Can you blame the U.S. struggles in the Ryder Cup since 1999 to Tiger and Phil? Chamblee says yes. David Duval, took great exception to this! Good cat fight!
The jackass Brandel has never been on any Ryder Cup team, much less knows anything about team golf other than his speculation as a spectator. Duval on the other hand has experienced it and should know the make up of what goes into winning a team competition. Kinda like folks that never had children trying to tell someone who has them, how to raise them. Smh.
I love duval and agree with him completely but that was a dumb statement. I hate brandel but stating "I understand youre never wrong" is a weak argument.
I am not a Duval fan but I just became one in this clip. I totally agree with David on this one. I think the issue is more about the top americans not being able to play well with a partner. They did pretty well in the singles. Tiger can put himself in trouble and get out of it but he couldnt put his partner in trouble and get out of it
I have always appreciated David Duval after he did one special thing. In the year that Duval won the Open Championship, he was also scheduled to play in the Canadian Skins Game which was scheduled for the Monday after the Open. Duval showed up with the Claret Jug in tow. A class act.
Branded feuding with all these tour pros. My favorite was when Rory defended Tiger saying “if it weren’t for tiger, people wouldn’t know who he was” or something like that.
Duval is speaking from personal playing experience in the Ryder Cup. Brandel has no such experience other than as a viewer just like the rest of us. Brandel is a know it none.
I so agree. When DD was on, there wasn't anyone better (including Tiger) and he's right, its not always the top ranked guys that are the leaders. Brandel does make a good point about how it was that way in the past but Tiger and Phil are different guys. Phil's changed some more into a leader as he has matured and Tiger has too, if his performance as an assistant captain at the Ryder Cup this past fall is any indication.
@@joshgarbemusic Chamblee was one of dozens of slightly older journeymen players who were able to stay out on tour before Tiger came along. The game changed. The ball changed. The clubs changed. The courses changed, and the game became more about raw power. Chamblee and those like him could no longer compete at the level needed to stay out there. It happened in a very short period of time, and was shocking to those players who couldn't keep up. In Chamblee's case, and I say this having listened to his commentary for nearly 20 years, I think he carries a bit of a grudge against Tiger. He's always expressed a hint of glee when Tiger's doing poorly either personally or out on tour. This is of course just my individual opinion.
This clip showing up in my suggested videos confirms my phone is listening in on me. I’ve been playing an audiobook about the Ryder Cup and this conversation was written in the chapter I was listening to yesterday.
I have always like David Duval. I wish he never would have lost his top form. He was such a great player and just an all around humble guy. Now he's one deserving of an analyst spot.
It comes down to world-class players in big events being able to make shots and rise to the occasion, simple as that. The captains don’t shoot the shots-the players do.
The British and Wales Ryder Cup team got much better once they included all of Europe and subsequently you cannot compare Arnold Palmer Ryder Cup against the American players since 1979 and later, although I think Palmer and Nicklaus and the Americans would still of won. But a really good group of European golfers showed up at the same time Seve, Faldo, Woosen, Langer, Lyle. So the American team had suddenly gone from dominating the Ryder Cup to losing more than it has won the almost last 40 years.
Gotta go with Duval. He's been there and felt the heat, the pressure. The only heat Chamblee has ever felt is the heat of the studio lights. Case closed !
I'm with DD. Yes being out there and doing it gives you better insight to what is actually happening vs just looking at stats. Stats can tell you certain things, but stats can not tell you why the stats are what they are. As an example if you take a 6 on a par 4 the stats tell you that you are now 2 over, the stats don't tell you what happen to cause you to get the 6. Maybe you hit a sprinkler head in the front of the green with you approach shot and the ball shot out of bounds. Is that player playing bad or did he or she just catch a bad break. The stats don't tell you that information. Chambee is wrong.
You are exactly right. How about when Tiger hit that flag stick at the Master's and it went into the water and then he played a wrong drop. Nobody there told him it was wrong or noticed it was at the time, no official or caddie said not to do it. Bad luck on top of bad luck--after hitting the stick! Stats don't always tell the story.
David Duval makes a totally valid point and all Brandal wants to argue is stats. Analytics are great. but in a team match there is no way to measure the position your partner has put you in.
Chamblee has a beef with Phil going back two years ago when he said that Phil would regret the day he spoke out about Tom watsons team captain leadership.
There are so many variables in golf, a player can stay up too late and cause him a dismal performance. You can't base everything off stats. I agree with Duval totally.
The two guys brandel is talking negative about,tiger,and Phil have over 130 combined pga tour wins! The guy brandel is arguing with has 14 pga tour wins! Brandel has (1) win! What I take from this ,is that brandel is a good announcer!
Brandel is awful smart for a guy who never played at a high level. In today's game, he would have been a web.com player at best, and probably middle of the pack at best...
It almost always comes down to who putts the best. I think there's something to the theory that the players take on the coaches personality. Just look at the 86 bears with Ditka and Ryan. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers with Jon Gruden. The Lakers with Phil Jackson. But that said, the players have to perform.
I agree with Duval. It's not always the best player who leads the team. A team wins when there are enough players on the team that steps up and plays well enough to carry it to victory. Anyone who has played golf knows this game is fickle and can leave you at any time. One day it's as if you have never played and the next you are striping it. Can't blame any one player for a rider cup loss.
Brandel has said that to make it to the PGA Tour you have to be a great player. By that definition, every player including Brandel is great. So after greatness, what's the next benchmark?
Brandel might be able to tell us about the Boston Tea Party but not from the experience of being there. He should learn how to listen and defer to someone who actually has the experience that he doesn't.
I like it, having an opinion is a good thing. It's not boring fucks who have one sided only views. Disagreement upon one another is good. It's not just entertaining, it develops forward thinking. This is the point of debates. You can live without opinion if you'd like, but him having one doesn't mean he's rude. They're all equally rude to each other. Don't whine about it if you don't want others to have opinions.
Brandel Chamblee, are you ever wrong about anything? And sorry Brandel you were not good enough to play in a Ryder Cup, but yes you can at least be part of the peanut gallery and comment all you like (whether you are right or wrong).
David Duval was on 2 Ryder cup teams one of them that won. Brandel... Yeah but he knows what it takes to have a winning Ryder cup team. Alright Brandel😂
Sorry but no Brandel...just because you read a 3 books about War doesn't mean you know how it felt to go to war. David Duval has been through the Ryder cup war. You my friend are at a desk.
Chamblee should look at his own stats and compare them to David's. Then he would have to say 'I'm not fit to lace your shoes Mr Duval, I'm a talker and you're a player please accept my apologies'.
