

its a 2004 tank, what do you expect.

@@boxtankgamer6014 Leopard 2A5 was introduced in 1990, even the 2A6 is only 2001

@UCmUq5pgc8BoP5N_gIo9AoLA what I’m saying is don’t expect the T-90A to be good when it was outclassed by nato tanks from nearly 10 years prior.

@@skyz6708 ik I’m saying the T-90A is from 2004, not the leopard. It should 100% be expected to fight the leopard 2A5/6.

The thing is that the t90 is a cheap tank and wast never build to be the best tank or have the best technology. There are far more superior _Russian Object prototype that would shit in anything that nato has. But Russian economy would never afford them. Like obj187 that was the other tank running a long the t90 dev. That thing has no frontal weak point aside for the lower plate. Frontal armour is the same as t90a turret armour. And it have t80 lv of mobility. With a shell Anker1 that would be on lv of DM43. Don't even talk about all the Object that lead to development of the Armata.

Im watching in 360p

:)

And here I am with 1Gbps fibre broadband, but Gaijin server hamsters still screw me over.

@@Zosterias well at least ur not alone on that

@@pivko6083 oof

I bring 15 xd

@@kajmak64bit76 do you get ammo racked

I've seen fuel tank and engine explosions classified as "ammunition detonation" for some reason. I'm not sure if the game counts ghost ammoracks or the actual components as culprits.

@@bickboose9364 yeah I got shot in the engine earlier and just fucking died

@@qwispychild9491 i don't pay attention but if i get shot there chances are my crew dies with or without ammo detonation... so idk but logically speaking less ammo improves survivability incase the shell doesn't kill the crew or detonate the ammo but rather just passes trought and kills the engine xd

Hahaha So that's what happened

If abrams and leopards are sexy girls, russian tanks are doberman and bulldogs. Entirely different class of look but both look good nonetheless just in a different way

@@killthemall55 God,what is a beautiful about Abrams 😮? A large cardboard box on a harp ,in comparison with it the t90 is a racing car,squat with a small silhouette )))

@M.Chairu yea, idk. I do know for a fact that 2 things are incorrectly modeled. 1 is the turret armor, it is supposed to be substantially stronger. The turret is like a diamond shape, so in the trials done on the turret, shooting it head on (gun facing target in the flat parts) it was impenetrable against shells used, meaning it has around 750mm, and then when it was shot at from the 45 degree angle(head on armor brick side) it was estimated to be about 900mm of thickness. The second thing is the turret speed, apparently the turret speed now is from the t90(old turret design) and it should be about the same as the t72b3 with about 35degres per second. Aside from that, the hull armor I think is correct, the mobility and everything. Honestly, the t90 just isn’t the tank we all thought it was, and people including gaijin kinda warned us too, so it’s our own fault that we got our hopes up

@M.Chairu I’d like to say, it’s not a bad tank, as a matter of fact, I’d say it’s a great sniping tank, especially with its round, but it’s not a good brawler like the t80u or t72b3

X_Glitches_ 2014 In protection analysis, I noticed that the T72B3 upper front plate has a better chance at stopping DM53. I also heard the T90A is missing armor values on its upper front plate.

@@Bruh23732 yes, if I remember correctly, T90A and t72b3 have the same Hull armor, nothing different. And going by that standard, it should have about 650mm of armor los. So I do believe both of them are missing about 25-50mm of armor. But until that is fixed, if even, it's gonna be one shot a lot

X_Glitches_ 2014 That’s true, 25-50mm is a marginal improvement. But in regards to the the T90A’s turret armor and rotation, I hope Gaijin patches that quickly.

and the T-15

I think there would be the t 90m first

@@davideb.4290 t80bvm and t72 rogatka, t84oplot and list go on, and do forget a russia still gets no wheeled machine, and no light tank with mbt cannon.

I dont think you get t14. Now every nation gets their best. Germans leoa7+, russians t90m

@@darklysm8345 i dont think that t14 will ever enter the game. Even if it will not be a good tank. Strong hull and paper turret (hullbreak possible?)

Lmao that leo dude gaijined

It's an absolute beast. Both the old and new M829s seem to be doing quite a bit more shrapnel too.

Servers my friend. You do not bought a premium pack?

Gaijin does this, they buff certain vehicles after adding new vehicles and premium packs to piss people off and switch sides to buy these premiums and GE to spend on getting to the extra buffed vehicles, ive been playing a lot of matches yesterday, all the weakspots on the 2A5, even on the weak front hull, seem to bounce off and non-pen most of the times. Give it a week or two at max untill leo 2A5 goes back to being oneshotted from the front when gaijin has milked all wallets from their playerbase

@@RKForeigner So, what i was referring to was actually ghost shells/ latency bounces. You can see in the video, Justin fires 3 shots into that dude, with only 1 of them impacting the enemy tank. I don't think the problem is overbuffed tanks, I think the problem is that Gaijin didn't do any internal playtesting (what's new, right?) And have completely borked the stability of this update.

im this update, they buffed sraams so they pull like 360gs now

Op? he only has 25mm more penetration than the ariete be happy that he didn't get the 820mm like in real life

The lack of frontally weakspots is unfair... Go ahead and go back in time and tell all the tank designers that. Nothing you can change about that bud.

@@lumonic8324 that's pretty much taken out of context man. It has nothing to do with IRL tank design. What my comment concerns is the game where GJ has intentionally reduced the angled pen of mono-bloc long rods so that they won't just lol pen everything. But this has lead to the situation where rounds that were designed to defeat Heavy-ERA, i.e. DM53 from L44(Even the DM33 was desgined to counter Kontakt-5 to some extent) will be countered with 100% efficency. Also you're missing the other point. WT maps are designed to iniate action as soon as possible which means tanks that were designed for hull-down fire(All western tanks) are at an obvious disadvantage especially now since russian tanks can match the speed of nato tanks and shrug of shells fired from an C1 Ariete

dm63 was designed to counter heavy era like contact 5. why dm53 ingame ignores c5 is beyond me

@@m1a1abrams3 the method western nations used to counter heavy-era was to increase the length of the rod which increased the perforation. To my knowledge first rounds designed with this in mind were the M829A1(the uranium core helps but doesn't provide that much increase compared to tungsten) and DM33 which are almost the same length. GJ simply has reduced the angled pen of all long rods, including russian, so it will be really weird when they introduce the M829A2, Charm 3, and 3BM44-60 as to what those penetrstion values will be. Still the LOS penetration of the rounds(which is to double the value of pen at 60°) is in the ball park of the estimated irl penetration, i feel like the armor effectivness is a tad high with russian vehicles. Also the new round of L27A1 which sports a nogded tip isnt corrdctly implimented. The british charm 1 had a nodged tip to have best of both worlds, angled pen and flat pen which the first gen russian apfsds rounds were exceptionally good at with their slug style apfsds

They nerfed the armor to shit you cant bounce any shells thx gaijin

Well you can penetrate the UFP if you dont hit the kontakt-5