War Thunder - T-72B3 - The Modernized Workhorse 

Please do, I have so many plans for one! Or 50... xP

@@JustinPlaysTV T-72 bumper tanks

They’re only worth like $400000 iirc

Uh oh I think Justin might create ATLAS from AW

You can get a t72 for 140000 usd plus about a 30k import cost

that would be helpful

very helpful

NATO would like to issue a formal surrender.

I noticed that also, many people didn’t notice it. I found it by accident when putting the cursor in between the plates.

Gaijin Bot or we can start giving Soviet MBTs Svinets and give NATO DM53 M829A3 L28. Also Leopard 2A6 and Leopard 2 Revolution/Evolution.

@@gaijinbot8135 in your dreams and in this joke game where you nerfed NATO tanks for the russian ones to look better..lame

@@Zosterias Svinets at 10.7 would be no difference to the Mango. (For example if you're matched against 9.7)

Raf_wt I was on stream at like 1:41:48, I was the German MIG-15 bis on the right corner and ohh yah my brother was the one in the radkampfwagen who rammed you to help u repair but he was a bit late 😂😂😂😂

Yep lmao

@jeevaa yuhan it came out just 8 hours after hehehe

U got played

And the better turret traverse

Kind of, I still prefer the T-80U though. Speed over Armour, and the slow reverse is a nightmare.

Kind dont get why they didn’t give the t72b3 a new round

How can you read this Theres no picture bigfoot they don’t know how it would perform with a full set, kinda why they haven’t done that so far with other MBTs.

@@egonieser I agree, mobility is more important at top tier cos no matter how much armour you have there's always an easy way to kill it

how do they benefit from this?

Dragonreaper211 in some places of the mantlet, it can be up to 650-700mm thick now instead of just 127mm. There’s even some places that 120mm apfsds can’t penetrate

@@atomicspartan131 it’s accurate but not by much, it’s arguably a bug as 120mm shells naturally pen until you hit the cast welded areas. Generally it should make it seem like it has better armor but not by 600 mm of RHA as it’s literally cast armor. What should happen is it should pen and have to interact with the slice under or pen through both platings no matter if it’s 2 different volumes of armor especially since again it’s just cast armor.

Foreal man ... America suffers at top tier....the m1a2 isnt as good as it should be....they should give us the sepv1 with tusk to make it better

America should get the M1A2C with m829a3

@@PongLenis50 America does not suffer,I love my M1A2 and average 4-5 kills a game in it alone. But I do agree we should get SEPS

Both those upgrades will literally just add weight and leave the hull still terribly protected. HA is just 1st generational DU components to the turret; lot of extra weight. SEP just has upgraded third-generation depleted uranium armor components with graphite coating to the turret only; a lot more weight. The latest Abrams literally addresses these things by the newest version; M1A2 SEPv2 or latterly known as M1A3 and they are designed to be lighter due to the issues the already added armor components have caused due to the shear weight distribution. They are also designed to fundamentally increase the life expectancy of the tank.

@@KozenX ok, don't you think even the 1st gen of DU would help the M1A1 atleast?

It is

The reload is not realistic either

NATO bias

Also it doesn't get the new round as it got in real life too, because Russians would be overpowered, but hey we have Leo2A6 and now a new cancer M3A3 w top attack TOWs which are broken atm...

@@nemanjalackovic2288 the bmp-1 doesnt have a stabalizer because it wouldnt be bAlaNCed

@@Silver_Prussian lmao literally

Estian Burger it’s that a 2003 mod version?

@@tylerdurden629 challenger 2 came out in 2003 the 2F is a 2018 mod.

Meanwhile the country with the highest defense budget is stuck with a tank from the 80s,I believe? With the shitty gen 1 thermals

@@yowaddup5649 M1A2 from 1992 tho?

@@ODSTOninersIxTwO chally 2 is from 1998 not 2003

I did the same thing but I started a new account and the grind took forever. I was playing like 4-5 hours a day and only managed to get to around 6.7 in the 5 or some months I played.

@@davidtihire with work , its almost impossible for me , but i sure miss playing , i miss tanking so bad

HEATSEEKER3227 what is your in game name? I’m doing the same we can squad if you want

Added you

Granted

man we deserve vaccum 1 with 1000mm of pen lol just kidding svinets is enough

we need the fucking type 99A this year ffs

Another copy paste tank?

@@DOVM6336 it's not a copy paste tank. In fact many newer Chinese vehicles aren't.

@@Gongolongo All* Even seemingly copy paste vehicles such as the ZBD04 - a BMP-3 modification - are very different to the original.

How much does that cost? Lol

@@Zman2598 somewhere around $40 just to buy it and about 10-20$ more to spade it

Lmfao it’s expensive af to do it that way, get a month of premium and just grind lol

I have a tali on my t-62 from when it was top tier ages ago and the t-55am Im already 70k into it

MAnnn I wish I could do that

Rep costs are bullshxx anyway, 10-20k for one death in a OHK scenario is some crazy bad stuff..(not to mention the B29..)

Rep costs are crappy indeed and should either be removed competly or be put to a set value for each tier for all nations and not be used to "Balance" with. But russia does have waaaay cheeper repair costs for thier top tier tanks compared to any other. Overall i think Russia got the cheepest repair costs of any nation in general.

They said on the livestream that they might turned it off and on to test it

with Russian tank, the shell will top after meet breech, driver, fuel tank hehe

Jimmy Bobs T-72B3 has different cannon but same ammo type. 2A46M-5 instead of 2A46M-1

Russia for simplicity and a general understanding of all of WT, USA for the Middle ground, nation that generally forces you to think about your moves, rather than holding W for russia. IMO

Its a weird bug that was introduced in this update. Tanks can somehow lock and track helicopters and plans through hills and buildings.

Yeah... imagine the absolute atrocity the T-90M will be. Relikt on the sides is one thing but on the front it will be quite the thing. Alone it would bring Soviet tanks to a level that could counter 2A6. Problem is, I don’t think there are tanks with Relikt that don’t also have all the new soviet improvements. Hard kill APS, better mobility, better engines... still wishing to see them but at the same time not really XD

x4 M1+ ADATS, AH64, F4; x3 Leo + TAM, Tiger; x3 Ariete + x2 Centauro...

They ruined the game with the unlimited respawns, if yiu want to drive the baddest tank in the game you get one tank then have to spawn something else. Russias line up is the best hands down, the round all Russian tanks use the Mango is available from the T64 to the T80U, the Challenger 1 for example only has access to the L23 (which wont pen a T72B) Then the Challenger 1 mk3 only has the L23A1 both vastly inferior the Challenger 2F Britains best tank gets the L26A1 still not as good as the Mango round. Russia are steam rolling everyone in ground RB T80U dies get T72B3UHB then the T80B all have amazing front armour and a weak spot that only destroys the breach. 20+ games today and Everyone VS Russia we lost them all.

@@_b_x_b_1063 I agree that there is very good lineups that are similar to the top tier russian. However, I would like to point out about the rounds fired. the 3BM42 is accessible for all the russian at 9.7. Does the Leo 2A4 have the top round ? Same question for the M1s, only the M1A1 and A2 have top round. The only one with 3 top tier with top rounds are the Italians. So you can do "the same" in a 9.7 russian tank as in a 10.7. Can you in the other nations ? Basically russian have fast tank, which can go in position very quickly, are easy to kill, but you must aim weakspot or sidshot. And they all have the best round at 9.7. You can't deny the fact that overall russain tank have more potentiall at 9.7 than all the other tanks. And I'm not saying that they are overpowered, no no they are very balance, but having 6 vehicles for a linup, at top tier is THE most OP thing for the russians.

Agree it's just like german 9.0 9.3 lineup already strong and they get two more tanks in the lineup, where the other nation lack 9.0 9.3 tanks

Lemon China has good copy tanks but you should’ve went RUSSIA

I know, i almost went french. Even that sounds better than the Chinese tech tree.

@@Kai-mg1rz but high repair but better

If the US gets SepV2, then Russia gets T-90M

TheYamato101 true

And for some no reason i think that stupid CL3143 could pen the m1a2 turret i dont because the last time i checked it is able you shoud try checking i dont know if it is changed

badinas2134 I checked today and even at like 500 meters it won’t pen because of the armor of the interior plate behind the like extra inside plates

@@TheYamato101 yea. If they add the m1a2 sepv1, or v2...with TUSK included.....we'd have the same problem with the US being the op line up...so adding the t90 would be a good balance

Me too :]

This tank is so sexy, and in all reality isnt far out from being a top mbt in irl, all it needs is a bit better turret protection, thermals for the commander, a GPS system, and it would be on par with a t90

@@cameronpitcher4024 Yep ikr ill take 2 delivered to New Zealand. Thanks Putin!

They actually split the Relikt into two different parts. Underneath the first layer that Justin showed, there are flat panels of relikt that have the 200 mm of KE protection. They only made the change a couple of days ago and it was only discovered in a data mine so Justin might not have known to look for it.

So I can just break the ERA with Leo 2k 20mm and then I can fuck them raw?

@@PorWik no idea how resistant it is to autocannon kek

Bruh some people grind only planes and don’t grind for tanks

SidSucksAtPlaying Exactly.. I don’t know why he is trying to compare when one is air and one is ground lol. Even if the R3Rs aren’t very good vs the AIM7s, would still be nice to have 8 missiles because 21s really did have double stack missiles just like the F4s.

@@bwhittv1446 yes

@@bwhittv1446 Only the 21 BIS which we dont have in game could carry 6 R60M not 8 usual config was 2 R3S and 4 R60m on double pylons. 21 couldnt haul the same ordinance as the Phantom same as the Mig 23 wont have the same amount of missiles as the F-14. Different combat roles, the Mig 21 was a front fighter, not designed to loiter like the Western aircraft, hence less payload and less fuel, take off shoot down targets land.

yeah he seems to fixate on people stealing his kills, little arrogant if u ask me.

To make people grind event leopard?

to make the tank more attractive for people to grind, many will spend money on this tank, which is even more money in gaijins pocket. Many other exemples like this occured over the years, for exemple, do you remember the IS-6? British HESH would have been that things nemesis, guess what got nerfed to the grave

They gave everyone who has top tier tanks and doesn't have them spaded yet HEAT-FS .. the rest of us just pay more for the darts.

The stock HEAT thing sucks but if you think they did that just to make this tank better is pretty dumb.

@@yankee5377 It is gaijin

Well with that context that statement was much different to hear. Even has the, "haha, yeah, we'll pretend this is your age" sound to it. D:

@@EnduringFrost pmsl