Тёмный

Could SS murderers resign from killing? 

History on YouTube
Подписаться 41 тыс.
Просмотров 12 тыс.
50% 1

One of the excuses frequently used by Nazi era killers was that they had been ordered to kill and if they did not kill then they would be killed themselves. However there is not one solitary example that I know of where this actually happened. That is not to say that the Nazi German military courts were not extremely severe, at least 18,000 German soliders were shot during WW2, compare that to zero in the British army. During the period 7 December 1941, to 22 February 1946, 141 US soldiers were executed, 71 for murder, 51 for rape, 18 for murder and rape and only one for desertion.
Thomas Blatt was born in Izbica, Poland in 1927. In April 1943 he was deported to the Sobibór death camp from where he escaped in the prisoner revolt of 14 October 1943. I spent a great deal of time with him in both Poland and the United States, talking about his experiences during the war. He told me of the case of one of the SS staff who asked for a transfer out of the death camp and when given his transfer out, he even came to say goodbye to some prisoners and shook hands with them.
However there are cases where even killers asked for a transfer. Erwin Shulz was the commanding officer of Einsatzkommando 5 which was subordinated to Einsatzgruppe C. He initially participated in killings in the formely Soviet occupied zone of Poland then in turn occupied by Nazi Germany but when asked to shoot more people in Zhitomir, he asked for a transfer and returned to his old job as commander of the Führerschule der Sicherheitspolizei in Berlin-Charlottenburg. His transfer did not even effect his career, only shortly after leaving the occupied USSR, he was promoted to SS-Oberführer on 9. November 1941 and to SS-Brigadeführer und Generalmajor der Polizei on 9. November 1943.
Matthias Graf was attached to Einsatzkommando 6 as a Unterscharfuehrer, that is to say a corporal. After one year he was promoted to Scharfuehrer (sergeant) and when he left the occupied Soviet Union in October 1942 he held the rank of Oberscharfuehrer ( master sergeant). In September 1942 Graf was assigned to be in charge of a sub-kommando, but he refused to accept the assignment. Because of this refusal he was arrested and placed in custody for disciplinary action but this action was dropped after a few days and he was sent back to Germany in October 1942.
Another example is the case of Nikolaus Ernst Hornig who was an officer in a Police Battalion. In June 1941, Hornig was ordered to go on a officer training course for Schutzpolizei. Membership of the SS was expected but he refused and even criticised Nazi policies such as Lebensborn and the existence of the nearby Dachau concentration camp. In mid-October 1941, Hornig was ordered here to Lublin in the General Government of Poland to work with Police Battalion 306. In September 1941, SS-Obergruppenfuhrer Kurt Daluege , chief of the Order Police, ordered his unit to shoot Soviet prisoners of war. At the end of October 1941, Hornig himself received the order, as platoon commander of the 2nd company of the battalion, to shoot 780 prisoners of war, soldiers of the Red Army, in a forest near Zamość , who were regarded as political officers or Jews and previously had been chosen by the security police and the SD from Stalag 325 "to be shot". Hornig reported to his battalion commander , Ernst Dreier , that he had to refuse this order as it contradicted international law and also Section 47 of the applicable Military Penal Codethe execution of a criminal order is expressly forbidden. He also requested that disciplinary investigation be taken against himself in order to be able to refrain from such liquidation actions . Hornig referred to this provision of the Military Penal Code:
"If a criminal law is violated by the execution of an order in official matters, the superior issuing the order is solely responsible for this. However, the subordinate who obeys is subject to the participant's punishment [...] if he was aware that the superior's order concerned an act which aimed at a general or military crime or misdemeanor."
His superior's reaction to the refusal to obey orders initially consisted of playing it down. ‘Hornig will certainly acquire the necessary toughness for deployment in the east and will learn to carry out such orders in the near future;, was the general attitude. Hornig assembled his own platoon, explained to the police officers under him why he himself refused to take part in such shootings, and, citing Section 47 of the Military Criminal Code, pointed out that every subordinate had the right to refuse an order that was criminal.
Production of independent researched history is time consuming and expensive. Please consider supporting me on Patreon. / alanheath

Опубликовано:

 

10 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 111   
@warwickmorris9097
@warwickmorris9097 Год назад
Very informative. Being ex military and knowing about illegal orders, I have often thought about this very subject and the mind set of the SS and military personnel who carried out such orders, as well as what would happen if they refused. To be a loyal well disciplined soldier and do your duty does not mean carrying out illegal orders. Military personnel must have the “right of refusal” to obey what might be considered an illegal order and the consequences of such a refusal. Well done I would like to know more about this subject.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Thanks Warwick. In the British army it was written in a book we were given, as for the German army it was in the rules written in their paybook, never mind being a point of law.
@patkearney9320
@patkearney9320 Год назад
Soldiers must follow orders. We can't choose what orders are correct that's not are problem, I hate what war makes us become but the military didn't come looking for me to serve it was I who looked for them.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
@@patkearney9320 I don't know the situation in every army but it was written very clearly in the book that recruits got when I joined that one cannot be ordered to do something which is illegal.
@thestraightroad305
@thestraightroad305 Год назад
@@HistoryonRU-vid Thank God for that decency.
@rabbitholereviews
@rabbitholereviews Год назад
We absolutely can choose which orders to follow. In fact, if an order is unlawful, you have an obligation not to follow said order.
@NTav540
@NTav540 Год назад
Thank you for this channel. I am Brazilian and I am learning about WW2 and this channel is a great way to do so. It is a service to us all.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Thank you Nila, that is very nice to read!
@iDoTechOK
@iDoTechOK Год назад
Great presentation! Thank you. I recall mention of the military penal code and this was a good refresher. Good point that many soldiers did not have awareness of their ability to refuse criminal orders.
@27294Mike
@27294Mike Год назад
Very informative, thanks Alan!
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
My pleasure Mike!
@eleanorkett1129
@eleanorkett1129 Год назад
Thank you for this very important episode. “I was carrying out orders” never held water in defense.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Thanks for watching Eleanor!
@jean6872
@jean6872 Год назад
The examples chosen to show that members of the SS were free to refuse orders to kill Jews and Red Army POWs will give a false impression that ordinary SS soldiers soldiers could refuse to carry out orders to kill prisoners with impunity. I do not believe this to be true because the fear of death by soldiers, especially conscripts was very real during the war. It is admitted that 18,000 German soldiers were shot dead during WWII as punishment This number is vastly underestimated. In fact, one and a half million German soldiers were sentenced to imprisonment for refusing to follow an order. Up to 50,000 were killed for often minor acts of insubordination including 23,000 German soldiers executed for refusing orders. An unknown number were summarily executed, often in the moment, by their officers or comrades when they refused to follow commands. It was not therefore uncommon that discipline was maintained by using fear. The legality of countermanding an illegal order undoubtedly was not altogether understood by soldiers as it would take some knowledge of the law to take a stand as well as an attitude that the policy of arresting and sending Jews to death camps was a government one and held behind it the authority of the state. It is to be doubted that any military tribunal would not tolerate such insubordination. It is a fact that superior orders were considered necessary to be obeyed in principle. Those giving the orders are responsible even though those carrying them out, in the case of an illegal order, were officially guilty also. Most soldiers would not dare question the legality of orders they were given. The first example given was from a death camp in Poland where an SS man asked for and was given a transfer. This proves nothing; there were other requests for transfers which were denied. The example is not the same as someone who refused an order. Those who were refused a transfer are considered guilty of contributing to murder and they are prosecuted by the German government even if they actually killed nobody. The West German government overlooked postings in death camps and labor camps in an effort to put the past behind them. Today they prosecute people in their 80s and 90 who were teenagers out of school and conscripted by the SS against their will to be guards or clerks even if they had requested transfers. The video is misleading.
@jettjones9889
@jettjones9889 Год назад
My thoughts exactly, very well put.
@jean6872
@jean6872 Год назад
@@jettjones9889 Nice to know, Jett.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
If this is incorrect, all you have to do is to name one example to back up your claim.
@jean6872
@jean6872 Год назад
@History on RU-vid You miss my point entirely. We do not know how many of the 23,000 German soldiers executed for refusing orders were due to refusing to participate in killing Jews or Russian POWs. This information was not recorded. Look at what you said; a mere 100 or so who were not executed on the spot like the tens of thousands who were shot by a superior for no specific reason other then refusing an order. To claim, as you did, that not a single German soldier was shot for refusing an order to kill Jews or POWs cannot be substantiated. Your data cannot substantiate your grand claim. All it does is tell of the 100 who were imprisoned, refused further promotion, or transferred, depending on his superior, his rank, or the time during the war. It is illogical to extrapolate from this that no-one was shot for refusing to kill. *Such information was not recorded.* Very many were shot for less without reports being written about them. You seem not to understand how the German Wehrmacht or the SS operated.
@americanmeteoritefan9670
@americanmeteoritefan9670 Год назад
Perhaps at a certain point, because death is ever present in a world where the penalty of death is attached to any resistance, it is unecessary to be threatened openly. Everyone knows. The threat of death was firmly implied, everyone had already seen what happened to those who resisted, especially what was done to the the Reichsbanner, made up of WW1 veterans, the most honored of them, who would enthusiasticly resist fascism or illegal orders, were incarcerated in mass as early as May 1st, 1932, most died in concentration camps in the following years. I don't know that everyone had the same experience but I do know of one man who was a WW1 vet, a Reichsbanner member and a chairman of the SPD party in Frankfurt Germany who resisted. For his resistance he was arrested on April 5th,1935 in Frankfurt where he drove a streetcar, he was charged with treason, was stripped of his vet status and citizenship, his wife and kids were arrested as well. One son was sterilized and had his own citizenship stripped from him while in Dachau concentration camp, another son was forced to go on the run, while his daughter and wife were both murdered. Mr Emil Schubert was held for 10 years by the Nazis for his resistance, tortured by the gestapo for years in several prisons, spending almost two years in Dachau before transferring to Gusen 2, a subcamp of Mauthausen in Austria,where he was murdered on February 19, 1945. This still doesn't answer the question of whether the SS could refuse orders but it gives you an idea of how difficult it might be for someone who resisted. Only one son survived the war but I'm certain Emil would still resist today. RESIST FASCISM.
@Brembelia
@Brembelia 8 месяцев назад
Excellent channel. You are educating responsibly, for which I am grateful.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube 8 месяцев назад
Thank you!
@ryankenyon5010
@ryankenyon5010 Год назад
Excellent video. I've often wondered about this.
@Orphen42O
@Orphen42O Год назад
I heard a rumor that each soldier's handbook included the statement that a soldier could refuse an order that a soldier found morally repugnant. I do not know if that is true. Many of the executioners were non-German members of the German SS who may have been eager to prove their dedication to SS principles.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Something like that. The paybook stated that it is beneath the dignity of a German soldier to break the law.
@roberttelarket4934
@roberttelarket4934 Год назад
Everyone familiar with legal procedure including judges/lawyers will always state to defendants that ignorance of the law is no excuse!
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Only one hour ago I was going through Paul Blobel's excuses and was thnking whether or not to put them in a video on him.
@patkearney9320
@patkearney9320 Год назад
In times of war the goal posts get changed! A soldier must follow orders.
@ritamedina-molina8550
@ritamedina-molina8550 Год назад
The consequences of asking for transfer to transfer depended on the specific commanding officer...you never knew if your family would end up in a concentration camp.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
There is no evidence of anyone being punished for asking for a transfer. If anyone has evidence, then perhaps they could produce it.
@michelhuard5080
@michelhuard5080 Год назад
Actually, there was an incident in Serbia (Yugoslavia) where a regular army soldier named Joseph Schultz was executed by the same firing squad that he refused to be part of. An officer had taken photographs at the scene. Despite being warned twice that if he didn’t follow orders, he would be shot. After twice refusing to raise his rifle and aim at a group of suspected partisans, he calmly placed his rifle, his tunic, and his utility belt, along with his helmet and dog tags on the ground, and walked up to the stack of hay where the condemned men were lined up. He stood in the middle of the group, and reached out to hold a hand. The firing squad executed him after first shooting the partisans. Though some historians question the event, there are photos of the event. His parents were told he was killed in action.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
I know of this incident and there are good reasons to doubt it actually happened even if it has appeared on internet memes etc. However, even taking that story as true, the execution of the soldier was illegal under German military law and thus also is murder.
@michelhuard5080
@michelhuard5080 Год назад
@@HistoryonRU-vid Yes indeed. Joseph’s commanding officer was either not aware of Himmler’s order stating that any soldier in the regular army who didn’t want to take part in executions, DIDN’T HAVE TO DO SO. Disciplinary actions against such individuals were FORBIDDEN. He didn’t know, or didn’t care.
@michelhuard5080
@michelhuard5080 Год назад
It should be noted I believe, that the German army as well as the Luftwaffe hated and despised the SS and the Gestapo because of the atrocities that both organizations were carrying out against civilian populations.
@georgebrown8312
@georgebrown8312 6 часов назад
I'm surprised that there were some SS officers who had the courage to refuse orders to kill innocent people or prisoners of war, or who refused to order their soldiers to kill innocent civilians or captured enemy soldiers in their custody. Hats off to those bold, courageous officers who refused to carry out illegal orders. Thank you for this eye-opening video.
@lablackzed
@lablackzed Год назад
Good post I enjoy it it goes to show how many German generals and Field marshals were guilty of war crime's by the laws quoted here the excuse of we where only following order's goes right out of the window also was it not in the soldiers field book on law's of conduct in war.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Exactly, it was in their paybook never mind anywhere else!
@lablackzed
@lablackzed Год назад
@@HistoryonRU-vid That is what I thought I remember reading that somewhere along time ago when I was in the army also the German war academy had a manual on the conduct of war with a code of ethics If my memory serves me right.
@Hongaars1969
@Hongaars1969 Год назад
Investigative (historical) reporting (journalism). Factual research objectively presented in unambiguous manner
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Thanks Doc!
@royalflush6542
@royalflush6542 Год назад
very well done, alan!!
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Thank you!
@roberttelarket4934
@roberttelarket4934 Год назад
I’ve heard somewhat of a few refusals! Shocking that all were not treated severely including execution!
@msgfrmdaactionman3000
@msgfrmdaactionman3000 Год назад
Thanks as always for your in depth history perspective. Are there any still alive at new year 2023? I wonder, probably.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Not that I know of, although it is possible!
@mediocremaiden8883
@mediocremaiden8883 10 месяцев назад
The German 'soldiers' would have had to have been Hitler Youth,the American Soldiers aged 17-early 20s would be in their mid to late 90s I suspect. As for Holocaust Survivors, mostly any children or teens would be late 70s-early 90s. I'm guessing. The Great War was over 100 years ago so...WW2 started in 1939 so 86, years ago
@saturnchildwinterborn7897
@saturnchildwinterborn7897 10 месяцев назад
How was this man not punished? He was lucky to have survived Buchenwald. A true nightmare. 😢
@fr.michaelknipe4839
@fr.michaelknipe4839 Год назад
Excellent presentation
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Thanks Michael!
@bookaufman9643
@bookaufman9643 10 месяцев назад
This is a very interesting video on a subject that I don't think I've heard covered before. I want to say that these people suddenly grew a conscience but I'm sure it had more to do with the difficulty in killing people directly in front of you. The Nazis actually recognized that this was very difficult and that's how they started developing gas Chambers so that their soldiers wouldn't have to suffer the side effects that come from murdering the helpless. I'm sure some of these guys remained true believers they just didn't like killing people physically but probably didn't object to it all that much morally. That's what some of the Nazi bureaucrats came to believe.
@josephstabile9154
@josephstabile9154 Год назад
Thx much! The last thing the nazis wanted was one of these trials for refusal to carry out illegal orders to make its way into open, civilian court. The nazis would rather just reassign the 'refusenik' . This video should be required watching for every nazi apologist.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Thanks Joseph!
@frederikbjerre427
@frederikbjerre427 Год назад
Very informative, I hope you will do an episode on Werner Best, major figure in the Nazi party and the Gestapo as well as the head of occupation forces in Denmark during the war. He influenced German law after the war, benefiting criminals and turned out to far worse than his indictment showed.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Around 16 years ago, I got a stack of archival materials on Werner Best, I suppose now is the time to start using them.
@frederikbjerre427
@frederikbjerre427 Год назад
@@HistoryonRU-vid interesting, I'll look forward to it. Thanks for the great work you do.
@larry1824
@larry1824 8 месяцев назад
Even enlisted could refuse to be part of an aktion with no reprisals
@mediocremaiden8883
@mediocremaiden8883 10 месяцев назад
Somderkommandos..Weren't they Jewish Prisoners themselves that had to run the actual 'killing machines' lie to them about a shower and where to put their clothes, they get undressed go into the room,the Sonderkommandos fish through the clothes for valuables while the prisoners were being gassed and exterminated then they had to use a hook to drag the corpses to the ovens and burn them. Then after a few months,the Sonderkommandos were shot or gassed themselves so the German secret would stay hidden..But the secret got out. The Sonderkommando Photos that was a secret operation smuggled a roll of film of this scenario out through a tube of toothpaste. I need to watch this again I think I missed or misunderstood some parts Edit: Yes I absolutely missed a great deal of info because I'm an idiot and should've waited and watched in my quiet room 🎉🎉 *Wonderful video* very educational and voice much like the ASMR like Mark Felton Productions,however the topic of the videos are a harsh education your calm voice comes through helping and reminding us to focus on the learning and not be distracted by the 'Giant Boogeyman' if you will, of the third Reich"
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube 10 месяцев назад
You are right about the Sonderkommando, at Auschwitz three photographs were taken by people in the Sonderkommando. Thanks for the comment about my voice, I don't particularly like it but it is the only one I have.
@mediocremaiden8883
@mediocremaiden8883 10 месяцев назад
@HistoryonRU-vid I don't think anybody likes the voice they hear when it's recorded and listening to playback because we are use to what we hear in our heads 🤗 Yes I only wonder what monstrosity was accidentally missed in the 4th photo because the terrified SK shot the photo too high 📸 and took a photo of trees . I forget his name (shame on me) he was a Greek Jewish man (I'm sure you know this already) He now belongs to the Heroes of The Ages. I hope 🙏 😌 that you will continue to keep posting with your real voice (A.I. voice just seems inappropriate in such a topic as this..and it was very kind of you to allow me to explain to you Sonderkommandos when you already knew very well) I look forward to watching more of your hard work and research and videos !
@tamiegrgn11
@tamiegrgn11 7 месяцев назад
This is Unbelievable! Sadly true.
@dannyc.jewell8788
@dannyc.jewell8788 Год назад
Very nice ,I talked to an old man who was a ww2 vet , ,he said he got captured twice one time by the Germans ,he escaped , second time by Russians ,they put him with the German pow's They got him out in 3 days
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
The subject of how many western POWs were held by the Soviet Union is an interesting one. In your friend's case, maybe he was lucky to get out after only three days!
@thewwiiprofessor5808
@thewwiiprofessor5808 Год назад
Another interesting topic to discuss would be the Barbarossa Decree implemented by Field Marshal Keitel. The decree declared any war crimes committed by the Wehrmacht or SS against Soviet civilians, partisans, etc. would not be held responsible, and therefore considered not crimes....even under the laws of Germany.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
I think that that is more of a legal question and I don't think I have the knowledge to do it. I can describe laws as I see them (as in this video) but not come to a conclusion. However, in my untrained opinion, I cannot see how a supreme court would allow a military decree to have precedence over criminal law.
@thewwiiprofessor5808
@thewwiiprofessor5808 Год назад
@@HistoryonRU-vid I am no legal expert myself. The criminal laws of Germany or under the international tribunal after the war did not recognize the decree as lawful. The decree was certainly just another war crime.
@thepub245
@thepub245 9 месяцев назад
I don't think there was any real notion of illegal orders at that time. Authority wasn't challenged or scrutinised they way it is in today's world. From what have read on the subject, matters like taking part in mass shootings were presented as a special solemn task to be carried out in the interests of the nation. Soldiers and members of Police units were given an option of not taking part but those that did take the option were sent to Coventry, sneered at and treated with derision by their colleagues, so not many did take the option.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube 9 месяцев назад
That is a good subject for a video response but you are completely wrong. The law existed then and most killers knew that they were breaking it. This video explains the articles of German law that were broken and why superior orders could not be given as a defence.
@thepub245
@thepub245 9 месяцев назад
@@HistoryonRU-vid on a completely moral point of view,I believe many knew what they were doing in committing these acts of extermination was wrong but factor in the success the Germans were having in the war at the time, the feeling of invincibility and remoteness of any possibility of repercussions and the effects of the nazi propaganda on the boots on the ground, I doubt many worried about the law as they had effectively taken the law onto themselves anyway.
@markcargill9734
@markcargill9734 Год назад
Madness.
@isawa6649
@isawa6649 Год назад
Thank you
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
You're welcome
@markcargill9734
@markcargill9734 Год назад
Adolf only Had One Ball..... The other is in the Albert Hall. All Together now....
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
There is my video on this very important theme Mark : ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-aAqgihtEF8Y.html
@davescorner2393
@davescorner2393 Год назад
Excellent really interesting.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Thanks Dave!
@weilandiv8310
@weilandiv8310 Год назад
Also, Himmler was cited for needing a close shave.
@elrjames7799
@elrjames7799 Год назад
A view probably supported by the authority of Dr Christopher Browning, in relation to participation in the 'Holocaust'.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
I tend to agree with him on the whole!
@MrOuija-rr8kq
@MrOuija-rr8kq Год назад
Wow. Sounds like you need to make a video on the US executions of its soldiers. Fascinating.
@Skipper.17
@Skipper.17 8 месяцев назад
There was a British/Sri Lankan soldier executed I believe
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube 8 месяцев назад
There was a British soldier in the SS who was executed for not murdering people?
@dolltall
@dolltall Год назад
🌟🌟🌟
@vincentadams9569
@vincentadams9569 Год назад
Another Great Video!! And a MERRY CHRISTMAS 🎇🎅🏼 🎄 to You!
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Thanks Vincent. Happy holidays to you too!
@solvingpolitics3172
@solvingpolitics3172 Год назад
@@HistoryonRU-vidHave a happy New Year & thanks for your great channel.
@thewwiiprofessor5808
@thewwiiprofessor5808 Год назад
Another great video. I think we can debate whether the ability to refuse orders and the intimate executions of POWs, Jews, Roma, Slavs, etc. were one of the significant components of why the death camps were established ...especially during the Holocaust by Bullets and the implementation of Aktion Reinhardt. It is far less impersonal to load people on trains to be exterminated via an industrial setting....of course, not for the officials at the vernichtungslager and the victims. This is not to diminish the horrors of liquidating ghettos, starvation as a tool to murder, etc. It is just an opinion that even though mass murder still existed on the Ostfront along with the camps, centralised killings alleviated some of this burden overall. This would be an interesting topic to discuss.
@HistoryonYouTube
@HistoryonYouTube Год назад
Effectively we have the desk killers who shuffled papers around who took orders from people who had no contact whatsoever with the victims and were just peddling conspiracy theories. These desk killers then passed orders onto people who had some but not a lot of contact with the killers to those that did who may have passed orders onto the victims themselves.
Далее
What the German generals knew
22:15
Просмотров 18 тыс.
Introducing iPhone 16 | Apple
02:00
Просмотров 4,5 млн
гендер пати🩷🩵
00:21
Просмотров 113 тыс.
The railway station at the Chełmno death camp
8:49