Critical Thinking #3: Types of Arguments

Подписаться 2,2 млн

Просмотров 71 тыс.

50% 1

→ brilliant.org/criticalthinking
The critical thinking miniseries was made possible by our viewers and listeners. To support more of this type of work, become a member or Patron at www.davidpakman.com/membership and / davidpakmanshow
-Donate via Bitcoin: 15evMNUN1g4qdRxywbHFCKNfdCTjxtztfj
-Donate via Ethereum: 0xe3E6b538E1CD21D48Ff1Ddf2D744ea8B95Ba1930
-Donate via Litecoin: LhNVT9j5gQj8U1AbwLzwfoc5okDoiFn4Mt
-Support when you buy cryptocurrency: www.davidpakman.com/coinbase
-Follow David on Twitter: / dpakman
-Follow David on Instagram: / david.pakman
-Follow us on Steemit: steemit.com/@davidpakman
-Discuss This on Reddit: / thedavidpakmanshow
-Facebook: / davidpakmanshow
-Get your TDPS Gear: www.davidpakman.com/gear
-Call the 24/7 Voicemail Line: (219)-2DAVIDP
-Subscribe to The David Pakman Show for more: ru-vid.com_c...
-Timely news is important! We upload new clips every day, 6-8 stories! Make sure to subscribe!

Опубликовано:

1 мар 2018

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 63

@gillianandrews8194 5 лет назад

I am a 6th grade teacher and am excited to have these videos at my fingertips. I will be creating lessons based on these as they are language heavy for 12 year olds and would need some supporting materials. Critical work for all school children. Thank you!

@Janewomanpower 5 лет назад

I'm watching this series again. I wanna be a better critical thinker. I have learned a lot from watching this show. David is a great teacher!

@Overton_Windows 6 лет назад

“If a train leaves the station”..... actually these are great videos. You’re educating and I love it 🖤

@mireillelebeau2513 6 лет назад

This one should be the first episode of critical thinking series

@janoslehr1256 6 лет назад

What about abductive arguments, which are also used in hypotheses? When one of the premises is just plausible, but the other is for sure, but this makes the conclusion just plausible as well. For example: P1: These candies are white. P2: This jar only contains white candies. C: These candies are from this jar. (This form of reasoning was rediscovered by Charles Sanders Peirce.)

@sorryforprojectingmyparent6402 2 года назад

From? So they could came from somewhere else into that jar?

@janoslehr1256 2 года назад

Precisely. Consider the following: a mother everytime when she does her shopping buys some white candies for her little boy. On one occasion as she puts the other groceries away leaves the candies accidentally next to the jar to which she normally puts them in. Then the little boy comes in to the kitchen and sees the sweets next to the jar. Since he associates the _rule_ (This jar only contains white candies.) with the _result_ (These candies are white.) he abductively concludes that the _case_ is that the candies, just like any other, are from the jar. He might not have any idea how these candies are made or what a supermarket is, but the conclusion from his point of view seems to be true and affirmed. That is why it is just a hypothesis and can lead to uncertainty.

@luguy8347 6 лет назад

I want copies of this series. I want to gift it, how can I do that?

@dothex4919 2 года назад

Love your critical thinking series and wish I could subscribe to your channel to get more of this kind of great content instead of political stuff.

@Cartman4wesome 6 лет назад

Will this be on the test?

@An_NBA_Enjoyer 6 лет назад

Great video guys. Can't wait for more

@w00dyblack 6 лет назад

youre insane.

@RonnieD1970 6 лет назад

w00dyblack I am curious why is he insane?

@Janewomanpower 5 лет назад

@@w00dyblack what do you base this conclusion on? Lol! But seriously!

@eranims1664 2 года назад

I'm registerater in your learing program. but the problem is I'm not ready to this year but i want to see same videos what shall i do

@ch3ngg 2 года назад

does the argument include the conclusion or just the premises of that conclusion?

@stayawayfrommrrogers 6 лет назад

Where’s that group theory playlist boi?

@123sheag 6 лет назад

is it weird if i started thinking like this in gr 8 or so without someone telling me about it?

@123sheag 6 лет назад

Thank you haha

@ade8890 5 лет назад

Sounds like you're trying to toot your own horn ;)

@jeremyramsay9345 Год назад

Thanks David!

@nicholas8479 Год назад

So is deductive reasoning going from general to specific and inductive reasoning is going from specific to general??

@onedaytonwomandotcom 6 лет назад

David... = genious!

@dinnerwithfranklin2451 4 года назад

Excellent series David, thank you.

@technatezin 6 лет назад

Very good series and I like the topic being presented. However, I like to add that although inductive reasoning could be used in arguments that are more flexible and therefore have conclusions that are not inevitable particularly if the original premise changes or new premises are added, inductive reasoning could still be used in objective arguments particularly if it involves math such as when attempting to interpolate data to discover a formula or curve on a graph.

@briant4266 6 лет назад

You will be tested on this class.

@travisallen3204 5 лет назад

The studio being in Boston example is not an example of a deductive argument. There at least 6 cities named Boston in the United States and several others around the world I believe. So the second premise would be false.

@IceAngler 6 лет назад

....these are gonna get more in depth right? Pretty surface level so far.

@Aritul 3 года назад

Revisiting this series. This miniseries is a treasure. Thank you, David.

@EASYTIGER10 4 года назад

David's studio could be in Boston, Lincolnshire, UK - there's nothing in the statement to preclude that. Boston IS in Massachusetts. Given these facts, the studio IS NOT in Massachusetts, so the 2 premises don't guarantee the stated conclusion. But I'm being silly.

@Obylearns 2 года назад

1:40 (Inductive). Other premise could invalidate the argument.

@fergusmallon7428 6 лет назад

Excellent David. When do we get to St. Anselm's ontological argument?

@Potencyfunction Год назад

When u learn to not copy others idiot.

@trevorprime2274 6 лет назад

There are many Boston's. Aren't they?

@MH-gr8ge 3 года назад

astonishing 👑

@johnbartlett9568 2 года назад

I just realized If you remove the M from Massachusetts You get Assachuetts Brilliant!!!

@Potencyfunction Год назад

You mean that if The sky is blue and everyone live under the blue sky is that because they like to live under the blue sky? Is that mean if its applyed for x is it valid for everyone? .....:)

@InspirationParadise 2 года назад

The first argument is inductive not deductive, because the premise that your studio is in MA is not guaranteed, because the governments could rearrange the borders at any time. After reading the above argument a few times, I realise that the statement 'My studio is in MA because it's in Boston' is deductive, because we're talking about the present moment, and Boston is currently in MA. The statement 'My studio will be in MA tomorrow' is inductive. A penny for your thoughts, dear reader...

@ajgroth8265 4 года назад

Assumption: You are talking about Boston Massachusetts

@academyruins1278 6 лет назад

what evidence do you have>? support you are claim davd

@jasonayer8159 4 года назад

This is perfect my professor suggested this because he is horrible at explaining anything.

@robertwillis4662 6 лет назад

Hang in there Pakman. Emotional maturity isn't a skill to be mastered; it's something arrived at over time with experience.

@RonnieD1970 6 лет назад

Robert Willis Hi Robert, I was wondering why you posted this comment, or better yet the context. Thankyou

@somebody3143 6 лет назад

I believe that Robert is posting this because around the time of release David posted a video in which he discussed some of the struggles that he has been confronted with recently. And I agree; DAVID, hang in there buddy! Your show is amazing and very important. Keep it up!

@An_NBA_Enjoyer 6 лет назад

That beaker was trippin me out as it was continuously growing larger 😂

@pokerk09 6 лет назад

Forgot validity and soundness...

@Noah78516 6 лет назад

That was episode 2. This is episode 3

@pokerk09 6 лет назад

Ah, thanks. It just seems strange viewing this one without those combined into it. Makes sense for keeping the vids short though.

@ihartevil 6 лет назад

if you dont know this stuff you cant pass the second grade standardize test dont you pay attention to how our school system works at all now you also find this stuff on the SATs you should take the SATs again and make sure its still on it because i took it in 07

@miely0847 6 лет назад

You break the rules you hide behind, Pakman....

@raghavaraghava2877 2 года назад

Bunyi video tidak bagus

@ihartevil 6 лет назад

you do realize scishow kids already uploaded all of this stuff because they are teaching children not at grade level so second graders are now doing 5th grade work and 5th graders are getting ready to do calculus if you dont know physics by 7th grade you are behind and you need to pass the standardize test and it has physics in it thx for this ha bisky vid anyways even though everybody knows this stuff and what you should go over is what jimmy dore does and why the dictionary is so important