Darktable vs Rawtherapee in 2024: 5 Differences You Need To Know

Подписаться 2,3 тыс.

Просмотров 16 тыс.

50% 1

In this video, I compare two open-source and FREE Adobe Lightroom alternatives, Darktable and Rawtherapee. Which one is best? Hopefully, this video will help you decide.
Sign up for our darktable course for beginners: www.udemy.com/course/darktabl...
Also available in Brazilian Portuguese: Inscreva-se: www.udemy.com/course/darktabl...

Наука

Опубликовано:

6 мар 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 44

@WildEarthPhoto 4 месяца назад

Sign up for our darktable course for beginners: www.udemy.com/course/darktable-essentials/?referralCode=82ECED1844601E7119DC Also available in Brazilian Portuguese: Inscreva-se: www.udemy.com/course/darktable-essencial/?referralCode=F60361140FBB7765EB02

@antonrosenfeld735 Месяц назад

I think a big difference with people using them for the first time is that RawTherapee has a starting point that looks very similar to the out of camera jpg whereas darktable generates a flatter looking image. This leads to lots of people saying darktable messed up my image and assuming it is no good. Rawtherapee is also able to use dcp files to get images very close to the camera colours (if that is what you want).

@WildEarthPhoto Месяц назад

Yes, this is true!

@Vicky-il5yv Месяц назад

What about Lightroom? Does it also shows flatter image like Darktable ??? I never tried it.

@paullafleur6112 4 месяца назад

That was a great overview. Thank you

@WildEarthPhoto 4 месяца назад

You are welcome!

@dejmien73 3 месяца назад

I have been using both Darktable and Rawtheapee for several years. In RT I edit photos seriously, and in DT when I feel like having fun. Editing a photo in DT takes much more time, but the final effect is still better in RT. The main problem in DT is the sharpening tools. No matter how much I try, the sharpening is always much better in RT. And there is no way Darktable will sharpen the photo better than Rawtheapee. DT also lacks the option to use DCP profiles, which makes editing very easy. Mainly, the colors of the photo are immediately perfect. In DT you need to use the RGB mixer tool which requires a lot of knowledge. However, the big advantage of DT are masks, which are missing in RT. But overall, for my needs, RT definitely wins.

@WildEarthPhoto 2 месяца назад

Not so sure about sharpening. To me, the diffuse and sharpen module with masks make the sharpening in darktable a lot more natural.

@adamd3145 28 дней назад

I an just starting, that was very helpful. Thank you.

@WildEarthPhoto 27 дней назад

You are welcome. Don't forget to try both to see which one suits your needs!

@Eigil_Skovgaard 4 месяца назад

It's interesting that while Rawtherapee seems to be simpler to learn than Darktable, it may take longer to understand the tools. Some tabs have sections and sliders that are very little intuitive. The capture sharpening is very good and should be adopted by DT. I use DxO PureRAW for denoising and initial sharpening, so I don't need it. Last time I used Rawtherapee it would have a problem with DNG files from e.g. DxO or Topaz, until the DNGs were run through Adobe RAW converter. That's not a problem with DT. When it comes to masking, light and color management Darktable is superior.

@WildEarthPhoto 4 месяца назад

That is true, Eigil. The capture sharpening does a good job. Though your workflow certainly is good also. The sharpening I've seen from DxO is decent.

@joaovtaveira Месяц назад

Difference #7 darktable has a module to transfer images from the memory card or from the camera to the drive.

@maggiem1323 4 месяца назад

Love your channel.

@WildEarthPhoto 4 месяца назад

Thanks!

@donperegrine922 10 дней назад

"For example, Look at this random set of option in the LAB area.......hhmm" Thanks for the insight...I have no idea what the problem is when you don't discuss it.

@WildEarthPhoto 10 дней назад

I assume your post is sarcastic. However, in my opinion, it is self-edvident that it is a user interface nightmare. And that's enough for me. No need to discuss it. Thanks.

@mtbboy1993 28 дней назад

A weird thing with Rawtherapee I noticed is there's a magenta fringing at trees when there's actually not one, I zoom in there's nothing. But this was after de-fringing it, there was minor fringing, but for some reason after it shows massive fringing, which is actually not there. But it's only on with images with trees with sky behind it. But I usually just zoomed in never been a massive issue, but yes not idea.

@WildEarthPhoto 28 дней назад

Some Rawtherapee modules only show their effect at 1:1.

@joaovtaveira Месяц назад

Difference #6 darktable has a map mode to manually geotag images and a module to add .gpx files to automatically geotag images, RawTherapee has neither of them.

@danieljimenez1989 3 месяца назад

I don't think those options in the LAB tab of rawtherapee look random at all, moreover they're quite useful. You can change Hue, Luma and Chroma as a function of any of them, and even as a function of itself. They're a nice tool to have, and don't seem out of place to me.

@WildEarthPhoto 3 месяца назад

You are right but what I meant was that they are rather confusing to a beginner, especially in how they are presented.

@danieljimenez1989 3 месяца назад

@@WildEarthPhoto yes, I can see that it could be hard to grasp. I think both tools have their strengths, and have been trying to improve my understanding of darktable recently. Curiously, rawtherapee has always seemed more intuitive for me, although some of the tools in darktable are tremendously powerful.

@mtbboy1993 29 дней назад

I did some testing with Sony ARW. I see Rawtherapee upscales and display a wider image, it adds few pixels to the side, making the picture wider, so you actually get a wider image than Darktable, Lightroom. The image is not stretched out, but actually you see more of what the sensor/camera captured. Make sure to use the latest version of Rawtherapee if you have a Sony camera, or right side pixels will be stretched. This has been fixed in 5.10. Rawtherrapee works well with Sony ARW files now. But none of them offer the embedded profiles from the ARW file, sony has six of them. But Rawtherapee uses the standard profile, Camera ST as is shown in Lightroom but Rawtherapee doesn't show the name. And can't select a different profile. But Darktable doesn't show a good starting point at all, no matter what I do. it's completely useless. Standard color matrix shows pale image, Adobe ARGB shows oversaturated, overexposed, over contrasted image. I stil lahven't figured out how to have decent starting point. Also some bugs, so turning on lens correction in Standard color matrix makes highlights magenta, switching it fixes it. same with other color features. I don't know if it's only with ARW files. A big plus forr me with Darktable is the map uses Open Street Map, so I can accurately place the photos on the map, as it shows trails and objects I can't see in Google Satellite image in Lightroom. So can place the pic on a specific spot on a trail. Rawtherapee doesn't have a map. The Lightroom map is useless if it's not pictures from a street, if it's in the forest on some trail, I had to use Geosetter to solve it. But In Darktable I don't have to as it has OSM. And I contribute to OSM so my local area is very accurate.

@arthurhoornweg7894 17 дней назад

I am using both and I'm beginning to prefer RawTherapee over Darktable. RT gives me good results in less than 10% of the time I would need in DT. In RT, the initial starting point matches the out-of-camera jpeg quite well, it gives me those "Nikon colors" that I love by default. In DT, the colors and the contrast are way off by default and I have to take numerous steps to make the image look how I (and Nikon) prefer it to look and even then the colors are not accurate. It's simply too many steps that I have to repeat for every image. Also DT's demosaicing algorithm produces aliasing in places where RT's algorithm does not. To make matters worse, DT has too much redundancy. There are a dozen ways to adjust the same thing, it really neads a cleanup. For me, RT gives me the results that I want very quickly and DT was just never quite satisfactory.

@WildEarthPhoto 17 дней назад

That's a fair assessment.

@mtbboy1993 28 дней назад

A major con of Darktable enabling each module adds the effect, so have to adjust it each time. Also it doesn't read the embedded camera profile. so all pictures will look wrong from the start, so lots of work to get it done. 'What am I doing wrong? Maybe I have to enable all modules, and set all to a neutral setting so they actually don't do anything. and then save the layout. If it's possible. But depending on the picture, some settings have to be adjusted just for the picture to look somewhat normal, as it looks way too dark, contrasty. So even if I were to save it maybe I would need to still edit other photos more. Some photos I shot are almost perfect just need minor tweaks but in Darktable I have to do a massive edit to make it look as it does out of the camera. This processes makes no sense. But maybe I'm missing something. Looks like I have to enable Adobe RGB then edit, as lens correction enables Adobe RGB without enabling it. But once I've went trough long battle trough the modules, results are good. But instead of a simle tweak it's a massive edit. I will look into this further to see if I can make it usable for me.

@WildEarthPhoto 28 дней назад

I don't really understand your first line about having to adjust it each time.

@mtbboy1993 28 дней назад

@@WildEarthPhoto Just enabling a module changes the image as it has adjustments already made, all adjustments are to insane level, I have to turn tweak it. it makes simple editing harder as I can't just do a simple adjustment I have to adjust almost every slider there is. And as different photos look differently, like a sunny photo, looks too dark with harsh shadows, crazy shadows, blacks. And a darker pic with shadows, looks way too dark and flat. So if this would mean I would have to save each module presets to suit those images I guess. this would be a mess to deal with if I would have many different sceneries. I simply want the image to be the standard camera profile that's embedded in the raw file. I haven't figured out a way to do this. Imagine if someone went crazy with all sliders, and you would have to correct it. that's what I have to do. While Lightroom Classic uses Camera ST profile. Darktable doesn't seem to read any profile at all just read the ARW file and make it's own crazy image. I read that Darktable works in RGB, but for some reason it starts off as a crazy image, and enabling lens correction makes it look like Adobe RGB, seems like a bug. I want to avoid having to use almost most of the modules just to do one simple adjustment, as Darktable ruins the image, at least for me with ARW. nothing makes sense, nor that I have to adjust every slider in every module I enable.also seems hard to set them to 0. I will come back to it. and see what's possible. Once I go trough all of the hassle I get good results. I saved some modules with presets. I experienced weird bugs with magenta infestation, if I used Standard color prefix, but when I changed it to RGB or enabled lens correction it was gone. Other modules did it too. I seem to have sorted that. Just keep it in Adobe RGB.

@mtbboy1993 28 дней назад

@@WildEarthPhoto But enabling Adobe RGB makes some images super dark. But sometimes with some images or it happens randomly I'm not sure, but enabling lens correction basically turns on Adobe RGB without doing it. Maybe I have to reinstall it. Standard color prefix is overly flat, and not what the embedded Camera ST profile is. If conditions are good, minimal editing would be needed. Which is not cases in Darktable, so no decent starting point.. but Lightroom uses it, but not tested other software yet. Rawtherapee uses this profile. so looks fine so I can do the fine adjustments on those pics that need it. But in Darktable I have to use many modules. The software seems to be buggy making things inconsistent. Which version do you use? I'm currently testing 4.6.1. I can't make sense of why it enables Adobe RGB look when enabling Lens correction, sometimes and sometimes not, maybe it depends on the picture. so it darkens the image, so I have to correct that. Adobe RGB, sRGB make darker areas and shadows almost completely black. If I leave it in standard color matrix if it's a bright image I can just tweak some sliders make it more colorful and blacks blacker. But when Darktable decides to make image super dark, I have to tweak the shadows. and when original image looks too falt I have to make it look colorful. One picture is just dark and have to brighten it up, do minor tweaks in Lightroom, but in Darktable, it's flat. I'm not sure what to do. I will try to find a solution.

@fintonmainz7845 3 месяца назад

How does Darktable compare for Black and White?

@WildEarthPhoto 3 месяца назад

I think darktable has some very interesting options for black and white, especially because you can be creative with tones using several modules like the color lookup table. I haven't experimented too much with Rawtherapee's version though.

@gerhardbotha7336 Месяц назад

I find RT lack things that matter like dealing properly with exif data and so on. I stopped using it because it discards most things from my R7 exif data files. Looks like RT only develops improvements for Nikon snd Fuji users. DT scene referred workflows are superior and the denoising is far superior. DT is now my preferred raw editor

@WildEarthPhoto Месяц назад

I didn't know that it had trouble with EXIF data. Do you mean it just can't read the data or that it is not present in the exported JPEGs? But I agree with the rest of your post, especially with the filmic and sigmoid modules. They handle highlights much better than RT does.

@58Tommy 16 дней назад

Darktable can handle sony A7Rv raw compressed files.

@WildEarthPhoto 15 дней назад

Do you mean "can" or "can't"? If it can, that is good. If it can't, that is bad.

@TheIvanDM 3 месяца назад

Raw Therapee has nice real film emulation presets collection, called "HaldCLUT" or smth

@WildEarthPhoto 3 месяца назад

NIce. Thanks for letting us know!

@ahman324 2 месяца назад

Darktable supports it as well in "LUT 3D" module

@GeorgeStar 3 месяца назад

Can you compare darktable and digiKam?

@WildEarthPhoto 2 месяца назад

I will try.

@LosingMyCool 23 дня назад

Technically darktable has before/after as well

@WildEarthPhoto 15 дней назад

Oh yeah? Do you mean just using the history stack? That's not as convenient as other programs.

@LosingMyCool 15 дней назад

@@WildEarthPhoto Sure, I agree with you, it's not as good as a strictly before/after but very good for comparing before/after in your history, and very good if you make snapshots.