The shown point cloud is *not* the scanned object - the scanned object has its mouth closed, the point cloud has its mouth open. Also, the point cloud shown does not have points in layers as suggested by the time lapse, but the points concentrate radially in front of and behind the head, suggesting someone modeled it starting with a sphere primitive.
Cool build. I’m a bit disappointed that you didn’t credit the original build. If you could please link to my original video in the project description, I would appreciate it!
Nice project even tho the point clowd you've obtained at the end is not the one from the object you've scanned, can be a little deceiving because it looks like you can get some killer resolution while in reality you can't
Well made video and a neat idea, but the point cloud was clearly modeled from sphere primitives, not scanned (the ducks' bills don't even match). The disproportionate vertex density around the eyes and bill were an immediate giveaway as were the converging vertices toward the back of the head (exactly as a UV type sphere does). Not trying to expose you as a phony, but when you have over 100,000 views on your videos, you should probably make them more convincing before everyone in the comments starts calling you out.
En el scaneo el pato tiene el pico cerrado y en la toma de puntos el pato tiene el pico abierto, no es el mismo pato, salvo que la maquina tenga inteligencia artificial y detecte que el pato estaba hablando, estas publicaciones dejan mucho que desear y no le hacen bien al sitio.
Облако точек не соответствует реальному сканированию. Это видно невооружённым взглядом, облако построено из триангулярного файла 3D модели типа STL или подобного. Обман
just a little question : beetween 5:15 and 5:30 when did you add the laser diode ? is it just for easier use of the scanner ( seeing what it is doing in realtime) or did you wire it directly in the distance module to get a narrower area for the measured dot in the point map ?
Hello sir, first of all thank you for the video. Second, i want to ask you if I can use Infra Red Proximity Sensor instead of that shown right here. (It is a bit big in size) and i have a lot of them laying around
J'aimerais bien le VRAI nuage de point, pas un faux qui en fait est une modélisation ou on ne voit que les points. Le vrai résultat doit plutôt représenter une patate un peu diforme
Es una lastima que no muestre el verdadero resultado del escaneó, los modelos son diferentes y la nube de puntos no coincidente. Preferiría ver una nube de puntos mal hecha a que me quieren tomar el pelo
Hey there, I own 2 pouch packaging machine . They have serious problems with their controllers and are out of order. Their manufacturer consider them as obsolete. I am wondering if Arduino can take over the old PLC controller.
@@d_besson кринжу словил от того, как он глаза из наклеек отсканировал. Мог бы хотя б распечатать эту несчастную модель утки и сгладить слои, не палился бы так
bonjour je voudrai savoir comment faire son pcb car j'aimerai reproduire votre diy pour voir ci jarrive car jaimerai testé d'en faire un mais je sais pas comment faire le meme pcb
WOW!! Che risoluzione. Mi interessa l'idea ma la superfice deve essere più grande per il mio utilizzo. Motori p-p e riduttori. Ma al posto del sensore IR, perchè non hai messo il modulo HC-SR04? Schemi\collegamenti e codice? Grazie mille.
the sharp sensor's output is a voltage, so if sampled using an 8bit or 12bit analog-to-digital converter this gives you the resolution, but there's videos about that Sharp module that mention the need for software filtering of the data. more expensive sensors sometimes have a microcontroller on-board that do the filtering. else the noise/errors may swing larger than the 1/4096 or 1/256 resolution of the ADC
Ничего крутого на самом деле. Проект у автора не удался, он показал не сканированную сетку, а сетку 3д-модели изначально нарисованной на компьютере. Думаю, получившаяся точность оказалась слишком низкой чтобы ею можно было похвастаться.
Hi. Totally excellent. I'm retired and live in a small rental house, and can't make one myself. How much would you charge to make one for me? Thank you.
I think this project is a sales exercise for jlcpcb - unlikely it works properly. No homing switch on z axis - the sensor shown is not that accurate. You would be better off with a laser line projector and a camera at an angle to determine the profile. Also, you'd need some sort of calibration object to set this up.
