Does God Play Dice with the Universe? | Einstein's Quantum Theory 

Be sure to watch all of the Feynman lectures and interviews.

Then when you hear it in a classroom and it is important that you understand to pass an exam, for some reason you fall fast asleep. 😆😆😆😆

50k views *love youtube*

stuff like this is infinite... did you understand?

@@appy96 no

This video is nonsense. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote Sean Carroll "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

Happy to hear you enjoyed it, Rasika! Happy learning!

Just as i do! He's fresh, isn't he?

This video is nonsense. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote Sean Carroll "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

This video is nonsense. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote Sean Carroll "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

If we are capable of creating our own simulation, there is a high probability that we are a simulation because it is more probable for a Boltzman brain to assemble from quantum foam than intelligence to develop from evolution. 😁😁😁😁

We it was actually proven when 1982 Alain aspect experiment. The world is fuzzy and God does play dice

This video is nonsense. This is why you hire a Historian OF Physics (or a historian of science), and not an actual physicist, to talk about the history of physics. Dan Hopper is an excellent physicist but poor historian of physics. There are many errors with this lecture. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote a peer of Dan Hopper, Cal Tech physicist Sean Carroll: "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

But not to GOD.

This video is nonsense. This is why you hire a Historian OF Physics (or a historian of science), and not an actual physicist, to talk about the history of physics. Dan Hopper is an excellent physicist but poor historian of physics. There are many errors with this lecture. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote a peer of Dan Hopper, Cal Tech physicist Sean Carroll: "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

Thank you so much for your kind feedback, Calvin! We truly pride ourselves on our professors and the depth of our content and are very glad you're enjoying our offerings. Thanks for being a fan!

He's a phenomenal physicist and a great teacher of physics. However, this video is partly about the history of physics and in this department he gets a lot wrong. This is why you hire a Historian OF Physics (or a historian of science), and not an actual physicist, to talk about the history of physics. Dan Hopper is an excellent physicist but poor historian of physics. There are many errors with this lecture. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote a peer of Dan Hopper, Cal Tech physicist Sean Carroll: "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

God would of course always know in advance, how the dice roll. So no point even thinking about it. ✌️

@@mikethunman436 The casino operator doesn't care about the minutia of an individual outcome, when the overall outcome is already known (entropy).

This video is nonsense. This is why you hire a Historian OF Physics (or a historian of science), and not an actual physicist, to talk about the history of physics. Dan Hopper is an excellent physicist but poor historian of physics. There are many errors with this lecture. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote a peer of Dan Hopper, Cal Tech physicist Sean Carroll: "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

And, if that is the case, what happens if you tell that person what he will do next year? Is telling him what causes that to happen? Or did you just change the outcome?

Hi Calvin, this video is episode eight from the series "What Einstein Got Wrong", Presented by Dan Hooper. Learn more: www.wondrium.com/what-einstein-got-wrong

This video is nonsense. This is why you hire a Historian OF Physics (or a historian of science), and not an actual physicist, to talk about the history of physics. Dan Hopper is an excellent physicist but poor historian of physics. There are many errors with this lecture. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote a peer of Dan Hopper, Cal Tech physicist Sean Carroll: "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

@@Wondrium Would be nice if you guys were as obsessed about the things Einstein got right, which you've omitted (e.g. Bose-Einstein Condensates are pretty damn important to physics, his Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission trilogy of paper is pretty damn important to physics, etc), as you are about the things he "got wrong." Go read Max Born's Nobel lecture and tell me Einstein was "wrong" when he conceived of, and then gift wrapped, the idea that led to Max Born's Nobel Prize. Disappointed. Why aren't you doing an eponymous series on what "Isaac Newton Got Wrong?" (Hint: lots of things). Very disappointed.

What does that mean?

The camera cuts are overused and goofy. I couldn’t even listen to the lecture, I was waiting for a camera cut haha

I think the equiprobable points A and B are just to ease demonstration. Electrons don't need to "only" be moving at the speed of light. Electrons can have any speeds. In electric circuits for example, if you increase the voltage of the power source, then the speed of electrons increase and hence the current intensity increases too.

@@yahiashabara6517 if the speed of the electron is established it still doesn't have a 50% chance of being at A and B. That's the point I'm making. It's obvious that we can't know the position and speed of a vibrating anything until we stop it vibrating. There should be no mystery about that . It's common sense. And the cat is either dead or alive not both until someone observes it. That too is common sense. Scientists make the simple complicated to keep themselves in a job.

Most reputable physicists do not like many worlds the best. I think you just like many worlds the best. There are many debates on this stuff from reputable physicist, and after the debate they take votes. Unfortunately the Copenhagen interpretation is still most popular as far as I know. But even then it’s like 30 percent of PhD physicists. Many worlds comes in second. Even if it’s changed since I last checked and many worlds is the most popular, it’s still only gonna be a 30 or 40 percent consensus. So you cannot go around saying most “reputable” physicists like many worlds the best. There is one particularly nice talk on RU-vid where four physicists put fourth their argument for 4 separate interpretations. Brian green hosts it. Sean Carroll argues for many worlds, which is whom I suspect you listen to a lot. Sean is great, but he loves him some many worlds

That's ooooold

This video is nonsense. This is why you hire a Historian OF Physics (or a historian of science), and not an actual physicist, to talk about the history of physics. Dan Hopper is an excellent physicist but poor historian of physics. There are many errors with this lecture. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote a peer of Dan Hopper, Cal Tech physicist Sean Carroll: "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

@@johndoe-sh6bi Copenhagen interpretation of QM is rubbish. It basically says QM is FUNDAMENTALY irreducible. That is patent nonsense as MOST philosophers of physics have acknowledged .

@@richardromero6193 I dont think there's a consensus to be honest. When I was in grad school, my advisor was a Bohmian. There really is no real consensus about the correct interpretation of QM. And, in fact, thank to Einsteins persistence on pointing Entanglement in his seminal EPR Correlations paper, Quantum Information Theory HAS to parse out what entanglement really is in order to make substantive progress in the field. QM is clearly not the last word on the matter.

This video is nonsense. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote Sean Carroll "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

Everybody knows dice is loaded by Leonard Cohen

This video is nonsense. This is why you hire a Historian OF Physics (or a historian of science), and not an actual physicist, to talk about the history of physics. Dan Hopper is an excellent physicist but poor historian of physics. There are many errors with this lecture. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote a peer of Dan Hopper, Cal Tech physicist Sean Carroll: "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

WTF was that, didn't read it because My comment wad a tease

Which God? God of the Bible is eternal. Do you know what Eternal means?

This video is nonsense. This is why you hire a Historian OF Physics (or a historian of science), and not an actual physicist, to talk about the history of physics. Dan Hopper is an excellent physicist but poor historian of physics. There are many errors with this lecture. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote a peer of Dan Hopper, Cal Tech physicist Sean Carroll: "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

@@feynmanschwingere_mc2270 i am not interested in who done that i want to know how its works.

An astute eye! We have spoken to the person in charge of typing titles, and he blamed "Friday Brain". Thank you :)

@@Wondrium haha no problem, have a nice weekend! :)

This video is nonsense. This is why you hire a Historian OF Physics (or a historian of science), and not an actual physicist, to talk about the history of physics. Dan Hopper is an excellent physicist but poor historian of physics. There are many errors with this lecture. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote a peer of Dan Hopper, Cal Tech physicist Sean Carroll: "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

Bohr, according to MOST contemporary physicists, was talking nonsense in the Bohr Einstein debates. Neither of them, strictly speaking, was correct about the final verdict of quantum mechanics but Einstein at least had rational arguments unlike Bohr who constantly retreated into scientific mysticism. This video is nonsense. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote Sean Carroll "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

And sky is the board?

Proverbs 16:33 tells us that God doesn't play dice and in this verse we can see Matthew 6:33, when we choose to seek first for the kingdom of God and His righteousness the we know that everything doesn't just happen accidently because it's God ordaining us according to His good will for our lives.

Father of quantum physics Bohr facetiously replied to Einstein 'don't tell God what he can do.

@@suatustel746 Einstein didn't tell God what to do, he just stated what He doesn't do; play dice!

@@gerardmoloney433 he's never indicated referring to Abrahamic God, he simply dazed stupified of dynamics and harmonical workings of Universe and posed the question if really God exist would he be free the constrains of math, but Bohr facetiously replied to him 'dont tell God what to do'..

This video is nonsense. This is why you hire a Historian OF Physics (or a historian of science), and not an actual physicist, to talk about the history of physics. Dan Hopper is an excellent physicist but poor historian of physics. There are many errors with this lecture. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote a peer of Dan Hopper, Cal Tech physicist Sean Carroll: "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

@@suatustel746 Nobody who actually knows the history of quantum mechanics would EVER call Bohr the "father of quantum mechanics." No. That is hogwash. He didn't even believe in Einsteins photoelectric paper for several years joking to him that "If Einstein's idea ever turns out to be true, I will send him a congratulatory note on the telegraph." The joke being that a telegraph runs on wave technology not particle technology. Bohr is the father of the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics. The father of quantum mechanics is Einstein, the grandfather Planck, and the sons Born, Heisenberg, Schrodinger, Dirac, De Broglie, Pauli. Einstein contributed more to the formation of quantum mechanics than any physicist in history.

Excellent point. This video is nonsense. This is why you hire a Historian OF Physics (or a historian of science), and not an actual physicist, to talk about the history of physics. Dan Hopper is an excellent physicist but poor historian of physics. There are many errors with this lecture. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote a peer of Dan Hopper, Cal Tech physicist Sean Carroll: "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

God is the reason why the laws of physics and the physics constants exist at all.

@@wulphstein still don't get that, because how do you know that?

God isn’t a judgemental figure that controls the universe but yet all is controlled under it and it is the bases of all existence. Matter is always in a changing process, because energy is always in a changing process. Energy moves and transfers the moment intention isn’t given. Movement comes the moment intention is given. Intention is given the moment clinging to matter arises. Everything relies on another thing. One thing relies on another thing to move, to change, just to create or transfer into another thing. Ever-changing constancy comes from ever changing intentions. Thus nothing can settle. Not matter, not thoughts, not energy. The First Law of Thermodynamics (Conservation) states that energy is always conserved, it cannot be created or destroyed. Every piece of existence can only change as it always is, creating and preserving and destroying. Again, this ever changing universe , causing suffering is made by intent. This itself is samsara. creation is creating through the transfer of energy. Creation starts when intent arises, which arises from attachment or grasping. How can attachment or clinging arise? Because of awareness. How can awareness arise? Does it? No. It is unchanging, always still. Everything comes in motion because of awareness. Everything, creation, preserving and destroying is a derivative of being aware. Of settled stillness. Thus movement can arise, thus energy transfers, matter evolves. Everything arises and dissolves back into its origin. Pure nothingness. Mind dissolves after death, physical body decays. Energy stays changing and awareness stays as it is. That which all evolves around and all’s origin. The father of quantum physics, Max Planck, had realised that “consciousness is fundamental; even matter gets derived from consciousness. I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness." Max Planck had also said, "All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter." Why? All starts from awareness witness consciousness. I now separate bodily consciousness and the witness awareness everything evolves around. Why? The witness consciousness (awareness) doesn’t fade even as bodily consciousness fades. Say one hits their head to test how easily consciousness fades. They then say “Consciousness is changing, I feel me becoming more unaware when I hit my head.” To this sentence i propose this statement back. What is aware that awareness of the body and mind is fading? You say “I feel me becoming unconscious” and such. Who is that “I” which is aware thus being spoken outwardly as such? The witness doesn’t fade, everything else does. Even plants are aware , why else does energy constantly change under its movements, and it too changes under energetic movement caused by another force. Because a plant is aware of physical phenomenon, it can grow and change as done. As Max Planck stated, everything is a derivative of this. The Buddha in many lectures to the Buddhist monks , laymen, laywomen, bodhisattvas, etc stressed nothing coming of it’s own origin. Not matter, thoughts, ego, etc. Everything is influenced by others due to intent being made from clinging thus causes creation to arise. It has no origin of its own. As in the shurangama sutra the Buddha personally says everything arises from “Bodhi”. From the self. From awareness - consciousness. Nothing else has it’s one origin or settled being. All situates around beingness. Bodhi. Hum (the one consciousness in which there is the full form of both wisdom and method as one undifferentiable entity/ spirit.) Albert Einstein has to say this. "A human being is a part of the whole, called by us 'Universe,' a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separate from the rest - a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty. “ As long as action (karma) stays samsara (unsettled movement/ creation, preserving, destruction). As long as that stays, conscious witness awareness can’t be united with. To give up attachment and clinging, intention stops, when intention stops desire is fully dissolved. Thus no more delusions of the mind can be created. Such as false realities of ego, suffering, etc. We must notice physical phenomenon isn’t any different from the witness origin. Study Advaita Vedanta to know what “God” is. But God itself is just an idea. It is the process of clinging onto that which is eternal, awareness, thus a label of empty origin is created. This is an idea of the attaching mind. Science two is just an idea of cleaning onto physical phenomenon which we are aware of. As I said physical existence does not come of its own origin and everything relies on another to create and equal. As I stated before everything is able to be moving and evolving because it all arises from awareness. Without awareness no intentions or no movement can even happen to create universe. As the Buddha had stated all arises from Bodhi. Advaita Vedanta texts are also very good to look into if one is trying to understand eternal reality which all revolves around.

@@Chase_Istre But how do u know all of that? Is that faith-based knowledge?

@@willyh.r.1216 no try it out for yourself. you are never not this. is your arm aware of its arm? are your eyes aware of their surroundings? does your touch nerves aware of the touch? no you are not this body. when you are thinking what is aware of your thoughts? you say “I am thinking” , what is aware you are thinking? This is awareness. The witness. Because you are aware of your surroundings you can cling onto it thus thoughts arise due to intention. You do this every moment of your life. Let’s take an example. Because you are aware of the bodily sensation, let’s say you feel the need to urinate, because you’re aware of the body you make the intent to get up and go urinate. Because you are aware of phenomenon intentions arise. When clinging to an intention comes attachment is now established. When attached to physical or mental phenomenon you suffer. When desire/lust/strong wanting stands you suffer. Now to talk about false realities. Things like the ego self. Because you attach to situations that happen because you are aware of it, ideas of the mind arise. you cling to the body thus you see yourself different from others , you believe to be the body - mind , but it all comes back to being aware. you create duality because the mine becomes conditioned when desire stands. You desire something, your mind is conditioned to the environment and others ego selves aswell. The ego itself is thoughts , it is as much as a fairy tale as mythology. It is merely made in the mind. Thus let’s say one wants material items for sense pleasures and ego boost, the moment you desire material items you attach to it. You suffer. You suffer to get it, you suffer if you don’t get it, you suffer when it’s lost, you suffer when someone crumbles your ego and bad talks you. Why? Because you desire for them to see highly of you, to not bad talk you. Why? You attach to ego. Why? You attach to phenomena you are aware of. Why? Because you ability to be aware. You are never not awareness, the mind is the only obstacle that says not so. Matter and other physical phenomenon moves and transfers due to movement, vibration caused by movement. Movement only comes with intent. Whether body or mind. And why is this able to be? Because that is aware. Whether person, animal, plant, etc. any conscious being is aware thus intent and conditioning happens. Without awareness how can one even be able to be conditioned physically or mentally and make intentions to make any matter or energy move and transfer continuously? Without this nothing arises. Not mind or physical movement. This is what the Buddhist labels as Sunyata (emptiness). This is why meditational practice is used in Indic religion. Someone puts off all desire no false realities can arise and even no movement. In samadhi (union with awareness, no intent, deep meditation) even the breath will stop, all bodily function will appear dead, that being has no sense of self, physical or mental, they are just witness consciousness. That which all evolves around. They are “God”. And you are also never not, only mind and clinging causes you to say so. Take Yogananda, Sri Ramakrishna, Ramana Maharshi, and other modern day sages that have shown this type of samadhi documented. This part is skeptical (samadhi) but nevertheless, all revolves around and comes into place , arises , from that which just is, awareness. They hindu calls this “atman”. It is in all but yet the cause of all existence to move, they call that “brahman”. There is no difference. Brahman sustains universally and it’s in you as the “atman”. The Buddhist label “Brahman” as “Dharmakaya”. In you as anatman. (No self). In science, you are aware, even when unconscious as I’ve stated before, you are aware. This awareness isn’t physical. It is aware of physical unconsciousness. Physical things fade. Come into being and disappear. But the witness which is in me, was in dinosaurs millions of years ago. In any animal now, any person. “I am” everywhere. When you sleep you wake and maybe say “I had a deep sleep” “I was sleeping” “I felt myself fall asleep” or if you pass out you may wake and say “I was unconscious” “I could feel it feel like nothing happened, the world felt nonexistent”. You see the “I” doesn’t change and even is aware when your physical consciousness fades. It is the witness. This is “God”. Because of knowing/witness/awareness/Atman, etc is there, everything else haves the ability to arise. Without this everything fades. Like the Christian Bible says “If God were to take back his spirit and withdraw his breath, all life would cease, and humanity would turn again to dust.” If awareness was not, nothing could arise physically or mentally. It would just be as Sunyata. Nothing, like before the Big Bang. Space - time like. Not only do all religions lead to the greatest science but physics and modern science leads to the greatest science. The science of un-physicality. The science of the pure being witness awareness as the base foundation of all. Max Planck had seen this. Albert Einstein. And many more. Quantum mechanics is the study leading to just this. Praise be to these great minds and intellect.

And she's called Lucy..

@@suatustel746 nope, Her name is Ma'at.

@@eastafrika728 thank you for enlightment, but you know James Brown tune 'this is a man's man's world yes second line but there'd be nothing without a girl or woman but the first verse could' ve been this is a girls or women world but there'd be nothing without a boy or man see what l mean...man rule the world trust me I'm not chavunastic sod.. .

@@suatustel746 it was never a man's world, the earth is female, if a man feels inadequate and is like a child, then he thinks it's a man's world.

@@eastafrika728 are we here to debate here with the battle of sexes, obviously you're a woman presumed heterosexual, in respect of this agenda you didn't choose your gender, you know there's masculine side as well as feminine, they all claim they're the superior race the irony is any gender whether male or female were they reincarnated don't want to be opposite number, it's a mystery to me unwilling view the world off the flip side... I partly agree with you somehow feminine wiles comes up trump most of the time but its good to chat with you..

Leonard Cohen knew that 'everybody knows dice is loaded

Yeah, rigged by humans that know better than god and win a game god does not play.

@@chapster6273 i mean, rigged for life....death is god throwing the dice again, living is playing, because in the end nobody beats the dice. it's trial and error until they stop hating so much, and no one has to keep dying. so, death is a 14+ billion yrs temporary mesure so far. until life get it right.

This video is nonsense. This is why you hire a Historian OF Physics (or a historian of science), and not an actual physicist, to talk about the history of physics. Dan Hopper is an excellent physicist but poor historian of physics. There are many errors with this lecture. Einstein contributed more to quantum theory than any other physicist in history. Einstein didn't just write the photoelectric paper, he quantized the radiation field. He then followed that up with his seminal paper on the Specific Heat of Solids. He then followed that up with another seminal paper on Phonons. He then followed that up with a revolutionary paper on Wave-Particle Duality. De Broglie almost literally copied Einsteins equation, applied it to electrons, and won his Nobel Prize on matter waves (which he would never have been able to do without Einsteins paper). Einstein, using ingenuous statistical arguments, did this 13 years BEFORE De Broglie did. Bohrs work on electron orbits (discontinuous transitions) was also a direct byproduct of Einstein's work from 1905 to 1910. Einsteins work on Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission, as codified in the Nobel-Prize worthy Einstein A and B Coefficients, created the foundation for the LASER. Einsteins work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates, in which Einstein, and Einstein ALONE, predicted the Boson (which, due to historical reasons was incorrectly named) which created Condesed Matter physics - an entirely new state of matter. Without this work of Einstein's, superconductivity would be impossible. Without Einstein's work in this area, Schrodinger likely never derives the proper equation for the wave function as he always acknowledged. It was Einstein who first conceived of what would essentially later become the Born Rule, according to Max Born himself, by interpreting the "square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurence of photons." Max Born took Einsteins work - which Einstein had applied to a gas of photons - and simply applied it to a gas of electrons. And then won a Nobel Prize for it (Born, much like Schrodinger, was effusive in his praise for Einstein). Einstein was the first to discover Entanglement, something that Bohr, Dirac, Heisenberg and Schrodinger etc all missed. Einsteins seminal EPR Paradox paper laid the foundation for quantum information theory as Clauser, Aspect, and others have widely acknowledged. There is no quantum mechanics without Einstein as T. S. Kuhn, Stachel, Stone, Brown, and many other physicists and historians of physics have acknowledged. For Dan Hopper to imply that Einstein's dislike of Quantum Mechanics meant that he didn't contribute to it other than being a critic of it is not just patently false but the shows a distinct lack of intellectual honesty. Did Einstein dislike certain elements of quantum theory, yes. Did he criticize it frequently, yes. But he also contributed most of the original concepts that would make it's way into the theory (including the aforementioned wave-particle duality, B-E Condensates, Intrinsic randomness, and Entanglement, to name only some). Einsteins big issue with quantum mechanics was not that it was probabilistic - after all his 1916-1919 papers on Spontaneous Emission introduced intrinsic randomness into quantum theory - but that Bohr insisted on the idea that the "observer" directly influenced measurements and experiments. That felt like, cheap superstitious reasoning to Einstein as Wolfgang Pauli pointed out in a letter to Max Born Poor video. I recommend to anybody interested in learning about Einstein's IMMENSE contributions to Quantum mechanics to read two books starting with: 1. Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian by Douglas Stone And 2. My God, He plays Dice!: How Albert Einstein Invented Most of Quantum Physics by Bob Doyle To quote a peer of Dan Hopper, Cal Tech physicist Sean Carroll: "If anything, Einstein is underrated; he understood quantum mechanics better than anybody ever has."

So sad. Most physicists are not religious nuts to promote theism. And most theists are not good physicists.