Can a point and shoot replace your DSLR or Mirrorless Camera? (RX100V vs A7SII SHOOTOUT) 

Yucon thank you!

Thanks for the video content! Excuse me for the intrusion, I am interested in your opinion. Have you heard the talk about - Riddleagan Create Memories Remedy (search on google)? It is a great one of a kind guide for mastering dslr camera and creating stunning photos minus the hard work. Ive heard some pretty good things about it and my BF got astronomical results with it.

Thanks for watching

Thanks for watching! Have fun with your new camera!

yeah its an awesome camera for the size and price.

Thanks for watching Josh!

Glad to help

thanks! and yeah, i'm using it so much more than my a7sii

thanks i appreciate it!

Chris Winter buy through my link!

Thanks for watching! As far as rx100v vs a6500 it just depends on the application. Both are great cameras!

Cinema Heist Yeah thats for sure, im sure it will do the job, otherwise ill get the a6500

Thanks I appreciate it!

Of course! I got my dad an a6000 too and he loves it

@@hidemaxwell ordered the RX 100 V used at b&h today :)

Thanks for watching!

thank you! i use a pilotfly h2

As a travel camera the rx100v is amazing simply bc you can keep in on you at all times even in a pocket. I keep mine in a small case attached to my belt and just having it there is a great peace of mind whenever I'm out. However, the a6300 will deliver a better image simply based on sensor size and resolution. So if absolute best image for a sub 1k price point is your goal then get the 6300, but if versatility and convenience is your goal then get the rx100v. Hope this helps and thanks for the comment.

mainly for vlogging... it would be paired with my older canon 7D. Had the G7x before, but dropped it and it died, contemplating the switch to Sony...

thanks man!

Ive never used the zv1 but it has a similar sensor to the latest rx100 camera. I think the zv1 is more geared toward video though. I think it seems pretty good, just depends on what exactly you are going for. ZV1 id good for shooting in public and carrying a tiny camera with decent quality.

as i recall i shot the stabilization test at slog2, 28mm f2.8, 23.98fps, 50 shutter. if you shoot log at 1600 on either camera there will be minimal noise. no denoise needed! for the dynamic range i used 3 stops of ND filter, bc the sky was blowing out and the rx100v has a built in nd filter that gives you 3 stops of ND and I added the same amount of ND to the a7sii as well using a variable ND filter.

thank you!

thanks for watching

I think miii is the minimum level for the rx100 series these days. mi and mii are missing too much

i had a vintage lens on the a7sii

the lens for the a7sii was a contax zeiss 28mm 2.8. a7sii with a G lens will give you some of the best image quality you will find on a DSLR or Mirrorless camera. however, that combo is like 5k and the rx100v is 1k. it better look better! the point is, is that the rx100v is not 5 times worse and in some ways can be better in terms of size, form factor, and ease of use.

Thank you, yes of course you are absolutely right. A complete different type and different price tag as well obviously, but is was very interesting anyway. If the 4K videos would have looked concerning details like the A7SII and the RX100 V would be able to record more than 8 minutes (see other 4K video tests) before overheating, I would have chosen the RX100 V. I also got to know that the Zeiss lens (for the A7SII) has massive quality problems respectively it's a lottery to get a zeiss lens with good quality. Some people had to exchange the lens three times until they received one with good quality meaning without color fringing etc.. Maybe you were lucky with your lens. :)

Can I please have some help? I've been trying to figure out what to get specifically for RU-vid videos. I've been using 1 g7x mk1 & 3 SJ4000 action cams for about 3-4 years now, and the canon does great in low light, but 1 of my sj4000's broke a few weeks ago. At first I thought I should get an action camera, then point and shoot, then dslr, now camcorder...basically, I have no idea. I would probably need 2 cameras. I have a g7x mk 1, which does really great in my low light setting even with just those 2 lights, BUTTTT, only records video for about 10-15 mins before stopping. The problem is that my setting is virtually pitch black, aside from the 2 Neewer 176 LED lights I use pointed on my drums. ^ I've researched and learned that action cams don't do well in low light and adding more light can even make a bad camera better, so I may be getting 2 more of those Neewer lights and have 1 on each corner of my drum rug. But what about point and shoots? Action Cameras? --------------------------------------------------- My lighting setup/scenario: * Black background all around my walls. * I use 2 Neewer 176 LED lights on myself and my drums with no living room lights on and the Neewers at around 10-20% brightness ^So it's basically pitch black aside from the LED lights. Things I don't care about: 1. Audio quality (I get that edited) 2. Stabilization - they'll be mounted on a tripod or boom mic stand. 3. 4k - though it'd be cool to shoot in that and slow down for super slo-mo, but I think I can do that with 1080, 60fps Things I care about: *Price: Range $300-$500 (I may need 2 cameras, so, yeah) ^^^Though I'm willing to spend a little more on a good DSLR/point and shoot if I have to and possibly just get 1 camera while I continue to use my g7x mk1. 1. Shoots great video quality in a low to no light studio. 2. Has a pretty good color profile in low light. 3. NO Grain/Noise in my low light setting. 4. Adjustable settings (WB, ISO, Exposure, etc) 5. Long record time - at least 45 mins (I don't need 5,6,7+ hours, but at least 45 mins, most likely an hour in 1 video) 6. Great battery life - I don't wanna have to interrupt my drumming to swap out batteries. ***Bonus if it can be plugged in charging while recording. My options: Action cams - DSLR/Point n shoot - Camcorder 1. GoPro Hero 5 Black - not performing well in my studio so far.. 2. Yi Lite - haven't gotten yet 3. Yi-4k - haven't gotten yet 4. SJ7 Star - haven't ordered. 5. Canon EOS M50 6. Canon EOS Rebel T4i 7. Canon EOS Rebel T5i 8. Canon EOS Rebel T6 9. Canon 70D (but pretty expensive for 1 camera) 10. Canon EOS 700D 11. Canon EOS Rebel SL2 12. Panasonic Lumix LX10 13. Panasonic Lumix G7 4k 14. Nikon D3200 24.2 MP 15. Sony 4k FDRAX33 16. Sony Handycam CX405 17. Canon Vixia HF R72 Camcorder I'd really appreciate some help with this. I'm a drummer, not a photographer lol This stuff is confusing. Thanks in advance.

i hear good things about the canon m50. ive honestly never used any of the cameras on your list. what i would do is find a channel that makes .a similar style of video as you and just copy their setup.

yes slog2

good question, and it depends on what your final delivery/purpose is. If you don't mind a little noise or have noise cleaning software I would go up to 12800 in certain situations. Sony cameras in general are incredible in low light. If it was a closeup on someone's face or a dialogue scene probably stick to around 3200 or mayyybe 6400.

Thanks for the fast answer, thats insane. Im torn between the Alpha 6400 and Rx100 iv. I think the rx100 is far more portable and usuable in situations where dslr are not allowed :) @@hidemaxwell

@@vince5474 I actually sold my rx100v after getting my iphone xr. The quality level is too close to have both. For me, I would not spend money on a 1 inch sensor even with all these bells and whistles. I made this video almost 2 years ago and cell phone tech has simply caught up. For me, I would only spend money on apsc and above. I think the 6400 would be a great choice and I think those apsc cameras are small enough with a small lens to go everywhere the rx100 can go. Just my 2 cents.

It only overheats in 4k shooting. It will overheat and shut down sometimes as fast as 15min. If you shoot in 1080 I don't think it will overheat.

Appreciate the love!

TBH I made this video a while back and smart phone tech has really improved since then. The 1 inch sensor in these RX cameras aren’t much better than the latest phones. The only point and shoots I’d consider are the Ricoh GR, the Leica Q or the Fuji x100v.

thanks bro

Listen, I love the look of Fuji for photos. Amazing colors and detail. But for video I just don't think it's a serious platform. I'd love to own a fuji camera for street photography one day but since I make money off video, I'd choose sony, canon, or panasonic for video. Specifically, I don't like how the XE3 has record time limits on almost all resolutions of 10min. That means you can't really use it for interviews. Also, I prefer full frame for video. Just my opinion though!

found: Glittering Lights - Martin Hall

thank you i didn't really know and i pulled it from an online library i dont have access to anymore.

RU-vid vloggers tend to like the canon better but photo/video creators go for the rx100v

Cinema Heist i want to get into vlogging as well, but at the same time i definitely want to create cinematic videos as well. This would do great with both right? :)

To me, the rx100v is much better. Good luck with your content!

Ida Anduyan I have a g7x Mkii and I really love it, stabilization is amazing and once you set the color profile you get really amazing videos. Sony is also fantastic but I got canon because of its price and I don’t regret at all, it’s a super Little camera. This is just my point of view.

Ida Anduyan ATE IDA! MYGAD NICE TO SEE U HERE HAHA

Thanks for watching

Gracias

Cómo sabes que eres su primer sub y cómo ha sabido que hablabas español!!? Jajajaja, muy buen vídeo!

google translate FTW

Hahahaha. Now you have answered me, I take the oportunty to ask about one doubt that has my head running hot. I bought the Lumix g85 a few months ago. I love it, the way it feels, all the custom dials for smooth daily use, the stabilization. But I see these Sony cameras and I don't know why but I see like the quality of the photos has something special that seems better to me, also that portabilty of the RX100 or the a6300 will be awesome. So I don't know if should I sell the g85 and buy one of them or what! D: Have you tested them? Will be awesome to hear your recomendation, thanks a lot!!

G85 vs Rx100 isnt a proper comparison despite the price similarity. rx100 is a point and shoot and only has a 1 inch sensor whereas the g85 has a m4/3 sensor which has more detail to the image. so why does the rx100 have the same price tag? it's bc of the small size and relative features packed inside a tiny body. thats the true value and appeal of the rx100 series. a6300/a6500 is a better comparison. one downside ive heard about the g85 is it has poor autofocus which is unacceptable for vlogging. the a6500 has excellent top of class autofocus. as for the "look" of the diff brands, even though i'm a sony shooter i will say that their color science isn't as good as panasonic or canon. shooting sony is more about the tech inside the camera, the low light, the autofocus etc. in conclusion it comes down to what you want to get out of your camera. what do u use it for? if you are vlogger, i would def consider getting an rx100v or a a6500. however, if you just want a great value camera that makes a nice image and has a lot of features for the price, then just stick with your camera. hope this helps! remember, camera decisions are all subjective, just do your homework, watch reviews, and go with what seems the best for you.

www.amazon.com/Sony-AGR2-Attachment-Grip-Black/dp/B00KOUIBRU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1504719436&sr=8-1&keywords=rx100v+grip

Do you have LR CC? I just updated it to the latest version and it works fine.

No I have V.5. I dont pay mounthly for a software that I already buy once.

thanks for watching

Wayne Louie good question lemme know when you figure it out

yes i used the pilotfly h2

Glittering Lights - Martin Hall :)

No problem. I made the video because I was unsatisfied with the reviews I was seeing!

Cinema Heist yup likewise good i found ur review how about ur thoughts on Panasonic Lumix G7?

Sorry I havent gotten my hands on that camera

Rode ntg2

Glittering Lights - Martin Hall :)

thank you so much :D

No this is in Glendora CA

Up further north, but looks so similar! Now I miss home! Good video by the way!

thanks a lot i appreciate the comment!

Thats a good point. Such a basic thing but very important. Def should have had a physical comparison! Thank you.

the best part of the video

So true.

interesting, are you exposing it 2 stops over?

depends on how much you shoot and if you are shooting video vs stills. but if you are shooting video then def not. I have a couple spare batteries i always keep with the camera.

haha you are right. but i think people people want to see the camera put through its paces. they want to actually see the footage more so my opinion or conclusion.

you got me...

yeah i know but the avg person knows what a dslr is more than a mirrorless camera...

thank you haha

me dont do da gramma

i dont have 300k subs...

Cinema Heist it was probably a glitch, but it definitely said you had 300k before.

thanks for the feedback

this is true, but like i said, this is not a doc camera or an interview camera

I would keep my pausing of interviews to a minimum. With this camera I'd shoot interviews on 1080p only and get 4k broll instead.

You are correct, I just didn't like the title "DSLR or Mirrorless camera"