@@ekie7473 If it were classical, I would agree but the chess in chess boxing isn't classical. These days, Hikaru and Magnus are close to an even match in any form of "speed chess", as seen by the speed chess championship. Not sure about the boxing part though.
No bullshit intro, no beating around the bush with a hype voice like "OK GuYS now We are gonna talk about whats happening" then proceed to talk about everything we all know to increase video length. Straight to the point. Good Job. I subscribed
I was really interested in Hikaru and Magnus. I watched a lot of the last big tournament thing. Now I don't like Magnus or Hikaru. Therefore, I've lost my interest in professional chess. #hansdidnothaveavirbatingbuttplug
Han's response strongly suggests that he is full of crap. People respond like this either when the proof is absolutely clear or when they have no explanation. And, since it's not clear, Hans apparently does not have a good explanation. He responded the same way when initially asked about the cheating scandal. He said, "His chess speaks for itself." It didn't.
Whats interesting is how the hell did Eric Hansen/ Chessbrah managed to evade Han's lawsuit. After all, they were the ones who started the anal-bead theory in their streams.
@@rayscheelhaase4733 He is counting his lucky stars. He already threw HIkaru under the bus after learning about the suit by saying HIkaru has tried to get players banned from tournaments in the past so he was not surprised by his actions....LMAO. Wouldn't be surprised if he is called to testify for the plaintiffs. I could also see HIkaru end up testifying against Magnus. hahah It will be a wild circus if it goes to court. Personally I don't give a crap about cheesy com, hikaru or magnus so I welcome the entertainment and dirty laundry it will bring out.
1) chessbrahs don't have enough money, 2) bringing up the anal bead thing is so zany it increases the likelihood of the case being dismissed, 3) chessbrahs did nothing illegal (same as Hiki and Magnus)
@@ulisesmora1282 What are you both on? I have watched almost all the hikaru videos on the topic. Hikaru has nowhere accused Hans of deliberate cheating. His videos only ever contained wishy washy phrases like "could be/may be/suspicious" etc. No jury in their right mind will convict him.
@@cooloutac I would like to know those lawyers so that I can see them when they have eggs on their faces when Hans' either gets away with nothing or gets slapped with punishment for frivolous lawsuit.
100% a SLAPP Lawsuit by Niemann. Even with elementary level knowledge of law, you would know none of these charges are going to amount to anything. Even if any of the accused said that Hans Niemann did for sure cheat without proof, there still needs to be proof that they said this KNOWING it to be false. So not only do they have to outright say he cheated as fact, Hans team would also need to prove that the accused KNEW he wasn’t actually a cheater. Considering there is no currently known meaningful relationship with Hans and the accused to suspect malicious intent and the fact Hans has already admitted to cheating before, there would be no reason a judge would find any of them guilty for defamation.
I think we need to start punishing the lawyers of the SLAPP cases to prevent such frivolous cases from happening. I am pretty sure now that Neiman's lawyers are just milking him dry on a useless case. Anyone with half a brain can see how stupid this lawsuit is even if Hans' grievances are legitimate
The lawsuit is more about Niemann's futures earnings being damaged by actions and speech of Carlsen and Nakamura. It's not so much about whether Niemann actually cheated or not. If the lawsuit goes to trial (which it probably won't), the focus will NOT be on proving whether Niemann cheated or not over-the-board (as opposed to online, which he did, by his own admission). It will be about proving whether Niemann's career was damaged by their actions.
@@potzysk2 Yes, OP already mentioned Hans admitted to cheating. This is why he is saying the lawsuit will have no merit because he is a proven cheater(among other things). Someone can’t be held liable for monetary damages when you actually did those things. Simply bringing up potentially harmful (but true) things about someone to the public’s attention is not defamation at all. This is a complete joke of a case.
@@1allstarman That's actually not true. The plaintiff doesn't win by default, they would need to prove their case. You're just making it significantly easier for them by not providing a defense.
@@1allstarman That's not how the burden of proof works. This guy is going to be humiliated on the same level as Amber Heard. He admitted to cheating, so Carlsen had a right to be suspicious.
Thanks for the update Epic. I'm pretty sure the Court will dismiss the action against Hikaru, and probably Rensch/Chesscom. Magnus is the only one in jeopardy, and even that's a bit of a stretch. Everyone's hoping Hans plays Magnus and/or Hikaru next week; if so, they could be the most watched matches in chess history.
Some Lawyers like Pasha Law PC on youtube says Hikaru has the most to fear. Noone knows what a judge will do, And Case Precedent in Missouri, Legal Vignettes on youtube said they have cited California pecendents, meaning if it was on the internet HIkaru doesn't have to be in the state as long as Hans was and as long as they consider it defamation. I have a feeling these guys are all gonna scramble to settle out of court. Hans doesn't even have to pay his lawyers...
@@cooloutac I personally would like to see it settled out of Court because a trial could get very ugly. From what I understand though is that Chesscom make a point of never settling, and after reading Hikaru's and Carlsen's defences they seem determined to not settle either. Time will tell, I guess.
@@seanc5861 Well that was wat GM Finegold said about chesscom. but who knows. Their actions leading up to this already shows they are batshit crazy so I wouldn't be surprised if they refuse to settle lol. And I agree it wouldn't be in their best interests at all.
@@seanc5861 Honestly I don't see how Hans ever wins any claim. The truth is an unbreakable defence for defamation and Hans has repeatedly admitted to cheating in the past - that makes any claim that he is a cheater provably true. I don't want to see this get settled because I think it is a blatant cashgrab by Hans and I want to see it backfire massively.
I gotta disagree, I think Hikaru has a lot more to worry about. Magnus kept his mouth shut pretty much the whole time, while it was Hikaru who kept talking about it on stream. There’s almost nothing Magnus could’ve said that was defamatory because he didn’t say anything, while it’s entirely possible that Hikaru may have crossed that line a couple times during various live streams.
Consequence of the lawsuit. His lawyers would (very strongly) advise him to participate until the legal dispute is resolved. Edit: Also, he literally can't comment on it for the same reason. That's why it's potentially a SLAPP.
@@marciusnhasty which is why it's crazy that he made that asinine public statement literally sinking himself and exposing himself to the world as the greatest sore loser in sports history. Not that Society thinks any differently of chess players regardless. Lmao.
Cheating is much harder in blitz. If you see some of the banter blitz clips online where the player the GM is facing is obviously using stockfish you'll see them slow down when a human wouldn't and they end up losing on time.
@@cooloutac Agreed, if anything, Hikaru and other popular chess personalities should just own up to Magnus being a sore loser and that could be some minor justice for Hans.
@@zanierrules some like GM finegold and some of the chess Dojo guys did. But it seems Danny Rench just has oo much influence over them and eventually silenced them all. Finegold even admitted to getting a call from him before he just totally zipped his mouth up on the issue. Its all so sad.
Indeed, and it should be no surprise that Hikaru’s defense put lack of personal jurisdiction in the motion to dismiss, because it’s a no-brainer from a legal standpoint. The lawsuit was insanely flimsy in the first place, ESPECIALLY for trying to bring in Hikaru as a defendant in a Missouri case 😅
That anti slapp counter suit was a good move. If the courts support Hans in this then it forces him to push through with his suit and prove he’s serious and not just leveraging the threat of court to silence opponents.
Not really. Hans has already admitted he has cheated, therefore could be called a cheater. I have no doubt he has cheated in live tournaments. There is strong evidence he cheated in at least 100 online matches. He has nowhere near the gifts Magnus has.
@@ThenVersusNow_ Thankfully, that is not the way courts make their decisions - You may "have no doubt", but it has yet to be proven. Your "strong evidence" is also nothing but statistical probability, which has yet to be seen how much said evidence is weighted in a court of law, not to mention, it holds no baring on the actual articles of the present suit. Finally, not having the gifts of Magnus... bro, for one, no one does, so it seems a pretty empty statement, and for two, the amount Hans has accomplished in such little time clearly demonstrates an immense talent. Did I say he didn't cheat? No. Does the question of whether or not he cheated change in any way the fact that he is consistently beating some of the best players in the world now and very obviously a beast a chess - not in the slightest.
@@anthonyrun He admitted to cheating already so yes he can be called a cheater. His coach admitted to cheating in chess for money using one of his students and a chess software (look it up). A basic understanding of statistics shows it not humanly possible at this time. The probability is akin to being struck by lightning twice. It can be said beyond a reasonable doubt he cheated in at least 100 games online during the last 3 years.
@@anthonyrun What I am saying is someone who was found to cheat in over 100 online games, recently, should never be allowed to play in live chess tournaments. Chess is very prestigious and if you want to cheat and defraud people, don't expect anyone to ever believe you. Humans have the ability to cheat undetected in live chess, that is fact. This is more about the future of chess than it is about this cheating idiot.
All you have to do to dismiss the lawsuit is to acknowledge the fact that Hanz admits to cheating in the past. Choosing to acknowledge and respond to that is not a slander.
Probably wouldn't work quite like that, I imagine they mostly have their own separate representation & maybe some shared as well between some parties, but that their attorneys are all or mostly working together a lot on the strategy for these proceedings
Maybe make them play inside a Farraday cage? So signals could not get in or out. Referees and a video camera with them in the cage. No internet or other connection to the outside. Post the video online after each game. 😊
When did he cheat? Years ago a few games? Also doesn’t using an engine is something half the population has done at least once including professional players and due to the scandal a lot of gms were found to have cheated some games in the past as well
@@tengu8560 imagine this, you're in a high dollar fps tournament. Your opponent is doing decently okay with some kill here and there. The next day comes and all of a sudden it's prefire headshots kills only. After that game of prefire headshots, the interviewer ask "so how did you know to prefire him on this corner on round 1 when he made no audible noise? Then, how did you know he wasn't at that same corner but prefire under the car in the next round? He got there before you enter the sound proximity." "The game speaks for itself." My point is, he couldn't explain any moves he did, which I find hard to believe that he can't remember any moves right after playing the game. I play hour long session CSGO and can remember why I did what I did after the game. I even go back to watch my games to see if I can improve.
@@UnfiItered Also, overanalyzing every single move that happened (or didn't) during the game seems to be a universal fetish of every GM ever. Which is understandable, given that to become a chess master you need to have ridiculous memory in the first place.
@@magicmilkshake8901 He never admitted to cheating in those games. He can deny it all. Thats why cheesycom chose to slander delugy by releasing his emails instead, because they had none on Hans. Ken Regan himself said the claims of those 100 games is outlandish and I'm sure the guy is ready to testify in court for the plaintiffs. It will be a juicy trial and the defendants would be foolish not to settle and choose to air all their dirty laundries out in court if it goes that far. The arrogance on all 3 parties is historic.
Everyone had knowledge that HN admitted to cheating in the past. This fact alone is probable cause for MC to resign the way he did which is what this is really about. MC resigning as a protest to HN being allowed to play....still....again if anyone has video of HN analyzing any position ever please post below 👇
Then why didn't he resign in every other tournament he played against him previously. Including a week before in Las Vegas where he was playing with Hans on the beach? lol
Some of Hikaru’s comments on the “cheating scandal” were a little bit too cute. This doesn’t mean he’ll be found guilty of slander but I don’t think he’s come well out of this. A great player but not much of a data analyst.
I guess Hans could not act differently - he couldn't leave the allegations unanswered. Now that both parties responded, hopefully this all will blow over.
Thanks for the update! Your video's are very high quality. I just find that you're talking really slow and i think it makes the video feel like it's longer than it is. You're speaking very clear and well tho. Keep it up!
Thanks Tony appreciate it! Yeah tricky one because some people say I got too fast, at least this way people can speed up it they want and sounds ok. Slowing down sounds horrible I think. Cheers for watching
Carnage in the context of a chess tournament sounds over the top, but knowing the details, it's over the top...I don't have a stake in the game, but Newman's case brought me back to playing chess. Cheating allegations didn't make any sense to me initially without someone being caught with a device, especially over the board. I didn't know who these people are, nor understood the rankings, and thought of Magnus as spoiled by successes. After playing for free months, understanding the power of engines, and how easy it is to create a simple device, how every player has a range of abilities, and styles I can see the point. Fascinating though how in the world, this puzzle can be solved without catching someone cheating. What is interesting is these chess players with high IQs and 5 competitive moving competitions from the game board to life.
Problem is this has nothing to do with the internet which is a cesspool full of cheaters enhance by the fact the website themselves makes exceptions for a lot of it. Bit the issue is they are accusing him of cheating over the board.
Hikaru not having "knowledge" is BS lol. They are chess professionals, they know very well how cheating accusations affect someone's business dealings. Thats like an actor slandering another actor, which may cause them to lose future roles, and then being like "Hey i dont have any knowledge of their current business dealings! I cant be held liable!" As a professional in the industry you know very well how certain things may affect the business dealings of another professional in the industry. If Hikaru was some random chess fan, or someone outside the industry then that would make sense. But for someone like Hikaru, its BS
The argument that he didn't know about Niemanns' specific business deals is ridiculous. Every player in the top 50 is going to have some various business dealings, and it doesn't take knowing the specifics of those to know that slander/libel can destroy those.
They are letting a proven cheat play in the 26th dec tournament?. Everyone needs to refuse to play Hans Noman in every form of the game. The gronk needs to be banished.
I support Hans. Hiraku and Magnus just throw out baseless accusations and can't provide a shed of proof to back up their claims. It's embarrassing really.
Why is the video of you talking mirror imaged back and forth? The emblem on your shirt, the door, and your hair part switch sides repeatedly between cuts
They should do investigation either way. Reckless behaviors like that should be punished. You cant just claim other famous player is cheater without giving proof. If this gets sided than everyone can do same when they dont like other player for whatever reason.
While the mugshot of Hikaru was a joke, I think it’s a misstep as it could be interpreted as real. I had to go back and pause the video to see that it was in fact a joke.
Hikaru actually does have a criminal record, with mug shot, from when he stole kitchen appliances as a teen. His friends dared him to _"Take That Juicer"_ and, he did. 🍊 - j q t -
Not necessarily I think. He didn't destroy his career by admitting to having cheated, that would have helped him if anything, IF he did it properly. But he sticked to version where he cheated only twice or whatever. And then he got all but proved to lying. THAT is what I believe will contribute to his career going to shit. And also by being an overall douchebag. He tried hard to be a chess world "bad boy", well it's now going to bite him back in the ass. As Fabiano Caruana said, there's probably not a single super GM Niemann hasn't insulted in one way or another. Well, now none of the important chess figures is going to back him up. Serves him right.
The reason why noone cares about online is because it is a website that lets its streamers cheat for living. A website that has let 1000s of titled players who cheated play in money events. Online gaming itself has never been respected by general society because of all the anonymity and sandbagging. Its already considered a cesspool and the perception is everyone cheats. Its simply not treated with the same respect as real life chess and Hans argued he has much more respect for OTB chess. The fact the website coudln't even prove he has cheated since he was last caught and promised not to doesn't look good on them for banning him cause Magnus was upset he lost a game. Also doesn't look good that not expert in the world woudl claim he cheated in the sinquefield cup or any otb game.
Thank you. I must read the filing before i say much more but from this video it seems you are getting the hang of such cases already. Im not sure the contractual piece will work. You could be on the way to sign a multimillion dollar deal and get involved in a car crash. Because you didnt show up the deal may be cancelled. The other driver would have no idea about the deal. This is not a forseable consequence of the crash but im sure there is a ruling somewhere covering it. On jurisdiction. Thats tricky. Federal law is supposed to be the same throughout the US. In practice it differs. There are for example four different tests for copyright. The Supreme Court has declined so far to sort this one out. Neiman is based in one state. Nakamura in another. As a general rule the court will favour the weaker party as it is required to do so. I dont see Nakamura being the weaker party so the suit will stay where it is most likely. Regardless there is nothing other than money stopping Hans refiling it in another state so that is unlikely to be the end of it. The other defenses are more technical and i will have to bone up on them before saying anything more. Nakamuras lawyers like the others certainly seem to be competent judging from this filing alone. This case if it progresses from here looks very interesting. The next step in the process is Hans filing a motion rebutting these defenses. If he fails to rebute these the case will be dismissed. The filing is not the end of the matter as both sides get to argue thier case in front of the judge. And any other bystander who wanders in. The judge hears the oral arguments and then issues a ruling. Here the only matter to be decided is if Hans claims can survive dismissal. Nothing else will be decided normally at this point. If the case survives this motion to dismiss then we may get to hear evidence on which the claims are made. Which imho will be the most interesting part of this matter. Of course it may not come to that. If the case survives the motion to dismiss a settlement may be agreed without admission of liability. This might be a lot cheaper for all concerned. But it would be a pity for the rest of us.
A little context to what the actual case is, who is bringing the case against whom and for what reasons, would have been helpful to people like me who have not been following the controversy.
I dont think you can call someone a cheater which would have obvious implications to his character, with absolutely no proof.......... The Markle law......To accuse with no proof......
@@ryuk5673 There's no evidence that he cheated, he admitted when younger a couple times, but when Magnus called him out and then refused to play him was bad form, he had no evidence, what's Magnus grip I do not know but there's one there, maybe he dislikes him for admitting he cheated when younger but all this anul bead stuff is horse droppings.
@@Christoff070 I couldn't stand to be in the room with either of those snobby pieces of s***. If I had to choose though I like magnus a lot better than Neiman. But my personal feelings don't guide my judgment here I feel what Magnus has done is way more unsporting and more detrimental to the sport. You cant accuse someone of cheating because he was caught cheating in that online Cesspool over 3 years ago because you lost a f****** game to him. That makes Magnus the biggest sore loser in gaming history. And he's really setting a terrible precedent that I fear other players may follow.
@@cooloutac Crybaby huh? Then how do you explain that Magnus has never behaved like that after any other game he lost? He was on the receiving end of upset defeats from several young players, some better some worse than Niemann and Magnus always took it in stride with no drama, if anything he'd always be angry at himself, never throwing tantrum the other player's way. He just did what he did against Niemann. Surely not because he must have had some good reason to do so? Calling Magnus crybaby would be like me calling you an illiterate dumbass who never went to school, just because you forgot the apostrophe in "that's".
@@ahriman935 Because this was the first classical match Magnus has lost in years, especially with the white pieces. And because only now has his main focus been on his classical rating. Well, I guess now he has even given that up because Hans has destroyed his dreams and ego.
I never believed Hans had any case and it seems like thats what is going to be held in court as well. Anyone with half a brain can see that what Hikaru was talking about was way too generalised to be given any sort of slander against against anyone let alone hans
If they are conspiring to defame and block Hans from competing, they can be found liable in a civil court. There were multiple counts in the suit, and Hikaru had danced about the idea of Hans as a cheater for months before he was slapped with a lawsuit. His defense claim #1 is a technicality on jurisdiction, and the court can effectively rule "if not here, where?"
@@aaronhoffmeyer alleging conspiracy/collaboration is one thing but proving it is entirely another thing. This is only a motion to dismiss lawsuit which is why we haven't gotten to the point yet. I doubt this will move beyond preliminary evaluation and even if it does, it won't be anything more than a frivolous lawsuit. Imo, hans will be lucky to escape without getting slapped with frivolous lawsuit charges if it goes for trial.
Also, Neither magnus nor hikaru ever accused neimann of cheating. They only claimed that 1. Hans is a known cheater(which hans himself admitted), 2. Cheating is a serious problem in chess, 3. Cheating could be possible despite precautions. Magnus went above that and said he won't play against such guys. First three points are not enough outside of a Kangaroo court of public opinion to get a conviction of defamation. Magnus saying he won't play with past cheaters is his damn right. I don't understand how he can be prosecuted for that. This is why i find it crazy that so many guys support Hans neimann lawsuit. Seriously, Hans has no case even if his grievances are legitimate. It's one thing to be right but entirely different thing to prove you are right.
Hans is going to lose for a very simple reason, he's a significantly worse chess player. Chess at its core is about strategy, and he just called out 2 of the best strategists in the world. So he's going to lose by a mile. Furthermore for FIDE to not Suspend Hans pending the outcomes of these lawsuits and investigations is ridiculous.
You are believing in traditional myths that chess has anything to do with real life. it's a game for people with good memory amd spatial vision. If they are smart they'd settle out of court in a hurry. But they are both autistic brats with no real life experiences. Hans is a kid who's been on his own since he was 16.
@@cooloutac they won't settle because they did nothing wrong. And I wouldn't settle if I were them either, fuck hans, he's a cheating piece of shit. And I'm glad that they're fighting back.
The fact they didn't suspent or downright ban Magnus puts their whole organization into disrepute. They no longer have credibility in the chess world and might as well say they are part of the corruption.
@@tactrix1h to be honest I don't like hans, but that's irrelevant. And the fact you think I might be him means you're the one that's out of your mind. Hahaha. Wow.. don't you realize most people support him in society and in the Chess World because what magnus did is wrong? You are the one that's in the minority and that's because you gobble up all the garbage that websites streamers spew at you like your a kid..
I expected this. I don't think all the allegations will be dismissed against Magnus, there are allegations there that, if proved, would make a good case. Those facts are unlikely to be proved in court and I expect Magnus to win. But not to get it dismissed. The allegations against Hikaru are different. There really is no case against him on the facts even as Hans claims them to be.
@@angusmacangus3181 Keep in mind, they only make a good case IF TRUE. That's a big if. But if Magnus didn't believe Hans was actually cheating, that's a good case. That's not likely, but he gets to seek discovery to find evidence of it. By the time Hikaru said anything, Magnus had already turned it into a big news story and Hikaru was just commenting on it. The standards are different, as was what he said. He was opining on whether or not he agreed with Magnus, not making his own accusations.
@@Sam_on_RU-vid Whether it was malicious or not will determine defamation. Hans has a case here. And who knows what evidence the plaintiff side has. I mean the website and Magnus's public statements are so arrogant and ludicrious I think they are damning in themselves. One literally outted himself as a sore loser. and the other literallys aid they banned the kid because the sore loser got mad he lost. Its unreal lol.
@@cooloutac Maliciousness is part of the calculation, especially for Hikaru. For Magnus, it is a little more nuanced because they have to analyze whether or not Hans was a "public figure" at the time Magnus withdrew from competition in a manner that sent a clear message he thought Hans was cheating (I had certainly never heard of him). Then there is some real question about the way he made his point clear, if it was clearly an opinion or if he would reasonably have been interpreted to be stating a fact he knows. All of that makes the case against Magnus MUCH stronger than the one against Hikaru which is why I think Hikaru's motion to dismiss will be successful, but not Magnus'. I think they get to seek evidence on Magnus.
@@Sam_on_RU-vid it will come out in court man. Upon learning of the lawsuit for example Eric Hansen said he is not surprised because hikaru does not like Hans and has been known in the past to try and get players banned from tournaments. The whole thing will be better than Johnny Depp versus Amber Heard if it goes to trial. And regarding Magnus the guy literally came out with the public statement exposing himself as a sore loser to the whole world, quite a historic event. And the website themselves we all know their actions were purely vindictive and malicious. Even their own streamers said it didn't look good they released their hit piece on the day of the US championship o0ening ceremony. and they basically admitted to Banning the guy because of what he said in his interview. They already all lost in the court of public opinion for most of General Society even if the courts do not agree. And I'm sure at least Magnus and Erik from the website regret their actions. But hikaru and Danny rensch clearly are socipaths.
@@Sam_on_RU-vid the thing with Magnus and why some lawyers think hikaru has the most to fear is because it all depends the timing of when Magnus released his public statement. He was smart to wait till after the US championship but it was still damning in itself in my opinion.
Blame FIDE's lack of activity and non-committal responses with respect to this. If anyone should sort this out it is FIDE, not lawyers who of course stand to get ever fatter.
Thanks for the updates ! Hans did it all to himself. Blitz will be carnage indeed ! I have a prediction : Hans will go back down for "reasons that will speak for themselves" - LOL -Edit: indeed !!! he scored 47th , not even near the top. He went back to 47th place when not cheating....blitz has that advantage. No time !
Magnus could simply play out the first fifteen moves, and then punch Hans right in the face, and say, _"Oh! I thought we were Chess Boxing! . . . My Bad!"_ 😜 - j q t -
Mangus foolishly thinks he has a future in online chess. I find it hard to believe when no gaming site has been as popular as real life sports, because the anonymity makes it hard for fans and sponsors to take seriously. And this website is the first gaming site in history to publicly make exceptions for so many ways to cheat its downright shameful. Magnus better think about a streaming career cheating/smurfing on twitch I guess lmao...
AFAIK a case cannot be dismissed with an argument of "I'm innocent" or "the prosecution is wrong", or even "the prosecution is lying". Those are things that have to be argued in court, in other words, the trial, with evidence presented and the prosecution allowed to cross-examine. An appeal for dismissal cannot be the trial itself. A plea to dismiss the case can be granted only when the lawsuit is completely invalid (for example the lawsuit is based on an alleged law that doesn't actually exist), or in situations where even if the defendant were found guilty there would be no sentence (for example if the crime is too old and has expired, and thus cannot be prosecuted anymore). In other words, the case is dismissed if it can be shown that the actual trial could not lead to any kind of sentence regardless of anything because it's just an invalid, frivolous or non-punishable accusation, even if the defendant were "guilty" of what he's being accused of. But I suppose lawyers make dismissal pleas anyway, regardless of anything. And, for some reason, sometimes judges will actually sentence the accused to be innocent and dismiss the case (even though according to legal procedure they shouldn't do that. They cannot declare the accused to be innocent without an actual proper trial.) I suppose in some cases jurisdiction questions might be grounds for dismissal (as it would be a case where the lawsuit trial simply cannot proceed and cannot be held.)
Oh yeah check out my video on ‘this will never be repeated In my lifetime’ if you don’t want a spoiler! Otherwise google works rapid and blitz chess , thanks for watching. Hans did a bit rubbish though unfortunately
that's an ignorant thing for Hikaru to say he wasn't aware of contracts Niemann may have had. that might wash if he wasn't a GM full time chess player. complete BS he didn't know
Thanks for the update. We all know what Hikaru did...along with several other top chess streamers, they ALL said Hans was guilty of cheating, but damages will be hard to prove. With Magnus I definitely see a solid case.
@@potzysk2 Yeah but I do consider that a mark on his character. So when statistics start to call some questions, it's healthy to investigate the entire thing thoroughly. *snaps on rubber glove* Merry Christmas Hans...
SO then why the fk are you supporting a cheater who smurfs for a living on his stream? Guy even titles his videos "Disrespectful" to mock his supporters like you. And whiner? When was the last time Hans cried cheater when he lost a match, in a match no expert or GM in the world thought anybody cheated in . Magnus is the first athlete in world history who literally made a public statement outing himself as a sore loser. He said he thinks Hans cheated cause he seemed too relaxed and was too low rated? What a baby.
What do Daniil and Hikaru have in common? Both betray their country for Magnus. 6 parts Part1. Bobby Fischer agrees. Part2. Magnus, unlike ASH KETCHUM, was never the world champion. Part3. Talent Part4. Magnus is a coward Part5. Magnus cheated 3x Part6. More on talent and then stuff about Hans Niemann Part1. Bobby Fischer agrees with me. Bobby would side with Hans and Wesley over Magnus and Hikaru. I'm not American, but GOD BLESS AMERICA. Bobby still wouldn't like the US government today, but Bobby would like the US players today esp Hans and Wesley. I guess Magnus is the reverse: no political opinion on the US but has something against American people or American players, as Magnus admitted in podcast (see yev3a1 ). Now, Daniil and Hikaru betray their resp countries not for Norway but for Magnus. As Nepo pointed out in 2021, Norway is 'not a chess country'. So Norway was never the villain. Magnus is the villain (not a Norwegian villain, just a villain who happens to be Norwegian). - Daniil betrayed Russia by helping Magnus over Sergey and Nepo in WCC 2021. - Hikaru betrayed the US by siding with Magnus over Hans without sufficient evidence. What is up with Magnus that makes people betray their countries for Magnus? Magnus was never the WC, so why betray your country for Magnus? Anyway: When Wesley So or Bobby Fischer accuse people of cheating, we LISTEN. When Magnus Carlsen accuses, we LAUGH. Magnus is a cheater too eg against (more in part5) - Alireza 2019, - Danya 2021 and - Nepo 2021. Part2. Magnus, unlike ASH KETCHUM, was never the world champion. Wesley is the inaugural WC and has been from 2019 to PRESENT. Wesley did not lose in a game to Magnus in Iceland 2022, in St Louis 2020 or in Norway 2019. Wesley did not lose the title to Hikaru same as how Bobby never lost the title to Anatoly Karpov or anyone because the conditions FIDE gave that were unfavourable for the AMERICANS Bobby and Wesley. Does FIDE have something against Americans? (They had only 1 non-European president, a Filipino/Filipina/Philippine.) Hikaru is just the rapid WC. Magnus sucks. Wesley rules. Part3. Talent Magnus may be the best currently, but Wesley has been the most talented since 2019 in being the only world champion since 2019. Magnus lost 4-0, actually 13.5-2.5, to Wesley in 2019. Then Magnus lost 3-1 to Nepo in 2022 and thus indirectly lost 3-1 to Hikaru. LOL. Chess = great = a combination of theory and talent 9LX = pure talent Talent is how good you are when there's no theory. Looks like Magnus is good only for openings. Turns out Magnus is a talentless patzer who crumbles without opening prep. PATHETIC. Note: Patzer means extremely good at openings but sucks at middlegames and endgames. So much for greatest endgame player of all time ey? Ok to be fair this is what Larry Kaufman told me: (Begin quote) Magnus doesn't generally play such great openings, he strives to get the game out of book as early as possible usually. I think the issue here is that his greatest strength is the endgame, but FRC games are much more likely to be decided in the middlegame as the players are on their own so early. That's probably why he doesn't shine as brightly in FRC as in Classical chess. (End quote) Anyhoo, Magnus is maybe 1 of the greatest but THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME? Please. How can you be THE GREATEST when you're TALENTLESS? Also Garry is not greatesr due to cheating against Judit Polgar (whose sibling Susan is American btw) and not apologising for it almost 3 decades later. (Similarly, Magnus is not greatest also for cheating against Alireza Danya and Nepo. More in part5.) Wesley told Hikaru in stream that 50-70 years 9LX will replace chess. See Wikipedia. Wesley said in 2018 interview St Louis that Bobby or Garry is greatest of all time. Even if Bobby is not greatest of all time, Bobby is MTOAT - most talented of all time. Don't tell me about 2nd place. 2nd place in the 2019 WC was PATHETIC for a 4x WCC and wow later 5x WCC. And then in 2022 Magnus wasn't even 2nd place. LOL!!!! 9LX removes openings, so Magnus should be STRONGER not LESS STRONG. Yet in 2019 Magnus lost 13.5-2.5 to Wesley and didn't get a single win. Why?!?!?!!!! And look now in 2022 Magnus lost 3-1 to Nepo despite beating Nepo 4-0 in the 2021 WCC (where Magnus cheated against Nepo). And of course consequently Magnus indirectly lost 3-1 to Hikaru. Also Magnus should be better in rapid than classical re Sergey 2016 and Fabi 2018. Yet 2nd 2019 and 3rd 2022. LOL. Part4. Magnus is a coward re the 2022 WC because: 4.1 - The 2022 WC doesn't have a candidates the same way the last 4 WCCs do. Magnus had the privilege to defend against ONLY 1 OPPONENT each of the last 4 times. (And Vishy from 2008-2013.) Here, there isn't like a tournament / a series of tournaments and then the unique winner will face Wesley. 4.2 - FIDE lowered the time controls by 25%!!!!! Magnus obviously has a higher advantage in rapid since Magnus was rapid WCC and reached 2900 in rapid. Magnus even beat Sergey and Fabi only because of rapid tiebreaks. Magnus couldn't beat Fabi in a classical WCC game!!! But anyway, Sergey and Fabi I guess 'deserved' to have lower time controls because they only drew against Magnus in original time controls. But Wesley didnt lose a single a game to Magnus in 2019 and even beat Magnus 4x !!! Why did Wesley deserve lower time controls?!?!! Bobby was on top for only a short period of time because FIDE and Anatoly (no offense Sergey Karjakin!) were cowards who ran away from Bobby. (Wait Sergey ok I can compromise that FIDE were cowards but not necessarily Anatoly.) See? It happened again. FIDE and Magnus were being cowards running away from Wesley. But it backfired on them because they didn't expect Nepo, and apparently Hikaru too, is more talented than Magnus. But I already knew it: Nepo lost only 3x to Wesley in 2019 FIDE and drew with Wesley in 2022 St Louis while Magnus lost 4x to Wesley in 2019 FIDE and FURTHERMORE lost to Wesley in 2020 St Louis. SAYNOTO2900 Part5. Magnus cheated 3x 5.1 - with David Howell against Danya Naroditsky 5.1A - in the lichess thing. 5.1B - in relationships. Lol. 5.2 - Magnus also cheated in world blitz 2019 in distracting Alireza. Yes Magnus spoke in Norwegian on own turn BUT AFTER punching clock continued to talk on Alireza's turn. 5.3 - Magnus cheated against Nepo in 2021 WCC with the knight touch move thing and then said 'do better' as part of gaslighting the reporter. Search 'magnus carlsen gaslighting'. MAGNUS INTENDED TO MOVE THE KNIGHT. HIKARU SAID SO. Magnus is like the cheaters Tigran V Petrosian and Tigran L Petrosian and is unlike the HONEST players Wesley So and Bobby Fischer. Also Garry Kasparov cheated against Judit Polgar by touch move. See? Magnus copied Garry. Lol. I guess 9LX players have more integrity than chess players. Also, have there been any cheating scandals in 9LX? See. Chess has a lot of cheaters while 9LX has virtually none. Part6. More on talent and then stuff about Hans Niemann Quote 1: After playing Chess960, I realise how mentally unwell chess players become the more they play it. They know they will get the same ideal setup every game and they deny the fact that they will mess it up unless they memorise some other geek's ideas. In Chess960 there is nothing to deny. You know you are going to get a far from ideal start position and you know it is up to you to make the best of it and you know you will be playing moves nobody has tried before. Which is better for your mental health? Quote 2: Chess960: The winner is the more agile mind. Chess: The winner is the biggest nerd. Wesley So is the most TALENTED currently even though Magnus is the GREATEST currently. Thank you Bobby for helping us realise how TALENTED Wesley is. Wesley is far from the greatest currently or of all time. HOWEVER WESLEY IS THE MOST TALENTED CURRENTLY AND POSSIBLY OF ALL TIME (well maybe next to Bobby). MTOAT VS GREATEST. BUT WE WOULDN'T REALLY KNOW IF FIDE DOESN'T GIVE US CLASSICAL 9LX OR AT LEAST 45MIN 9LX. What of a joke so-called WC in Iceland recently. Congrats to Hikaru who became the RAPID WC. Ok fine Wesley won in SLOW RAPID not classical, but don't believe FIDE when they tell you 25min-for-30moves is slow rapid. It is FAST RAPID. And either way it's a 25% reduction in time!!! Wesley never lost the title to Hikaru, same as how Bobby never lost the title to Anatoly. FIDE was being cowardly in 1975 and is being cowardly in 2022. FIDE lowers the time controls to lower Wesley's odds wanting Magnus to win just as chessc*m kicked out Hans Niemann because chessc*m wants to please Magnus. Lol. Magnus not only cheats (eg against Alireza, Danya and Nepo) but also manipulates chess entities (resp chessc*m and FIDE) into hurting American players (resp Hans and Wesley) for Magnus' benefit. Civil conspiracy and ra()sm. LOL. The 5C's: Corruption Cowardice Cheating Civil conspiracy I already said in this post Title: Parallel between Hans and Fischer Random 2022? ID: ydwn2y P.S. agadmator accepted my suggestion As32LdyKDbc P.P.S. Who's the biggest sore loser? Light Yagami (death note), Magnus Carlsen (chess), Garrett Adelstein (poker), Magnus Carlsen (chess960)
