Cop Gets Shut Down by His Sergeant 

forbidden from any future position in law enforcement

yah right he will be a sarg within 5 to 10 years when the old Sarg dies from a heartattack.

He's essentially saying the only law is his own way of thinking no matter what the LAW actually says. Sack his ass with a lifetime ban on possessing weapons of any kind.

Literally... He just said 'I don't care about my oath to uphold the constitution.'

He had his fingers crossed....

that's what made me laugh the most

Priceless... And a shame!

That was hilarious! I also appreciated the little bit of rubbing his face in it at the end. "So, you were wrong?"

+REGIMENT65 ...they think that for good reason..in most cases it's true

Contempt of court.

Agree

He can still own a gun regardless but he doesn't deserve a badge & unifrom and the ability to protect his community.

This cop was respectful. Compared to the others at least

1000%

Well spoken.

Tbh he probably just got wanted to end the conflict, like I don’t know but that seemed like the situation

No, that sergeant has just been around long enough to know a losing battle. he walked all the way from inside to save his deputy. if he truly were a "REAL cop", these officers would already know these laws as he does. he doesnt care about not harassing people, he only cares about not harassing ones with cameras.

@@spencerphilippinedream3706 That is an assumption not fact.

@@simplydanlrene4276 nothing gets by you.

That sargent is a real cop...but he is one of MANY not few

Yah that was bs and I was even like really? Funny how you took a oath to uphold the laws, of your state & federal codes, along with what the constitution and Supreme Court say & rule out! That cop needs to go back for some more school time...

Glad you noticed that Dude. When I heard him say that, I thought "this is the problem these days with law enforcement". If he doesn't care what the Supreme Court rules, then that is someone that I do NOT want patrolling my streets.

they literally said that as I scrolled passed your comment. Illuminati confirmed.

Chris Thomson tis but a tradition on comment threads, much like holidays to humanity. While it's boring and overused, it will forever be engrained into the internet as the meme of memes when the reptilians take over.

I WAS JUST SAYING THAT.

What?

Agreed

@Regular Guy the sergeant is the one who stopped the officer

@Regular Guy you are lost man. Clearly any explanation will go right over your head so it's not worth the breath. Maybe you are one of those super smart but Don't understand social Normalities. Lol!!

No, I dont applaud any of them anymore. the only reason this sergeant shut down them harassing this citizen is because he was afraid of backlash. why has this sergeant failed to educate his officers?

lol

his wife probly washed it the night before and shrunk it

lmaooo

No,....he has a fat head! Charlie Brown head

I laughed for about a minute at this!

I winced when I heard that.

I creamed my pants when I heard that

So..you were WRONG?

My favorite part of the whole video.

He didn’t learn anything though. When asked if he was wrong, he replied, “According to my sergeant.” He himself refused to accept that he was wrong.

*... and another further inflated one.*

Leslee Hamilton nope !

Kim Ellis I bet he gave his wife a gnarly shiner that night...

@@DanIsAces i really think we have a problem with the current state of the police- but yes indeed, it feels like the guy who video taped this got a ego rush from this... not cool. Buuuuuut the cop was sketchy, no matter what.

had to chuckle at that XD

Well the supreme court doesn't care what the constitution says so...

The cop was only wrong at saying he was wrong..he wasn't wrong he was just following the suggestion of the Sgt. The Sgt didn't have to come out he was just avoiding paperwork from an escalation. He is very smart and cool.

OMG I almost shit when he said that lol

Best comment here.

Bahaha!! I loved that part! The sad thing is that he was serious. I agree with you, though. Kick his ignorant and arrogant ass out. He's part of the problem.

Because the Supreme Court has also ruled that you may not resist the lawful orders of a Police officer, even if they are wrong. They ruled that a court of law is the police to determine right/wrong, and not in the street (where citizens encounter officers). Therefore, when you refused to obey the lawful order of an officer, YOU are in violation of the law. IF (a big IF) the officer is also in violation (not just YOU THINK their in violation), then a COURT OF LAW will determine that, and issue appropriate sanctions. Either way, in some states, what he did is a crime. In all states, it's extremely rude. Toward good, hard working people.

is the place*** NOT "is the police" Lol

Lol, he doesn't realise the Supreme Court has higher powers than himself.

They intentionally keep them ignorant of the law.

true shit

That's why many cops are wife-beaters.

Yeah and dicks like this guy filming are just sociopaths who will go on to break the law in ever increasing degrees.

Ooh...nasty.

+Jon but he didn't break any laws. Stop being Delisional!

baffled

Fucking clown said he doesn't care what the Supreme Court says....un fucking real

Agreed. I am not saying that the guy flying the drone is right, because I do see the police point of view as well. But, to say who cares is contempt of the law. Governments makes laws, police enforce laws and the Supreme Court ensure that there is law and order. If we had no Supreme Court then there is only a totalitarian state. This cop is a dangerous breed.

+Jojo Z W

Your comment is hilarious. (I would like people to know that I am not cop bashing - I just believe the comment that he made about the Supreme Court to be odious. It's analogous to going to a resturant for a meal and the waiter says to you, "I don't care what the price in the menu says.., you're paying 10 times that amount!"

I think him asking for them to be educated in the law was reasonable.

Yes it is, but there's no need to be a dick about it when the sergeant was being very reasonable and nice. The drone op was clearly looking for confrontations like this, especially since he said it's happened several times before. The sergeant pretty much finished the confrontation but the drone op just had to try stiring it up a bit more because he wasn't getting the reaction he wanted. Happens almost every time in videos like this, makes it very hard to side with the public side when every time they're just being assholes who intentionally get into situations like this.

Amen Ben. The first guy it's a bit more understandable, but to the second guy he should have just said "Thank you" or something to that effect. That second cop was keeping the peace and doing the right thing, and op just couldn't leave well enough alone. I don't like the idea of big brother and all powerful government anymore than the next guy. But after Sarg tells you you're cool, why continue the hostility??? I agree that we as people need to hold law enforcement accountable for wrongdoing, which definitely happens. But that seems different than what this guy is doing. Like you said, he seems to be intentionally looking for a certain reaction.

Rob Brumfield yeah the guy filming seemed like he just wanted to pick a fight.

I saw the original video and in it he said that he had previous bad encounters with this police department and he threatened to sue them, so the only reason the seargant responded in this manner was because of those previous encounters.

yeah, but it shows a good side of him that he admitted he was wrong. nothing wrong with that.

edward james yeah because he was being recorded lol.

A good cop will admit he was wrong regardless Los Pollos Hermanos you have no point of reference to say that's the only reason he did. Everyone makes mistakes and people somehow expect cops to know every law on the books which is ridiculous. Like the poster of this video that put in the description that the sergeant shut the officer down for misconduct which he didn't because the officer was not performing misconduct, he was simply performing his job based on his current knowledge of the law.

I get you but at the same time a good cop would not argue something based on what he thinks and your right they are not expected to know every law but this one is simple the guy is in public recording the Sargent did correct him and he walked away which was good there are many videos when the cop is wrong and the rest of the other cops know it's wrong but they back each other up so you are right it was cool that he admitted he was wrong. Now I wonder how he would have acted if the Sarge didn't come out and correct him how far would he have taken it? Who knows.

Jason Davis ++ Hey Jason, can you pull your lips off the douche bag cop slime bag your are blowing to listen? No one expects ignorant, scumbag, on the take criminals, otherwise known as cops, to know every law. It's just these closet pedophile, drunk, drug adled incompetent waste of air shitheads act as if they know all, doall, be all. I say, therefor, obey. Fuck you shitstain.

Its called being professional. Too bad there arent more like him. Problem is you got all these young cops trying to earn there stripes and abuse their new found power and its a problem.

hear hear

and another problem is people treating the polite kind cops like shit, so they might end up turning into asshole cops too

sergeant*

here, here, I concur

youd better care lol, they can ruin your whole life

Lmao

😂😂😂😂😂😂

😀

"Our","My" facility.

Agreed.

It's called experience and a cool head.

-Regular guy, I agree with you on the fact that the Sergeant shouldn't let his subordinate do this kind of thing. However, I think there wasn't a better response that we could see on camera from him. What happens off camera is whats important, for all we know the srg had a meltdown on that guy and scared him straight. Optimistic, i know but lets cut the srg some slack.

What crime? Stopping someone to ask them a question is no more a crime than intentionally being a dick in public.

The Sergeant definitely did a stern "fuck off" to him in the most professional way possible to his underling, the way he immediatly walks away and even takes flak from the camera dick shows there's definitely more nuance going on here. Although I agree that sure the Sergeant could publically reprimend him infront of the camera, and it'd be cool, then this would be a sensation, he'd be a sensation, life would be a sensation, he just can't have all that senstationalism in his life. So he just took the easiest way out. Camera dick should have been a little less of an entitled brat to the Sergeant, but hey that's life in this day and age, the first cop really jimmy'd his ruffled chips, and more cops are doing the same in the past and even went as far as to get verbal confirmation that he was allowed to film there. So I guess he was just really pissed off at this point and was hot and in the moment. What we need is cop canniblism, a movie where a virus only infects cops and they start eating eachother and the good cops are left, and the bad cops are all zombies, and there's only like 3 good cops per station. And as the cop zombies burst from the glass windows of the station and attack the public, a vision from Buddah, Allah, and Jesus (in Boyband format) to all the surviving cops that they must save the world from the zombie cops from hell who are actually escaped demons from Satan's secret sex dungeon where he keeps the most perverted of the perverted and subjects them to the most G-rated softcore pornography for eternity, and then they break out of his sex dungeon, and they flee out of hell, and they go through a gateway which is guarded by Frank Serpico (Who went to hell on a technicality for being a "traitor" so instead of punishment was given the role of guarding one of the seven doors out/into hell) and this is why they get bad cops because they use Serpico's energy to go through the doorway and the world's police all over turn into zombies who eat because they haven't ate in years. I don't wanna say demon cop rapists are what they become, but they definitely are rapist demonic law enforcement. And it's up to 3 rookie cops with no time, no options, no shortage of bullets... This Christmas, take your family to see "No More Law In Hell"

Beat me to it

I guess he doesn't care about Miranda rights either since that was a Supreme Court decision. Just the kind of person you'd expect to be an officer of the law. :/

I latched on to that comment right away as well. Everybody in any type of law enforcement agency should be held accountable for blatantly disregarding a law/ruling decided upon by legislators

cal81985 so did I

Joseph Garret- Well said sir. I agree 100% Unfortunately all over the USA there are police officers that are under-trained, forget what they have learned and give no effort to CONTINUING to learn the laws they swore to uphold. They're training is extremely limited due to fund and timing constraints. They have to "learn" on the job, so to speak for the most part..... and that doesn't work for me. If you wanted to do that at McDonalds or Walmart, that's fine.... but when we're talking about people that carry firearms and use lethal force, it become a whole different matter.

I agree with you....I'm sure we'll hear about him later! What a dick!

don't be ridiculous

Ridiculous as say... harassing a citizen unlawfully and acting like they are committing a crime when you clearly don't even know the law properly yourself?

lmfao the cop passed asf

If you tell me if that is an insult the to cop or not I'll know if I should plus one that Cinny :) Nice rack btw :)

He’s a trooper not a deputy

Yea, that is what I thought as well.

in other words-I'm the supreme judge and can do whatever I may.

at least til his boss stops him from getting the department sued lol

Exactly. That's the one thing you should really care about in that line of work. Ignorant police are dangerous.

he lost when he said video taping was a crime

the average cop has little education nor allegiance to the constitution

+Tommy Nickels and on what source did you get that information?Are you a cop? Have you gone around the country asking every officer their knowledge of the people's rights? Is it just that you only watch RU-vid videos of bad cops? Also there is nothing in the Constitution about flying drones, and with all the crazy things happening around the world, it is a little weird someone flying one around a police station. I wouldn't have blocked traffic but I'd definitely talk to the man on why. It's just easy to see he just wanted a reaction from police.

Fuck people's rights! Wake up idiot! 80% percent of the people in America today are complete narcissistic ignorant assholes who need their asses totally kicked!

Arthur you should come to Australia! You would love living in a police state. Nobody does anything stupid like saying no to a cop, if they do they get frisked and taunted into swearing at police which is illegal. Everybody is happy to be pulled over for no reason, just to be tested for drugs and alcohol and the road worthiness of their vehicle for a random inspection. It makes the world safer. Especially the $300 fines for speeding 3 miles per hour over the speed limit. Leave that hippy bullshit freedom loving USA and come here. It's basically the same except we have better healthcare.

+Joseph Stott I hope noone believes that garbage, it's not like that here in Australia.

Angelbelle The unfortunate truth about law enforcement is, it only takes about 19-21 weeks of education, in the form of the police academy, before someone can be labeled an officer. They do undergo further training once they've graduated, in the form of a probationary period. Usually served alongside a veteran member of their force(who has undergone the same schooling). Conversely, Lawyers must aquire a bachelor's degree in the subject of their choosing and pass the LSAT before even making it into law school. That's if their undergrad GPA was good enough. Law school is usually three years, sometimes more depending on a person's preferred pacing. Tl;Dr It takes six months before they give you a gun and badge and tell you to enforce the laws it takes criminal defense attorneys can only practice after seven years. Haha.

The founding fathers knew what they were doing. Probably dealt with police like this under Britain’s rule

Marilyn Wilson integratey learn to spell corectly

Christine Winder ...Are you really that stupid? "Integrity," go look it up you moron.

Christine Winder I'm just going to assume you're a troll. Have a nice day!

He just prevented a fiasco. I don't know about integrity but he's got intelligence lol.

The fuck do you know?

👍

Everyone chill

Kobe Bryant I agree. The people are the only ones who can change the police how they should act and not act. There are good policemen but not enough

Kobe Bryant The people have been tired of their behavior and now it's the time people are united and become strong together to get a change!

Kobe Bryant Nazis? Do you even know what a Nazi is?

Furio Solorzano yes, and he pretty much violated his oath to protect the constitution. Some cops don't realize that We The People have just as many rights as they do.

Exactly.....that boy was CLUELESS. Is that the law in all states in the u.s....not to show ID unless you are suspected of a crime?

I heard that too....what an arrogant piece of shit.

Yeah, and notice how these dumbasses here STILL defend cops that act this way! Idiocracy didn't go far enough.

And you wonder why people don't trust cops.

Go fuck yourself Jeffy.

Yea he's probably some SJW that just got done stoning a rape victim who is pregnant with her assailants child or fighting to put guns back in the arms of gangsters

I don't think that cop would have been less shrewd if the guy had committed an actual crime, but said he was unaware of the law. He would be told that ignorance of the law is no excuse. But the cop--who, by the way, said that he doesn't care what the Supreme Court or the Constitution says-was displaying his ignorance of the law. The ones who enforce the law have an obligation to know it.

He does not have to be less shrewd at all.

What he said was actually very passive aggressive for someone that has already been in the same situation and expected someone like the Sargent to pass that info around.

Only when you tame a Shrew can you be less shrewd. but that's after getting screwed by Shamu

Cameraman just came off a heightened emotional state. Probably had a surge of emotions running though him. I'm sure he cleared his mind and was thankful after.

Oliver Cave Would you like some more Haterade?

777Skeptic No, I am just laughing at the stupidity of some of these comments ;)

Oliver Cave Don't fall off that high horse now.

777Skeptic I might do considering how much I am chuckling away at your comment xD

jaja true

I said the same thing too myself & was about to type it, but you already did...So damn...lolol..

Nope, he's going to get in in his car and find someone J-walking or some silly shit like and intimidate them....because HE Knows the law:/ and is above it!

To be fair, a lot of people don't care what the supreme court says

A lot of people don't care what the supreme court says, but cops can't, that's literally his job lol, that's like saying I don't care about the ball when you're an NBA player lol...his job is literally to uphold the law.

Gail Patrice Lockert Anthony Agreed. Instead, he upholds HIS law based on how he feels. The badge and gun justifies HIS feelings

Pretentious Navel-Gazing yep. 2:07 he said don't worry about it I'll put charges on you some other day. Wow. I don't care what the Supreme Court ruled??? His eyes shout to me he's high or under the influence actually.

vmwareannais and the clown car and the badge that probably cost 30 bucks that was probably made in China lol

PhantomoftheInterwebz Not Surprised! when you allow under trained officer's "on the beat" What's to Expect. Cockiness... Corruption... Holyer then thou attitudes. colonized mind's with guns and badges. Needs to be dismantled & a new age appropriately. Stand Down.... ReGroup........🤔Start anew.. Better Higher Standard For we all are One and want to go home to are Family at night. 🤔

PhantomoftheInterwebz why would u say that u should be in prison for 63 years

Why would I expect police to care what the Supreme Court says? Oh, I don't know, maybe because that's how the country is suppose to work.

The camera guy was a dick from the start to the end...

Good I'm glad he was. That moron that hates this country but dresses up in a outfit that gives him power deserved it.

reason why?

+zameliz privet property

It actually is a crime to fly a drone over private property, not just police stations, because it has a similar effect to you actually entering that property and looking around in places that you shouldn't be in.

Ari Simonian Xcept police stations are not private property, they are public property. If the guy filming this would have committed a crime tht sergeant would have acted bit differently in this situation, namely get this guy arrested.

zameliz but arent they government property and either way even though the guy didnt fly it over the police station its still super suspicious and him refusing to give his id kinda made him look a bit worse in the eyes of the cop

John Burns so your on that lil pip squeeks side huh....u think flying drones around police stations is cool....i cant stand u lil bitches who try to egg on the cops....get a life

It's called "A free country" what out forefathers fought to keep and if you want to fly a drone then that is your right, you would rather live in a police state? It is on a fast slide that way because idiots like you would rather give in to cops and allow them to chip away at the simple freedoms instead of standing up for the rights provided to you but some great men and women? The second this cop said "I don't care about the supreme court" he should lose his job, instantly no if and's butts or or's. In the constitution it clearly states that "an acting officer can not uphold the laws if he does not know the laws", this cop should be removed and sent straight back to the academy to be trained as he does not know the law, hard to tell others they breaking the law when he has no idea what the law is.

bud barker Alright. Im not on either side, but what if he was flying a kite outside the station? Sure, it's dumb, but he can do it, although the kite may be prone to the nearby powerlines haha

John Burns yeah its great that he said sorry

Joe Stark yea....that wasnt from the heart...he just said that cuz he was starting to get intimidated....he'll do do it again...that lil turd

Hector Cortez-aponte-cabrera that is call reporting the situation to his superior not whining and he is reasoning with the guy thats filming . tho it may not be wrong in the eyes of law but you are filming their station and if any of their officiers found it weird and wanted to check it out its not wrong .

These kind of people actively seek these encounters out and are typically smug as fuck about it. Carrot danglers, if you will.

Yeah he had to rub it in... if a cop is in the wrong, totally clueless about the laws, and he is on the streets being a cop, you gotta rub it in. Just because a cop thinks they are right doesn't mean they aren't wrong most of the time.

falsely claiming he had any power over the guy is criminal. he was INSISTENT. saying shit like '' i don't care what the supreme court says '' the true definition of a power hungry cock sucker who will do and say anything o try and control people. hopefully he did learn a lesson

look how he is wearing that hat.... i think that answers your question.

Naţionalistu' Legionar No, what are you talking about? You think it's okay to film a police station?

you gotta stop thinking the average cop deserves respect

What is a commie?

The drone was small. You can't even place a bomb on it. He was trying to expose how police officers can act unlawful to ordinary citizens.

Didn't you watch the video? His superior said the police officer was wrong.

The moment when a bully has to walk away with his tail between his legs. This video should be shown in all the police training academys in the country.

what you just said was brilliant..thank you very much

so how dey get hired in the first place

the whole system is broken, that's how.

ancoloco the cop should not have a badge "I don't care what the supreme court says" should be grounds gor termination

cops.. that's how.

People probably voted it down because these videos are people looking to piss off cops. Yes it’s legal for him to film outside a station, but that doesn’t make it any less suspicious. If I was a cop I would wonder why people are filming the station to.

@@tiger22059 you can "wonder" all you want, but you have no legal ground to demand answers or identification as long as no crime was/is being/about to be committed

@@ymac7245 I’m not saying they do have a right. I’m just saying these people are doing things that they know look suspicious and know will get cops to question them. Which is probably why people down voted it.

@@tiger22059 i dont see how filming in public is suspicious behaviour. Your reasoning is the same as cops

As long as there are people as stupid as you are, the police won't be able to handle their realy bad cops. To adress those important issues they need support and understanding, but all idiots like you do is inflaming the situation. This cop was maybe not well enough informed on any judicial decision, but he was far from corrupt (not sure you know the definition of this anyway) or criminal. He made a mistake (strange one for me because i think in my country it is legit to ask for id) and beside that even admitted that regarding to his sergeant he made a mistake. Take that and be happy and go hate on those cops which are a problem, those ones who draw a weapon on you for no reason, hit you for no reason (sadly stupidity aint one in this world anymore) or something. With your attitude or the attitude of the guy who made that video you won't change anything for a better in this world - thats just hating on its own.

Gil Jones Go get a life ive seen you post the same dumbass reply hugging this guys nuts on multiple comment threads. Who gives a fuck if this cop wasnt doing his job all that well this wouldnt have even happened if the camera guy wasnt being an ass trolling for attention to bust a cop. The cop was NEVER getting violent or even touching the guy. He said he was going to ask a superior and he did. Fuck off loser.

Furtive Pygmy point is, how can an officer enforce a law when he doesnt know the law?

I like these guys, I wouldn't want to see what people in power would do it left unchallenged.

My Account Actually he was quite calm. If you consider someone informing you of something you didn't know about to be provoking you need to get some help for that.

lonecourierjoeyV2 ik right the Sgt. just helped his ass then the juy speaks to him like that

Chr ,

At what point specifically was he rude to Sgt in the 30 second conversation? Im so fucking confused. He even told him to have a good day. Im not even trying to argue I honestly just don't see it and get why everyone likes the comments? Very confusing I even rewatched the video. The other dude they were both dicks to each other but whatever. The sgt he just told him he should probably inform the people he's commanding of the laws because he was just harassed by them which isn't really uncalled for or being a dick. I honestly don't see it man

That's what these people are like, and that's why it's satisfying seeing people like this pepper sprayed.

Metalhead Forlife and that's why your police force is draining the money out of your city. Because morons like you have no problem with cops pepper spraying people exercising their rights and then get sued. And then the cities taxpayers fit the bill.Hope you enjoy your poor city

those hats would be a deal breaker...

Neither did the officer. The point was he didn't care what the court ruled. As in he doesn't care what the law says. Does he think he's Judge Dredd?

or more likely people try to reference him bull shit that is either made up or doesn't even apply. the cop was just doing his job and what he thought was right, videotaping a building can look like suspicious activity.

...and the last thing the officer said to the videotaper after he admitted that he was wrong was, "Don't worry about it...."......No, actually I think that I should worry about supposed officers that have sworn to protect the public with laws that disregard Supreme Court rulings and try to hide their profound ignorance of the laws they are sworn to enforce...

Brandon Marvel; A suspicious activity "PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITION" and "SUPREME COURT RULINGS" LEARN THE LAW!

perfect example of someone who has a micro penis

+Matt5930r puppet*

exactly

even if he was provoking the police, they are supposed to be professionals. if they knew how to do their job correctly, they never would have walked up to him in the first place. after they did walk up to him, the moment he makes it clear he will provide no information, the police should walk away. the issue isn't that the police made a mistake, the issue is they kept making mistakes over and over. every single thing that police officer did was incorrect. not one thing. everything.

It seemed like he was making more of a statement. The first part being that these guys that are suppose to uphold the law don't even actually know or understand. The second being if the police can use drones and helicopters fitted with optical equipment that can use things like thermal imagining to spy into your house with no warrant then why is it not ok for this man to film the outside of the police department as well?

Star Does Gaming well either way it is admirable

Lol...the moron did take the bait, and got shutdown by his superior, and then pinked by this dude.

Hiruu Amon no, he thought he was doing the right thing, was informed that he wasn't, and left the scene calmly even when the guy was taunting him.

Only cause a cop told him, that happened to be his Sargent.

this is correct.

ffs, someone help us all

When bored fuckk with the police.....

+Bryce William Lol you sound like a typical conspiracy dipshit. Go take your medication weirdo.

The Supreme Court says he can. SUCK it up.

He still made a major mistake by publicly on record stating that he doesnt care what the Supreme Court says, an officer of the LAW stating that is a major red flag, if one can say it, several others can.

Gracchus Babeuf And how do you know that?

The cop was lying about the law. Who cares about his feelings

Nine They aren't talking about the idiot cop that walked away. They're talking about the experienced sgt. who kept his officer in line.

Rawler94 Well their job is entitled as civil servants, so respect isn't too much too ask. If they don't do that job, that's a different story.

Duvie apparently you haven't understood the police state we live in. Sometimes you got to crack the whip.

No it is He He He He He He He He= Helium

PHILOSOPHICAL THINKER quick! How many valence electron does helium have!!

I bet he pulled his glasses up when he said this

And know hes makin mad money and fame on this viral video

And perhaps spending it all and more because he has constant problems with the law. If you had a car, they know who you are.

Clorox Bleach Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin

But this isn't in aid of any of that. This is just being a pain in the ass for no good reason.

It's called being a pest and wasting resources. This does nothing to audit the police. Taping police is fine when there is a good reason, but flying drones over their office and video taping the premises is just pointless, you aren't learning something that is helping protect someone's rights, you aren't trying to prevent misconduct. It's nothing but being confrontational. Dude just wants to feel like a hero but theres no injustice here, just cops trying to do their job.

Exactly! Which proves he's an asshole to start with!!

+PaulGreen11 I have no problem telling a cop who I am whether a 300 year constitution says I can or can't.

+Ricky Bachman Double Exactly, my man!! If a cop ask me for I.D. I don't see that as a problem. Especially if the cop is cool and not threatening me in any way.

+PaulGreen11 These assholes denying a DUI checkpoint would have a problem if a DUI involves a family member of theirs becoming injured and see how quickly he refutes the next checkpoint. I'm sure cops get together and say, let's see how many people we can piss off! It's to save lives. For the record, I'm not a cop dickrider and I see there is a definite problem with black men being killed and something should be done to improve relations. Only trouble is all cop/black man shootings are lumped into the pile. Mike Brown is guilty. Many others aren't. If I, being a white male, mimicked Browns actions in Canada where I live, I'd be dead. No question.

+Ricky Bachman You'd be killed for Jaywalking?

The policeman looked completely retardet with his hat

Lol😂😂😂

It makes them look taller... just like a kitten would stand on its hind legs when there's a threat.

New York state police. Most are like this lol....

Do all American cops have those hats I'm from Australia so idk.

lol

AYeeeeeeeee

ha ha ha nice

What Simon A said is 100% correct, it's good to see there are some people with common sense on here.

vampuerile could be for footage for vlogs plus I'm pretty sure as long it isn't a prison courtyard or somewhere where the inmates are its ok also he most likely just got it and is messing around

I'm sure there's probably someone out there who's just been waiting their entire life to do this so hey maybe this video will help them if they ever see it.

Jesus, the fuck is wrong with some people? Cops attitude and understanding of the constitution was wrong but the dude is suspicious as fk filming a police facility of all things. These people go to work and never expect the day someone might surprise them with a bullet and they can't go back to their families. All the young cop did was ask who he is and why was he doing that suspicious activity. And the second the sarg told him it's fine he walked away and even said he was wrong.

Drake krome - regarding your first comment, there's nothing wrong with that but this is an obscure and ridiculous law to be making such a fuss out of that's why. Hence my original comment, if he has extensive knowledge of the law and enough spare time then he could spend it exposing police ignorance where it really matters instead of being a petty smartass prick and provoking a confrontation.

Do you know laws on drones, smart one?

+indemniman 162 k who's gonna read that

Bryan Milligan If he didn't know the laws on drones he could have just drank a nice tall glass of stfu

Why, they have a tradition to uphold, bust our balls.

he doesn't care what the law is

Give that sgt a promotion

No, for doing it well, and defusing the situation.

Some people just have nothing better to do with there time. I’m talking about the idiot with the drone.

Michael Denave Or the cop who is ,suppose to be....fighting crime but is worried about fucking drones and attempting or to violate your rights.

Prometheus McMurphy I’m sorry I didn’t know a police officer asking you what your doing and what is your name is a violation of your rights. Call me crazy but I thought that was part of there job. So according to folks like you they should only have contact with murderers, robbers burglars and rapists. Everything else should be ignored. I’m sure no career criminal has ever been caught while stoped for committing a violation . How about speeding and DWI. All BS right? You’d be the first person saying the police didn’t do there job if a drunk driver killed a family of five but was allowed thu a check point because answering questions is a violation of his civil rights. But folks like you seem to want it both was when is suits you. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

The American people didn't pass the law; they elected criminals who passed it for them. After 9/11, Congress created legislation which was signed into law by the POTUS, that declared American soil a battlefield. They have also cleared American airspace for over 30,000 drones. As well, POTUS has claimed the right to detain American citizens without a trial and, oh yeah, the right to kill American citizens without due process, a right to a fair trial and hear the evidence and face the witnesses who have accused them. Why, again, do you think police have this attitude? A storm is coming...

I agree with you that a storm is coming. The more united we are as a human family, the weaker the impact of the storm. But it is coming. Native Americans believe it is a healing and cleansing process.

+Michael Will so that's why armour piercer rounds for more popular

+Michael Will for citizens

well said!

Really? There could be no ill intent? The cameraman was right in principle not in spirit. Asking for his job is witch hunting. Once confronted with lawful information he was immediately submerged and had a knee-jerk response (unfortunately common with humans in an authoritative position). You should hope he learns from this and becomes a more informed officer.

ik, that the cameraman had the right but it just seems kind of sketchy to me

Kristo Vooro the fuck does that matter? And no it doesnt

Kristo Vooro it does

Regular Guy well first off its a gated police office I mean people are crazy some people may spot the area see how things work then BANG BANG BOOM and stuff like that

Gil Jones How dumb are YOU? The Sargent was the one that came and helped him in the end so why wouldn't he thank him for explaining the rules to a dumb cop

Gil Jones You're to dumb to talk with.

at least he said "have a good one" I guess in the end. Although not a thank you, it can be interpreted as a thank you too, and the end seems already have a bit cut.

Gil Jones um u do realize that the guy arguing with the guy behind the camera is not the sergeant? The sergeant was the one behind the fence later in the vid

You don't thank people for merely doing their job. Da pigs must fry.

Brandon Nguyen you could tell be that walking away, he probably started to cry after his head was turned. Lmao

looks like he couldn't' care less of all this shitty scene. Within minutes he was away of this, while the idiot with camera was celebrating his small triumph.

bdub78 One bad apple ruins the bunch sadly.

bdub78 no it's the other way around

Dillon Shafer well maybe for you,smart guy

So why was he filming

OMG I was so blind. Why, you're so intelligent! How'd you come up with that observation all by yourself!?

Lesley Pettit or lack thereof.

Well if I was a cop i would ask him why he was filming the station or what ever he was filming. This day in age where people are committing mass murders for no reason you never know what will happen. Its seems that everyone resits everything a cops says if you dont have anything to hide, just do what the cops says.

Just because a cop doesn't like what you are doing doesn't mean you have to cooperate. This day and age doesn't trump the rights we all have.

Those who sacrifice liberty for security, deserve neither. Your paranoia does not justify the police overreaching and/or violating anyone's rights.

+Mike Koger that's not a very valuable quotation, because the entirety of society is about balancing the needs of society vs. the needs of the individual. In some cases, we *do* "sacrifice liberty" and we do so because the alternative is far more damaging than the sacrifice. Warrants, for example, are a legal. justified and justifiable violation of a person's rights for a specific end.

You are so fucking bad, man. pyrespit@

geerenmo who gives a fuck nobody gives a fuck

So he's on a powertrip, and the camera man is on a confrontation bait mission. Not sure which one is worse. Cops have been targets of violence, so anyone with a brain and a bit of compassion can see the cop's point of view.

finally someone gets it

IF my brother had one hole more, he'd be my sister.

If the police were irritated because they were being filmed in public, then they have a guilty conscience, and should be filmed, and recorded.

He was doing it for the sole purpose of getting attention and looking fishy as fuck. Yeah there is no legislation on it yet but there definitely is going to be pretty damn soon if we get more retards trying to pull this or fly them next to people's windows. It's just a childish and stupid thing to do.

Rs Sleep *"He was doing it for the sole purpose of"* How long have you been reading minds?

Gil Jones lol maybe your the guy that filmed it, or just on his nuts

Gil Jones I figured you were. In my original post I said the guy filming was in his rights. Then you copied and pasted some stuff and insulted me for I don't know what reason, lol maybe to cause a scene of your own? He wants to be an activist and informative but doesn't want to say who he is because it's his right and zooms in on the officers names. That's a weak individual. Like a said he is in his right, the officer was wrong, don't mean he is corrupt, and both of you caused a scene, and if anyone is the dummy it is you, next time retort don't insult people. That is all, no need to go back in forth with small minded individuals as yourself, I'm sure you will respond though ;) you will be left waiting....forever

doesn't matter - we need people like this to keep cops honest. next time you get your rights violated, maybe you'll change your tune.

The camera guy is quite the dick to cops in the area here, so the fact that they're quick to be annoyed with him is part of the reason.

Chris Land of the free? Faaaack off.

I would have made the officer apologize for harassing someone unlawfully.

+Charles Mills oh cry about it

Bryan Milligan you are the one whinning.

That's why he got promoted to command class, he knows what he's doing.

reprimand a police officer in front of a civilian is a good job? they'll respect police officers "a lot" if this happen frenquently.. isn't?

Well if the drone he happened to be flying around a police station happened to have a bomb built in, it'd be nice to not hit you civies that wanna bitch about stuff like that now wouldn't it.

now... try this again and replace drone with car or horse carriage

***** How does parking slanted vs straight stop you from getting hit by moving cars what

***** Oh, I thought we meant hitting the car, I didn't realize that it was actually a problem where the officer themselves would get hit when stepping out..

I often wonder why all cops do that...freaking annoying!

I think in today's environment with terrorism being a real and probable threat, that it's fair to say that the trooper was acting in the interest of the public. Filming government facilities, especially critical infrastructure like a police station is a huge alarm bell. He could have been gathering information on how many officers are there, what firearms do they carry, what are their routines etc... If he were to just leave it be I would be saying he is not acting in the peoples interest and ensuring security and safety of the country , state or town. I''m not saying go arrest everyone who wants to film a police station, but if in a situation that is obviously suspicious in nature, even if not in intent, just comply and give your name, dont be a self righteous jackass. Maybe I am wrong, but getting name and date of birth hardly seems to be flexing your muscles of power, if there is nothing you have done wrong there is nothing that can go wrong. Its almost a human decency situation, if you see someone standing near your place of work and filming it by himself, especially if that building is a hub of people, you would be curious yourself and probably ask, or at least if you have an ounce of awareness and security you should. If that person refuses to provide anything it would certainly ring major alarm bell's, or it again should. Granted he obviously spoke to other officers and did talk to them to some degree of his purpose, what is the harm in telling it again if another officer obviously was not part of your initial explanation. If this is what the general public act like in these times, boy ISIS is going to have an absolute field day my friend.

+Unnecessary Risk I get what you're saying but it's not quite accurate. I agree it was the officers job to try and investigate suspicious activity, but suspicious does not equate to criminal. Once the officer went and asked the guy for ID and the guy exercised his legal right not to give it without a probable cause or reasonable suspicion then the officer should have taken a different approach just like with any investigation. When blocked on one avenue you find another one. He should have told the guy to have a nice day and then just watched him until he was satisfied the guy was not a threat. But what he did instead was harass a man who was not doing anything illegal. I can't stress this next sentence enough because people can't seem to understand the concept: It is NOT a civilians job to do ANYTHING but follow the law. If a civilian chooses to be nice to someone who is infringing upon his/her rights, fine, but if not that doesn't give a cop leave to try and strong-arm them into compliance.

Mission Attrition I get what you are saying, but in my eyes the trooper most definitely had probable cause to get some ID from the man. At the end of the day the civilian was being a jackass for the sake of it, There was absolutely no benefit for the trooper to possess the mans particulars. I imagine a name check would have been conducted and if there are previous alerts of suspicious behavior or actions, then steps would have been taken, however, if there were no such alerts then it is obvious that he is just filming because he is interested or plain old felt like it. People need to understand the situational circumstances. If the civilian is just standing around minding his own business in a shopping center, or out the front of his house, or place of work etc, then it would be unreasonable and unfair to demand his particulars, but this situation was not like those above and was definitely suspicious to say the least. It is every citizens responsibility to watch for and report suspicious behavior and ask themselves 'Is this normal, what are they doing, who are they?' This is especially true for any police officer/soldier/security officer as it is their paid job to ask these questions. I dont know why people get so offended by this and cant see the situation from the officers point of view. Now especially since there are shooting, or rather executions of officers in the public domain, it can be expected that the days where they will just look at some guy filming and loitering around the police stations or areas of police gatherings and assume it to be innocent are gone. Let me set you a scenes - imagine if there was some guy standing out the front of your kids daycare center, or out the front of your house etc, and he is filming you and others near by. In days of old you would have thought nothing of this, but these are not the days of old and there are MANY people out there that will blow up a daycare full of children without hesitation and call it gods work. Now keep this in mind and add the fact that police officers and other government officials are even more specifically targeted by said people. So you think to yourself 'I'm calling the police, something just doesn't feel right here and I am concerned there may be something more insidious in nature to this.' Scenario 1: The officer attends and speaks to the gentlemen who now understands that he was making you nervous and apologizes, providing his details to the officer who confirms there is no safety alerts on the male and leaves him to his lawful activities and you at ease knowing all is correct. Scenario 2: The officer approaches the male and asks him what his purpose in filming or loitering around is, however is met with avoidance and hostility. The officer requests the males name, however the male refuses to. The officer approaches you now and says "Sorry sir, I agree it looks suspicious but hey, I dont want to infringe this mans rights so im just going to leave him here and go. If he does turn out to be a terrorist or starts shooting the place up, call me then." Sorry for the wall of text, but I just want people to see reason other than 'fuck the police' because that seems to be the issue here, Hell, I dont even live in America, but like i said, in this circumstances and VERY recent history of terrorist and other attacks, i would call it 'reasonable suspicion' enough.

Unnecessary Risk I am a former police officer who is now a regular civilian so I see things from both perspectives. Here's the thing. Yes, it's suspicious for a guy to be arbitrarily walking around with firearms but again that doesn't make it criminal. If I were called to that scene I would have done the same thing initially. I would have asked the guy for his ID as I could and should do. But the moment he chooses to exercise his right not to produce it, as he could and should do in this situation, as a police officer I would say "ok, I just want to let you know you're making people nervous." At that point I'd just watch him for however long I felt the need to make sure he didn't do anything illegal. Sure the guy might get pissed off about it but I'd be full within my rights to do so just as he's full within his rights to carry the weapons. That way he can carry on with his business legally and unhindered and the public that are counting on me to protect and serve them can feel better knowing a cop is keenly observing a guy walking around with guns. So in your scenario 2: the cop (if he's a good cop) would say "Sorry sir, I agree it looks suspicious but hey, I dont want to infringe this mans rights so im just going keep an eye on him."

But that just seems to pussyfoot around the problem. I am a former police officer in Australia too by the way my friend, good to talk to other ex officer's ☺️ I just think that if an officer has suspicion enough to hang around and basically babysit some guy, there should be enough probable cause to obtain his particulars. I just don't see the harm in it. I know Australia is vastly different to America and I am not trying to compare the two, but reasonable suspicion here is much easier to come by. For example if there have been some assaults or burglar activity etc in an area, and someone is walking around in all black with a hoodie on, that is more than enough to obtain his particulars. Now granted the person may just be innocently walking just because he felt like it and can, and sure it may inconvenience him and make him feel like I am bullying him, but at the end of the day, he will understand when the burglaries or other crimes drop in the area. In Western Australia, when we look someone up on our system, it's basic information only, just criminal history, address, name and drivers licence details, nothing to be worried about, is it different in America? I just don't see the benefits for police in having your details in those circumstances, as in why is it assumed by most that the officer is only asking them for his own benefit, rather than out of reasonable suspicion?

Amen to that!

Golden voice - Yea you know when the other office arrived he began to get more cocky and was immediately shut down by his Superior.

D Underwood - And yes in Florida (Fort Myers) were I live they will also back up their officers. Also listen at this Nate Allen professional football player for Philadelphia Eagles Cops claimed a young girl said he tried to pick her up for prostitution. They arrested him and he told them that wasn't him. However, he got one of the best lawyers here. And they're ass was made to shame. Plus later the Chief was fired. www.news-press.com/story/news/local/fort-myers/2015/07/24/nate-allen-speaks-police-investigation-findings/30613085/ www.news-press.com/story/news/2015/07/31/internal-affairs-investigation-released-nate-allen-arrest/30955411/ Just go to Nate Allen Fort Myers fl arrest and read up on it.

D Underwood - You are very welcome. Be blessed 💋

***** - 👍💯💯💯💯💯

Why ignorant? New and tougher laws are being passed THIS very year(2018). And btw, it's spelled ignorant,not "ignoranqnt". You spell like crap. :P

Regular Guy Google it yourself you stupid fuck

Not sure he can spell Google you may have confused him

Settle down there "Keyboard Cowboy" before McDonald's sends you home early from your shift for crying in public.

Regular Guy as you can see, everybody think you are a psycho! And BTW, I found HEEPS of 2018 regulations in the USA alone.