Did Jesus Actually Exist? | Joe Rogan & Michelle Dowd 

The moment she said Paul saw the “ghost” of Jesus, I immediately knew she didn’t know what she’s talking about.

What?! The name Mary comes etymologically from the Hebrew name Miriam. It doesn't mean woman.

I’m An atheist and I’ll be the first to say that this woman knows absolutely nothing about the Bible or Christianity. She’s conflating everything together and misunderstanding a lot.

This is what happens when people who have NO IDEA wtf they're talking about just SOUND like they do.... Its dangerous

Geez. I don’t usually become dumber during his podcasts, but I could actually feel it happening during this clip

I love Joe but this is two people who literally know nothing about the Bible and don’t seem to want to learn. Nothing more nothing less.

She's combining two different Bible stories. Jesus spoke about casting pearls to swine but that doesn't have anything to do with the story of The prodigal son.

The Jesus guy in Australia used to be a Jehovah’s Witness… go figure..

Actually scholars say the earliest, the Gospel of Mark, was written 30 years after Jesus.

Joe needs to have Voddie Baucham on. His mind would be blown.

She knows nothing about the Bible!!!

When the blind leads the blind

I’m not religious but I just did some research and it appears she’s incorrect. Here’s what I got. Gospel of Matthew: Traditionally attributed to Matthew, it was likely written around 41 C.E., approximately 8 years after Jesus’ death. Gospel of Mark: The earliest Gospel, written by Mark, dates from around 65-70 AD, which is about 35-40 years after Jesus’ death. Gospel of Luke: Written by Luke, it falls within a similar timeframe as Mark, around AD 75-100, approximately 40-65 years after Jesus’ death. Gospel of John: The latest Gospel, authored by John, was written around AD 75-100, making it approximately 40-65 years after Jesus’ death.

The most written about human being in history he even changed time A.D. ,B.C. of course he was real.. the reason people don't want to believe in God is not a lack evidence it's because they just don't want to obey...

this woman says a lot of "maybe"s and "I think"s.

Jesus Christ is the only way

Pontius Pilate (Latin: Pontius Pilatus; Greek: Πόντιος Πιλᾶτος, Pontios Pilatos) was the fifth governor of the Roman province of Judaea, serving under Emperor Tiberius from 26/27 to 36/37 AD. He is best known for being the official who presided over the trial of Jesus and ultimately ordered his crucifixion. Nobody denies Pontius Pilate existed.

Matthew and John were Apostles . They walked, talked, saw Jesus resurrected.

Basically he not real. 😂

Outside bible sources of Jesus Thallus (52AD) Thallus is perhaps the earliest secular writer to mention Jesus Tacitus (56-120AD)
Cornelius Tacitus was known for his analysis and examination of historical documents and is among the most trusted of ancient historians. In this account, Tacitus confirms several historical elements of the Biblical narrative: Jesus lived in Judea, was crucified under Pontius Pilate, and had followers who were persecuted for their faith in Christ. Suetonius (69-140AD)
Suetonius was a Roman historian and annalist of the Imperial House under the Emperor Hadrian. His writings about Christians describe their treatment under the Emperor Claudius (41-54AD Josephus (37-101AD)
In more detail than any other non-biblical historian, Josephus writes about Jesus in his “the Antiquities of the Jews” in 93AD.

Alll I know is when i started reading the bibe. My life Ignited Incredibly 😮and great great things, experiences and people were placed on my path. LIVING A GLORIOUS LIFE

A good read , "a case for Christ" lee stroeb I believe is the author. Book of Acts was believed to be written by apostle Paul between 50 ad -70 ad , only 20 to 30 yrs after crucifixion

Yea you can tell that they know nothing about Christianity

Joe, here’s a fact to consider….the 4 Gospels were written as early as 35 years after Jesus death. Julius Ceaser wasn’t written about until 125 years after his death. And yet no one ever says Julius never existed…..

Mark was written 20-30 years after, possibly earlier, by Mark, the associate of the apostle Peter, and most scholars will agree its the first written, and would be the account of Peter. Matthew/Luke would have been written within 30-40 years after. These two are traditionally written by Matthew, the apostle (or possibly a scribe/assistant of his) and the latter is actually Luke the evangelist, associate of Paul, who also wrote the book of Acts. There is lots of debate on the timing, largely because Jesus predicted the destruction of the temple, some scholars date some of the gospels after 70 AD, simply due to the fact there is a bias against the ability to divinely predict/prophesy. Finally there is John, written 60-70 years after death, latest 100 AD. Written by the apostle John, one of the twelve apostles, direct eyewitness (some scholars might disagree, but would grant it is from the Johainne community, so worst case written by those that John preached to). So you have two books written by apostles, direct eyewitnesses, a third book written by the associate of Peter (another eyewitness and "the rock" that Jesus stated he would build his church on), and a fourth book written by Luke, while not an eyewitness, was the associate of Paul, who was deeply embedded in the earlt Christian community within 10-20 years after Jesus resurrected. So long story short, this lady is wildly misinformed, Joe has no idea what he is talking about again, but is spreading non-sense as if it is fact. Joe is at the peak of the Dunning-Kruger effect curve. Unfortunately needs to be educated in this topic. God forbid he does and gets confused/lost in some of the Gnostic texts. However, due to joe's proclivity's, I have a feeling he will never be truly charitable to Christianity. LASTLY: On the topic of written sources documenting Jesus Christ, we have plenty, and more sources have written about Jesus within 20-50 years after his death and resurrection, than have written about Roman emporers. Nabil Q did a talk at a university, I believe he mentioned Nero(?), basically, we have 3 primary sources for EMPORER NERO, but we take his history (largely) to be written as fact. But we question Jesus when we have 4 immediate gospel accounts in the Christian tradition, almost a dozen of Paul's letters written to churches within 10-30 years after the resurrection, and we have 3 external non-christian sources documenting Jesus (Tacitus, Josephus, etc). And we still get people spewing this nonsense. We have many sources documenting Jesus Christ, more sources than we have for many historical figures, more sources than some Roman emporers, as many sources as we have for Alexander the great. It's amazing how scrupulous people are when it comes to Jesus and Christianity, applying standards that are incredibly high, standards that are not applied equally when it pertains to historical figures. Even agnostic scholars like Bart Ehrman will emphatically attest to the historicity of Jesus Christ's existence, it is beyond mere conjecture, it is simply a fact. No other individual has as much written about them in the age of antiquity Palestine, or the roman empire. I'll end off with one of a dozen quotes from religious scholars, and there are many similar quotes like this, and these are from secular scholars attesting this fact (it goes to say evangelical/Christian scholars would also be just as empathic, if not more so, about the fact of Jesus Christ's existence) : “I don’t think there’s any serious historian who doubts the existence of Jesus …. We have more evidence for Jesus than we have for almost anybody from his time period.” ━━ Bart Ehrman

why would she say matthew Luke and John didn't see Jesus? Mark wrote for Peter and was likely a teen whose mom would have them all over. This lady isn't the lady to be explaining things. Blind leading the blind.

She's lying about 100 years they've now counted it down to about 30 to 50 years and it was the accounts from the disciples Luke was not of the 12 disciples but they were all alive when Jesus was alive the first 2:32 the first four Gospels

We know what they said, we know what they ate, we know where they lived. Read the Bible we know all of these things about Jesus. This woman really is off on her research and timing. The funny thing is if the Bible was found on a scroll by the Dead Sea Joe would be like isn’t this crazy! Wow! They were not written 100 yrs after death.

Bring cliffe on. Please

"Did you know that Jesus was actually a character in the bowling film The Big Lebowski??"

I wonder what would happen if Joe and his friends tried to deconstruct quran or bagawad gita? Just wondering.

The lost son and casting pearls before swine are two different teachings from Jesus. The lost son teaches about repentence and God's forgiveness. The latter teaches not to offer something valuable and sacred to someone who will not appreciate or respect it

...Isahah 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel._____ this was BEFORE New Testament!!! This clearly refers to Jesus

People have a hard time believing in Jesus.... And yet there's a bigger dude out there who created us all. Yahweh or whatever his name is. Do people believe in that? Evidence is where? Buildings ... Old old scriptures... What is there any physical sculpture evidence that leads to God. How about the mountain people should go up there and research it. And whoever's guarding it tell him to buzz off. It's not a secret mountain.

Oh, Joe! Please educate yourself! Gospels were written few decades after crucifixion and resurrection by apostles who walked with Jesus and were his disciples and eyewitnesses of Jesus ministry. Also many other eyewitnesses were still alive and able to share their testimonies. Paul didn’t see Jesus ghost but had encounter with Jesus who is resurrected and alive and is seated at the right hand of the Father. And this lady maybe knows the stories from the Bible, but she definitely doesn’t know the Bible or God. I would recommend you to get some esv or nkjv study Bible and check out Cold-Case Christianity channel for the start.

Sorry, but, The first gospel written about Jesus was about 40 years after.

OMG everythings said here is simply false. They Both don’t know what they are talking about

This little bit just made me realize Joe Rogan sucks at comedy along with Brandon Schaub

The problem isn’t belief blinding people to the truth. The problem is she literally has no clue what she’s talking about.

There is so much ignorance in this talk it’s almost unbearable to even watch.

He still exists

It was always testament about living by example.

She doesn't know the name of Jacob and Eesaw?

Actually I heard 4 years after was the first gospel.

joe is not a story teller, he is the ultimate pupil. taking in information and digesting it on a real level.

This has got to be one of the worst episodes

Wait till Joe finds out most of the historical biggest names from the ancient past, our closest writings to them some are over ONE THOUSAND YEARS after that person existed.

Rogan needs to be fair and interview a Christian apologist. Someone who’s studied this field.

Cast not your pearls before swine has LITERALLY nothing to do with the prodigal son. Infact she portrays it as though the father's obedient son says it, in jealousy, to his father, when in actuality it is said as instruction by Jesus. She couldn't possibly be more wrong.

If he didn't exist, contemporary Jewish historian Flavius Josephus wouldn't have written about him.

we have all sinned and the wages of sin is death but the gift of God is eternal life in Jesus John 316

If Jesus is mentioned in every holy book and is said to be a prophet or teacher or another Buddha and considered to be a way and in his book is the only way I think Jesus Christ is the way the truth and the light

Jesus is prue fiction.

NOOOOOOO, within 40 to 5 years woman! The last 27 books of the Bible, known as the New Testament, were written over a much shorter period by fewer people. The first was begun around 50 AD; the last finished in 90 AD. Consensus was quickly reached that the four Gospels that we have now should be the only official ones. By the 2nd century, the Gospels, the book of Acts and Paul’s 13 letters were being circulated around Christian churches. Gradually other writings were considered for inclusion in the list of scriptures. By around 200 AD there was consensus about the list and it was finalised at church conferences around 400 AD. By now scrolls had been replaced by books. But adding the 27 books to the agreed Old Testament was only giving official approval to what Christians had believed for some time. Thousands of New Testament manuscripts still exist. The oldest fragments date back to 130 AD; the oldest complete scripts are from 350 AD.

This is why you don't take bible classes from a person who read the bible once at 8 years old. Eve translates to woman. Adam to man. How do you mix up Eve with Mary

At the end of the day. Who cares. Live your life.

The Gospels of Matthew, John and Peter were written immediately after the Resurrection of Jesus Christ as they were his Disciples. Meaning they walked the earth with Him. Not 100 years later. Thus Joe's argument is based on a false premise.

Most biblical scholars believe the gospels and the rest of the New Testament were written between 20 and 60 years after Jesus’s death and resurrection. Not the same as 100 years.

The creed in 1 Corinthians is dated to within 5 years of the resurrection. Some people have dated it to within months. It outlines the basic claims of the New Testament that he lived died and rose again. Whether it's true is another story but the claims were legitimate

Joe needs to read the actual Bible. Probably should start with the Gospel of John.

Yes, "Iesous" existed, but he is a literary disguise for Titus Flavius, the Roman General (later turned Emperor) who destroyed the Temple in Jerusalem.

You know what must’ve been the hardest thing, if Jesus did exist, which I do believe. I believe the fact that he knew that his ministry was going to end the way it did can you for a fact that eventually someone would catch him and kill him, and that was his plan. All along was to sacrifice himself so that we would have a chance at becoming something better.

ENOCH IS PROPERLY PRONOUNCED. ENO C HE. ANNUNAKI, ENKI I'M HERE. The only one in the bible that did not die that god sent back down the real coming of The Son of God.😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 And I'm angry.

PhD Scholars that believe the Gospel Jesus never existed; Thomas L. Brodie, (His 2012 book Beyond the Quest for the Historical Jesus, Thomas L. Thompson, Robert M Price, Bruno Bauer, Arthur Drews, George Albert Wells, (1975 book, Did Jesus Exist?, Earl Doherty, John M. Allegro, Alvar Ellegård, Archibald Robertson, Albert Schweitzer, On the Historicity of Jesus: by Richard Carrier, Raphael Lataster, Gerd Lüdemann, his book Paul, the founder of Christianity, Philip R. Davies, R. Joseph Hoffmann, Dan Barker, his book From Preacher to Atheist, John E. Remsburg, his book The Christ: A Critical Review and Analysis of the Evidence of His Existence, H.H. Mangasarian, his book, "The Truth about Jesus, is he a Myth? among many others.

I wonder what would happen to Joe's brain if he shed his bias and got an actual historian telling him the undisputed evidence of Jesus on the show. It seems my bro always gets these half assed people on this topic instead of the genuine article. There's way more evidence of Jesus and his resurrection than, say, Julius Caesar, foe example.

No well respected historian thinks he didn’t existed

This poor woman is an example of someone who thinks they know everything but is actually a fool and doesn’t realize how ignorant she is, it’s really quite sad.

John 20:25-29 New Living Translation (NLT) Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here, and look at my hands. Put your hand into the wound in my side. Don't be faithless any longer. Believe!” “My Lord and my God!” Thomas exclaimed.

I dont think this lady knows the Bible

Why doesn't Joe just bring Cliffe Knechtle on? A man who's very knowledgeable on this and nowhere near the MOST so it's not like Joe would be completely......Cliffe would probably turn him actually 😂. He's quite good.

The existence of Jesus as a historical person is not debated by scholars, neither conservative Christian nor liberal agnostic. The only thing keeping this dumb question alive is fringe sensationalist authors (any non-credible person can get a book published) and ignorant RU-vid “documentaries” like Zeitgeist. This is why checking sources is so important and looking at the general consensus among NT and historical scholars on both sides. If we’re going to debate, let’s debate over the right questions.

Michelle Dowds view of eyewitnesses and dating of the manuscripts is wrong. First, Matthew and John were of the twelve apostles Jesus appears too in John 19:19-29. Marks appearance when Jesus is arrested in Mark 14:51-52. Secondly, majority of scholars agree Mark is the earliest of the four books dating 56-60 A.D written in Rome. Not hundred years after, around 30-50 years after. P137 is the earliest fragment of Mark. Paul did not see a ghost of Jesus. In Acts 9:7, the men who were traveling with Paul heard a voice but saw nothing. Paul saw light, Jesus himself. In addition, Luke notes in 1: 1-4 how he received his sources, called today New Testament Textual Criticism, form, source, redaction criticism. Jesus not a storyteller, he spoke Gods words in parables to those could not understand because God blinded them. The reason to reveal the truth about the Kingdom of God Jesus is the true King, fulfilling what was spoken of him. Last, Plato and his writings are in worse condition. If Jesus did not exist either did Plato, or Aristotle. Plato's earliest manuscript is the Republic called the Nag Hamadi a 4th century A.D. only two copies, one in Greek, the other in Coptic, they don't agree with each other. Aristotle, 14th century A.D. I hope Joe Rogan has consistent and meaningful scholars who understand. Jesus is a true person, he is God.

The earliest accounts of Jesus' existence are found in the writings of the New Testament. The earliest of these writings are the Epistles of Paul, particularly 1 Thessalonians, Galatians, and 1 Corinthians, which are generally dated to around 50-60 CE. The Gospels, which provide more detailed narratives of Jesus' life and teachings, were written later, with Mark being the earliest, commonly dated to around 70 CE. The other Gospels (Matthew, Luke, and John) followed in the subsequent decades, with John being written around 90-100 CE.

Blessed are those who believe but did not seen. I was about to be agnostic but i remembered my apparition of the Blessed Mother. She did not spoke to me. But i know she is one of the Goddess. You dont need to be a believer, maybe if you go to Lourdes of France, Guadalupe in Mexico,you might be lucky to feel the grasp of the holy spirit. Also, sacrificing is really good, so if u love to smoke weed everyday. And u stop for 30 days u will feel something lifted within u . Like u being spiritually cleanse. For me i did 30 days fasting , no meat, diary allowed. It was the toughest month as i am a carnivore. You can do small sacrifices such as no coffee for a month, etc doesnt jave to be extreme .

Joe...lol, even in the 1300s most ppl were illiterate. You think they were in the first century? And the first books were written much sooner even as early as 50AD. To believe or write or preach Christs message was a death sentence! Lol, that's why it wasn't some fashion statement like ugs, religion is so much deeper. And if you actually read the bible, it explains why Jesus spoke in parables. Joe, I've heard you say that if you don't know the subject don't cast judgement on it. Yes you do, especially when it comes to something you know like mma or hinting or comedy. Give unto to Joe what belongs to Joe, give unto God what belongs to God. (trust me Joe, there is an explanation, but you have to actually read the bible and study it.)

Really??? In the era of google/internet and having your assistant Jammie who always quickly Googles stuff , you guys couldn’t check that the very first books were written 50 something years after Jesus’s death?🙈

She's wrong about the synoptic Gospels and John's Gospel. John and Mathew actually walked and talked with the living Christ Himself. St. Mathew was the tax collector and John(James's bro) was a fisherman. St. John was at the foot of the cross during the Passion along with the Blessed Virgen Mary and St. Mary of Magdala. St. Matthew and St. John were part of the original 12 Apostles. Plus, St. Peter -the leader of the Apostles- also wrote scripture that's in the New Testament. St. Paul met the resurrected Christ on the road to Damascus whilst butchering the very first Christians. His name at first was Saul of Tarsus, he hated the new movement of "The Way" -which is what the first Christians were called- he hated "blasphemers" and killed them. Then one day on the road to Damascus a flash of white light hit him, blinding him, and being called out by Christ Jesus of Nazareth. After he ran into Jesus, he fasted and was blind for three days, was healed by Ananias(in Christ's name) restoring his sight, and was baptized and given the name Paul by Christ Jesus. St. Paul gave his life to Christ, traveled all throughout the Levant to spread the good news. He was eventually martyred in Rome by Emperor Nero. St. Luke "the Greek" wrote his Gospel from many sources of Christ's followers but mainly was inspired by Matthew and Paul. St. Mark got his Gospel mainly from St. Peter(Andrew's bro & also a fishermen). Cast that net one more time 😉 So, this gossip about "people that wrote the Bible never met Christ" is bullshit. And the dates of the very first texts are always going to be a debate amongst theologians, scientists, skeptics, and historians. This chick doesn't know her Bible or what she's talking about. Rogan needs to get Bishop Robert Barron or Sam Shamoun on and really get deep in the weeds about the greatest library to mankind, the Holy Bible! Edit: Pray the rosary 📿✝️

Jesus is a historical figure. There were dozens of want to be messiahs… so the option is zero to billions of followers. The gospels were written prior to AD64

How is this even controversial? It's widely accepted that the vast majority of historians and scholars agree that Jesus of Nazareth existed. The only point of debate is whether or not he was divine, which is easy to get to the bottom of if you are able to connect the dots

After I heard this woman butcher the meaning and history of the name Mary I had enough. I guess any fool can be a guest on Rogan’s show. Mary is the English version of Miriam, which means bitter, not woman. Women were not just called “woman” in ancient Judea. They had names. Common names of the time and place , like Mary or Joseph, were followed by destinations, typically the names of their home towns, ie Mary Magdalene or Joseph of Arimathea.

0:29 Mary is not just a translation for “woman” but for a particular type of woman, it describes a characteristic, Mary means one who does not follow orders for the sake following, a woman of her own mind, she’s not swayed by the group, she’s fully independent.

"He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant-not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life." -2 Corinthians 3:6 KJV Without the wisdom of the Holy Spirit and faith the written Word only brings death to the hearers. It's like adolescences swinging a sword around with no skill or understating.

You say some people were much better documented than Jesus Christ, like you knew what they ate and etc. Where those people, Kings and Queens? Because Jesus was born poor and was living very humbly on Earth.

She's clueless. 100? Unbelievable!!! Joe Rogan always talk to clueless guest who knows nothing: about Jesus. Get a proper Bible scholar. This is the biggest podcast. Get it right!

The Bible was written a hundred years before Christ was born , predicted what would happen and when it would happen. I love Joe Rogan don't get me wrong but I'm just throwing out some factual information. You're welcome 🤗

Seriously? 🙄She's yet another ignorant 'author' who hasn't even researched the basics of the religion she professes to know so much about. The first gospel was written within 40 years of the crucifixion of Jesus. Easily within living memory and certainly not 100 years later, then she goes on to embarrass herself further, multiple times by exposing her lack of knowledge on Christianity and the bible. Cringy viewing...

Matthew was a disciple of Jesus, so that gospel is a first hand account, same with the book of John, Luke was a post death collection of everything luke could gather and I believe was written about 40 years after Jesus death, everything Paul wrote was roughly over a time span of decades but started well close to Jesus' death

Add to this…. If you’re going to deny the existence and divinity of Jesus Christ then you better come up with a good way to refute the fulfillment of all the Old Testament prophecies. Daniel predicted to the year that Jesus ministry would begin…. Some 500 years before. Simply put, we have historical evidence that Jesus Christ defied time and space. And we also have evidence that Emperor Tiberius knew of the resurrection of Christ, because Pontius Pilate told him.

Tacitus the esteemed Roman historian wrote about Christ. Josephus the esteemed Jewish historian wrote about Christ. Pliny the younger wrote about Christ. And King Herod wrote letters to the Romans about what to do about Christ. And all these men lived in the same century as Christ.

She is the WORST person to explain or discuss anything in the bible. She completely conflated everything together, Pearls before swine and prodigal son, she completely butchered the parable gutting it of its proper context and meaning. Ridiculous

Somehow Qur'an written hundreds year coincides with historical facts, doesn't call him son of God nor God but a prophet and tells the story about his mother which is very different then Christian Bible. Somehow Muhammad S.A.V.S. transfers the story about mother of another prophet and doesn't talk about his own family.

This life is spiritual warfare a battle for our souls and we need God every second of this battle. The weapon and armor we use is God's Word. If satan can't get to you he will use other people to get to you. To try to tempt you with sin. I also think there is different types of evil spirits that are called demons lust, addiction, anger, depression, confusion, greed and other negative feelings that tempts you to sin and goes against God. Stay strong especially in times of temptations. The second you feel tempted is the second you pray against it. Because if you give satan more than a second he will take that second and stretch it out longer. It gets harder to fight temptation that's why you don't give satan any chances. You pray against temptation the second it enters your mind. Because that's satan tempting you it's not sin to get tempted. Because Jesus was tempted by satan and Jesus never gave into sin. Jesus fought temptation with God's Word. We have to do that too. We can be willing vessels for God or we can be willing vessels for satan. There is no in between. The only way people can be willing vessels for satan is if they give into those temptations to carry out evil. satan likes deceiving people so they blindly keep doing evil without realizing it. It's like being hypnotized willing to do something evil without realizing the true effect of it. The only way you become a willing vessel for God is accepting Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior and asking forgiveness for your sins. Also being obedient to God's Word and putting God first is also important. Then you will feel God as you walk in the Spirit. Ephesians 6:11-12 "11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places." KJV

Joe...stay on topic with the guest's area of expertise. The evidence is actually reasonable clear that Jesus existed as a man. Was he the Son of God? No sway to say. Do better homework!

Plus don't support that narrative that Jesus's information was written 100 years after. They have the capabilities and plus they have knowledge to document during that time. It was personal and kept secret for a while. Remember there was a spiritual war since the beginning, if Satan would have found out about the text and there were no angles protection, Satan could easily change or destroy what was documented.

John , Mathew didn’t really knew Jesus????? Oh good lord

There was or there is another guy from Siberia with 5,000 apostles claiming he is Jesus Christ, this guy even dresses like Jesus did, plus has a town constructed by his team where all his followers live. The guy's real name is Vissarion and if check out the video on RU-vid about him you would see it's crazy how he has it all set up.

Besides…the whole thing was done by GOD NOT YOU! 😂

According to the Roman documents found Yes a man named Jesus was executed by crucifixion happened

Look into Tacitus, a Roman Senator and historian. He writes about an actual man named Jesus Christ and his followers. A small note but it's there.

None of the gospels were written 100 years after Jesus lived. The manuscript evidence shows that all of the New Testament was most likely well finished within the 1st century. Most scholars place the last of the four gospels which is the gospel of John as being finished in the the 90's A.C. That's still 55-65 yrs after Jesus and the tradition says it was directly by the apostle John himself or his own personal scribe and assistant.