Can you Make a SELF CHARGING ELECTRIC CAR? 

yet hydrogen completely bypass the second law of thermodynamics... you know a hydrogen torch's heat is based on what its actually touching? swipe the flame by your hand and it barely feels warm, yet turn it to tungsten and it instantly VAPOURIZE'S it.

And yet... think of that energy continuing long after vehicle has stopped through use of magnets. The car gets the rotation started and the magnets go until car is charged through use of a motor controller. This "LAW" of man and old science is now easily beaten by technology combined with materials that produce a force. THIS "LAW of SCIENCE" now upheld to protect all these fuel industries both petro and electric? ( MY UPPERCASE WILL NOW IDENTIFY AS LOWER CASE, IT'S THE SCIENCE, THEY ARE FLUID AND FEEL LIKE LOWER CASE THEREFORE IT IS TRUE ) WHO PAYS FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH? WHO HAS BEEN KNOWN TO COME IN AND DESTROY TECH! MANY OF THE OFFICICIAL "SCIENTISTS" ARE TRULY THE PRIESTS OF BAAL AND WILL LIE FOR QUEEN JEZEBEL. BAT AT THE WET MARKET RING A BELL? YEAH... FUNNY THE BAT QUARTER FROM SOUTH PACIFIC SAMOAN ISLAND WAS RELEASED SAME MONTH COVID CAME TO TOWN... SAME TIME. WATCH EVENT 201... DARE YOU TRAILER, 1ST SEGMENT AND 4TH SEGMENT.

👍🏻

he is laughing at idiots in the most polite way possible

thanks for reminding me I'm wasting my time

Exactly. Any undesired energy output is a loss. For example, on your electric toaster, the coils glow red. You want a toaster to turn electricity into heat to toast your bread, but some of the electricity is wasted being turned into red light. The noise your internal combustion engine makes as a result of the way it works is also a waste of energy. Though you may actually like the sound, it takes energy to produce sound, and thus some of the energy in your gasoline goes into making the sounds rather than moving your car forward.

Also, you can't even hear it but pushing air around, or deforming the tyre consumes substantial energy too! You can hear the noise of the tyres rolling, but not all the energy is converted to noise, not even all the noise is audible to us!

Me too

I have an idea how it can be done where it is not perpetual motion, but I'm interested in hearing/learning how your friend has it set up.

Exactly, what he and most of the other commentators don’t understand is that the energy is coming from outside of the system (car). As long as you’re producing more energy than it takes to power the weight you’re pushing you’re going to be at a net positive when it comes to loss/gain.

@johnnytheprick Glad someone one said it... its not about perpetual motion, its about electric loss reduction or replenishment, and to some effect EV markers do this today with regenerative braking, I am sure the heat is a big factor, and dimensioning returns also, but the biggest has to be wight and cost for EV manufactures. Anyway... I would not say this is a fools errand, as if possible would allow for smaller batter packs, longer range, and lighter cars... and less battery waste... worth exploring along side greener energy production.

There is nothing being "created". Wind and solar are being converted into another form of energy. There's a huge difference between creation and conversion. This youtuber has a misunderstanding of what perpetual motion is. In order to have the conditions for perpetual motion it must be a closed system. Neither solar nor wind are a closed system. It doesn't matter if they are in motion or stationary.

I was thinking the same thing but using fans on the vehicle to extend the battery life

@neophiliac Wouldn't this make sense in a semi with the many wheels? Why not have a reserve battery system that is recharged vis the wheels and can be accessed when the main system is low?

@neophiliac Makes sense. No free ride. I am sure braking doesn't transmit all that much energy either.

Hahahaha omg lmao

@@thurgogopro5338 yes this is what is thought as well

I was thinking like at least eight batteries really good ones have a switch to use four of them and then the switch to use the other one and use the other four batteries while the other one is getting charged by the air when

The number of batteries is irrelevant to this still being a perpetual motion scheme. No number of discrete batteries can work around nature’s limitation here

J P the only limitation is in your brain buddy!! The powers that be don't want free energy!!

So much better if you have a spare battery being charged while the car is running for a continuous distant journey.

Clear understanding with slow speed speaking, that's well explanation

Range extender is totally do-able ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LmLCKjZbGJQ.html

+jehugarcia I'm definitely interested in the building my own electric vehicle, soon as my financial status is better lol I always seek out your videos for insight! Great information and down to earth explanations.

i feel like the only time it would be useful is when it is coasting. it would be much better to learn how to hypermile. learn when to star coasting when you are coming to a stop, get the best aerodynamic and lightweight car. solar panels might be the most useful.

if the car uses two wheels to move forward while the other two wheels as generators instead of just spinning without purpose, the vehicle will move for a longer range.

+Samer Abbas incorrect, the generating wheels require energy to spin, usually 10+% more than they put out to the battery, Generator are really energy converters, they convert mechanical energy into electrical energy, so if you would to do what you suggest you would actually get less range

👍

Man will never fly

You will never fully grasp physics. Even the Wright Brothers bowed to physics. Solar collectors - more weight/more wear on suspension (heat), more drag, more rolling resistance (tire flexation heat). Wind generators truly will only benefit the car when the car is still and there is a strong steady wind. Otherwise you're consuming energy pushing the wind generator through the air. Wind generator - wire resistance inside (heat/energy loss), mechanical friction (heat, sound, vibration/energy loss). We're working on super conduction that doesn't require refrigeration and doesn't cost more than its benefit. That'll happen, in time. If you like arguing about future technology, you might want to look into the Solar Roadway issue. Many say it will never happen. It sorta depends on whether we're talking about the roadway as originally imagined, or one toned down to more doable mass production. Already, a chuck of old Route 66 is being modified for some kind of solar energy collection. We're making scientific and technological breakthroughs all the time. If we could have totally knocked out energy conversion inefficiency we would have. There are 'perpetual motion' groups online for folks just like you. One wonders where you find the time, being so wrapped up in conspiracy theories. ;) Good journey.

Yeah, completely ignore my message and information.

Heavy sigh. Good luck.

I does charge but it also slows down the car. When you send the energy to the batteries, the wheels become draggy like you are hitting the brakes and the car quickly comes to a stop.

spot on great job

so explain this- You pulse a[1] coil in a motor , it produces a force Due to the Energy applied and of-course it pushes off. Its only one pulse so it does only so much work for that pulse. But then it spins down to zero motion. where is the extra motion which is not influenced by the pulse comes from what do you call it. if you opt out the standard bearings and put hi-eff bearings which by the way weigh less it spins down even longer. So you call it momentum right?! where did that come from and why cant that be used to create needed energy.

All of that motion is provided by the initial energy. If you use bearings with less friction, the spin down lasts longer because more of the energy is going into motion and less into friction (heat) than with the worse bearings. The problem with your question is that you said "the extra motion which is not influenced by the pulse" but that is not true. All of the motion comes from the pulse. Think about throwing a baseball. You only apply energy to the baseball when the ball is touching your hand, but that doesn't mean that it's continued motion through the air is magic free energy.

i thought you would say that. but if you calculate the number of turns the motor made and calculate lets say the energy captured, if the motor acted as a generator on one turn and multiply it by the number of turns you will certainly get more out than in . If your ball hit the ring and bounced out of the court and rolled down the road, you certainly will be blamed for where the ball ended but the fore from you ended when it hit the ring who really is to blame for where it is now[down the road rolling] its not Your energy trying to come to an equilibrium. This is the point i am making use energy out there available so you dont have to input it all to accomplish work needed.

that is the point i am making ...we take for granted the "down hill situations" which can help equalize a system. Take humans, they are not perpetual because they were not built for this purpose but still are able to mimic these systems for a period. They though are some birds that stay in flight for months at a time before touching ground...granted they do hit water for food , still they spend weeks in flight using different mechanism to save energy. We mostly concentrate on producing energy and using it efficiently, but "down hill" situations are seldom tapped which is referred to as free energy. Its free in that we did not produce it as part of our power source system but its there so why ignore it if we have net losses to our system. This is what i was encouraging the folks to do on the VW.

+Gabi Done That would work to re generate some energy. The bigger the motor/alternator the more energy you can recuperate. My motor puts out around 200 Amps back into the battery when i break

How much of a range increase (if any) would you get with the setup Gabi Done is talking about?

This is essentially swapping regen from the motors to a different 'motor in reverse'. Why increase the complexity for such limited generation, when the motors can also act as brakes due to their size? I can't imagine an alternator would be much more efficient than the current system, especially not enough to add the complexity and remove the advantages.

It won't work, the motor driving the car has to use more energy to turn the generator than you get back so you always lose out overall.

Man cant fly... The world is flat.. the sun revolves around the earth... All these things brought to you by men that thought they knew every thing...

The conservation of energy is very certain. You can't get more energy out of a system then you put in. Also, as far as science goes, there are some things that are beyond resonable doubt. For example we know more about evolution than we know about gravity and the law of conservation of energy is solid. We do not know everything - that much we do know. I suggest you start reading some popular science and you'll quickly find where we know there are gaps in our knowledge and how everything we do know is always open to question BUT it requires extraordinary evidence to support extraordinary claims. Science never has said that man cannot fly or that the earth revovlves around the sun. Currently, for example, we don't exactly know why gravity works. We know what it does etc but we can't explain what causes it in detail. This does not mean Einstain and Newton were wrong!

david quintana All those things you listed also follow the laws of physics and so far in all the millions upon millions of careers that have existed in any scientific field nobody has ever broken the physical properties of the universe... It is what it is man, if you don't believe it go back to school so you will understand why you are coming off as scientifically illiterate....

Its for americans I think. THats why he talks so slow :P

Daëmon American laboratories and universities lead the world in technological advancements.... Why is everyone so jealous of America?

Gods Country Bumpkin look up the Dunning Kruger effect

Will do, does it mention aerodynamics and channelled air flow via vortices? Similar to how water jets produce a solid stream of water but slightly different because the liquid is a gas and has far easier means of flow rate. That's what's good about this bus, the front is as near as makes no difference square, and with putting direct channels straight through the vehicle is will aide in reducing that aerodynamic drag because of course it's no longer hitting a none moveable driving face so it would do 2 things, aide in charging and provide less aerodynamic drag which in turn will increase battery life because it's not working as hard to push through the air. Just image the front of the bus is a grid and with each section you open is a section that's having its aerodynamic drag reduced by at least a third. Sorry I've not educated myself of the effects you've mentioned prior to replying, just thought I'd make it clear as to what it was I meant and Yes I fully understand that the weight of the vehicle will change but that's disputable as to how much it would increase or decrease with the composite materials available for use such as S-glass fibreglass. Much more cost effective than carbon fibre and because it's used mostly to provide ducting it could work to be close to equal weight, personally I think the vehicle would benefit from that as well as flatflooring it like a race car. It's a good vehicle for the task in hand but there's some creative ways that wasted energy can be exploited. Just got some things to take care of but when I have I'll look into the Dunning Kruger effect. Thanks bud have a good day if I don't get chance to thank you later. Be a gent and do me a huge huge favour it won't cost you anything other than time to look into it, Google Boeing Direct Energy Systems. It's got absolutely zero to do with what we're talking about I just wanted to make you and others aware of this over forty year old technology that proves all kinetic weapons such as bombs and missiles have been obsolete that entire time and still are to this day. The only reason I bring such things up is because my great grandparents and millions of others fought and died to protect all of us from tyrannical extortionists hell bent on financial enslaving us all but the information I've requested you look into proves that over the past forty years governments throughout the world have been utilising public ignorance of existing technologies to extort trillions of dollars from the global population. In short we're all being robbed blind and have been for over forty years, it's not a behaviour I am willing to allow to be passed down to mine or anyone else's children. None of us deserve to be extorted just because we want a peaceful life free from violence but that's exactly the ones we've all been thrust into. Again have a good day and please do be as forthright and courageous as our great grandparents who were fighting a world war to stop what's occurring today. Thanks greatly for your time.

Checked the effect and it's vague to be blunt as it in no way explores anything of what I've mentioned and factually when you have less surface area driving through the air then it will take less energy to push it through said air. It seems as though you've misinterpreted what the Dunning Kruger effect is and how it's not applicable to this particular instance as nothing I've mentioned has been over assessed. With the correct ducting to brushless turbines factually that would mean a lower impact on the surrounding air and then there's static charging just like wind turbines do throughout the world.

I know how to make a fully functional self charging car that never needs to be refills or charged

amazing patience thanks i'll refer my friends who ask the same here from now on

They will claim added weight of batteries along with added weight of such mechanisms charging said batteries. They will ignore that that they used a brick for their example.

I was thinking this exact thing.even if not a full sized battery as the main but a half size.

Winner of a video, I've been looking for "free electric guitar wallpaper" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Ever heard of - Diyarah Electric Freedomify - (do a google search ) ? Ive heard some awesome things about it and my mate got amazing results with it.

I saw a road trip once where someone did that, put a generator in a caboose / trailer and charged a battery to reduce downtime. The problem is that it takes a large 8+ kw generator not a small honda suitcase generator , so you use a lot of gasoline, but to get your electric car project 3000mi across the us as quickly as possible you could do it. But these days our charging infrastructure is muuuuuch better than it was about 15 years ago when I saw that take place so it's sorta silly now.

People have thick heads

+jehugarcia although i knew of the laws of thermo and why a moving car generating energy will be a perpetual motion machine, I enjoyed your calm explanation. I guess one thing that should be added that some vehicles do regenerate *some* energy when they brake, those efforts are more toward minimizing energy losses that way rather than actually generating energy more that or equal to what it'd take to run the car.

screenflicker1 Yup, My car regenerates.

@@jehugarcia Nope, it is either ignorance or skepticism.

+rstevewarmorycom / sorry i seen this after my Quest above ,Turbine aside then,what about a wellbalanced,low-friction 5th Wheel dragging behind running a 100 Watt Alternator,easiest,lightest Gearing,i can`t understand that this not feeds at least a Part of the used Power back ? Thanks and sorry,Fatso

+Fatso Currywurst No. That whole concept of "self-charging" is flawed. ANY additional load causes your engine to run harder, burn more fuel, and anything you get back is less than that additional fuel would do. So it's even MORE loss than not doing it. It's the same as when we use an alternator in a car to charge the battery, all we're doing is loading down the engine to get a smaller amount of electricity.

You get part of the power back but not as much as you used in the first place. If you're generating 100W from the generator then your traction motor needs to put out more than 100W to compensate for the added load, so you're always going to lose power.

Lew tronics No, you can't get back what you used. Whatever you get results in slowing of the car. You can't get something for nothing. And in the conversion of motion to electrical energy to motion you lose even more to heat in the conversion. No net gain at all, only loss.

No. You lose more that way. If you put the power into kinetic energy you would store it better and keep moving. Trying to get energy from your kinetic energy changes its form, and loses a lot to heat. Carrying more fuel or batteries would get you more motion.

100% wrong, You would add complexity and inefiency to to the system guaranteeing shorter range and performance

People only learn what matters to them in real life or they are passionate about. That's why a public school system is a waste of time. You on the other hand are probably just an ignorant physics nutter who prides yourself on remembering knowledge you care about.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UQfRdl3GTw4.html

They should have had my physics teacher he always made physics fun. One thing he stressed you cannot get something for nothing.

He appeared to care enough about the topic to pay attention in physics class. Especially the first law of thermodynamics. Good reading brought to us by a guy named Isaac Newton in the 1600's

@@parmachine470 the question was can a car recharge it self, the answer is NO. You cannot get something for nothing, but you can obtain wasted power like downhill and braking. You can make a solar car that can run off the sun at about 35 to 40 mph top speed. We used to do the motor- generator experiment and eventually the motor stops tuning. If any of these discoveries were true, someone out there would have marketed it. If not mass production at least in the classified market. We were better off in the late 70's and early 80's when most small cars got over 40 mpg on hwy driving. Everyone wants cars that break the speed limit. Most states have a 70 mph speed limit. All my 4 cylinder cars could do 80 with no problem.

Not everyone is a physics nut, derp.

Diesel Electric Locomotives ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-49rH3buD0bc.html

Yeah, and then when VW used the exhaust as the heat source everyone laughs saying how stupid it is. I would hope not very many people would actually ask this question. I mean, do people actually believe there is some secret or conspiracy regarding perpetual motion machines? I wonder if those people were listening in their high school physics class. Oh wait! It isn't required. I can understand asking why not have solar panels, but this is rather silly.

Silly - agreed Common - Very common Best part is 50% of the time its a suggestion. "Here is what you have to do, Generator on each wheel! It charges while you drive! you get me? I'm a genius!"

Go look up fuel vaporizers on here.

how does the battery in any car get charged, not by a generator but by an alternator? I don't know talk tome like a three year old and make me understand how the battery in your car gets charged while you drive...

The 12 volt starting battery in any ice car only expends energy while starting the engine or running the fans or radio. So after the engine starts the engine spins an accessory called an "alternator". This device creates an a.c. voltage that is rectified(converted to D.C)and regulated to provide a charging current into the starter battery. It is enough to keep the battery topped up and run the cars electronics and ignition.There is plenty of energy available from burning fuel: Physics 101: Energy only changes form it can't be created or destroyed . The car is a closed system energy wise: Gasoline has a certain chemical energy stored in the molecule bonds. Gasoline is the energy input to the system.Burning (combusting) the gasoline with oxygen releases this energy, creating heat and rapidly expanding gases. These expanding gases push on the cylinder and pistons driving them down turning the crank shaft.In a 4 stroke engine after the piston reaches bottom it returns upward pushing the burnt fuel charge and excess heat out of the exhaust valve into the exhaust system; Unused heat is also carried away by the coolant system and dumped overboard into the air stream by the radiator. Typically only 15-20%of all the energy released by combustion is used to move the car forward. The other 80-85% is thrown away through the exhaust and coolant systems. Electric motors are typically 90-95% efficient. Of All the energy put into the motor drive 90-95% is used to move the car forward; little is lost to heat;friction and air resistance (drag or aerodynamics.)So the electric is magnitudes more efficient. Now: If you put 100 kilowatts of pure electrical energy into moving the car and you attach generators to the wheels( like regenerative braking does) you remove energy stored in the mass of the car ( momentum); It slows down. eventually it would stop. all the energy goingi nto the car comesfrom and is is 100%stored in the battery. You take 100% from the battery turn 90 % into momentum; put (say)10% of that back into the battery from your generator; now you are at %10 charge. Put that into the motor; that 10% become 9%(90% efficiency remember ) into momentum. Take 10% out of momentum again.. .9% goes into the battery...... You see where this is going: nothing is free.

How?

I'm just guessing but i imagine the amount of heat it would take to be substantial would overheat the system.

+jonathan berg I think they teach it, students just not learning

+jehugarcia Thanks for the reply, I am really enjoying watching your videos however they all seem a bit piecemeal. Would you please do an overarching video explaining the whole process of creating your own electric car? For example , basic principals, the basic components and a few common issues/problems faced by someone building your own electric car.

America is not filled with idiots it just seems idiots are the loudest

Wish physics was implanted into toddlers minds through programs like sesame Street.. really watered down teachings. Then as they grow older..the information starts to become more relevant.

@@jehugarcia Public schools are indoctrination camps. People only really learn what is relevant to them or they are passionate about.

That is exactly the solution employed by electric trains (and trams): the overhead cable running above the tracks works in exactly the same way as a really really long extension cord!

yes if you want to gain 1 mile per hour of sun

Funnily there is a cement mining company doing almost this in Switzerland - it picks up cement at the mine and drives down the hill to the depot. The regen driving downhill with 70 tonnes of cement (120 tonnes gross) generates more electricity than it uses driving back uphill empty (50 tonnes). They feed this extra 10kWh per trip back into the grid.

@@morosis82 hey man is it possible to send me the link please?

@@dragan3290 arstechnica.com/cars/2017/09/this-cement-quarry-dump-truck-will-be-the-worlds-biggest-electric-vehicle/

Do they expend energy getting the raw materials for the cement to the top of the mountain or does it appear there magically?

BigCooter, me dear old departed pop told me to increase gas mileage by putting big tires on the back of your car so you are always going down hill.😉

Or overestimate the age of the audience? :)

Exactly

+gen81465 NO if it ran @ 25% efficiency it would decrease your range by 75% it would have to run at 125% to gain 25% over unity

Ok, I'm not a scientist, so please bear with me on this. I don't believe I'm trying to get "over unity"; I'm thinking that since the wind coming into the machine is basically free (since it's hitting the vehicle in any case), wouldn't the fact that the device would be generating "some" usable electric current, that it would be considered a positive efficiency? I'm thinking of the setup being used to supplement the normal regenerative processes; not to completely recharge the system. What if the generator were charging a 2nd battery set? Couldn't you then just switch over from one battery bank to another as needed? Thanks for your positive conversation, George.

"the wind coming into the machine is basically free" its not free, you have to use energy to move the car thru the air and any drag you add you rob the energy available to move the car forward. the only energy available to run your generator is in the cars battery, if you use up 4 units of energy to put one back into the battery you are at a 3 unit deficit, so your car will have less range. it doesnt matter if it goes to one battery or a second one. your car will go farther the less generators it has to power

Also: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2WeqnD2HzS4.html

Thanks for the info. I really didn't consider the drag coefficient changes. Oh well, at least the idea didn't cost me much energy. :)

johnstarr2001 and also for *MAXIMUM EFFICIENCY*

It will actually reduce range

They would not extend the range. Regenerative braking does add range, but any other attempt to take energy out of the kinetic energy of the car, would produce less energy than that is lost. And anyway, even regenerative braking is far less efficient than trying to drive in a way that little or no braking is necessary. Unless perhaps going downhill.

Indeed, the only ways that you could increase range is by harvesting external energy without creating an equal drag on the car moving through the air. As the drag increases exponentially with speed, at high speeds even a sail harvesting side/tail wind would have a net negative effect. The only real way is with solar, as they can be integrated such that they don't affect the aerodynamics, but panels on a car will never generate enough to make it worthwhile cost wise. Imagine a Tesla, for example, with a 500km range. You drive at 100kph, therefore you have 5 hours of driving with that solar panel. You could probably fit something like 500W of solar panels on the car. So in 5 hours of driving, you generate a maximum of 2.5kWh of extra energy, assuming it's sunny and you aren't driving through trees/buildings. That will take you around about 10km in said Tesla. Not really worth it, IMHO.

yeah, batteries charge slow, caps would do it better

+DIRTDIVER882 no

+jehugarcia oh. was just curious. I saw a video where the guy had a Ford ev I believe and he said his 11 yr old came up with the idea the plug the car into itself. obviously it was unsightly having the cord running out of the window into the socket lol. but ik know u cannot believe everything u see on the inner webs. thank utho.i do appreciate it. I was weighing my options as far as buying clean diesel vselectric vs hybrid.either way I am definitely getting away from gasoline vehicles altogether.

@@DIRTDIVER882 in effect.. you're creating an unnecessary circuit which becomes parasitic to the system. In other words it'll unnecessarily eat power.

+Mike M yes it would work, but it would be less efficient than just connecting the 2 batteries together charging them at home from the wall and driving the car, All that extra equipment and all its losses would make you loose range.

+Gunzee ac motors don't have polarity like you describe but they become generators instantly as soon as energy stops flowing into them, it's called regenerative breaking and my bus has it

Sorry 1 Engine with 2 Energy Source working alternately

No. If there was any way to achieve perpetual motion every car on Earth would already have it. Back to school with you!

I don't care what the fuck they say we can or can't do, I ain't looking for perpetual motion. My car's battery get's charged while the vehicle is moving forward; diesel electric trains motors are energized by a diesel engine tuning an electric generator that supply's power to electric motors turning the wheels. You're telling me that some electrical energy cannot be preserved to charge batteries that can supplement or take the place of the electric motor, like a hybrid diesel electric motor battery powered train, with everything worked out to some balance of forces and weights of those devices fine tuned to maximum efficiency? And like most fools you explain without ever trying to build something yourself or point to others, with the appropriate links, who have directly tried to build such a device itself. Prove just how inefficient it would be by having some build "challenge" with others trying to build such devices. Dammit, a house uses an diesel or gas motor to supply energy to an electrical motor, which in turn is used to run a house which uses electricity to perform all kinds of challenges including charging batteries, if you need to do so. Now take that energy to run appliances and dedicate that energy mostly to charging batteries and put a small house on wheels with electrical motors to turn those wheels. Dammit do it stop bitchen about how it can be done with your obvious delusion to a system that isn't complete 5:06. And dammit I don't have the mechanical aptitude to do it myself, but theirs plenty out their who do. You have 2 parts to your incomplete system. There's a minimum of 3 to 4 parts needed to create a dynamo system. You just have some dumb closed loop feed back system, doomed for failure. Once again it's not perpetual motion that's being looked for, just a range extender fool.