Deriving the Kinematic Equations of Motion w/ Constant Acceleration in Physics - [1-2-13] 

These videos are seriously amazing! I really appreciate your concise and effective explanations!!

you are hero.

" You're the best brilliant teach ever seen for real"

Jayson, you put complex thing to simpler understanding. You are the best in YT. Bringing best subjects / topics in physics . Some videos on Sub atomic will be appreciated. Thnks.

I watch this multiple time to be sure that I understand this deeply because I have problem to figure it out where I can start to solve my problems. Now, I get it. Thanks you so much for all your works. I really appreciate it.

In all your videos, you simplify science to the most simple and understable level, thank you very much

This video is invaluable. Thank you so much for this explanation and for taking the time to create this! It helped tremendously.

I echo all the others that you are unique and admirable in your ability to distill information clearly. Thank you.

Thank you for taking your time to explain where these formulas actually come from

This was a perfect explanation, thank you.

Thank you so much for taking the time to teach me

Thank you, awesome video.

thank you so much now I understand ,I hate memorizing and I always wondered where did these come from

THANK YOU... SIR...!!! It is a lot to remember... but I do remember the basic equation v= at Thanks a lot for explaining it so well.

Love the lucid explanation

Hi, I have a question relating to Hookes Law, spring constant, and SHM If a vertical spring stretches x centimetres when a mass m object is hung from it. Then the object is replaced with a new mass that oscillates up and down. I know the formulas i need and how to rearrange hookes law to find k for the formula to find period, but my question is this. In general, do you always use the original mass in hookes law to find k?

this was so informative thank you from tuks south Africa

رحم الله والديك استاذ

thank you so much for this

Finally, the origin of those equations... Thanksss!!

Appreciate it!!!!

This man is the GOAT 🫡

Wow fantastic 🎉❤

תודה!

I've watched about 8 minutes of this video, and i feel like you made the first equation more complex than it really is, ( opinion )

Yes sir

That second fundamental equation makes no sense, because in the first equation the integral of dt is not done like the 2nd equation; dt 1+ exponent . Why

Sir, may I ask you when you will be teaching us calculus as I have been waiting for it for a long time .

Nice 👍

Where do you used

Brilliant Mathematics

I love you

This the cone [sqrt(x*0+y^2+z^2)/x, y/x, z/x]? The cones initial energy is 0 in the middle. [sqrt(x^2+y^2+z^2)/x, y/x,z/x] is a hyperbolloid that is related. I think I know where x-x_0 comes from. It has to do with the sec(θ)+tan(θ) difference of squares relationship. I think the cone in my avatar is wrong. The top should be white. The [0,0,0] is black. The very top is c/c. The middle is 0/c or slope zero, which can't happen (infinity/infinity). So I guess each wavelength has one white and one black point on the cone. But it is not scaled with a constant (from middle to top), it's scaled with sqrt(E)? I might have to write my own program if I want to get the geometry right. Maybe I can get a better picture of what is going on. The hyperbolloid is a special condition that can't be justified.

good video.

sir how much do you make at youtube? is it worth it to make educational channel these day? thanks

bro you cooked so hard

This made my brain woke