Criminal Lawyer Reacts to SSSniperWolf Doxxing Jacksfilms, Apology & Divorce 

It's super transformative, we all want Bruce's interpretation and analysis of true crime/legal issues

Head and shoulders above what this "influencer" does. I always learn something new with Bruce

Fr I learn something new every video. If not learn at least hear a new term which is still adding value

She is hot, and her content is unwatchable. I did not know other people, like bruce, felt this way too. Added some context and improved the content right there, just as an example.

knowing youtube they will only penalize her for a month!

Maybe Jack shouldn't have made an illegal DCMA take down notice. Jack was definitely cyber stalking her. My take is coming from watching Jack's own words. Jack fake playing victim here.

@@zappyeats2579 she's not going to bang you bro. Jack never did a dmca strike on her. All he did was show creators who were mad about their stuff being "reacted" to how to fill out a dmca claim. Creators have every right to claim their material if it isn't being used properly by fair use laws.

@@Careless-sv6cf Jack might bang you for your support tho, keep simping 🤣

​@@zappyeats2579is what he said about DCMA true or not?

@@jamesgornall5731 I don't fully understand your question here.

That is the rub if she gets too many strikes and others show she was taking their shit and posting it for her own gain that's gone in a heart beat.

@@chromeshellking The bigger they come, the harder they fall

If she's not a complete idiot, she's already saved millions and could quit any day...

That’s ridiculous. People are hungry.

​@@chromeshellkingyeah in theory sure. But she was a yt cash cow so those consequences straight up werw not going to come to her. She could have absolutely just kept doing her thing, never address Jack at all, and just kept taking in the dough indefinitely.

Not to mention, she apparently started reuploading to another account, to keep monetization.

Sick & wrong. Sick of her and insipid videos . Only a week suspension.

​@Rollerrot that one got demonetized after people caught it and called RU-vid out

The fact she done it still like she could of made $10-50m on her time on RU-vid and she can't take a slap on the wrist. Get her the hell off this platform youtube

She makes a lot of money to normal people. But to Google/RU-vid her money is irrelevant. Sites quote her as having a 100 Million dollar net worth. Assuming this is true and that 100% of her money comes from RU-vid(which we know is false) that represents 00.3% of RU-vid’s revenue.

This is the only kind of reactions I like, some that can add additional context or information I don’t know, or even an opinion outside of mine.

Could be worse he could read the case or put a video of someone explaining it, watch the whole thing, and just say "crazy!" At the very end.

Calling it "react content" is honestly misleading, because it abstracts key information about the nature of the videos in such a way as to create false equivalents when in reality the two types of videos are not even remotely similar. Bruce is an expert, going through videos about his field of expertise so that he can break down how his field works and what is actually happening and why. This style of "react content" is much closer to edutainment than anything.

There's a difference between reaction and analysis.

Her and Evan were also both booked for disturbance of the peace and assault. She did a video about her ✨traumatic✨ day and a half in county after her arrest. i don't think any conviction came from it because neither her nor Evan pursued charges for the physical assault, and the disturbance of peace after 10pm or whatever it was in her neighbourhood is such a lowly misdemeanor they would have only needed to pay a small fine - which given how much she was raking in from YT and AdSense even back then, would have been chump change to them. I _think_ the video about her night in county was in 2018, but I don't have it in me to wade through her shit to find it. Sidetracked. Sorry. Between the armed robbery and assault... Yeah, I'd be scared shitless if I so much as saw her walk down my street, because I blocked my barely teenage son from watching her videos back in 2018 and took a few pennies from her bank vault. She's got the potential to become so much more of a risk if provoked, and she doesn't care if it plays out publicly for all to see, evidently.

armed robbery not burglary in 2013 and this is from someone knowing about the situation: "She was walking through a store when a security guy grabbed her purse, because he believed she shoplifted, and she fought back, not knowing who he was. They searched her car without consent and found personal possessions that they assumed were stolen. Charges were reduced to assault after they discovered she owned the things in her car, and then later dropped after they realized they couldn't sustain assault charges if she simply explained to a jury that some large man tried to steal her purse without explanation, and she rightfully defended her property. No conviction tells you everything you need to know. If they had anything on her, they could have forced her to plead guilty to at least a misdemeanor. They had nothing." there is enough real shit to criticize her for, by creating rumours or making something out of nothing will only help her fans attack anything that actually has substance

​@@KatiB5587pennies from her bank vault?? Who are you talking about

@@dark_sky_guy Spotted the person who doesn't understand metaphors. When I blocked my _then_ 12 year old son from watching Lia's content it meant that she was receiving a few less cents per dozen videos without his viewership and AdSense from it. That's the pennies part of the metaphor. At that point in time she had enough money for the downpayment on a home worth USD$7million in Arizona. (Which she paid in 2019) A lot of money. That's the bank vault. My son being blocked from her content took a few pennies from her bank vault. Do you understand now, or do I need to break it down in my finest crayons?

@@SoneGurke it's a grey area about how it would have panned out if that incident went to trial. Arizona does have Castle Doctrine and therefore Stand Your Ground laws, but it doesn't cover vehicles. AZ laws only include someone's residence - or an investment property that is leased out to tenants - in their Stand Your Ground laws. Any physical retaliation regarding search of her vehicle, even an unlawful search without a warrant, is generally still a misdemeanor if there's no serious harm sustained, and can be bumped up to a felony if the person conducting the illegal search sustains permanently life altering injuries. So, because someone messed up by carrying out an illegal search of Lia's vehicle which is a more serious offence than her ruckus, the charges against her would have been dropped to prevent the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by her for the search without warrant. I hope I'm making sense. I'm so tired, but wanted to get my thoughts out because I know I'd forget if I left it til morning.

More money you make them... more "right" you are according to You Tube.

Simps are ruining the world

@RaniaIsAwesome she did stole content and you would realize that if you watched some of her videos. It isn't slander when it is true. She happened to to "pass by" his house in a big city like Los Angeles in the middle of the night and even stalled outside of Jack's home.

@@BradyKaynee I also recently heard (on the Someordinarypodcast) that she has a special tool on youtube to delete parts of her video and keep the rest when someone does actually issue a copyright claim. This sounds like "so what seems obvious, everyone should have that" but everyone doesn't have it. RU-vid only provides this "feature" so a few select big creators. So RU-vid makes it easier for her to steal content and get away with it when the content owners try to prevent it.

@@BradyKaynee exactly. All RU-vid cares about is their bottom like. They punish Jacksfilms for making them punish her.

Isn’t it wild when worlds collide 😂

legaleagle also made a video about it

legaleagle did a video too

I feckin love it

They didn't even get Jack's channel name right. It's jacksfilms plural with an S

why should she apologise? jack should apologise, as he harassed her for months. he made a whole channel just to attack her from. he was jealous of her

You're trolling right? He was being critical of her stealing content. It's not harassment, being critical is protected by free speech. Her Revealing a person's home in front of 5mil people and calling him out is harassment. That's almost inciting her fan base to act.

@@BikingWIthPanda and he isn't jealous. He wants her to credit the creators of the videos she watches. She doesn't credit or link any of them n that is straight up freebooting and stealing

@BikingWIthPanda there is no way your account is 11 years old and you defend the content thief instead of someone who actually creates content. What if she "reacted" to your dirt bike videos and made thousands or millions off of saying "wow" while you did all the hard work

It’s not just that she’s a woman. She prints out money for RU-vid; Look at the views and how many videos she pumps out.

And would need BR to keep the man out of prison

I am a woman and I agree. I have watched his videos and I love his sssniperwolf bbbingo. She needs to be held accountable

Idk, probably, but I think the real reason they don't want to really punish her is because she's a cash cow. They want to treat their big players good so they stay with youtube.

Cause youtube are simps if they knew to do thing's right they would remove her they could get charged for aiding a crime

I like Bruce but his stuff is no more transformative than sssniperwolf. (Someone I don't watch) but it is allowed on RU-vid. Jacks cyber bullying of sssniperwolf is against RU-vid policy that is why RU-vid demolished both of them.

​@@zappyeats2579😂😂😂😂 Yikes.

@zappyeats2579 you talk like sniperwolf paid you by the dollar to write that lmao

@@mookiess really? Why Because I'm not a sheep and I speak the truth. I could literally do the same thing to Bruce's videos as he did to snipers. They just appeal to different audiences. And apparently Jack appealed to noone so he had to latch onto name recognition 🙄

​​@@zappyeats2579what does that have to do with the fact she doxxed him, he did not deserve that at all the man is just having fun with sssniperwolf's trash content

Do it

We need you! You've got this!

🎉 yes

I wish you great success in your future in law school or anywhere else

Go get ‘em! 👍 Bruce and Michael are quite inspiring ☺️

Honestly, if it weren't for everything else, I'd respect the grift.

Very true. I had a narcissist boss who I "embarrassed" when I asked her in private why we weren't getting holiday bonuses that year. Ten years later she still tells the story with my name how I embarrassed her by screaming across the hallway and demanding the bonus. Turns it we weren't getting a bonus that year because she gave herself a massive bonus. Funny after I "embarrassed" her we all got the bonus.

​@@debby8428based as fuck

It depends on the type. Vulnerable narcissists cannot stand any kind of criticism. Grandiose narcissists however, are not bothered by it at all. Of course this is just 2 ends of a spectrum.

It’s ok to have NPD, and a lot of narcissists are good people and not like SSSniperwolf.

Bingo,

Never heard of the term “doxxing” until this video.

She also criminally defamed s dude (not sure if it's the same guy who she doxxed) by calling him a sex offender/sexual assaulter a good few years ago. Poor dude is still affected and attacked by her fans to this day. Wish he was able to go after her legally for defamation.

It was Enigmahood. Not a stellar creator by any means, but yeah, she doxxed him AND claimed she had evidence that he was a sex offender. (He doesn’t appear to be.). Her Stan’s went after him HARD. He did sue for defamation but it was dismissed on a technicality, because they lived in different states and that created an issue of jurisdiction.

​@@pibly7784its been commonly used on the internet for years.

Getting revenge for criticism could be a sign of narcissistic personality disorder.

that one was demonitized too

@@Not_Always now it is lol, it wasn’t before.

And sometimes just posting the tiktoks without herself 'reacting' to it too or repeating clips just to get videos long enough for mid rolls.

Not to mention she will cut out text from a video or cut out what a person says so that she can say the same thing. Reacting is pretty borderline at the best of times, but when your "reaction" is to another reaction, and you just cut out what they say so you can say it yourself.. It's just pathetic really.

@@3xceIIentare you a lawyer?

​@@mandypdxYour point?

​@@mandypdxAre you a dunce?

I bet she didn’t even write it anyway. She paid somebody to write that.

Asmongold is great!! His reactions to the Depp vs Heard trial were pure gold, and when he showed CLR on one of his videos is when I became a sub here.

She sure does!

Bruce is a real lawyer, what are you talking about?

That would be great , but I doubt it ......

Ha, you can try anything and see what sticks.

Honestly, if the creators that have their content stolen by xqc sue him, they probably would win, which would encourage other creators to sue those that do lazy reactions

They can just use youtubes copyright system to claim the videos with stolen content and take the profits from her.

You realize this would mean Bruce would be sued. And the fact according to what Jack said. The clips she takes are from channels that had 63 views etc. Probably not even monetized. So they have no damages

Creepy followers and also children who don't realize that she's stealing other people's work when they're the ones who deserve to make money.

The millions of INCELS that are obsessed with her will hopefully learn her address soon so they can have a nice respectful conversation 😅

These people who support her don’t know what she did and if you try to explain to them she delete or hide comments

My 10 yr old son watches her he used to alot more but I did just see him watching her the other day and was like oh your watching snipper wolf boy knowing about any of this but I'm old AF and don't know anything about RU-vid and doxing didn't know what the hell that meant 😂

Meant to say not knowing about not boy ... But yeah I'ma ask him if he knows about this because I'm sure he doesn't

And so much more! Bruce and Michael are wonderful and loving people. I wish there were more creators like them.

You are in for such an entertaining,educational treat. I suggest you drag it out and watch just a couple a day 😂

He didn't critique her, he was straight out cyber stalking her

Fun fact, she has a prior conviction of felony armed robbery.

​@@zappyeats2579she's not gonna bang you bri

@@Haarschmuckfachgeschafttadpole exactly if it's true not the person I would be going out of my way to steal from 🤣🤣🤣

@@zappyeats2579how. Is. critiquing. someones. Content. Cyber. Stalking? You legitimate downie LMFAOOOOO so technically every RU-vidr at some point has “stalked” another RU-vidr for simply making videos and critiquing them as well going by your T A R D logic.

I would bet most of her subscribers are between pre-teen and 30 years old, with a few adult pervs thrown into the mix.

The day after, she started posting videos on a separate, still-monetized account. RU-vid did demonetization that one as well, but her apology was worth jack because she immediately tried to work around it.

I love when he doesn’t diagnose people and only states what could be happening in a situation like this 😂

He somehow always sneaks a little wholesome moment like that in. It's nice.

I have also wondered about that. I asked a couple of weeks ago but did not get an answer. If you find out please let me know. Thanks

I always look at his suits and admire the way he dresses. He is an attractive man and look very nice in his suits.

She started streaming before her brain was fully developed, made tons of money & clout super fast, and sat in front of a screen indoors for 10 years while doing so. Seems like a lack of being in environments where real world consequences are more likely to be had. Now she really gets to see what real world consequences are.

This person is in her 30s. She's not just some idiot kid.

On this story, definitely. LE didn't do much research or look into SS's past.

LE has no humor

She wanted him to stop producing the same videos she makes? I mean I agree on that there was likely no thought from her on the decision she made but aside from that she’s entirely in the wrong.

@@Chickenguesswhat She was kinda mad at the videos but not enough to doxx him. What made her go psycho was the fact that Jack started to show creators how to claim their videos from her and that obviously hurts her money making machine. Was he in the wrong? Hell no. Not even RU-vid thought of him being wrong or his content being harassment. She could do NOTHING to make him stop. So the only way her minuscule brain thought of stopping him was to use intimidation tactics and obviously doxx him.

​@@Geronmyit never occurred to her to just give credit to the original creators?

​@@joisagirlsname that would mean being appreciative of other creators and being capable of forethought. Something she clearly lacks.

@@kalinkapavlova9398 obviously has no appreciation for the effort that goes into being an actual creator. I was taught to always credit the work.n

Lots of work in family law so people who like money tend to go into it.

I’m so sorry that happened to you. My brother committed suicide at the age of 19. I was 15 and we were very close. The pain never really goes away.