Can nobody else give Aman some serious love for playing those endgames so flawlessly?? (ok sure he has occasional blunder but he's HUMAN) Holy crap. And flagging a computer...woah.
@@jamesknapp64 how are they cheating though? Like 0.3-0.7s is enough to check ur engine and then play? I don't get how there can be bullet cheaters. Rapid and blitz I can understand
It is crazy to see how well a gm plays against a bot, even though it must have been incredibly frustrating it does reflect how great of a player you are
@@somen33t many people i heard saying that they train ai s only using a real human a image...the "cheaters" are usualy real persons using a engine to play and some like this one here play same opaning cause they can learn it better and have more fun playing all the sides while a true ai like "amen" that s just using a human avatar will allways be able to pick up since its powered up more so understand faster were to drag your game so they win.that s why this game was played like that from my point of view. that and i bet you none wanna w8 5 min to have a chess oponent his level so normaly they would have ton of bots just to make sure the players don t go to the competition.
@@peterpham1887 I don't know what you mean by "firewall" because that is something that does not affect cheating at all. Firewalls are for blocking certain inbound and outbound network traffic. Assuming you mean chess.com client sided anticheat, to my knowledge there isn't any. I was able to open up inspect element and read the board position manually pretty easily, and when I was also able to read the move I played in the network traffic viewer. It wouldn't be too hard to write a chrome extension that looks at the position, evaluates the best move, then sends that move to chess.com. In fact, it would be entirely possible, and not even that difficult, to completely cut out chrome and just play the entire game through https requests
@@cz19856 maybe he was Just sending the packets himself as If he had moved the piece, or maybe he Just had some software which immediately moved the mouse and clicked at the right time depending on the move the engine found
i mean, the engine is significantly worse if it needs to play really fast, for now, humans can have an advantage since we (i mean not "we" but the strong GMs) know opening theory and we don't have to spend time thinking for the perfect opening, and also we can play moves more deep from a positional stand point knowing the endgame would be favorable, an engine only think a couple of moves ahead with this speed, also it depends on the cheater's computer processing capacity and which software he is using. Still impressive, since the engine made almost to the 3000 rating. I would say that 10 years in the future, with more efficient computers, a bot like this would be definitely unbeatable
The cheaters set their engine to a very low depth for bullet. If any higher than a depth of like 5, it would be too slow. Not that it’s isn’t impressive of him though
@@SelmirAljic it depends on the engine he is using, but yeah, there are engines with opening database and even table base for endgames, it's hard to tell if this is the case since idk shit about softwares to cheat, only about chess engines in general
@@bibek12332Aman was literally just playing a bot. The whole process was completely automated, hence why it always played the exact same lines and also why it always took 0.3 seconds to play each move.
He was blundering a few moves here and there, probably one of those bots were you can manually play a dubious move or two and then switch back to the engine. It might be a bot equivalent to stockfish level 1 in lichess which isnt objectively very strong but is near impossible to beat in ultra bullet. Tang got wrecked against level 1 but managed to beat level 8 much easily.
@@shader6539 No it will follow the same moves, however you will have to memorize an extensive endgame in like 5 ultra bullet games, which is impossible even for a GM
@@JoeARedHawk275 its not a bot, its not programmed to follow the same moves. its an engine, its programmed and designed to play the best move every move. it's just on low settings here to be able to play bullet. Aman got lucky that it played the same game twice
19:00 Aman crushing engine in bishop endgame is amazing. If they could merge bishop pair Eric's power with one bishop endgame Aman has, we could see someone who can even draw with Magnus :)
Riiiight. Even GM's have a moment where move time varies, because no game is scripted by preparation to the end, and deciding which plan to go for sometimes requires a moment of thought. But moves playing the same line at the same intervals? Aman and Eric are pretty good, but they, and even their nemesises Hikaru and Magnus take moments to think on occasion.
I'm new to chess, and I don't understand how he could have cheated. His pre moves were fast. It's not like he would have time to analyze each move. Why did his account get shut down?
Stockfish can calculate 3 sec, 5 sec, 20 sec or 0,2 sec. It's program, you can change the settings and the depth of the calculations. Less calculation time - worse play.
@@patrickedwards2078 theres always a report button, i always get updated from chess.com whenever someone got banned i played against even if i haven't reported someone they analyze games
@@imbanana the amounts of cheaters you run into on chess.com compared to lichess is considerably more. Chess.com is more concerned with muting and banning people who say mean things more than going after cheaters. I have a friend who has cheated on chess.com since 2019 with no bans. It's not hard to do on chess.com where on lichess he was banned pretty quick.
@@KironKabir bullshit...even if it's true, i'd say 3/4 of the fuckin chess.com is cheating. if you can't play chess and love the game why even bother cheating phhh
The point is, in time, at all time controls technology will eventually surpass humans. Catching cheaters will at some point be a greater challenge, but that technology to catch them should get better too. In the end, the cheaters will still be found out.
they know they will never be able to achieve what they want and so they use the energy that is the disappointment of their own insufficiency to bring others down. to them, bringing someone else down feels the same as elevating themselves because at least they are level with you. little do they know that they will always be insufficient little cowards who will never amount to anything and that this "leveling" is really just a massive (and temporary) delusion designed to help them forget about how useless and impotent they are as a human being
@@circleviii1801 It was a figure of speech mate & I really don't need lessons on human behaviour nor comprehension. But thank you. I genuinely appreciate the 'help.' it's the thought that counts 😊
@@josephsalmonte4995 imagine being so arrogant and self centered that you think a youtube comment is directed at you, and that I am trying to "help" you... It's there for everyone to see you dolt, not just you
I'm just curious how these cheaters play so fast? Is it some kind of engine browser plug in? Such speed doesn't allow for manual inputting of opponent's moves... anyone know?
automatic, a player wouldn't bother playing 3h with the same guy and losing systematically (since at the end he learned all the lines the bot play and could easily farm elo buy just repeating until timeout by his opponent, the engine needs a little time for calculations and this is why his actions seems instantanious, but it's still possible to out-time it
@@bourhinorc1421 By stating that a cheater can "learn all the lines the bot [would]play" you loose all credibility as it becomes clearly obvious you don't understand nor play chess at any level above begginer. Why you would attempt to answer my qestion with ignorant speculation is beyond me.
@@jajajijijajajijijaja4928 funny can also mean weird but i agree that the choice of words was not optimal. instead one could say: it is indicative for a cheater how he always takes the same amount of time.
